Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Ambiguous. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Ambiguous. Sort by date Show all posts

Sunday, April 23, 2023

Ambiguous

Ambiguous (pronounced am-big-yoo-uhs)

(1) Open to or having several possible meanings or interpretations; equivocal.

(2) In linguistics, of an expression exhibiting constructional homonymity; having two or more structural descriptions.

(3) Of doubtful or uncertain nature; difficult to comprehend, distinguish, or classify.

1528: From the late Middle English ambiguous (of doubtful or uncertain nature, open to various interpretations) Latin ambiguus (moving from side to side, of doubtful or uncertain nature, open to various interpretations), from ambigere (to dispute about (figuratively "to hesitate, waver; be in doubt" and literally “to wander; go about; go around”) the present active infinitive of ambigō from ambi (around) + agō or agere (I drive, move).  The first known citation in English is in the writings of Sir Thomas More (1478-1535) in 1528 but most scholars maintain the noun ambiguity had been in use since circa 1400 in the sense of "uncertainty, doubt, indecision, hesitation", from the Old French ambiguite and directly from Latin ambiguitatem (nominative ambiguitas) (double meaning, equivocalness, double sense), the noun of state from ambiguus (having double meaning, doubtful),  The meaning "obscurity in description" emerged in the early fifteenth century.  The adjective unambiguous dated from the 1630s while the noun disambiguation (removal of ambiguity) is documented since 1827.  Ambiguous is an adjective, ambiguate is a verb and ambiguity, ambiguation & ambiguousness are nouns; the most common noun plural is ambiguities. 

Structural ambiguity, syntactic ambiguity & lexical ambiguity

One of the core concepts in structural linguistics is that the meaning of many combination or words (ie a compound, sentence or phrase) is derived not merely from the meanings of the individual words but also from the way in which they’re combined.  It’s a simple idea which academics have managed to make sound complex, calling the process “compositionality” (that meaning is a construct of word meanings plus morphosyntactic structures).  So, because a structure can contribute to meaning, it follows that changing the order of the words can lead to a different meaning even if the same words are used.  When a word, phrase, or sentence has more than one meaning, it is ambiguous and “ambiguous” has a specific meaning in structural linguistics because it doesn’t mean simply that a meaning is vague or unclear: It means two or more distinct meanings are available and this is called structural ambiguity or syntactic ambiguity (as distinct from when a word has more than one distinct meaning which is known as lexical ambiguity.  Sometimes, the intended meaning can be unclear but often context can be used to assist the deconstruction.  When in December 2017, several news outlets reported, “Lindsay Lohan bitten by snake on holiday in Thailand”, few actually believed serpents take holidays and assumed instead grammatical standards had fallen since sub-editors went extinct.

China, the renegade province of Taiwan and strategic ambiguity

Taiwan (aka Formosa) is an island off the coast of China which separated, politically, from the mainland in 1949.  The Chinese government regards Taiwan as “a renegade province”; the island’s administration maintains a position of structural autonomy without actually declaring independence.  Since 1950, the US has maintained a security guarantee for the de facto independence of Taiwan which has been sometimes explicit, sometimes vague, the latter paradigm known as a policy of strategic ambiguity.

The origins of the guarantee lie in the Korean War.  In 1950, Dean Acheson (1893–1971; US secretary of state 1949-1953) delineated the US security perimeter in Asia and included neither Taiwan nor South Korea.  Chinese leader Chairman Mao (Mao Zedong 1893–1976; chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) 1949-1976) and Kim Il-sung (Kim I, 1912–1994; Great Leader of DPRK (North Korea) 1948-1994), in an interpretation endorsed by their senior partner, Comrade Stalin (1878-1953; Soviet leader 1924-1953), concluded Washington would not defend either country.  The DPRK acted first, invading South Korea in June 1950 which shocked the US into assembling a military response under the flag of the UN and, fearing further Communist incursions in Asia, sent the Seventh Fleet to deter any attempt by Peking to invade Taiwan.

In 1954, China probed US policy by shelling some Taiwanese islands in what came to be known as the First Taiwan Strait Crisis; the US responded by entering into defense treaties with both Taiwan and South Korea.  The probing continued, notably with the second crisis in 1958 and in the 1960 presidential campaign, both candidates, Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974) and John Kennedy (JFK, 1917–1963; US president 1961-1963), pledged to defend Taiwan against Chinese aggression.  During the 1960s, in a kind of military choreography, US-China standoffs continued.  By 1972, things had changed.  The US sought China’s assistance, both to extricate themselves from the quagmire of the Vietnam War and to become something of a strategic partner against the USSR, Peking having long split from Moscow.  In a communique issued from Shanghai, Washington affirmed Peking’s “one China” principle that Taiwan is part of China saying it was a matter for China and Taiwan to work out the relationship peacefully. 

The nine dash line.

Despite that, the US-Taiwan Treaty remained but it needed now to be viewed in the context of Richard Nixon's Guam Doctrine, issued in 1969, in which the president noted "…the US would assist in the defense… of allies and friends" but would not "undertake all the defense of the free nations of the world."  For Taiwan, and presumably everyone else, strategic ambiguity thus began.  Seven years after the Shanghai statement, later, the Carter administration recognized the People’s Republic of China (PRC, the old Red China), severed formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan and terminated the treaty.  Strategic ambiguity has shrouded Washington’s position on Taiwan ever since.  US presidents have on occasion suggested both something more robust and something less so it appears to remain the position that the US might defend Taiwan were China to invade but it might not.  It would depend on the circumstances.  For seventy-odd years, the US position has been enough to deter China from exercising the military option to restore the renegade province to the motherland but a multi-dimensional chess game will play-out over the next decade in the South China Sea.

Thursday, January 5, 2023

Cryptic

Cryptic (pronounced krip-tik)

(1) Deliberately mysterious in meaning; puzzling.

(2) A message which is abrupt; terse; short, ambiguous, obscure (ie the effect rather than the intent).

(3) Of things secret; the occult.

(4) Involving use of a code or cipher etc (the stuff of cryptography).

(5) In zoology, fitted for concealing; serving to camouflage (applied especially to the coloring or shape of animals); living in a cavity or small cave (also as cryptozoic).

(6) In cruciverbalism (the compilation of crosswords), the puzzle, or a clue in such a puzzle, using, in addition to definitions, wordplay such as anagrams, homophones and hidden words to indicate solutions (the “cryptic crossword” usually distinguished from the “standard”, “basic” or “simple”.

(7) In biology, apparently identical, but actually genetically distinct.

(7) In biology, as “cryptic ovulation”, a phenomenon noted in certain species where the female shows no perceptible signals indicating a state of fertility (also as “concealed ovulation”).

1595-1605: From the Late Latin crypticus, from the Ancient Greek κρυπτικός (kruptikós) (fit from concealing), from κρυπτός (kruptós) (hidden), from κρύπτω (krúptō) (to hide).  The construct was crypt + -ic.  Crypt was from the Latin crypta (vault), again from the Ancient Greek κρυπτός (kruptós) (hidden).  The suffix -ic was from the Middle English -ik, from the Old French -ique, from the Latin -icus, from the primitive Indo-European -kos & -os, formed with the i-stem suffix -i- and the adjectival suffix -kos & -os.  The form existed also in the Ancient Greek as -ικός (-ikós), in Sanskrit as -इक (-ika) and the Old Church Slavonic as -ъкъ (-ŭkŭ); A doublet of -y.  In European languages, adding -kos to noun stems carried the meaning "characteristic of, like, typical, pertaining to" while on adjectival stems it acted emphatically; in English it's always been used to form adjectives from nouns with the meaning “of or pertaining to”.  A precise technical use exists in physical chemistry where it's used to denote certain chemical compounds in which a specified chemical element has a higher oxidation number than in the equivalent compound whose name ends in the suffix -ous; (eg sulphuric acid (H₂SO₄) has more oxygen atoms per molecule than sulphurous acid (H₂SO₃).  The alternative spelling cryptick is obsolete.  Cryptic is a noun and adjective, cryptical is an adjective and cryptically an adverb; the noun plural is cryptics.

Cryptic’s synonyms can include ambiguous, arcane, enigmatic, equivocal, incomprehensible, mysterious, strange, vague, veiled, abstruse, apocryphal, cabalistic, dark, esoteric, evasive, hidden, inexplicable, murky, mystic, mystical & perplexing.  However, it’s often necessary to distinguish between that thought deliberately obscure in meaning and messages either badly written or too brief for the meaning to be clear.  The familiar modern meaning “mysterious or enigmatic” is surprisingly modern, emerging only in the 1920s.  The noun cryptography (the art & science of writing in secret characters) sates from the 1650s and was either from the French cryptographie or directly from the Modern Latin cryptographia, the construct being the Ancient Greek κρυπτός (kruptós) (hidden) + graphia (of or relating to writing), the practitioner or code-breaker (the latter sense now more common and known also as crypto-analysts) being a cryptographer, the discipline cryptography (or cryptoanalytics) and the adjectival form the cryptographic.

Novelty birthday card on the theme of Freaky Friday (2003).

