Almach (pronounced elle-mak)
(1) In astronomy,
a second-magnitude quadruple star, telescopically visible as an apparent double
star composed of an orange bright giant and a fifth-magnitude blue-white triple
star, marking the left foot of the chained woman in the northern constellation
of Andromeda.
(2) In astronomy,
Gamma Andromedae, specifically the brightest star of the Almach star system.
Late 1500s
(in English): From the Arabic العناق الأرض
(al-ʿanāq al-arḍ) (desert lynx or caracal). The construct of the original Arabic was al- (the (the Arabic definite article))
+ ʿanāq (a small wild animal, often glossed
as lynx, caracal, or desert fox) + al-arḍ (“the earth” or “the ground”). The process by which “al-ʿanāq al-ard” became “Almach” was a familiar one, the transmission into
medieval Latin astronomical texts often was accomplished via translations of
works by writers from Antiquity such as the Greco-Roman mathematician,
astronomer & astrologer Ptolemy (Claudius Ptolemy, circa 100–170), filtered sometimes through the writings
of Arabic scholars who
contributed much to pre-modern science.
These processes appears to have been lineal (though not necessarily in a
single path because variations in spelling and use continued with alternatives
running in parallel) and the evolution essential was al-ʿanāq → al-anach → almach. The “-mach”
element was a not untypical corruption of the guttural consonants (ʿayn and qāf)
so familiar in Arabic that didn’t map
neatly into pronunciation in Latin or later European languages. While not a “meaningful” word in European
languages Almach endures as fossilized misreading of an Arabic descriptive
name, preserved (as modified) through the long transmission chain of classical
astronomy, a not unique linguistic phenomenon because other names of places in
the Cosmos (such as Rigel and Betelgeuse) went through similar Arabic to Latin distortions
and these types, although outwardly different, in structural linguistics, the
patterns are said to be consistent.
The related
variant (referring to the same star) is Alamak, a closer phonetic attempt at
the Arabic original. Alamak may be
thought a less-corrupted sibling of Almach with both traced back to the same
Arabic source, the difference being in the in transliteration of ʿanāq, approximated as anak or amak. So
“Alamak” represents a more faithful attempt to emulate the phonetic practice in
Arabic with the consonants (especially the final qāf) rendered in something close to the original but whether this
happened as a deliberate attempt at “authenticity”, through the offices of an
Arabic-speaking scholar or a native speaker of the tongue isn’t known. That of course poses the question of why,
when Arabic astronomical, scientific or mathematical texts were translated into
Latin in medieval Spain or elsewhere, there was no standardized system for either
preserving multi-word (or element) names or representing guttural consonants. Etymologists caution modern conventions and
conditions cannot be mapped onto earlier eras with transliterations and
translations a good example. In Europe,
scholars, separated often by hundreds of miles, sometimes were working with the
same ancient or foreign texts and it wasn’t unknown for them for years or even
decades to be unaware of the work of others, the modern concepts of “publishing”
and “distribution” then centuries away.
That’s also why so many errors of translation for so long endured into
the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and Modernity, a mistake which gained
critical mass (especially if widely printed) being accepted as orthodoxy.
Sometimes the errors were mistakes or misunderstandings but there’s long
been evidence medieval scribes weren’t above “making stuff up” to “fill in
the gaps” so what the early versions of consumer-level generative AI
(artificial intelligence) products (ie, the ones we’re living with in the mid-2020s)
sometimes do is not novel, as the recent "experiment" publishing "data" about the "condition" bixonimania demonstrated.
