Nipple (pronounced nip-uhl)
(1) In anatomy, the small, conical projection near the
center of the areola of each mammary gland (breast); also called mamilla,
papilla or teat. In females, the nipple
contains the outlets of the milk ducts.
(2) Something resembling (often in scaled-up form) a
female’s nipple, as the mouthpiece of a nursing bottle or pacifier (in some
places an informal word for a pacifier).
(3) Any device resembling a nipple in shape or function.
(4) A mechanical device through which liquids or gases
can be passed in a regulated manner; as grease nipple a small drilled bush,
usually screwed into a bearing (or other component needing periodic
replenishment of a greasing agent) through which grease is introduced.
(5) In plumbing & gas-fitting, a short piece of pipe
with threads on each end, used for joining valves.
(6) Any small physical protrusion on an automotive, a
machine part or any other part that fits into a groove on another part (now rare).
(7) In computer (hardware) slang, the pointing device in the
centre of the keyboard of certain laptops, partially fulfilling the functionality
of a mouse, trackball or track-pad (although some (male) users insist
it is called “the clit”).
(8) In pre-modern ballistics, a perforated segment that
fits into part of the breech of a muzzle-loading gun, on which the percussion
cap is fixed.
(9) In the design of bicycles, an internally threaded
piece which holds a bicycle spoke in place on the rim.
(10) To fit (a baby's bottle etc) with a nipple (archaic).
(11) To give one's nipple to (a baby) to allow
breastfeeding (archaic).
1520–1530: From the Middle English nipple, from the earlier neble,
nibble, nible & nepil (all of which may be derived from nib & neb (tip; point). The Old English nypel (elephant’s
trunk) was formed analogously as “a protuberance from one's neb”. The late twelfth century pap & pappe (nipple of a woman's breast) was first attested in Northern
and Midlands writing, probably from a Scandinavian source (there’s no record in
the Old Norse but there was the dialectal Swedish pappe), from the primitive Indo-European imitative root pap- (to swell), the source also of the Latin
papilla (nipple) which may have
influenced the English papula (a
swelling, pimple) and the Lithuanian papas
(nipple). The spellings neple, nypil,
nyppell, neapel, neaple, neble and all obsolete. Nipple is a noun & verb, nippling is a
verb and nippleless & nippled are adjectives; the noun plural is nipples.
One extinct verb which, perhaps surprisingly,
wasn’t revived even after it became apparent trends of use on the internet
suggested it might be helpful, was expapillate
(bare the breasts to the nipples), identified by the outstandingly good Online Etymology Dictionary as an entry in an early English "dictionary", published in
eleven editions between 1623 and the 1650s.
The book was neither a prescriptive or descriptive work encompassing the
whole language but was described as “An
Interpreter of Hard English Words”, an approach others later took including
Wilfred Funk (1883–1965) in his Word
Origins and Their Romantic Stories (1950), the idea being to focus on the
less known or more obscure. The
construct of expapillate was ex- + papillate. The ex- prefix
was from the Middle English, from words borrowed from the Middle French, from
the Latin ex (out of, from), from the
primitive Indo-European eǵ-
& eǵs-
(out). It was cognate with the Ancient
Greek ἐξ (ex) (out of, from), the Transalpine
Gaulish ex- (out), the Old Irish ess- (out), the Old Church Slavonic изъ
(izŭ) (out) & the Russian из (iz) (from, out of). The “x” in “ex-“, sometimes is elided before
certain constants, reduced to e- (eg ejaculate). The Latin papillate
was the vocative masculine singular of papillātus
(having nipples or buds; shaped like a nipple or bud) and was used in English
as a transitive verb (to cover with papillae) and intransitive verb (to take
the form of a papilla, or of papillae).
In 1974, The British Medical Journal (BMJ) used the term "guitar nipple" to describe "the irritation to the breast that can occur from the pressure of the guitar against the body." That was indicative of the trend in the English-speaking world for newly-identified (and sometimes novel) conditions to be constructed with English elements, rather than the Latin historically used. In the same spirit, two years later a contributor to the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) was more imaginative still, coining "hot pants syndrome" when documenting cases in which a burn to the skin had been induced by a patient carrying a battery-powered transistor radio in the pocket of their trousers. There was also in 1978 the New England Journal of Medicine's (NEJM) "disco digit" which referred to "a sore or infected finger caused by too much finger snapping while dancing."