In English, the Ancient Greek κρυπτός (kruptós) (hidden) proved productive.  A cryptogram can be just about any form of puzzle although as a commercial name (sometimes as crypto-gram) it has been used (on the model of telegram a la the strippergram, gorillagram, kissogram etc).  The idea of cryptocurrency gained the name from (1) the use of cryptography when storing the underlying data in the blockchain (a big-machine distributed database) and (2) the notion of the blockchain as a secure crypt (vault).  In biology, cryptobiosis is a state of life in which all metabolic activity is temporarily halted (a cryptobiont any organism capable of cryptobiosis).  In critical political discourse, crypto- was used (crypto-communist, crypto-Nazi, crypto-fascist etc) to label someone as something they were attempting to conceal.  In medicine, the unfortunate condition cryptorchism (the plural (where required) cryptorchisms) was the failure of one or both testes to descend into the scrotum.  In geology, a cryptoclastic rock is one composed of minute or microscopic fragments.

Pope Benedict XVI with Cardinal Pell, Australia 2008. 

In his theological writings Pope Benedict XVI (1927–2022; pope 2005-2013, pope emeritus 2013-2022) could be cryptic but when speaking to his flock of 1.3 billion-odd, his thoughts were expressed usually in simple language, his meaning clear.  Not all pontiffs have managed this so Benedict’s pontificate of plain-speaking was welcome, even if his messages didn’t please all.  Even so however, he never manage to issue anything with the raw honesty Pope Adrian VI (1459–1523; pope 1522-1523) showed in the instructions he gave to his nuncio, Francesco Chieregati (1479-1539) his representative at the Diet of Nuremberg, a gathering of the princes of the Holy Roman Empire convened in 1552.  Adrian’s words, a statement of repentance unique in the Church’s history was an admission of the need to reform the corrupted institution which instructed Chieregati to make clear:

“…we frankly confess that God permits this persecution to afflict His Church because of the sins of men, especially of the priests and prelates of the Church. For certainly the hand of the Lord has not been shortened so that He cannot save, but sins separate us from Him and hide His face from us so that He does not hear. Scripture proclaims that the sins of the people are a consequence of the sins of the priests, and therefore (as Chrysostom says) our Savior, about to cure the ailing city of Jerusalem, first entered the Temple to chastise first the sins of the priests, like the good doctor who cures a sickness at its source.

We know that for many years many abominable things have occurred in this Holy See, abuses in spiritual matters, transgressions of the commandments, and finally in everything a change for the worse (et omnia denique in perversum mutata). No wonder that the illness has spread from the head to the members, from the Supreme Pontiffs to the prelates below them. All of us (that is, prelates and clergy), each one of us, have strayed from our paths; nor for a long time has anyone done good; no, not even one.

Therefore, we must all give glory only to God and humble our souls before Him, and each one of us must consider how he has fallen and judge himself, rather than await the judgment of God with the rod of His anger. As far as we are concerned, therefore, you will promise that we will expend every effort to reform first this Curia, whence perhaps all this evil has come, so that, as corruption spread from that place to every lower place, the good health and reformation of all may also issue forth.

We consider ourselves all the more bound to attend to this, the more we perceive the entire world longing for such a reformation. (As we believe others have said to you) we never sought to gain this papal office. Indeed we preferred, so far as we could, to lead a private life and serve God in holy solitude, and we would have certainly declined this papacy except that the fear of God, the uncorrupt manner of our election, and the dread of impending schism because of our refusal forced us to accept it. Therefore we submitted to the supreme dignity not from a lust for power, nor for the enrichment of our relatives, but out of obedience to the divine will, in order to reform His deformed bride, the Catholic Church, to aid the oppressed, to encourage and honor learned and virtuous men who for so long have been disregarded, and finally to do everything else a good pope and a legitimate successor of blessed Peter should do.

Yet no man should be surprised if he does not see all errors and abuses immediately corrected by us. For the sickness is of too long standing, nor is it a single disease, but varied and complex. We must advance gradually to its cure and first attend to the more serious and more dangerous ills, lest in a desire to reform everything at the same time we throw everything into confusion. All sudden changes (says Aristotle) are dangerous to the state. He who scrubs too much draws blood.

We know how prejudicial it has been to the honor of God and the salvation and edification of souls that ecclesiastical benefices, especially those involving the care and direction of souls, for so long have been given to unworthy men.”

Probably plenty of popes could over the centuries have been justified in saying much the same thing but if any were tempted, none did.  Benedict did of course issue the odd statement of apologia for this and that but they bore the mark of a lawyer’s careful vetting to avoid legal troubles rather than a sinner repenting and seeking forgiveness.  Most of the Church’s problems and scandals were of course not of his making and it was unfortunate his time on the throne came when scandals stretching back decades were being exposed because the publicity these attracted meant there was less attention paid to some of Benedict’s genuinely interesting thoughts on the state of Western Civilization.  Unfortunately, there were occasions on which he should perhaps have been rather more cryptic when discussing these matters, such as the famous address delivered at the University of Regensburg in 2006, entitled Faith, Reason and the University, none of which attracted the attention of the popular press except the one notorious sentence:

Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

The comment was originally written in 1391 as an encapsulation of the view of the Manuel II (1350–1425; Byzantine emperor 1391-1425) but the thoughts were not new to Benedict and nor was its expression but what one says as an academic theologian is less scrutinized than when it comes from the vicar of Christ on earth.  That one brief fragment from the lecture overshadowed what was a thoughtful warning to Western civilization about its internal threats and contradictions, specifically the retreat from reason in moral and political life.  Among academics, the similarity of Benedict’s ideas to those of the German philosopher Leo Strauss (1899-1973) seemed striking and poignant too, the pope among the last of then generation of Germans who, like Strauss, had seen Nazism, probably the most evil of the totalitarianism which was such a feature of the twentieth century.  In their time, Strauss and Benedict both knew the West was facing a crisis, something identified by the philosopher as the very modern culture which had lost “its faith in reason’s ability to validate its highest aims”, understood as the view that notions of right and wrong are historically variable, changing as intellectual fashions shifted.  The pope knew this as moral relativism and understood that a “crisis of political reason… is a crisis of politics as such” which has relegated moral and political knowledge to the realm of radical subjectivity.

As a historical decline, Benedict traced the retreat from the Reformation, through the liberal theology of the last two-hundred years to the latter-day descent of Christendom to cultural relativism.  That didn’t mean the pope wished to undo the Enlightenment, it was rather that scientific positivism should run in parallel with moral certainty.  It might have been better, certainly for the quality of the press coverage, if Benedict had adhered a little more to one of Strauss’ techniques of didacticism: cultured crypticism.  Strauss held that Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) was no proto-Nazi but had written in such an accessible manner that it was simply for the Nazis to twist and appropriate his words for their purposes.  Strauss therefore sought to be more elusive, not wishing to be another misused German philosopher, his words were sometimes cryptic, the meaning able to be unlocked only by the few who had long been immersed.  Benedict too might have been well advised on occasion to remain a little more obscure because he had many interesting things to say which could have been plainly spoken.

Benedict XVI lying in state.

The mortal remains of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI were moved early in the morning on Monday 2 January 2023, from his former residence in the Vatican's Mater Eccle.  The archpriest of the basilica, Cardinal Mauro Gambetti, received the remains with a liturgical act that lasted about 30 minutes.

Pope Francis conducting the Solemn Requiem Mass.  It's the first time a pope has presided over the funeral of his predecessor since Pius VII (in somewhat different circumstances) attended the funeral of Pius VI in 1802.

A Solemn Requiem Mass was conducted in St Peter’s Square on Thursday 5 January, presided over by Pope Francis.  The readings for the Mass were Isaiah 29:16–19 in Spanish; Psalm 23 sung in Latin; 1 Peter 1: 3–9 in English, and the Gospel of Luke 23: 39–46 read in Italian.  At the conclusion of the service, the coffin was carried to his place of burial in the crypt of St. Peter’s Basilica, accompanied by the choir singing the Magnificat in Latin.

Sunday, March 12, 2023

Rorschach

Rorschach (pronounced raw-shack)

(1) A canton and town in Switzerland.

(2) A personality test using ink-blots

1927: The ink-blot based personality analysis was first published in codified form in 1927, the genesis of which was a 1921 paper by Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach (1885-1922).  Rorschach (Wahlkreis) is a constituency of the canton of Saint Gallen, Switzerland and Rorschach is its largest town.  The town lies on the Swiss side of Lake Constance, the construct of the name an early form of the German Röhr (reeds) + Schachen (lakeside).

The Rorschach test was for some time a standard clinical diagnostic tool in psychology & psychiatry.  It was a collection of ten “ink blots”, five rendered in grey scale, two in grey & red and three in color, all printed on separate cards and presented to the subjects who were asked (1) What might this mean? & (2) What parts of the card made you say that?  The usual protocol was to provide a pencil and have the subject write their responses in the space underneath the image although, depending on the circumstances, a clinician might engage with the subject and obtain more of their thoughts or the tests could immediately be taken for analysis.  Fond of jargon, the profession even took the opportunity to coin a word to describe specific responses, a subject thought to be especially demonstrative in their response to a Rorschach ink blot said to be exhibiting "extratensive" tendencies.  As an adjective it was thus a synonym of "extroverted" and is occasionally seen outside of psychology where it probably adds little but confusion.  It served also as a noun, the relevant subjects being labelled "extratensives".

Lindsay Lohan in Rorschach Ink-Blot Test inspired gold beaded cocktail dress at the Source Code premiere, Crosby Street Hotel, New York City, March 2011.  The dress was paired with black patent ankle strap platform pumps shoes and matching opaque tights.

