Auburn (pronounced aw-bern)
(1) A reddish-brown or golden-brown color.
(2) Of something colored auburn (most often used to
describe hair).
(3) A widely used locality name.
(4) As the Auburn system (also known as the New York
system and Congregate system), a notably severe penal method created in the
early nineteenth century and implemented in Auburn Prison, Auburn, New York.
1400–1450: From the late Middle English abron, abrune aborne & abourne (light brown, yellowish brown),
a sixteenth century alteration (because of a conflation with the later spelling
auburne with the Middle English broune & brun (brown) which also changed the spelling) of the earlier auborne (yellowish-white, flaxen) from
the Middle French & Old French auborne
& alborne (blond, flaxen,
off-white) from the Medieval alburnus (fair-haired,
literally “like white or whitish”) and related to alburnum (the soft, newer wood in the trunk of a tree found between
the bark and the hardened heartwood, often paler in color than the heartwood) from
alba & albus (white). Since the meaning
shifted from blonde to hues of red, auburn has tended to be used exclusively of
women’s hair. The noun use dates from
1852. Auburn is often associated with the
Venetian painter Tiziano Vecellio (circa 1490-1576; known usually in English as
Titian), especially the works of his early career when the colors tended to be
more vivid but the modern practice is to apply auburn to darker shades although
there’s much imprecision in commercial applications such as hair dyes and what
some call some sort of auburn, others might list as some variation of burgundy,
brown, chestnut, copper, hazel, henna, russet, rust or titian.
The term “medieval scholar” is not of course oxymoronic though the language is replete with errors of translation and misunderstandings replicated and re-enforced over a thousand-odd years. However, as English began to assume its recognizably modern form, nor were errors unknown and it does seem strange such a well-documented Latin word as alburnus (fair-haired, literally “like white or whitish”) which had evolved in Middle English as auburne could be conflated with the Middle English broune & brun (brown), leading eventually to the modern auburn having morphed from blonde to a range of reddish browns. Some etymologists however suggests it was deliberate, the late fifteenth century blond being preferred while auburne was re-purposed to where it could be more useful in the color-chart. The modern blond & blonde were from the Old French & Middle French blund & blont (blond, light brown, feminine of blond) thought most likely of Germanic origin and related to the Late Latin blundus (yellow) from which Italian picked up biondo and Spanish gained blondo. It was akin to the Old English blondenfeax (gray-haired), derived from the Classical Latin flāvus (yellow) and in Old English, there was also blandan (to mix). There exists an alternative etymology which connects the Frankish blund (a mixed color between golden and light-brown) to the Proto-Germanic blundaz (blond), the Germanic forms derived from the primitive Indo-European bhlnd (to become turbid, see badly, go blind) & blend (blond, red-haired)). If so, it would be cognate with the Sanskrit bradhná (ruddy, pale red, yellowish). In his dictionary (1863-1873), Émile Littré (1801–1881) noted the original sense of the French word was "a color midway between golden and light chestnut" which might account for the notion of "mixed." In the Old English beblonden meant "dyed," so it is a possible root of blonde and the documentary record does confirm ancient Teutonic warriors were noted for dying their hair.
However the work of the earlier French
lexicographer, Charles du Fresne (1610-1688), claimed that blundus was a vulgar
pronunciation of Latin flāvus (yellow) but cited no sources. Another guess, and one discounted universally
by German etymologists, is that it represents a Vulgar Latin albundus from the
Classical Latin alba & albus (white). The word came into English from Old French
where it had masculine and feminine forms and the English noun imported both,
thus a blond is a fair-haired male, a blonde a fair-haired female and even if
no longer a formal rule in English, it’s an observed convention. As an adjective, blonde is now the more
common spelling and can be applied to both sexes, a use once prevalent in the
US although most sources note the modern practice is to refer to women as blonde
and men as fair. Even decades ago, style
guides on both sides of the Atlantic maintained, to avoid offence, it was
better to avoid using blond(e) as a stand-alone noun-descriptor of women.
Paintings by Titian (left to right), Portrait of a Lady (circa 1511), National Gallery, London, Flora (1515), Uffizi Gallery, Florence, St Margaret and the Dragon (circa 1559) Museo del Prado, Madrid & Portrait of a Lady in White (circa 1561), Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Dresden.
Even the understanding of auburn as “reddish brown” or “golden
brown” has changed over the years. The Venetian
painter Tiziano Vecellio (circa 1490-1576 and known in English usually as Titian)
lent the name “titian auburn” to the tint of reddish-brown hair which appeared
so often in his work. As so often
happens in art, his output darkened as he aged so the term “titian auburn” as a literal
descriptor of a particular tincture needs to be understood as a spectrum. While his fondness for redheads seems not to
have diminished with age, the vivid hues which characterized the flowing locks
he favored in his youth were later sometimes rendered in more subdued tones.