Jaguar tool kit supplied with 1966 E-Type (XKE, 1961-1974). The grease gun (left) was used to force grease into various components through grease nipples. This was a regular part of automobile maintenance until recent decades and is still a feature of the servicing schedules of heavy vehicles and machinery.
Until the 1970s, it was common for cars to need periodic “greasing”
of certain components, a process which involved attaching a “grease gun” to a “grease
nipple” which permanently was mounted on the relevant part; manually, the
gun (usually a type of plunger) was used to force grease through the
nipple. This was undertaken either by
owners, chauffeurs or mechanics at service stations who routinely would perform
an “oil and grease” which included (all or some of): changing the engine, gearbox &
differential oil, replacing the filter(s) and greasing all required grease
points. On more expensive vehicles, “one-shot
lubrication” systems (known also as CLS (centralized lubrication systems) & ALS (automated lubrication systems)) were introduced during the 1920s, the
technology adapted from the hardware used in aviation.
Although some attempts were made to create wholly automated systems, the
most widely used were those which incorporated a foot pump for the driver to press
at specified intervals; this action forced grease from a central reservoir to
the required points. Being a sealed
system, this meant that nowhere in the system were grease nipples required (although
some often still were included in components which demanded less frequent attention or were of a design which made their inclusion in the CLS plumbing too difficult. ALS systems remain common in many places
including heavy machinery, ships and the industrial plant used in factories, power
plants etc.

The standard grease nipple used on the Jaguar E-Type (XKE) (left) and a diagram with a legend listing the E-Type's oil, brake fluid, transmission fluid and grease nipple locations. The grease nipples are indicated by the obelus (†). In automobiles, by the 1970s the need for multiple grease
points or one-shot lubrication had begun to be eliminated (although some older
designs maintained the legacy for decades) as advances in metallurgy and
lubrication technology permitted the development of sealed, maintenance-free
components which are “packed with grease" and thus “lubricated for life”. However, for heavy-duty machines such as trucks
and earth-moving equipment operating in adverse conditions, there are often
still components demanding regular greasing and thus grease nipples are still a
thing.
Also a
thing is the “nipple orgasm”, at least for those for whom a nipple is a “hardwired
erogenous zone” responsive to stimulation; that's a sub-set of the population and there are probably no reliable estimates of the prevalence. Although in humans orgasms are typically thought an ejaculative, vaginal
or clitoral phenomenon, sexologists list more than a dozen types, varying in
instance or intensity based on the individual, the circumstances and sensitivity to stimulation. When warming to the topic,
these specialists will also discuss the details of “energetic orgasms” (which
can, without physical touch, be triggered by meditation or fantasy) and “sleep
orgasms”, said to have been experienced by an “estimated” 37% of women and 83%
of men. Quite how those numbers were
obtained isn’t clear but helpfully, in 2011, New Jersey-based neuroscientist, psychotherapist
& sex therapist Dr Nan Wise (b 1967) undertook a study to reveal how nipple
stimulation affects the brain. What Dr
Wise wanted to build on was the existing understanding “…the clitoris, vagina and cervix are mapped
on the genital sensory cortex”, something which sits between the
brain’s two hemispheres and which she labels “hedonistic pleasure zone” or, more
illustratively “the
crotch of the brain”.
What Dr Wise did was have
the study’s subjects stimulated with various mental fantasies while in an MRI (magnetic
resonance imaging) machine, allowing her team to observe how distinct parts of
the brain responded to various experiences. The results were generally in line with
expectations except that nipple stimulation proved an outlier. While her hypothesis had been there would
have been activity in the brain region associated with chest sensation (the
theory being nipple orgasms might occur because stimulation of the organ releases
oxytocin, a hormone that can cause uterine contractions, potentially leading to
vaginal orgasm), instead it was found nipple
stimulation activated the genital sensory cortex itself, leading Dr Wise to
conclude: “The
nipples are a hardwired erogenous zone, like the genitals, when nipples are
stimulated, the brain gets activated, and regions processing the sensation
communicate with those responsible for pleasure.” This tied in with one of the accepted dictums
in neuroscience: “neurons that fire together wire together” and the study’s findings
do seem to suggest it is plausible there exists a neural pathway between the
nipples and the genitals. Sexologists however
caution individual responses will vary and techniques which produce pleasing
results for one will induce no response in others. So, YMMV (your mileage many vary) and the
sexologists recommend experimentation.
The SKIMS Nipple Bra