The idea of using indeterminate and ambiguous shapes as a way of assessing an individual's personality had been around for centuries before Dr Rorschach began his research and in the nineteenth century there were even popular parlor games which used the idea although they were designed to amuse rather than analyze.  What made Dr Rorschach’s work different was the sheer quantity of the data with with he worked, his research encompassing some 300 patients in mental institutions (with a control group of 100 “normal” subjects) to whom to he exposed over 400 ink-blots before selecting the ten which had proved to be of the greatest diagnostic utility.  Although the method was not greatly different from the games, the Rorschach test was genuinely scientific in its design and the systematic approach linking impressionistic responses to ambiguous shapes, this producing evidence of certain tendencies.  Within the still embryonic psychiatric profession, his approach was thought novel and initially received little support.  His book (a 174-page monograph Psychodiagnostik (Psychodiagnostics)), when eventually published in 1921 contained the structure of the ink-blot tests and the results of the 300 patient survey yet it attracted more interest from intrigued literary reviewers than the medical journals and he died little more than a year after its release.  Even the appearance of reviews in the odd literary magazine however did little to stimulate appeal because the book was very much a work by a scientist for other scientists and Dr Rorschach had made no attempt to make his findings accessible to a general audience.  It wasn’t until the work was republished and others began to refine the methodology that others saw potential, especially after professional mathematicians added rigor to the statistical models used to generate the scores from which conclusions were drawn.

However, those who inherited the work also shifted the goal posts.  While Dr Rorschach had always intended the ink-blots to be only a helpful tool in the diagnosis of schizophrenia, such was the expansion of the profession in the inter-war years that many became interested and, by 1938, the test had been adapted and was being promoted as a kind of “personality testing kit”.  It was quite a departure from Dr Rorschach’s original vision which had been designed deliberately to maintain some ambiguity in the images, his belief that the diagnosis of schizophrenia lay in the margins between the possible responses whereas when used as a personality testing tool, the answers took on the character of a parameter which, when collectively assessed with the provided statistical tool, placed patients in categories.

The Rorschach cards

The test in that form proved highly successful, its proliferation assisted by the demands of wartime and the military’s need for psychological testing, the Rorschach kit easily produced, more popular with subjects than many other methods and, as a piece of mathematics, able easily to be collated into the big data sets electronic machines were beginning to make possible.  It had that those qualities the military so adore: Speed, standardization and simplicity.  It was therefore by the mid 1940s a standard part of psychological testing, used in everything from job applications to assessing an inmate’s eligibility for parole so it was perhaps inevitable it would be applied to the defendants in the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946).  Even before the International Military Tribunal (IMT; which would conduct the trial) assembled, the authorities in charge of the Nazis in custody insisted on psychiatrists and psychologists being available as soon as the prisoners had been assembled.  There were a number of reasons for this, notably that they wanted to ensure the prisoners had the support necessary to dissuade them from attempting suicide and there was the need also to ensure all were mentally competent to stand trial.  Additionally, there was genuine curiosity about the Nazis because never had there been such an opportunity to subject to tests two-dozen odd who were responsible for what was becoming clear were the greatest crimes in history.  The question then, as now was: Are “normal ordinary people” able to be drawn to commit evil acts or are some people evil.

The Rorschach tests were of course only one of the tools the clinicians assigned to Nuremberg used and the conclusion drawn was that all defendants were sane in the sense they were legally sane and thus mentally competent to stand trial even if they were depressed psychopaths (that seemed to be the most common phrase).  Quite what part the tests played in this isn’t clear but the test results themselves assumed a life independent of the trial because of a dispute between the two clinicians most involved in the testing and it wasn’t until the 1990s they were (almost) all published.  This psychological time capsule proved irresistibly tempting for one of the US’s foremost Rorschach experts who over the years had assembled records which could be used as an extraordinarily diverse control group which included (in the hundreds) medical students, Unitarian ministers, psychology students, criminals, business executives and random patients from private practice.  From this were selected the clerics and psychiatric outpatients, the purpose of a comparison with the Nuremberg Nazis being a critique of a recently published analysis of the test results which had concluded the defendants (as individuals and a representatives of the whole Nazi hierarchy) were “cursed beyond redemption” and thus profoundly of “the other”.  Their work was not entirely conventional by accepted scientific standards and they tacitly acknowledged some of the long acknowledged limitations of the test but never wavered from their finding “…the Nazis were not psychologically normal or healthy individuals”.

Defendants in the dock, Palace of Justice, Nuremberg, 1945-1946.

That was as controversial a view in the 1990s as it had been fifty years earlier and if a blind test could not distinguish of the Nazi’s data from the two control groups, at least some doubt would be cast.  Accordingly, ten Rorschach experts were assembled and asked to assemble them into three groups.  All that did was identify the high, medium and low-functioning of each group but there was nothing in them which separated the Nazis.  That was interesting but what was probably definitive was that even when told the nature of the data, the experts were unable to discern any difference between the responses which would enable the Nazis to be identified.  Perhaps sadly, the Nazis may have been as ordinary as they appeared in the dock, the implication being we're all capable of evil, given the right temptation, a nod to an earlier memorable phrase spoken of them: "The banality of evil".  

As that might indicate, like many tests in psychology, the Rorschach is probably useful if its limitations are recognized and the interpretations thought valid decades ago are no longer treated as proven science.  For example there may be something which can be deduced from a subject assessing the whole image in their response which is different for one who picks just a section or who finds something different in different parts but whether there’s anything substantive in the difference between seeing moth and a butterfly may be dubious.  The test is still widely used although many have abandoned it though it’s famously a cult in Japan where it’s one of the profession’s standard tools.  Elsewhere use is mixed.  Interestingly, while the fourth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV (1994) did not endorse or recommend the use of any particular projective test, it did note many were used in clinical practice but cautioned that the validity and reliability of these tests had not been firmly established, urging caution.  Neither the DSM-5 (2013) nor DSM-5-TR (2022) make any reference to the Rorschach test.

Monday, April 24, 2023

Bilateral

Bilateral (pronounced bahy-lat-er-uhl)

(1) Pertaining to, involving, or affecting two or both sides, factions, parties, or the like.

(2) Located on opposite sides of an axis; two-sided, especially when of equal size, value etc.

(3) In anatomy and biology, pertaining to the right and left sides of a structure (especially in the region furthest from the median plane).

(4) In contract law, binding the parties to reciprocal obligations.

(5) In anthropology, relating to descent through both maternal and paternal lineage.

(6) In the British education system, a course combining academic and technical components.

(7) In physics, acting or placed at right angles to a line of motion or strain.

(8) In phonetics and phonology, of a consonant (especially the English clear l), pertaining to sounds generated by partially blocking the egress of the airstream with the tip of the tongue touching the alveolar ridge, leaving space on one or both sides of the occlusion for air passage.

1775: The construct is bi + lateral.  Bi-, in the sense of the word-forming element (two, having two, twice, double, doubly, twofold, once every two etc) is from the from Latin bis (twice) or bīnus (double), from the Old Latin which was cognate with the Sanskrit dvi-, the Ancient Greek di- & dis-, the Old English twi- and the German zwei- (twice, double), all from the primitive Indo-European PIE root dwo- (two), ultimate source also of the Modern English duo.  Bilateral is a noun & adjective, bilateralist, bilateralization, bilaterality & bilateralism are nouns and bilaterally is an adverb; the common noun plural is bilaterals.

It may have been in use before but was certainly nativized during the sixteenth century.  The occasionally bin- before vowels was a form which originated in French, not Latin although it’s suggested this may have been influenced by the Latin bini (twofold), the familiar example being “binary”.  In computing, it’s most associated with zero-one distinction in the sense of off-on and in chemistry, it denotes two parts or equivalents of the substance referred to although there are rules and conventions of use to avoid confusion with stuff named using the Greek prefix di- such as carbon dioxide (CO2).  In general use, words built with bi- prefix can cause confusion.  While biennial (every two years) seems well understood, other constructs probably due to rarity remain, ambiguous: fortnightly is preferable to biweekly and using “every two months” or “twice a month” as required removes all doubt.

Lateral was first adopted as verb in the 1640s from the fourteenth century Old French lateral, directly from Latin laterālis (belonging to the side), a derivation of latus (genitive lateris) (the side, flank of humans or animals, lateral surface) of uncertain origin.  As a noun (and as “bilateral”), the precise definitional meaning "situated on either side of the median vertical longitudinal plane of the body" is from 1722.   Equilateral (all sides equal) was first used in mathematics in the 1560s, a borrowing from the Latin aequilateralis, aequi- being the suffix- meaning “equal”; contra-lateral (occurring on the opposite side) is from 1871; the adjective ipsilateral (on the same side of the body), bolting on the Latin ipse- suffix (self) dates from 1907; the use in US football to describe a lateral pass seems to have appeared in print first in 1934.  Multilateral and trilateral seem to have been seventeenth century inventions from geometry, the more familiar modern applications in international diplomacy not noted until 1802.

Conventions of use

Although one would have to be imaginative, with the Latin, there’s little limit to the compound words one could construct to describe the number of sides of a thing.  The words, being as unique as whole numbers, would also be infinite.  Whether many would be linguistically useful is doubtful; sextilateral may mislead and ūndēquadrāgintālateral (thirty nine sided) seems a complicated solution to a simple problem.