Both “Almach” & “Alamak” (or “Almak” entered English through the highly productive medieval–early modern pipeline of Arabic to Latin to become part of the vernacular of astronomy but use stabilized at different times. Almach came first to English, appearing late in the sixteenth century in “star catalogues” (some of which carefully were illustrated with commendable accurately) and by the early 1600s, it had been accepted as the standard form in English astronomical works, remaining the dominant use for Gamma Andromedae well into the modern period. The variants “Alamak” & “Almak” came later, there being no evidence of use prior to the mid-eighteenth century and the more phonetically informed transliteration probably was influenced by an improved European knowledge of Arabic phonology, the shift from “-ch” to “-k” representing a closer rendering of the Arabic ق. (qāf). While that “authenticity” made it a more “difficult” word for those in the West, there were scholars wo took pride in wherever possible respecting original forms and although mistakes may have come from “source documents”, it was accepted practice to “correct” things verified as wrong. “Almak” however was not an “error”; it was a variant spelling of “Alamak” simplified by dropping the medial vowel. Today, “Almach” remains the orthodoxy in astronomy, while “Almak” survives as a recognized but less common variant. In the layered lexicon of astronomy, the synonym of Almach is Andromedae and the holonym (in philosophy & semantics, philosophy a term that denotes the whole of which another term's referent is a part) is Andromeda. Almach is a proper noun.
Despite the
similarity, there is no connection between the use of “Alamak” in astrometry
and the Malay word alamak (an interjection
meaning something like “Oh dear” (in
the sense of an expression of shock or dismay)?
While the former ultimately was the result of transliteration drift (an
attempt to correct an imperfect rendering of a Latinized Arabic), the
Malay word comes from a wholly separate linguistic
stream. The Malay interjection alamak! deconstructs as al- (the Arabic definite article (the)
which was absorbed into Malay through Islamic and literary influences + amak (colloquial Malay for “mother”). So alamak!
(Literally “oh, mother!”) is understood as an exclamatory construction
expressing surprise, alarm, or dismay and in that it may be thought functionally
similar to English expressions such as “oh dear!” or “oh my!” or “oh goodness!”,
such fragments doubtless parts of just about every language, serving as “polite”
or “socially acceptable” ways of expressing emotions other “oh xxx!” forms do
in earthier, more vulgar ways (in English there are more than a dozen of
these). The Malay use is thought
probably to have originated as a contracted form of Al(lah) (God) + mak (mother)
with the Arabic al- (“the”) an “official”
substitute element to avoid using the name of God for a purpose which might in
some circumstances have been judged “a profanity or blasphemy”.
There may have been some Portuguese influence (from the common
expression Kristang alamah (Mother of
God) or even the Christian expression “Mary,
mother of God” but modern Malaysian scholars have suggested the Malay term
may be contracted from the
Arabic اللَّهُ مَعَكَ
(al-lahu maʕaka), a traditional phrase meaning “May
God be with you”. Whatever the origin,
it survived into the modern era as an exclamation or expression of alarm about
a problem, error or crisis.
Gamma Andromedae is a multiple star system in the northern constellation of Andromeda and the third-brightest in the constellation, after Alpheratz and Mirach; it is some 390 light-years distant from Earth. Believed by the astronomers of Antiquity to be a single star, using the more advanced telescopes which had become available, German physicist Johann Tobias Mayer (1752–1830) in 1778 determined the object to be a “double star system”, the brighter member, Andromedae the “primary” component and thus designated Andromedae A (officially “Almach”), used as the traditional name of the whole system seen by the naked eye as a single object. The fainter secondary was called Andromedae B and it was only later (when optics improved further) that Andromedae was observed to be “triple system” and what appears to the naked eye as a “single star” is thus a “four star system”. That compelled the the renaming of Andromedae B to Andromedae Ba & Andromedae Bb.
The Mean Girls
(2004) crew (Regina George (Rachel McAdams, b 1978)), Gretchen Wieners (Lacey
Chabert, b 1982)), Karen Smith (Amanda Seyfried, b 1985)) and Cady Heron
(Lindsay Lohan, b 1986)), pictured at the 2005 MTV Movie Awards ceremony. Barbara “Barbra”
Streisand (b 1942) starred in the movie Funny
Girl (1968) and, after completing the sequel (Funny Lady (1975)), joked that in a few decades she expected to
hear from Columbia Pictures “…offering her the title role in Funny Old Hag.” Whether there will be a Mean Ladies isn’t known but one day, definitely there should be a Mean Old Hags.