Wearing it well: Kim Kardashian in SKIMS "nipple bra"
The admirable (and much admired) Kim Kardashian (b 1980)
in October 2023 announced the latest addition to her SKIMS product line: a bra
with “built in” nipples, designed to be prominent enough obviously to protrude through clothing. Said to offer the “ultimate
shock factor” (although after the shocks of the last decade-odd, some of which
those associated with Kardashian clan have instigated, that may be hyperbolic) the viewer
response suggested many weren’t certain whether product was real or a gimmick
designed to attract publicity. It
certainly attracted publicity but turned out to be real (with SKIMS part number). Even if the concept wasn't as “innovative” as
claimed, the promotional approach in the video certainly was, the spin being
that if women can don a bra to emulate one of the more pleasing consequences of cold
weather, the psychological effect might be they’ll be less inclined
to turn on (or up) the air-conditioner, thus reducing energy use, thereby lowering
carbon emissions, meaning a lesser contribution to the concentration of atmospheric CO2 (and
other greenhouse gasses) which causes accelerated climate change including
higher temperatures. That seems to be drawing a long bow but doubtlessly somewhere there will be published research
which can be spun to support (or at least not disprove) each of the steps in the internal Kardashian logic. It was certainly an example of the way commerce is attempting to monetize concerns about climate change.
As Ms Kardashian put it: “The earth’s temperature is getting hotter and hotter. Sea levels are
rising. The ice sheets are shrinking. I’m no scientist, but I believe everyone
can do their skillset to do their part. That’s
why I’m introducing a brand-new bra with a built-in nipple so matter how hot it
is, you’ll always look cold. Some days
are hard but these nipples are harder. And unlike the icebergs, these aren’t
going anywhere.” The bra was said to be available in six colors with a stated “10% of sales” (the exact math of that calculation
not disclosed) to be a “one off donation” to 1% for the Planet (a
multi-national collective of businesses pledged to gifting at least 1% of their annual revenue to “environmental causes”). So it sounded like a real product with a real part-number (not then listed) but there were those who thought the release date being Halloween (October 31) might suggest it might not be wholly serious. Even had it not been real, it would have been a good case-study for students of such things learning the craft of the promotional video clip, the only opportunity missed being Ms Kardashian should first have appeared in a scientist's white lab coat, peeling it off as she spoke the words "I'm no scientist". The part-number's later appearance in the catalogue verified the availability.

The 1970s: Rudi's sheer bra (left & right) and the original Nipple Bra.
It’s not a new idea. In the early 1970s, several manufacturers advertised
a line of bras with cups in a sheer fabric which offered coverage and support (within a limited mass range) but clung to the nipples' definition, the most celebrated being those of Austrian-born Rudolf "Rudi" Gernreich (1922–1985), remembered as the "designer" of the "monokini" (ie a bikini supplied without the top part). This
approach was for those who wanted to display the profile of their own nipples. The "Nipple Bra" offered enhanced engineering was the ancestor of the SKIMS bra in that rather than using, as Herr Gernreich did, the human body's "built-in" nipples, it provided some. The pitch all those decades ago was aimed at those who wanted to look “provocative” and in 1975 to achieve that the “Nipple Bra” cost US$20 (US$114.42
adjusted for 2023) so Ms Kardashian setting her price at US$120.00 seems not unreasonable. The somewhat obtuse contribution to averting
climate change aside, reaction to the product included the observation the bra
will provide permanently “perfectly aligned nipples”, something not always achieved
by the real things because, like most body parts, between left and right, there’s
often some variation in size, shape, direction or distance from the ground. Like many aspects of structural engineering, “perfect alignment” is achieved often with slight adjustments to variables like strap length.

Rudi not required: Lindsay Lohan displays perfect alignment, Venice Beach, Los Angeles, California, 2011.
In
the United States, patent law exists to protect inventions, processes, and
methods rather than abstract ideas and the general criteria (interpreted with
some latitude) for eligibility is that an invention should be novel,
non-obvious, and useful. What does
qualify is the implementation or embodiment of an idea in a tangible form so
while a mere thought or concept can't be patented, a specific application or
embodiment of that idea can be and this includes a new product, process,
machine, or composition of matter.
Within all that, patents can be granted to cover improvements made to
existing inventions. Whether
SKIMS have applied for or been granted a patent isn't clear but several for
products in this vein have been granted over the last 50-odd years. On 24 August 1976 Mr Jakob E. Schmidt of
Charlestown, Indiana was granted U.S. patent #3976083 (Brassiere Having
Simulated Nipples) as well as #4241737 & #4127128 covering “Brassiere
Having Simulated Nipples and Attachable-Detachable Nipple Simulators”.