Unilateral             One-sided
Bilateral               Two-sided
Trilateral              Three-sided
Quadrilateral        Four-sided
Quintilateral         Five-sided
Sextilateral          Six-sided
Septilateral          Seven-sided
Octolateral           Eight-sided
Novilateral           Nine-sided
Decilateral           Ten-sided
Centilateral          Hundred-sided
Millelateral           Thousand-sided

The modern convention appears to be to stop at trilateral and thereafter, when describing gatherings of four or more, adopt multilateral or phrases like four-power or six-party.  Trilateral seem still manageable, adopted not only by governmental entities but also by the Trilateral Commission (founded in 1973 with members from Japan, the US, and Europe), a remarkably indiscrete right-wing think-tank.  However, in the organically pragmatic evolution of English, there it tends to stop, quadrilateral now most associated with Euclidean plane geometry (there are seven quadrilateral polygons) and used almost exclusively in that discipline and other strains of mathematics.  Outside of mathematics, it was only in the formal language of diplomacy that quadrilateral was used with any frequency.  The agreement of 15 July 1840, (negotiated between Lord Palmerston (1784-1865; variously UK prime-minister or foreign secretary on several occasions 1830-1865) and Nicholas I (1796–1855; Tsar of Russia 1825-1855) to tidy up things in the Mediterranean) between Great Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia was formalised as a quadrilateral treaty but the word fell from favour with quadruple alliance preferred for a later European arrangement.

Bilateral diplomacy: Lindsay Lohan meeting with Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (b 1954; prime-minister or president of the Republic of Türkiye since 2003), Ankara, 27 January 2017.

Although many of the wonks in the foreign policy establishment like to dream of a world in which everything is settled by multi-lateral discussions, in the world of the realists, it's understood the core of conflicts (which are the central dynamic of international relations) are bilateral.  Accordingly, most efforts are devoted to bilateral discussions.  In the business of predictions, it's also the relationships between two states which absorbs most of the thoughts of pundits and the long-term projections of those in the field can make interesting reading, decades later.  In 1988, Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974) published 1999: Victory Without War, which with no false modesty he suggested was "...a how-to guide in foreign police for whomever was elected president in November 1988".  Given that, it's not surprising one passage has attracted recent comment: "...in the twenty-first century the Sino-US relationship will be one of the most important, and one of the most mutually beneficial, bilateral relationships in the world."  Things do appear to have worked out differently but there is a school of thought that the leadership of Xi Jinping (b 1953; general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and paramount leader of the People's Republic of China (PRC) since 2013) is an aberration and that his replacement is likely to be one who pursues a more cooperative foreign and economic policy because that is more likely to be in China's long-term (ie a century ahead) interest.      

Rare too is the more recent diplomatic creation, the pentalateral (five-power) treaty of which there appear to have been but two.  One was signed on 23 December 1950 between the United States, France, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam.  It didn’t end well.  The other pentalateral treaty was sealed in Tehran during October 2007 between Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkmenistan, the littoral countries of the Caspian Sea and was a mechanism to avoid squabbles while carving up resources.  Some assemblies are better described in other ways.  When the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (China, France, Russia, the UK & the US) plus Germany formed a now defunct standing committee to deal with issues raised by Iran’s nuclear programme, although a sextilateral, it was instead dubbed P5+1 although in Brussels, the eurocrats preferred E3+3.

Six men briefing the media about their sextilateral.  The chief negotiators of the six-party talks on North Korea’s nuclear program, Daioyutai State Guesthouse, Beijing, 23 December 2006.

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

Pink

Pink (pronounced pingk)

(1) A definition of perceived color varying between a light crimson to a pale reddish purple (sometimes described as fuchsia); any of a group of colors with a reddish hue that are of low to moderate saturation and can usually reflect or transmit a large amount of light; a pale reddish tint.

(2) Any of various Old World plants of the caryophyllaceous genus Dianthus, such as D. plumarius (garden pink), cultivated for their fragrant flowers including the clove pink or carnation (sometimes referred to as the pink family); the flower of such a plant; any of various plants of other genera, such as the moss pink.

(3) The highest or best form, degree, or example of something (expressed usually as “in the pink” or “the pink of”).

(4) As the disparaging slang pinko, either (1) a communist or one so suspected (US) or (2) a socialist (UK and English-speaking Commonwealth) (both dated).

(5) In informal use, a document provided in commerce or by government for some purpose which was historically issued on pink tissue paper (usually a carbon copy), the term still in some cases enduring for the modern digital analogue.

(6) In fox hunting as “the pinks”, a coat worn by riders (although actually in a shade of scarlet).

(7) In military tailoring, the pinkish-tan gabardine trousers once worn in some regiments as part of an officer’s dress uniform.

(8) In the stone trade, the general term for marble of this color.

(9) In informal use, of or relating to gay people or gay sexual orientation and used sometimes as a modifier in this context (the pink vote, the pink dollar etc, the pink economy et al) (dated).  The pink triangle was a literal description of the fabric patch worn on the uniforms of homosexual inmates in Nazi concentration camps.

(10) In labour market demography, as pink collar, that part of the workforce or those job categories predominately female.

(11) In commerce, as a modifier, such products as may be discerned as being of this color (champagne, gin, salmon, diamonds et al).

(12) To pierce with a rapier or the like; to stab (based on the idea of a pinkish stain appearing on the clothing of one so stabbed); figuratively, to wound by irony, criticism, or ridicule.

(13) In tailoring, to finish fabric at the edge with a scalloped, notched, or other pattern, as to prevent fraying or for ornament.

(14) To punch cloth, leather etc with small holes or figures for purposes of ornament; to adorn or ornament, especially with scalloped edges or a punched-out pattern (mostly UK use).

(15) As pink disease (infantile acrodynia), a condition associated with chronic exposure to mercury.

(16) In nautical use, a sailing vessel with a narrow overhanging transom (historically a vessel with a pink stern).

(17) As pinky or pinkie, the fifth digit (little finger).

(18) In gardening, to cut with pinking shears.

(19) In US slang, an operative of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency (archaic).

(20) In the slang of fishing, various fish according region including the common minnow and immature Atlantic salmon, the origin of all probably the Middle Dutch pincke.

(21) In snooker, one of the color balls (colored pink), with a value of 6 points and in use since the nineteenth century.

(22) In vulgar slang, sometimes as “pink bits”, the vagina or vulva.

(23) In slang, an unlettered and uncultured, but relatively prosperous, member of the middle classes (similar to the Australian CUB (cashed-up bogan)) (UK archaic).

(24) In informal use, having conjunctivitis (ie pinkeye).

(25) To turn a topaz or other gemstone pink by the application of heat.

(26) In (spark ignition) internal combustion engines (especially in motor cars), to emit a high "pinking" noise, usually as a result of ill-set ignition timing for the fuel used.

(27) Of a musical instrument, to emit a very high-pitched, short note.

(28) In color definition, any of various lake pigments or dyes in yellow, yellowish green, or brown shades made with plant coloring and a metallic oxide base (obsolete).

(29) As pinkwashing (al la greenwashing and the figurative use of whitewashing), a fake or superficial attempt to address issues of gay rights (though often applied to LGBTQQIAAOP issues in general).

Circa 1200:  The source of pink was the Old English pungde (to pierce, puncture, stab with a pointed weapon) which by the early fourteenth century had acquired the sense of "make holes in; spur a horse" the source uncertain but perhaps from a nasalized form of the Romanic stem that also yielded French piquer (to prick, pierce) and the Spanish picar or else from the Old English pyngan (to prick) and directly from its source, the Latin pungere (to prick, pierce), from a suffixed form of primitive Indo-European root peug or peuk- (to prick).  By circa 1500, it had come to mean "to decorate (a garment, leather) by making small holes in a regular pattern at the edge or elsewhere" and that sense endures to this day in pinking shears (although they were not so-named until 1934).  The English pinge, pingen, pinken, pung & pungen (to push (a door)), batter, shove; prick, stab, pierce; punch holes in) was from the Old English pyngan (to prick) and dates from 1275–1325 and may be from (1) the Latin pungere (to prick, pierce), (2) the Low German pinken (hit; to peck) & Pinke (big needle) or (3) the Dutch pingelen (to do fine needlework), the root again the primitive Indo-European peug (to prick). 

The words "pinkie" & “pinky” was from the Dutch pinkje, diminutive of pink (little finger), of uncertain origin, the earliest known used in Scotland in 1808 and is common in Scottish English, US English and elsewhere in the English-speaking world.  The nautical use dates from circa 1450, from the late Middle English pynck & pyncke, from the Middle Dutch pinke (fishing boat).  The flows were so named in the sixteenth century and surprisingly, the use to describe the color didn’t emerge until the eighteenth century, perhaps a shortening of pinkeye. 

The flower family was so named in the 1570s, the common name of Dianthus, a garden plant actually of various colors.  The family picked up the name “pink” probably because of the idea of the "perforated" (scalloped) petals (ie “pinked” in the earlier sense) although etymologists did suggest there might be a link to the Dutch pink (small, narrow (in the sense of pinkie)), via the term pinck oogen (half-closed eyes (literally "small eyes), borrowed in the 1570s, the speculative link being that the Dianthus sometimes has small dots resembling eyes.  The coincidence in the dates is interesting but there’s no documentary evidence.  It was the example of the flower which, by the 1590s, led to the figurative use for "the flower" or highest type or example of excellence of anything. 

Actor Florence Pugh (b 1996) in hot pink Valentino Tulle gown with Valentino Tan-Go pink patent platform pumps, July 2022.

The noun meaning "pale red color, red color of low chroma but high luminosity" was first noted in 1733 (although pink-colored dates from the 1680s), developed from one of the most common and fancied of the flowers and pink had come into use as an adjective by 1720.  As a physical phenomenon, the color pink obviously pre-dated the word pink as a descriptor and the earlier name for such a color in English was the mid-fourteenth century incarnation (flesh-color) and as an adjective (from the 1530s) incarnate, from the Latin words for "flesh".  These however had other associations and tended to drift in sense from “flesh-color” & “blush-color” toward “crimson” & “blood color”; it is thus a discipline to “translate” even early Modern English.

