Tattoo
(pronounced ta-too)
(1) A signal on a drum, bugle, or trumpet at
night, for soldiers or sailors to go to their quarters.
(2) A knocking or strong pulsation.
(3) In British military tradition, an outdoor
military pageant or display, conducted usually at night.
(4) The act or practice of marking the skin with
indelible patterns, pictures, legends, etc, by making punctures in it and
inserting pigments.
(5) A pattern, picture, legend, etc so made.
1570–1580: An evolution from the earlier taptoo from the Dutch command tap toe! (in the literature also as taptoe) (literally “the tap(room) is to”
(ie shut)). Originally, the tattoo was a
signal on a drum, bugle, or trumpet at night, for soldiers or sailors to go to
their quarters, the musical form varying between regiments but all based on a knocking
or strong pulsation; it was later it became an outdoor, usually nocturnal military
pageant or display. The
usual abbreviations are tat and tatt (used most often in the plural) and the
derived terms tend to be functionally deterministic (amalgam tattoo, henna
tattoo, sleeve tattoo, tattoo flash, tattoo gun, tattoo tool, tattoo machine,
tattoo parlor, tribal tattoo, tattoo artist, tattoo removal etc). It's much more common for one who applies
tattoos to be called a tattooist than a tattooer and tattooee (who who is
tattooed) is rare to the point of being extinct. Tattoo & tattooing are nouns & verbs,
tattooist, tattooee, tattooer & tattooage are nouns, tattooed is a verb
& adjective and tattoolike and tattooless are adjectives; the noun plural
is tattoos.
The word was first used during the Thirty Years'
War (1618-1648) in the Low Countries (Belgium and the Netherlands) where the Dutch fortresses were garrisoned by a
federal army containing Scottish, English, German and Swiss mercenaries commanded
by a Dutch officer corps. Drummers from
the garrison were sent into the towns at 21:30 (9:30 pm) each evening to inform
the soldiers that it was time to return to barracks. The process was known as doe den tap toe
(Dutch for "turn off the tap"), an instruction to innkeepers to stop
serving beer and send the soldiers home for the night although the drummers
continued to play until the curfew at 22:00 (10:00 pm). Tattoo and the earlier tap-too and taptoo, are
alterations of the Dutch words tap toe
which have the same meaning. Taptoo was the earlier used alteration
of the phrase and a reference was found in George Washington's papers: "In future the Reveille will beat at
day-break; the troop at 8 in the morning; the retreat at sunset and taptoo at
nine o'clock in the evening." Over the years, the process became more of a show
and often included the playing of the first post at 21:30 and the last post at
22:00. Bands and displays were included
and shows were often conducted by floodlight or searchlight. Tattoos were
commonplace in the late nineteenth century with most military and garrison
towns putting on some kind of show or entertainment during the summer months.

A Lindsay Lohan tattoo; the Italian phrase la bella vita translates as "life
is beautiful".
The use to describe body
marking dates from 1760–1770. Tattoo,
from the Marquesan tatu or the Samaon
& Tahitian tatau (to strike)
coming to replace the earlier tattow
from the Polynesian tatau. It took some time for tattoo to become the
standardised western spelling, the OED noting the eighteenth century currency
of both tattaow and tattow.
Before the adoption of the Polynesian word, the practice of tattooing
had been described in the West as painting, scarring or staining and in 1900 British
anthropologist Ling Roth in documented four methods of skin marking, suggesting
they be differentiated under the names tatu,
moko, cicatrix and keloid. There was, between the Dutch and the British,
a minor colonial spat about which deserves the credit for importing the word to
Europe and while that sounds petty, the colonial powers usually could find something about which to disagree,

A “dot tattoo”
on the skin of a patient undergoing radiation therapy with a US one cent (“penny”)
coin for comparison.
The US penny has a
diameter of ¾ inch (19.05 mm). On
12 November 12, 2025, after a run of some 230 years, the last penny was minted
at the Philadelphia Mint, the first coin the US Treasury has discontinued since
the half-cent was discontinued in 1857.
The penny (1 cent) will remain a unit in financial transactions and with
billions in circulation, the physical coin will still be legal tender; being
metal, some will last for centuries.
There was a time when a penny could buy many things but, over time, they
became close to worthless although there were still “penny stocks” (speculative
investments in the equities markets), even many of them cost a few pennies a
share. The word will remain part of
idiomatic use (”pennies in the dollar”; “penny-wise, pound poor” etc) but the
coins, for years a rare sight, will become a curiosity. As recently as the 1960s it was still common to buy thing "for a penny" and candy stores would even have sweets available a "three for a penny" but the inflation which began late in the decade meant the coin soon had little practical use but one exception is the Catholic Worker newspaper, seven editions of which are each year published each year by the Catholic Worker Movement in New York; since 1933 it has sold for a penny. While the term "legacy media" has become commonly used, the Catholic Worker truly is a relic of the pre-electronic age, being manually laid out for printing rather than digitally prepared and not available in any non-paper form; the publication has neither a website nor an E-mail address.
Because the
radiation therapy used to treat cancer gains its effectiveness from precise targeting
of the location of a patient’s cancer site, a small “dot tattoo” is applied to
the skin so at each session the body exactly is aligned with the machinery for
each session. By “sighting” the machine
using the black dot, therapists can ensure the radiation is delivered to the
targeted area. Small and permanent, the tattoos
are barely distinguishable from birthmarks but some patients subsequently
choose to have them removed using conventional laser techniques and advances in
have made possible tattoo-free radiation therapy using technologies like SGRT (Surface
Guided Radiation Therapy). SGRT uses
unremarkable cameras and infrared light to create a 3D map of a patient's skin
surface, meaning the device can use internally-generated grid (from thousands
of reference points) co-ordinates to handle the positioning. In certain cases however (notably in more
complex cases where multiple dots are needed), tattoos remain the preferred
option and while some opt to keep them, others have no wish to be reminded of
the experience and have them removed.