Conceptual
drawing supplied with application for patent #3976083 (Brassiere Having
Simulated Nipples), granted 24 August 1976.
The patent expired 24 August 1993.
The
abstract filed with the application for #3976083 included: A brassiere is disclosed having cups which are provided with a
nipple-like protuberance simulating the bulge of a natural nipple. The
nipple-like bulge or protuberance may be a built-in component of the brassiere,
usually situated under the fabric of the cup; a component which is permanently
attached to the external surface of the brassiere cop; or an individual
structure which may be attached to or detached from the brassiere cup as will,
by means of several linkage and attachment mechanisms. Simulated nipples for a brassiere would offer
an acceptable compromise for ladies who do not wish to go without a brassiere
and a welcome release from the subconscious effects of the suppression brought
on by wearing brassieres of the types variously available, which obliterate the
nipple. That’s informative but Ms
Kardashian might have phrased things in a more "Tik-Tok friendly" way.

A nipple patch (left), the nipple patch writ large to function as a special-purpose bra (centre) and the advertising concept (right) which could be used by the manufacturers of either the "nipple bra" or the "nipple patch". All that would be required is transposing the photographs, depending on whether the object was to display or conceal.
However, while one niche market will like the idea of
being “so provocative”, there are others who find the sight of their own
nipples “too provocative” and for this niche, there are ranges of products
which offer coverage and concealment, smoothing away any suggestion of a nipple
with patches which can be worn under bras with cups of even the most sheer
fabric. Self-adhesive (using a
skin-friendly temporary glue), they can also be used without a bra and the same
technology has been adapted to larger-scale units which actually function as a
bra. Marketed as being ideal to be used
when wearing “backless” dresses or tops, they’re also said to be easier to use
than the “fashion tape” (better known in the industry as “booby tape” or “tit
tape”), especially if being self-applied.
Helpfully, if one changes one’s mind after having smoothed away the nipples,
stick-on nipples are available in a range of styles and colors.

Piece from Miguel
Castro Freitas’s “Stardust Aphrodite” collection for Mugler, Paris Fashion
Week, October. 2025.
Miguel
Castro Freitas’s (b 1980) first collection for Mugler was called “Stardust
Aphrodite” and the designer described the pieces as “a trilogy of glorified clichés”, the
three elements being (1) oversize and bulky, with big fluffy fabrics or
shoulder pads, (2) severely tailored with extreme hourglass figures or (3) lightweight,
sheer dresses; critics detected some overlap in the use of the motifs. Although there were a number of nods to
Mugler’s historic use of materials in bulk for dramatic effect, the collection
otherwise tended to the “less”, one eye catching piece a gown with sparkly
silver stars, its straps hung from bare-breasted nipple piercings. To re-assure those whose toes had curled, critics
noted that one was made from “a very lightweight fabric”. The technique had be seen before, a “nipple
grown” the best-remembered thing from the catwalk from one of Mugler’s shows in
1998 and this year’s model was an acknowledged homage but apart from that, it
certainly was on-theme, Victoria’s Secret unlikely to see much business
generated from those taken with Stardust Aphrodite.
A fragment
from Fashion Feed’s take on Paris Fashion Week, 2025.
Of course
the point of the catwalk is it makes it possible to see a garment in motion, interacting with the body.
That can be transformative: an outfit that on a hanger or mannequin
seemed bland or lifeless can, when worn by a strutting model, come alive
although equally, one which seemed admirable when static might reveal flaws of
design or in construction once on the move.
Had the already infamous “nipple-piercing gown” been assessed purely on
the technical criteria usually applied it would have been judged a success
because the suspended sparkly chiffon flowed and swished as the designer knew
it would but that achievement wasn’t much commented upon because the usual factions
quickly were posting, the l'art pour
l'art (art for art's sake) crowd calling the piece “an artistic vision” and dismissing criticism
as the unwanted intrusion of a resurgent “purity culture” while those who disapproved
called it “inappropriate”
and yet another example of the way women’s bodies are exploited for the
benefit of the “male
gaze”.
One perhaps daring observation was that despite “many of the biggest names in women’s fashion being gay men… their designs often over-sexualise women instead of empowering them.” Quite how much of the collective energy of gay men over the years been devoted to empowering women isn't known but Indian fashion commentator Pranjal Jain (b 2001) seemed to speak for her faction by adding that having a model parade “…a topless dress down the runway” and presenting it homage to the original of a quarter-century earlier was absurd because in the particular social & political context of the late 1990s such a dress could be understood as something “sensuous and provocative” but in 2025, “…what the fuck was the topless dress doing next to structured blazers and mini dresses? I can tell you, the dress was a social media stunt engineered for virality. Yet again, a man using a woman’s body for shock value.” “Here”, she concluded, “is a perfect example of how fashion is political and historical, because context matters.” As it has been for centuries, the critical deconstruction of frocks remains a serious matter.