Lindsay Lohan in pink pantsuit with Valentino’s Rockstud pumps, New York, October 2019.

The noun pink-eye (and pinkeye) (contagious eye infection) was an invention of US English from 1882 although, dating from the 1570s, it one meant "a small eye".  The adjectival pink-collar (jobs generally held by women or those considered characteristically feminine (1977) or the female workforce generally (1979) was a back-formation based on the earlier blue-collar, white-collar etc.  Pinky as an adjective (pinkish, somewhat pink) dates from 1790, building on the earlier pinkish (somewhat pink), noted since 1784.  The derogatory adjectival slang pinko (soon also a noun in this context) was used of those with social or political views "tending towards “red” (ie sympathetic to communism, the Soviet Union (USSR) etc) since 1927 although as a metaphor that had existed at least since 1837.  It was in the context of the time a euphemistic slur; a way of calling someone a communist (or at least a fellow traveler) without actually saying so.  In Australia, former Victorian Premier Sir Henry Bolte (1908-1990; premier of Victoria 1955-1972) would often refer to the  local broadsheet “The Age” as “that awful pinko rag” although he wasn’t unique in his critique, the paper’s one-time headquarters known by many as the “Spencer Street Soviet”.

On any Wednesday.

In idiomatic use, to be "in the pink" is to be healthy, physically fit, or in high spirits; to be "tickled pink" dates from 1909 and is to be very happy with something.  The "pink slip" (apparently originally a "discharge from employment notice" and historically issued on pink tissue paper (usually as a carbon copy)),  is attested by 1915 and pink slips had various connotations in employment early in the twentieth century, including a paper signed by a worker attesting he would leave the labour union or else be fired.  The term pink slip came to refer to a wide variety of documents (in the US it was often the title to a car) provided in commerce or by government for some purpose (although not all literally were pink) the term still in some cases enduring for the modern digital analogue.  To “see pink elephants”, a euphemism for those suffering alcohol-induced hallucinations, dates from 1913 when it appeared in Jack London's (1876-1916) autobiographical novel, John Barleycorn although such things are not always apparitions.  While in London, famous Australian concierge Elvis Soiza (once a leading figure in the Secret Society of the Les Clefs d’Or) managed, at remarkably short notice, to procure a pink (painted) elephant to be led through the streets of Chelsea to delight one of the wives of a visiting dignitary from the Middle East.  It’s apparently not since been done.

Some languages such as Chuukese and German use pink but other descendants include the Afrikaans pienk, the Finnish pinkki, the Irish pinc, the Japanese pinku (ピンク), the Korean pingkeu (핑크), the Marshallese piin̄, the Samoan piniki, the Scottish Gaelic pinc, the Southern Ndebele –pinki, the Swahili -a pinki, the Tokelauan piniki, the Tok Pisin pinkpela, the Welsh pinc and the Xhosa –pinki.  Pink is a noun, verb & adjective, pinker, pinkest, pinkish and pinky are adjectives and pinkness is a noun.

The Playmate-Pink Cars, 1964-1975 

Hugh Hefner in his 1955 Cadillac Series 62 convertible.  1955 was Cadillac’s year of “peak dagmar” and amateur psychoanalysts should make of Mr Hefner’s taste in automobiles what they will.

The Playboy Motor Car Corporation was established in New York in 1947 by a pre-war car dealer who believed there would be much demand for a smaller, less expensive car than those in the ranges offered by the established manufacturers, almost all of which essentially differed little from the models which abruptly had ceased production in 1942.  In some ways it was a modern concept, in-house manufacturing minimized in favor of outsourcing and, wherever possible, the use of standard, off-the-shelf parts.  Conceived as a small convertible with three-abreast seating, it offered the novelty of a multi-part, retractable hard-top, something not new but which would not be offered by a volume manufacturer for almost a decade (before being mostly abandoned for forty years).  Like many thousands (literally) of optimistic souls who have for more than a century succumbed to the temptation of entering the car business, the hopes of Playboy’s founders were high but many factors conspired against the project, not the least of which was the car’s tiny size and under-powered engine; it offered economy in an age when austerity was becoming unfashionable and not even a hundred were built before the company entered bankruptcy in 1951.

1949 Playboy Convertible.

With that, the Playboy name might have passed forgotten into the annals of the New York Bankruptcy Court.  However, not long after the company’s demise, Hugh Hefner (1926–2017; founder and long-time editor-in-chief of Playboy magazine) received a “cease and desist” letter from counsel for Stag magazine (a men’s adventure title), advising a trademark protection suit would be filed were he to proceed with the release of the magazine he intended to launch with the title Stag Party.  A new name was thus required and after pondering Pan, Sir, Top Hat, Gentleman, Satyr & Bachelor, Hefner’s friend (and Stag Party’s co-founder), Eldon Sellers (1921-2016) (apparently prompted by his mother who had worked for the failed car company) suggested it was the ideal name.  Hefner agreed although whether that had anything to do with the clever mechanism with which the little car could be made topless has never been discussed.  With Marilyn Monroe (1926-1962) on the cover, Hefner in 1953 issued the first edition of Playboy magazine and the rest is history.  One footnote in Playboy’s history is that between 1964-1975, the car gifted to the playmate of the year (PotY) was usually pink.  After that, the gifts were still given but no longer in pink:

1964: Donna Michelle Ronne, Ford Mustang convertible.

The Mustang was the industry’s big hit for 1964, setting sales records which even now are impressive.  It was also highly profitable, most mechanical parts borrowed from existing Ford lines and the very platform on which it was built was that of the humble Falcon, introduced a few years earlier as a compact (in US terms), economy model.  Only the body was truly new but it was “the body from central casting” and while it didn't (quite) invent the “pony car” segment, it certainly defined it, its lines creating the motif which would be imitated by many and, sixty-odd years on, the current Mustang, Dodge Challenger and Chevrolet Camaro are all variations of the 1964 original.  That original had wide appeal, able to be configured with relatively small six-cylinder engines or larger V8s, soon to include even highly-strung solid-lifter versions, a sign of things to come.

The 1964 PotY’s car was finished in a special-order color which anyone could order but it quickly became known to the public as “Playmate Pink” or “Playboy Pink” although it was only later Ford added the latter to the option list as code #WT9301.  That would be one of four shades of pink the corporation would offer between 1964-1972 including Dusk Rose (code #M0835 and offered originally on the 1957 Thunderbird), Passionate Pink (code #WT9036 which was part of a Valentine’s Day promotion in February 1968) & Hot Pink (code #WT9036).  Interestingly, regarded as niche shades, most of the hues of pink rarely appeared on the mass-distribution brochures and could be viewed only on DSO (Dealer Special Order) charts.  Social change, workforce participation and the contraceptive pill combined in the 1960s to let women emerge as influential or even autonomous economic units and Ford was as anxious as any of the cogs of capitalism to attract what was coming to be described as the "pink dollar".  The tie-in with Playboy wasn’t the only time a pink Mustang was a promotional prop, the Tussy Lip Stick Company offering three 1967 Mustangs as prizes for contest winners, each finished in a shade of pink which matched the lip sticks Racy Pink, Shimmery Racy Pink Frosted & Defroster.  Defroster sounds particularly ominous but to set minds at rest, Tussy helpfully decoded the pink portfolio thus:

Racy Pink: "A pale pink".

Racy Pink Frosted: "Shimmers with pearl". 

Defroster: "Pours on melting beige lights when you wear it alone, or as a convertible top to another lip color".

The fate of the cars is unknown but nerds might note the three prizes were 1967 models while the model (as in the Mustang) in the advertisement is from 1966.  That's because the advertising copy had to be made available before the embargo had been lifted on photographs of the 1967 range.  The men on Madison Avenue presumably dismissed the suggestion of what might now be thought "deceptive and misleading" content with the familiar "she'll never know".

1965: Jo Collins, Sunbeam Tiger.

Although from a different manufacturer, the 1965 PotY’s car actually had the same engine as her predecessor’s gift.  Introduced in 1961 with a capacity of 221 cubic inches (3.6 litres), Ford’s small-block V8 (known as the Windsor after the location of the foundry at which it was first built), it pioneered the use of “thin-wall” casting techniques and, on sale between 1961-2002, would be enlarged first to 260 cubic inches (4.2 litres), then 289 (4.7), 302 (4.9) and 351 (5.8) and installed in everything from pick-ups to the GT40 (#1075) which won the Le Mans 24 hour classic in 1968 & 1969.  AC used a 221 as a proof of concept exercise in what, with the 260, would be released as the first Shelby Cobras, the most numerous of which used the 289.

In England, Sunbeam had been attracted by the Windsor’s light weight and compactness, finding, with a little modification and some help from Carroll Shelby, it could (just) fit in the bay of their little Alpine sports car, until then never powered by anything larger than a 1.7 litre (105 cubic inch) four.  Fit it did although one modification was the inclusion of a hatch in the passenger’s footwell to permit a hand to reach one otherwise inaccessible spark plug, an indication of how tight was that fit.  However, the project proved successful and the Tiger sold well although Sunbeam never offered the high-powered versions of the Windsor Shelby used in the Cobras, the platform really at its limit using the more modestly tuned units.  The US was a receptive market for the little hot rod and one featured in the Get Smart TV series, although it’s said that for technical reasons, a re-badged Alpine was actually used, the same swap effected for the 2008 film adaptation, a V8 exhaust burble dubbed where appropriate, a not unusual trick in film-making.  In 1967, after taking control of Sunbeam, Chrysler had intended to continue production of the Tiger, by then powered by the 289 but with Chrysler’s 273 cubic inch (4.4 litre) LA V8 substituted.  Unfortunately, while 4.7 Ford litres filled it to the brim, 4.4 Chrysler litres overflowed; the Windsor truly was compact.  Allowing it to remain in production until the stock of already purchased Ford engines had been exhausted, Chrysler instead changed the advertising from emphasizing the “…mighty Ford V8 power plant” to the vaguely ambiguous “…an American V-8 power train”.