Portrait of General George S. Patton (1945), oil on canvas by
Boleslaw Jan Czedekowski (1885-1969), National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian
Institution, Washington DC. Four star US
Army General George Patton (1885-1945) was steeped in military history and thought
in millennialist terms. During World War
II (1939-1945) thought of the Germans as “the Prussians” and the Soviets as the
“the Mongols”. After the war ended, so
concerned was the US State Department about General Patton’s openly expressed
hostility towards the Soviet Union they feared he might do something which
would trigger conflict; even if brief and localized, that would have been
unwelcome so the diplomats asked the Army to have their psychiatrists “keep a discrete eye
on him”. Patton was seriously
injured in a traffic accident early in December 1945, dying some two weeks
later.
The use of “star” to describe the hierarchy of senior military ranks is now well-established and is useful for those not well-acquainted with the nomenclature. For example a three star (lieutenant) general out-ranks a two star (major) general by a grade despite a major out-ranking a lieutenant by two notches. The reasons for the apparent anomaly are historic but is an indication why for non-experts it easier to “think stars” than titles. Surprisingly, in the United States military, the system was finalized only this century and prior to 1944, the matter of stars and titles for generals had been a little confused, the whole order of precedence in the army since the Declaration of Independence only properly codified with some retrospective creations in 1976 and 2024. Historically, the most senior rank in the US Army had been lieutenant general and it was as one George Washington (1732–1799; first POTUS, 1789-1797) retired from the military. The first major change came in the post Civil War (1861-1865) era when the rank of “General of the Army” was gazetted and while nominally a four star appointment, structurally, it was the equivalent of what would in 1944 be formalized as five star rank. However, in 1866, the significance of the title “General of the Army” was it reflected the appointee being the general with authority over the whole army which meant there could be only ever be one in active service. In other words, that meant the four star general was commander-in-chief of the army and the paperwork had years earlier been prepared for Washington to be raised thus but this was never done because of concern among lawyers it might set a precedent and be seen to impinge upon a president’s authority as commander in chief. Indeed, although later the US military would use titles such as “Commander in Chief, US Pacific Command”, Donald Rumsfeld (1932–2021: US defense secretary 1975-1977 & 2001-2006) in 2002 ended the practice (and use of the acronym CINC) by re-asserting there was in the US: “only one commander in chief in America - the president”, spelled out in Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." The matter of civilian authority over the military was one of the founding principles of the republic.
The next change came when General John "Black Jack" Pershing (1860–1948) who had commanded the US expeditionary forces in World War I (1914-1918) was appointed to the then unique rank of General of the Armies of the United States. At the time, the war was known as the "World War" (a suggestion by Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924; POTUS 1913-1921)), the vast and bloody conflict already regarded as “the war to end all wars” and the feeling was the conflict had in scale and awfulness been unique so some special recognition was deserved. Pershing however remained a four star general and confusingly, when the spate of five star appointments was made between 1944-1950, the old wording “General of the Army” was revived with the pecking order based on the gazetted date of appointment to the rank which no longer implied an individual having authority over the entire army. There have since been no five star creations (although many other armies have continued to appoint field marshals which is the equivalent). In the US, some historians and many in the military fretted over the untidiness of it all and in 1976, George Washington formerly was gazetted “General of the Armies of the United States with rank and precedence over all other grades of the Army, past or present”, meaning he will for all time be the US Army’s senior officer.
The Alamak wheel design by Mercedes-Benz is also sometime
referred as the “8-hole” which is accurate, if brutish. The name comes from the alternative spelling
of the common name for Gamma Andromedae and is one of a number of examples of the factory
turning to the lexicon of cosmology to dub wheel designs, others in the celestial
theme including Adharaz (a star in Canis Major), Alcor (a star in Ursa Major), Mizar
(a star in Ursa Major) and Toliman (Alpha Centauri). The Alamaks were most often fitted to the W126
(1976-1991), W201 (1982-1993), W124 (1985-1997), R129 (1989-2001) and W140
(1991-1999) ranges. Among students of
such things the Alamaks were thought among the factory’s most accomplished
designs (some of what followed, notably on the W210 (1994-2003) were inexplicably ugly) but
dissenting from the admirers were the AMG fanboys who, whenever possible, sought
to replace the Alamaks fitted to the early build 500 E models (1991-1995) with some
flavour of AMG’s Monoblock wheels, a design which attracted a cult-like
following.






