Lindsay Lohan illustrates the shift from the Latin alburnus to the modern English Auburn.
(1) Alburnus as
a Roman would have understood the description; now called blond or blonde
depending on context.
(2) The classical understanding of “titian auburn”, a light
and vivid shade reddish-brown.
(3) A more cooper-tinged hue, representative of what the
hair-dye industry would call something like “light auburn”.
(4) This is a dark alburn; any darker and depending on the tint, it would be described either as burgundy or chestnut.
The Auburn Speedster
Under a variety of corporate structures, the Auburn company produced cars in the US between 1900-1937 and is remembered now for the Speedster 851 & 852, one of the most romantic designs of the mid-1930s. Although Auburn, along with its corporate stablemates Cord and Duesenberg, succumbed to the affects of the Great Depression, the company’s financial problems long-predated the 1929 Wall Street crash, the conglomerate of the three manufacturers assembled in 1925 as a restructuring. After this, in the growing economy of the 1920s Auburn began again to prosper and it was in 1925 the company introduced the model which would be the basis of the later 851 & 852. Auburn-Cord-Duesenberg (A-C-D) actually enjoyed a logical structure in that the brand-names existed at different price points but it lacked any presence in the low-cost mass-market, relying instead on lower volume vehicles which relied on their style, engineering and value for money for their appeal. Had the depression not happened, the strategy might have worked but, given the austerity of the 1930s, what’s remarkable is that A-C-D endured until 1937.
Although now celebrated for their stylish lines, A-C-D’s
cars were at the time also noted for innovation and the quality of their
engineering. Cord’s front-wheel-drive
proved a cul-de-sac to which US manufacturers wouldn’t for decades return but
other aspects of their designs were influential although A-C-D’s trademark quixotic
offerings sometimes suggested a sense of disconnection from economic reality; in
1932, in the depth of the depression, Auburn announced a model powered by a 391
cubic inch (6.5 litre) V12, a perhaps questionable approach in an environment which
had seen demand collapse for the twelve and sixteen cylinder Lincolns, Packard
and Cadillacs. Elegant and powerful, in
less troubled times it would likely have succeeded but was wholly unsuited to the
world into which it was released despite being priced from an extraordinary US$1,105;
while that was 40% more than even the most expensive Ford V8, it was a fraction
the cost of the more comparable Packard or Lincoln V12.
1936 Auburn 852 SC Speedster.
The Boattail Speedster was less ambitious but had already
carved its niche. It was designed in
1928 to create the signature product that encapsulated what A-C-D wished the Auburn
marque to represent: fast, sleek, stylish and a value for money no other could
match; had the company anticipated the slogan “grace, space & pace” it
would have been well understood for what is now called a mission statement was exactly
what made Jaguar such a success in the post-war years. Using Lycoming's smooth, powerful and reliable
straight-eight cylinder engine, sleek Speedster delivered the performance the
lines promised, a genuine 100 mph (160 km/h) roadster which set speed records
when taken to Daytona Beach. The Speedster’s
classic iteration was the 851 (the subsequent 852 all but identical), introduced
in 1934, the design clearly a homage to the much-admired (if infrequently purchased)
Duesenberg Weymann Speedster though where the Duesenberg was long and elegant,
the Auburn was squat and sporty and for those who wanted something more charismatic
still, the 280 cubic inch (4.6 litre) straight-eight could be ordered with a
Schwitzer-Cummins centrifugal supercharger.
The market responded to the speed and the art deco style but the
investment had been considerable, something the under-capitalized A-C-D undertook
only because the improving economy provided some confidence sales would be
sufficient to ensure profitability. Had the
recovery been sustained, A-C-D may have survived, unemployment in 1937 still
high but significantly lower in the demographic which was their target
market. As in was, in mid-1937, the US economy
suffered a sudden, sharp, recession which would last over a year, the effects
lingering until late 1940 when the combined effected of increased armaments
production and a presidential election had a simulative effect. A-C-D, its finances in a perilous state since
the Wall Street Crash, couldn’t survive and the companies all entered
bankruptcy, Auburn succumbing in 1937.
A-C-D’s fate provides a cautionary tale which for decades was often ignored by those unable to resist the siren call to make beautiful, fast cars bearing their name. Unless volumes were sufficient (thereby diluting the lure of exclusivity which tended to be much of the attraction) or else subsidized by the profits of some mass-market offering, enduring success was rare and few of those which did initially flourish were capitalized to the extent necessary to survive the inevitable downturns which disproportionally affects those depending on the more self-indulgent sectors sustained by discretionary expenditure.