It’s not clear if the 1965 PotY received her Tiger as a gift or a twelve-month loan but either way she enjoyed a rarity.  The Tiger was produced for only three years, during which just over 7000 were made, most with the 260, but the PotY’s Mark II model was one of 663 fitted with the 289.  Now painted red, the car still exists.

1966: Allison Parks, Dodge Charger.

Experience on the NASCAR ovals had demonstrated how much more aerodynamically efficient were steeply sloped rear windows compared with the more upright “notch backs” that designers had preferred for the additional headroom their packaging efficiency created.  So buoyant was the state of the US industry at the time, the solution was to offer both and the most slippery form of all was the fastback, a roofline which extended in one curve from the top of the windscreen all the way to the tail.  As a generation of Italian thoroughbreds had shown, the fastback could be a dramatic and aesthetic success on smaller machines but on the big Americans, it was a challenge and one never really solved on the full-sized cars although by the late 1960s, a formula had been found for the intermediates.

In 1966, the formula was still being mixed and while the Dodge Charger’s wind-cheating tail delivered the extra speed on the ovals, the slab-sidedness attracted some criticism and, after an initial spurt, sales were never impressive and it wouldn’t be until the revised version was released to acclaim in 1968 that the promise was realized.  In fairness, the 1966 Charger, while not as svelte as its successor, was a better interpretation of the big fastback than some others, notably the truly ghastly Rambler (later AMC) Marlin.  Mechanically, the Charger was tempting, the top engine (though not the biggest, a tamer 440 cubic inch (7.2 litre) V8 also available) option the newly released 426 cubic inch (7.0 litre) Street Hemi which was a very expensive, slightly detuned race engine and the dashboard featured Chrysler’s intriguing electroluminescent instruments which, rather than being lit with bulbs, deployed a phenomenon in which a material emits light in response to an electric field; the ethereal glow much admired.

Apparently the 1966 PotY wanted something roomy and practical with which to take her family to swimming practice so the spacious Charger was a good choice and the rear-seats, although separated by a full-length console, could be folded flat, creating a surprisingly capacious compartment.  Wisely, the Playboy organization didn’t give her a Hemi Charger, the dual quad monster inclined to be noisy, thirsty and even a little cantankerous, the pink car fitted with a 383 cubic inch (6.3 litre) V8, the engine nominated by Chrysler’s engineers at the time as the best all-round compromise, the two-barrel version their usual recommendation, a four-barrel for those prepared to sacrifice economy for performance.  The fate of the car is unknown.

1967: Lisa Baker, Plymouth Barracuda fastback.

However ungainly the fastback may have appeared on the Charger, it worked well on the smaller Barracuda although there are students of such things who maintain the almost Italianesque lines of the notchback version are better and there was a convertible too, matching the coachwork by then offered on the Mustang.  What all agreed however was the second series Barracuda, released in 1967, was a vast improvement on its frumpy predecessor, now noted mostly for the curiosity of its huge, wrap-around rear-window.  Things could have been different because the original Barracuda, using the same concept as the Mustang (a sport body draped over prosaic underpinnings) was actually released a few weeks before the sexy Ford and was in some ways a superior car but it had nothing like the appeal, being so obviously based on an economy car whereas the Mustang better hid its humble origins.

The second series Barracuda looked much more attractive although, being less changed underneath, didn’t fully emulate the “long hood, short deck” motif with which the Mustang had created the pony car template.  Still, it’s reception in the marketplace encouraged Chrysler and soon, to match the now widened Mustang, big block engines began to appear.  The Barracuda was not actually widened but this was the 1960s and though Chrysler couldn’t easily install a big-block, they could with difficulty and so they did although the 383 was a tight fit and some compromises were required, the exhaust system a little restrictive and niceties like power steering weren’t offered; with the big lump sitting over the front wheels, at low speed they did demand strength to manhandle.  Almost 2000 were built with the 383 V8 but there were some who wanted more and in 1969, in a package now called ‘Cuda, a few were fitted with the 440.  At first glance it looked a bargain, the big engine not all that expensive but having ticked the box, the buyer then found added a number of "mandatory options" so the total package did add a hefty premium to the basic cost.  The bulk of the 440 was such that the plumbing needed for disc brakes wouldn’t fit so the monster had to be stopped with the antiquated drum-type and again there was no space for power steering.  The prototype built with a manual gearbox frequently snapped so many rear suspension components the engineers were forced to insist on an automatic transmission, the fluid cushion softening the impact between torque and tarmac but, in a straight line, the things were quick enough to entice almost 350 buyers.  To this day the 440 remains the second biggest displacement engine Detroit put in a pony car, only the 455 (7.5 litre) Pontiac used in the Firebird and Trans-Am was larger.

The 1969 440s weren’t exactly anti-climatic but true megalomaniacs had in 1968 been more impressed when Plymouth again took the metaphorical shoehorn and installed the 426 Street Hemi, 50 of which were built (though one normally reliable source claims 70) and with fibreglass panels & much acid-dipping to reduce weight, there was no pretense the things were intended for anywhere except a drag strip, living out sometimes brief lives in quarter mile (402m) chunks.  The power-to-weight ratio of the 1968 Hemi ‘Cudas was the highest of the era but lurking behind the Sturm und Drang stirred by the big blocks was one of the best combinations of the era: The 'Cudas fitted with Chrysler's 340 cubic inch (5.6 litre) (LA) small block V8 were superior machines except in straight line speed and the visceral reaction only a Hemi can inspire.

The Hemi Cuda reached its apotheosis in 1970 when, on a unique widened (E-body) platform, it and the companion Dodge Challenger were finally fully competitive pony cars.  Unfortunately, just as the 1967 Barracuda would likely have been a bigger success if released in 1964, so the 1970 car was three years too late, debuting in a declining market segment.  In 1970, an encouraging 650 odd Hemi ‘Cudas were sold but the next year, under pressure from the soaring costs of insuring the things, sales collapsed, barely reaching three figures.  The smaller engined versions fared better but the emission & safety regulations added to the negative market forces and the first oil shock in 1973 was a death knell, both the Barracuda and Challenger cancelled in 1974, the four-year E-body programme booking a significant financial loss.  In the agonizing reappraisal undertaken in the aftermath of what was labeled "a debacle", careers were said to have suffered.  It was as an extinct species the later ‘Cudas achieved their greatest success... as used cars.  In 2014, one of the twelve 1971 Hemi ‘Cuda convertibles sold at auction for US$3.5 million and in 2021, another attracted a bit of US$4.8 million without reaching the reserve.  If it survives, the 1967 PotY’s pink Barracuda wouldn’t benefit from quite that appreciation but it would have some appeal and there were reputedly another ten pink cars built for the occasion, all from the one California plant, the paint code #999, which, coincidently, is shared with Dior’s cor Rouge 999 lip stick and nail enamel.  Red rather than pink, the 999 reference was  borrowed from the gold industry, a purity of 99.9-something percent as pure as gold gets.  Known also as "24 karat" or "pure gold", because of the softness, it's not suitable for all decorative or industrial uses but is a required standard for investment purposes such as bars, bullion or coins.  The 999 standard permits an alloying with 0.1% impurities or other metals (usually silver, copper or lead) and some metals exchanges even specify the proportion of the other metals which may be included in the 0.1%.

1968: Angela Dorian, AMC AMX.

Before Tesla, American Motors Corporation (AMC) was the last of the "independents" and agglomerations which tried to compete with Detroit’s big three, General Motors (GM), Ford & Chrysler.  In the post-war years this was mostly a struggle and AMC’s brightest years had come in the late 1950s when, then run by George Romney (1907–1995 and father of Mitt Romney (b 1947; Republican nominee for US president 2012)), the company began to compete against small, imported cars, then a market segment in which the big three offered no domestically produced vehicles.  That however changed in the early 1960s and AMC’s halcyon days soon ended although they continued for years along the road to eventual extinction and one of their more interesting ventures was the short-lived AMX (1968-1970).

The AMX exemplified the AMC approach in that it was conjured up something new by taking an existing model and, at low cost, modifying it to be something quite different, an approach which, for better and worse, they were compelled to follow to the end.  The AMX was a short-wheelbase, two-seater version of AMC’s Javelin pony car which, introduced in 1967 to contest the then booming segment, had been well-reviewed by the press and, despite the latter-day perception of its lack-lustre performance in the market, sometimes out-sold the Barracuda and actually out-lived it by a few months.  However neither Javelins nor AMXs command multi-million dollar prices at auction.

AMX 36-24-35, post-restoration, 2015.