Tan lines.
Tan
lines are visible differentiations in hue separating a “tanned” area from the
paler “untanned” skin; it’s created by sun exposure or an artificial source of
UV (ultra violet) radiation and is the marker between where clothing, sunscreen
or shade has blocked the UV rays which radiate the exposed skin. Because such exposure is a documented
risk-factor for skin cancer, intentionally seeking to be sunburnt to create fashionable
tan lines is potentially harmful and many health warnings have been issued. While the energy from the Sun makes possible
life on Earth and humans benefit for some exposure, too much definitely can be
dangerous so, when exposed, the recommendation is to use coverage, either with
clothing or frequent application of a sunscreen (the higher the rated SPF (sun
protection factor) the more effective it should be. Probably, there’s never been a better
encapsulation of strategy than the Australian “Slip, Slop Slap” public health
campaign of 1981 (slip on a shirt, slop on sunscreen, and slap on a hat). It was an effective message but while the
incidence of skin cancer has fallen, between half and two thirds of the Australian
population will in their lifetime suffer at least one skin cancer. Despite the numbers, tanning (with consequent
tan lines) remains a popular pastime but fortunately, modern commerce saw a gap
in the market and many beauticians will now emulate tan lines using (a usually
spray-on form of) tanning lotion.

A tantoo.
The portmanteau word tantoo (the construct
being tan + (tat)too) describes a tan line planned deliberately in the style of
a tattoo and, in the abstract, it can be thought to have the same relationship
to a tattoo that a negative has with a printed photograph. Tantoo stickers are available in a variety of
shapes and the look is achieved by placing the sticker on the skin in the
desired spot, then inflicting sufficient sun damage on the surrounding area until
the desired tone is achieved. At that
point the sticker is removed. Tan lines
have a place in cultural history because of the relationship between pale skin
being associated with wealth (ie someone not toiling in the fields) and certain
forms of “selective tanning” being linked with “the leisured class”. In the late twentieth century tan lines
emerged as a genuine aesthetic in the beauty industry and rather than seeking
to conceal their presence, many dressed to in a way which made them a feature.

Most tan lines are merely
circumstantial although in niches they can be a thing, some adult sites now listing
“tan lines” as a category. So, variously
they can be admired or pass barely noticed but we live in very sensitive times
and an Australian swimwear brand in November 2025 received criticism for “glamourising
sunburn”, a conclusion drawn by those outraged by Loleia Swimwear’s Black Friday Sale campaign. What caused the angst
was Loleia’s use of a photograph of a bronze-skinned model with LOLEIA 30% OFF
STOREWIDE CODE: BLACKFRIDAY digitally added to her back in a way which looked as
if the characters were in un-tanned skin (ie a tantoo). Based in the Western Australian capital Perth
(the world’s most isolated city according to urban geographers), Loleia is said
to have become a cult favourite in the crowded swimwear business but being targeted
by the skin police will have generated a level of brand-awareness it would
otherwise have taken much effort and likely millions of dollars to attain. Wisely, the brand did not respond to multiple
requests for comment, presumably advised there was little to be gained for either
defending or apologizing for the use of the image whereas letting the story
play out was priceless (and free) publicity.