Chappell Roan on the red carpet, Grammy Awards, Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles, California, February 2026. The rich auburn hair worked well with the hues of the gown and body art.
Even if Mugler’s
“Stardust Aphrodite” didn’t at once migrate from the Paris catwalk to high
street stores, the house didn’t abandon the motif and in February 2026, singer Chappell
Roan (stage name of Kayleigh Rose Amstutz, b 1998) wore another of Mugler's interpretations (this time a burgundy gown) for the walk down the red carpet at the 68th Annual Grammy Awards. Predictably the event’s most publicized
outfit, men everywhere doubtless were intrigued at the possibilities but the
immediate reaction of women, regardless of their views of the aesthetic, may have
been an involuntary curling of the toes as they imagined donning the gown.
That phenomenon is known as “mirror-touch synesthesia” which describes the
experience when, upon observing another individual being touched or injured, a
corresponding tactile or pain sensation is elicited in the anatomically
matching location in the observer’s own body.
It’s very common but is a spectrum condition, most experiencing it as
momentary sensation but in rare cases there have been patients for whom the
effects have been long-lasting.
Technically, it’s triggered by a (usually temporary) reduction in the “self–other
distinction” at the neural processing level, the causes thought to include (1)
an heightened cross-activation between the visual and somatosensory cortices
and (2) hyperactive or atypical functioning of the brain’s mirror neuron system. There seems to be evidence an individual’s
susceptibility to mirror-touch synesthesia is more significant in frequency of
occurrence than the perception of the extent of the sensation (eg severity of
an injury) witnessed.
Mirror-touch
synesthesia is quite specific in its “virtual emulation” and differs from the vicarious
responses (typically, a flinching when seeing someone suffer an injury) in
being usually qualitatively stronger and manifested by a location-specific somatic
sensation; it may run in parallel with emotional empathy (which happens
typically without the literal bodily sensation) but is a separate phenomenon. There are of course exceptions and the
traditional (probably culturally obligatory) reaction of cricketers seeing a
batsman struck “in the groin region” by a ball (delivered sometimes at 90 mph
(145 km/h) or more) is one of mirth rather than empathy.
Drawing the lens: Chappell Roan photographed in front of the backdrop.
It would however seem the toes of mirror-touch synesthetes may uncurl because in the many
photographs and video clips circulated, Ms Roan appeared not at all discomforted
and the physics of that would have been determined by (1) the use of faux
nipple piercings, (2) the lightweight fabric and (3) the gathering at the waist,
ensuring each nipple had to bear the weight only of a few square inches of
material. No doubt pleased (if not
surprised) by the interest generated, Ms Roan insisted it was not “that outrageous of
an outfit”, adding “the look’s actually so awesome and weird”
before concluding “I recommend just exercising your free will; it’s really
fun and silly.” The look was
complimented with temporary body art, an extensive lace panel spread over her
bare back with a pony on the chest, both credited to artist Jenny Collins of
Puppy Puppy Playtime; the gold choker and earrings were by Buccellati. Perhaps disappointing some, the outfit made
only a one-off appearance on the red carpet, Ms Roan changing into something
warmer when serving as an award-presenter.
Skims Ultimate Pierced Nipple Push-up Bra.

Of course,
for such gowns to work (and that really is the correct expression), it relies
on the wearer's nipples having appropriate fittings and these can be real (as body-piercings) or faux (attached with an adhesive or clamping device, the latter on the model of “clip-on” earrings). However, what the use of light-weight fabrics should make possible is the material's attachment directly to the nipples with either a transparent surgical-grade glue or strategically placed double-sided tape ("boob-tape" or "tit-tape" in the jargon) but some of the
effect would be lost because of the extent of the surface area of skin such adhesives would require. More to the point, were
it not done with genuine fittings (piercings or clamed-on), some of the “edginess” would be lost and it
was this vibe Skims picked up on in the promotional video for “The Ultimate
Pierced Nipple Push-up Bra”. The tag
line was: “Our
sexiest bra gets even hotter with a faux nipple piercing design so you can get
the ‘Ooo’ without the ouch!” and there’s no reason why, for certain events (if not the street), a Mugleresque gown couldn’t be hung from the bra’s
fittings. Done well, it could look good although Ms Jain likely would remain unimpressed.
Skims promotional video: “The Ultimate Pierced Nipple Push-up Bra”.