Still, the AMX was an interesting, even a brave (in the sense Sir Humphrey Appleby might have used the word) innovation, a two-seat coupé added to a market in which there was no similar model, Chevrolet’s Corvette a true sports car, the last attempt at such a thing the two-seat Ford Thunderbird (1955-1957) which had been retired and replaced by a vastly more successful four-seat version.  That was not encouraging but AMC persisted, able to leverage its resources and produce lines at lower cost than the big three could manage.  The AMX, like the Javelin was a piece of typically solid AMC engineering, enjoyed some success in competition and quixotically, two dozen were assembled in Australia in right-hand-drive configuration, sold under the old Rambler name which had so well served George Romney, the marque lingering on there for a few more years.  However, the costs involved in maintaining the shorter AMX platform were too great and when a revised Javelin was released in 1971, AMX became just an option package.  The Javelin too would be axed in 1974 but AMC continued to use the AMX name (which had actually started life in 1966 for concept cars on the show circuit) until 1980.

By 1968, the deeply religious George Romney was long gone from AMC, having moved into Republican politics; like his time in the car business, his second career had its ups and downs and (like his son and many others) he never realized his goal of reaching the White House.  Had he still been in the chair, it may be that never would he have countenanced the idea of AMC getting mixed up with Playboy magazine and, even if persuaded, probably would have drawn the line at the PotY’s vital statistics blatantly being celebrated.  As it was, with no Mormon veto, the AMX, one of several said to have been painted “Playmate Pink” was delivered to Ms Dorian with a plaque on the dashboard engraved AMX 36–24–35.

Ms Dorian too had her ups and downs, eventually parting with AMX 36-24-35 after forty-two years but keeping the Walther (9mm) PPK handgun which had been a gift from a friend, the film-maker Roman Polanski (b 1933), the two having met when Dorian appeared as a recovering heroin addict in Polanski's Rosemary's Baby (1968).  She was also a friend of the director's then wife Sharon Tate (1943-1969) and in August 1969, after followers of cult leader Charles Manson (1934-2017) murdered the eight months pregnant Tate (and four others), Polanski gave his personal Walther PPK to Dorian for self-protection and it was with this that in 2010, after an argument, a 66 year-old Angela Dorian shot her husband of two decades.  He survived the shooting and was quoted by the press lamenting "I loved her for nearly 25 years. A divorce would have been sufficient, not a bullet....", which, in the circumstances, does seem generous.  Charged with attempted murder (later reduced to attempted voluntary manslaughter to which she pleaded no contest), she received a nine year sentence and was released on parole in April 2018.  AMX 36-24-35 also had its ups and downs, repainted (like many of the playmate cars) in something less eye-catching before being found in a dilapidated state.  It’s since been restored to its original pink splendor.

1969: Connie Kreski, Shelby Mustang GT500 with the ultimate hood ornament.

In their run of half a decade, Carroll Shelby’s Mustangs were transformed from race cars which, conveniently, could be road-registered and driven to the track, into elaborately embellished, luxuriously equipped cars usually just a little more powerful than those upon which they were based yet managing still to look faster still.  In 1965, Shelby was aware of the Mustang’s potential in competition and looking for a profitable line to sell, the new seven litre (427 & 428 cubic inch) Cobra giving every indication it would become the loss-making venture it proved.

Shelby created the first of his Mustangs in 1965, using basic, fastback cars sent by Ford to his factory in Venice Beach, the facilities later moved to West Imperial Highway adjacent to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) when more space was required.  All the cars built in 1965-1966 used the familiar Windsor 289 in essentially the same sate of tune as the Cobras and the drive-train was beefed-up to handle both the additional output and the lateral forces encountered in the extremes of competition.  The Cobra DNA in the early Shelby Mustangs was thus no affectation and the “Cobra” name was often applied to the cars, both in marketing materials and on parts prominently displayed.  The cars however were as much about what was left out as what was put in.  Shelby had been a race driver (winning the 1958 Le Mans 24 Hour) and understood the significance of lightness which improved performance, tyre wear & fuel consumption and reduced the stresses to which mechanical components were subject so, reflecting his philosophy that a sports car was one “with noting on not there for the purpose of making it go faster”, the Shelby Mustangs were stripped of whatever wasn’t essential, including carpets and sound deadening.  That helped the performance on the track but did make driving a noisy, uncomfortable experience.  At the time, the 1965 Shelby Mustang GT350 was memorably described as “a brand new, clapped-out racing car”.  Sometimes the weight-saving was necessitated by the letter of the law, the rear seat removed so the things could be defined as “two seat sports cars” and thus be eligible for competitions run by the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA), a modification which proved handy because it allowed the spare tyre to be kept where once the seat sat, improving weight distribution.  It was definitely not for everyone but 562 were sold, 34 of which were the specially prepared GT350Rs which for three years won its SCCA championship class.

The retreat from rawness began in 1966, the need to homologate for competition having been satisfied.  An automatic transmission became optional and the cars, now labelled as Shelby GT350s, were no longer fitted with some of the suspension, exhaust and other modifications which had distinguished the 1965 run although the rarely-ordered option of a Paxton supercharger was added to a growing list.  Famously too, in that year some 1000 GT350Hs were built on order from the Hertz Rental Car Company and there are stories, some of which may be true, of them being rented on Saturday, raced on Sunday and returned on Monday.  These days, the deal with Hertz would be called a “related party transaction", Ford (a big holder of Hertz stock) having prevailed on their management to place the order.

1967 Shelby GT500 (427, "Super Snake").

In 1967, the trend towards civility continued, a convertible added to the range (although technical problems prevented production) and all were now full-fledged road cars, Shelby’s interest now entirely in cheque-books rather than chequered flags.  Ford had given the 1967 Mustangs a wider platform so the 390 cubic inch (6.4 litre) big-block (FE) V8 could be fitted and this enabled Shelby to introduce the GT500 which used a 428 cubic inch (FE) (7.0 litre) V8, until then something used effortlessly and quietly to propel luxury sedans and coupés.  Shelby add a brace of four barrel carburetors and tuned his 428s a little but the quest had shifted from raw performance to making slightly faster versions of Mustangs which looked faster still and could attract a higher price (later replaced by Ford's factory supplied 428 CobraJet which, with a single four-barrel carburetor was more powerful).  However, in a glimpse of what might have been (and was not quite realized even when the Boss 429 Mustang later appeared), Shelby did build one GT500 with a 427 FE.  With fractionally less displacement than the 428, the 427 was a genuine racing engine, more oversquare in configuration with enhanced lubrication and a strengthened bottom end; it twice won at Le Mans and had been intended as an option for the 1968 Mustangs before the accountants worked out quite how expensive that would prove.  Dubbed the "Super Snake", Shelby’s 427 GT500 was used to test tyres in high-speed use and remained a one-off, selling at auction in 2013 for US$1.3 million.

In 1968 the convertible was added as an option and from then on, the Shelby GT350s and GT500s became less interesting and more successful, the engines growing larger but less powerful, Shelby’s decisions vindicated by rising sales and healthy profits.  However, Ford was less content and, the arrangement having served its purpose, the corporation gradually assumed control, the 1969 models the end of the line although a few cars built that year were re-listed as 1970 models and sold in the first few months of that year.  The PotY GT500 (Shelby serial #1027 & Ford vehicle identification number 9F02R481027) was regular production item with a 428 cubic inch (7.0 litre) Cobra Jet V8, an automatic transmission and no air-conditioning.  Not accounted for in the Shelby registry, its fate is unknown though one quirk of note is that it left the Shelby line finished in Pastel Grey (code M3303A) and was re-painted prior to delivery.


1970: Claudia Jennings, Mercury Capri.

From a Shelby GT500 to a Mercury Capri isn’t quite the sublime to the ridiculous but it’s quite a change.  That said, the Capri, a product of Ford’s European operation and built in both England and Germany, was always regarded as “Europe’s Mustang” and borrowed the same successful and lucrative model of construction: bolt a sexy shell onto a best-selling platform.  So, atop the uninspiring but reliable and cheap to produce underpinnings of the Cortina (UK) and Taunus (Germany), a two-door fastback coupé appeared in 1968 and, over three generations, remained in production until 1986.  In the US, it enjoyed some success and was at one point the highest-selling import.

In Europe, it was available initially with an engine as small as 1.3 litres (79 cubic inches) but the bigger sellers were 1.6 (98 cubic inch) & 2.0 litre (122 cubic inch) fours (some of which, unusually, were V4s) and the V6s of 2.3 (140 cubic inch), 2.6 (159 cubic inch), 2.8 (170 cubic inch) & 3.0 litres (183 cubic inches).  Additionally, a few 3.1 liter (189 cubic inch) V6s were built for homologation and even some 3.4 litre (207 cubic inch) engines appeared purely for use in competition.  Ms Jennings was just in the right place at the wrong time.  In 1970, the only engine Ford offered in the Capri (imported from Germany and always sold in the US as a Mercury) was the 2.0 litre in-line four shared with the the Pinto which would be introduced that year.  At least she didn’t get one of them (although in the early years the Pinto didn’t carry the stigma which would be attached by later events).

Ford Capri RS and BMW 3.0CSL, Spa Francorchamps Belgium, 1974.

The so-called Cologne Capris were among the most famous to compete in European touring car racing during the 1970s and to counter the threat BMW produce their famous 3.0CSL, the be-winged, lightweight version of their E9 coupé, the battles between the two the stuff of legend.  For many seasons sharing space on European circuits, the more unfortunate link between the two was a vulnerability to rust, E9s and Capris prone to rot at a rate bettered only south of the Dolomites, Fiats, Lancias & Alfa-Romeos of the era crumbling more quickly still.  On the road, even with the bigger or the later turbocharged V6s, the Capri was always competent rather than dominant and the only ones to make a serious attempt to make genuine high-performance version were the South Africans, around 500 built there with the 302 Windsor.  Rapid on the road, it was also successful in competition.  Again, the fate of the pink car is unknown but given the propensity to rust, hopes are not high.