Token gesture #1: Loleia's website is lavishly stocked with images of models in swimwear but there seems to be only one carrying a container of sunscreen and, at SPF (Sun Protection Factor) 30 it's not the most protective available. Note the admirable shoulder blade definition.
The CCWA’s
(Cancer Council of Western Australia) SunSmart manager condemned the advertisement,
saying: “It’s
really concerning to see images like that, particularly targeting young people
who might see that image and not realise that it might be a generated image. We don’t want people to aspire to that kind
of look – tanning causes damage to your skin, and it is skin cells in trauma. Portraying and promoting images like that in
the media is really not on … we’re really disappointed to see that kind of
depiction.” That must mean the
SunSmart manager believes bikini-buying young women will assume an advertising agency
would pay an appropriately-stickered model to lie for hours under the sun or a
sunlamp to achieve the desired tantoo rather than spend a few minutes (or maybe
seconds if generative AI (artificial intelligence) is used) photoshopping a
stock image. Perth may be isolated but
the young folk there know about fake images.
In fairness, the CCWA did have a good point to make because tanning
remains fashionable in Australia despite the country’s skin cancer rates being
among the world’s highest, the sometimes lethal melanoma one of the most common
cancers in Australians aged between 15-29 (ie the prime bikini-wearing
demographic).

Token gesture #2 (
DEI): Although the quota seems to have been set low, the site includes a handful of MoCs (models of color).
Cultural
change can be achieved but nobody seems yet to have found the formula which to make
youth perceive untanned skin as desirably attractive and the bronzed look as
mere “skin damage”. Historically, that was
in many places the dominant narrative but that was when a tanned skin was
associated with peasants toiling in the fields and a pale complexion reflected
having the wealth and social status to “stay out of the sun”. Social and economic shifts have changed things
in that in the twentieth century tans became linked with leisure which,
combined with a “beach culture” (certainly in sunny Australia) made bronzed
skin a marker of youthful vitality. “We’re really
trying to change the culture that Australia has around the fact that tanning is
desirable because we know that it just leads to skin cancer” the SunSmart
manager was quoted as saying, adding “We’d really encourage brands and advertising agencies to
consider how they’re depicting those behaviours in their materials –
considering that it’s young people that they’re targeting, [it’s
important] to
think about how they can encourage them to do the right thing, particularly
with swimwear brands. We want to see
just some positive reinforcement of the messages that we’ve been talking about
for generations.”

Token gesture #3 (DEI): There was also a smattering of plus-size models (at the lower end of the spectrum). As a general principle, the plus-size community is at higher risk of sun-induced skin damage because their surface area is greater.
The manager
of Skin Collective (a Perth skincare clinic) concurred, saying “…advertising
sunburn in any form was dangerous. It’s
a real concern that an advertising campaign is glamourising sunburn or tanning
by showing it in a pattern. Research has
shown that actually it takes only one sunburn that blisters and causes a peel
to double your melanoma likelihood or risk.
I definitely think a year ago, there was a significant messaging around
making it trendy or cool to create tans.
We saw even people go as far as tattooing tan lines on their bodies,
which is a real concern in a country that has the highest melanoma rates. I think we need to take responsibility and
understand that our marketing campaigns genuinely do influence trends – it’s
important that your messaging is about sun safety, and we can do that by
creating beautiful, curated campaigns that still [have a] SunSmart message. We’re actually changing the health of a whole
generation, and it’s really important for us to be those educators.”

Mostly though, the site's photography is on theme and the compositional standard high although what was striking (especially for a swimwear retailer) was the relative paucity of
blonde hair and it may be this was done deliberately to disguise the lack of diversity.
The issue with tanning in Australia is not new. In 2024, Ad Standards (the national regulator for advertising standards) found Fox Tan had,
in a TikTok video, breached the AANA’s (Australian Association of National
Advertisers) code of ethics regarding health and safety (advertisers have
ethics, who knew?). That case concerned
a video of a woman lying on a sun lounge, the caption reading: “When they say
it’s time to get out of the sun now but your tan just started to look good.” According to Ad Standards, noting “…skin cancer
affects a very large number of Australians over their lifetime and continues to
lead to a high number of deaths every year”, the panel concluded “…the audience for
the advertisement is likely to be younger Australians interested in tanning and
considered that the messaging in this advertisement was especially dangerous
for this group of people.”
However commendable her efforts, the CCWA’s SunSmart manager may be
fighting a losing battle.
In Japanese, the word irezumi means "insertion of ink" and is applied variously
to tattoos using tebori (the
traditional Japanese hand method, a Western-style machine or any method of
tattooing using insertion of ink. The
most common word used for traditional Japanese tattoo designs is horimono although increasingly the word
tattoo is used to describe non-Japanese styles of tattooing. Etymologists found tattoo intriguing because so
many languages contain similar words, some appearing to have emerged
independently of the others and anthropologists agree the practice of tapping
on primitive instruments as a distractive device seems to have been a
widespread practice while images were being made on the skin, the conclusion
being some of the variations are likely onomatopoeic:
English: tattoo
Danish: tatovering
Italian: tatuaggio
Brazilian: tatuagem
Estonian: tatoveering
Romanian: tatuaj
Norwegian: tatovering
Māori: Ta moko
Swedish: tatuering
German: tatowierung
French: tatouage
Spanish: tatuaje
Dutch: tatoeage
Finnish: tatuointi
Polish: tatuaz
Portuguese: tatuagem
Lithuanian: tatuagem
Creol: tatouaz