1972: Sharon Clark, Spectra 20 Ski Boat.

That Ms Clark received a boat (and one more red than pink) rather than a car attracted comment.  Many concluded she just liked boats or perhaps skiing and that seems to be the case because Playboy's archives record that she met the boat’s designers after recognizing them as the fathers of two of her high-school friends, the donation of a Spectra 20 Ski Boat as her prize happening some months later so there’s presumably some relationship between events.  It proved synergistic, the publicity said to have improved sales to the extent that Spectra offered her a weekend job taking prospective customers on test rides at Long Beach.  Later she would work full-time for Spectra.

1972: Liv Lindeland, De Tomaso Pantera.

The De Tomaso Mangusta (1967-1971) was achingly lovely but adapting a race car for the road necessitates compromises and the Mangusta had a few.  The 32/68% front/rear weight distribution delighted racing drivers but induced characteristics likely to frighten everybody else and the interior was cramped, something tolerated in competition vehicles but not endearing to buyers looking for something with which to impress the bourgeoisie.  However, it sold well enough to encourage de Tomaso to pursue the concept and the better designed (if less beautiful) replacement, the Pantera, lasted from 1971 to 1993, over seven-thousand being sold, most fitted with US or Australian-built versions of the Ford 351 cubic inch (5.8 litre) Cleveland V8.

1969 De Tomaso Mangusta.

The Pantera was designed from the start as a road-car and was thus a far more satisfactory experience for most drivers and the Ford Motor Company, interested in having in their showrooms a competitor for Chevrolet’s Corvette, began to import the car into the US in 1972.  Predictably, there were quality control problems (Elvis Presley famously shot his when, once too often, it refused to start) which compelled some investment from Ford and although the sales volumes never challenged those of the Corvette, in the four years it was available in the US, well over five-thousand were sold.  After being withdrawn from the US market in 1975, De Tomaso maintained production on a smaller scale, the majority sold in Europe and it enjoyed a long Indian summer, the final examples not leaving the factory until 1993 by which time the output was reduced to a trickle.

1985 De Tomaso Pantera GT5.

Disappointingly, despite on paper appearing to possess a promising specification, there was never a stellar career in competition although factory support was offered and private teams ran regular campaigns.  Conspiracy theorists have long attributed the paucity of success to the more established players like Ferrari and Porsche having undue influence on the regulatory bodies, nudging them always in directions favoring their machines.  The factory arranged small runs of Panteras which conformed to Group 3 and Group 4 racing regulations, some of which owners later converted to Group 5 specifications but consistent success proved elusive.  De Tomaso however knew his market.  Even if he couldn’t often beat the Porsches and Ferraris on the track, as the years went by the Panteras adopted increasingly wild styling and they certainly looked the part.  

The playmate-pink Pantera re-imagined, for better or worse, 2022.

Panteras have a high survival rate and the pink car still exists, though no longer is it recognizable as the playmate’s prize.  Extensively modified (as are many Panteras) and now painted a vivid (almost a Dior 999) red, the engine has been enlarged to 397 cubic inches (6.5 litres), the interior refinished and wheel-arch flares added to accommodate wider, staggered-diameter wheels.  It sold at auction in June 2022 for U$110,000, a not exceptional price for the breed and it may have been more valuable if left in the original pink livery.

1973: Marilyn Cole, Volvo 1800ES.

Still one of the more admired Volvos, the 1800ES (1972-1973) wasn’t the first shooting brake to combine utility with sportiness but it was an exquisitely executed styling exercise which breathed new life in the coupé (1961-1972) on which it was based.  The re-design was undertaken entirely in-house, the proposal by Fura (the P1800’s original designer) thought too avant garde for Volvo buyers.  They may have had a point because Volvo owners do seem impressed more by frugality of operation and longevity than anything flashy and there are several 1800s which are documented as having covered more than a million miles (1.6 million km).  The coupé gained not quite a rakish reputation but certainly one associated with a certain style by virtue of its use in a popular TV series shown in the early 1960s, a promotional opportunity made possible only because Jaguar declined to loan the production company one of its new E-Types which had debuted in the same year as the P1800.  Still, the seductive E-Type hardly needed a TV series to create its image.

Ms Cole was the first English Playmate of the Year and took her prize in England and the range has an English connection, the first 6000-odd of the coupés built at Jensen’s West Bromwich Albion factory.  Those early models (1961-1963) were called P1800 but when production moved to Sweden, the name 1800S was adopted (1963-1970), changed again in 1970 to 1800E (1970-1972) to mark the addition of fuel injection.   Like many of the pink cars, it was re-painted red but, despite being involved in an involved in an accident in 2005, it’s still registered for road use in the Netherlands although it’s not known if it’s been restored to the pink.  Another quirk in the nomenclature was it continued to be labelled (1800) even after the engine's displacement was increased to 2.0 litres.  It transpires too there are other uses for an 1800 coupé, one gifted amateur engineer, taking advantage of a similarity in dimensions and angles, using one to build his own (partial) replication of the 1967 Ferrari 275 GTB/4 NART Spyder.

1974: Cyndi Wood, Mercedes-Benz 450SL (R107).

The Mercedes-Benz R107 (1971-1989) had a unexpectedly long life, a longevity which slightly exceeded even the 600 (W100; 1963-1981) although across the Grosser’s eighteen years, the only obvious change was when the two-piece hubcap & trim-ring combination (the appearance of which suited the design) was replaced with a one-piece wheel cover (which wasn't as satisfactory) whereas during much the same duration, eight different engines and several transmissions were fitted to the R107:

280SL: 2.7 litre (168 cubic inch) straight 6 (M110)

300SL: 3.0 litre (183 cubic inch) straight 6 (M103)

350SL: 3.5 litre (215 cubic inch) V8 (M116)

380SL: 3.8 litre (231 cubic inch) V8 (M117)

420SL: 4.2 litre (256 cubic inch) V8 (M117)

450SL: 4.5 litre (274 cubic inch) V8 (M117 (iron-block))

500SL: 5.0 litre (301 cubic inch) V8 (M117)

560SL: 5.5 litre (338 cubic inch) V8 (M117)

1988 Mercedes-Benz 560SL.

Not all versions were sold in all markets, the sixes never offered in the US, the 420 sold mostly in Europe and the 560, an emission-controlled special restricted mostly to Australia, Japan and the US.  Some 500s are seen in the US and Australia but all are private or grey market imports and it remains the most powerful (and among the most toxic) engine offered in the roadster.  The labelling of the early US versions was however confusing; although called a 350SL (as it was in the rest of the world where it used the 3.5) it was fitted with the 4.5 litre V8, chosen (1) because the improved low-speed torque characteristics of the long-stroke 4.5 was better suited to US driving conditions and (2) the increased displacement partially offset the power loss caused by the early, primitive anti-emission equipment.  The US market cars were later re-badged 450SL, matching the 4.5 litre SLs in the rest of the world.  Fuel consumption of both the 3.5 & 4.5 was poor, even by the slight standards of the time, the larger 6.3 litre (386 cubic inch) and 6.8 litre (417 cubic inch) V8s surprisingly little more thirsty though those big-blocks were fitted to much heavier cars.  The 3.5 litre 350SLs are notable for being among the final Mercedes-Benz V8s available with a manual transmission, the last apparently sold as late as 1980.  Not exactly Lotus-like in operation, the gear-shifts can be a little clunky but, as a manual V8, those 350SLs do have a cult following among collectors.

The R107 had always been intended to be exclusively V8 powered but the 280SL entered the line in 1974 in response to the first oil shock (1973) and in many markets, a six cylinder version remained available to the end.  That the end didn’t come until 1989 is because for much of the R107’s early life, the very future of convertibles in the US was uncertain, threatened by what was thought to be impending US legislation which would ban the things.  That never transpired but much of the 1970s and 1980s were troubled times and there were other priorities so the R107 remained the only convertible offered until replaced in 1989 and a four seat drop-top didn’t return to the line until 1992.

SL actually stands for “super light” which was sort of true when first it was used in 1952 but by 1971 was misleading at least, the R107 no lightweight and a grand tourer rather than a sports car.  For years, the factory never much discussed what the abbreviation "SL" stood for and the assumption had long been it meant Sports Light (Sports Leicht), based presumably on the SSKL of 1929-1931 (Super Sports Kurz (short) Leicht) but the factory documentation for decades used both Sports Leicht and Super Leicht.  It was only in 2017 it published a 1952 paper discovered in the corporate archive confirming the correct abbreviation is Super Leicht. However defined, the R107 is heavy, the removable hard-top famously so and although that roof was fashioned in the "pagoda" shape, a la its (W113) predecessor, it was only the earlier model which picked up the nickname.

A whiff of scandal attaches to the “pink” 450SL: It was white.  Whether Mercedes-Benz couldn’t or wouldn’t supply a pink car isn’t known and in photographs, Ms Wood seems unconcerned.  Playboy's (pre-digital) production staff were famously adept at air-brushing and other editing techniques so making a white car appear pink would not have been a challenge, even if the bodywork was a little more rectilinear than their usual fare.  Whether it survives isn’t known but anyone who fancies a pink R107 should find one to paint, a remarkable 227,000-odd produced over the years and they were for decades the preferred (one suspects almost the obligatory) transport for types such as interior decorators, Hollywood starlets, successful hairdressers and the wives of cosmetic surgeons.

1975: Marilyn Lange, Porsche 911S.

Ms Lange’s 911S proved to be the first of eight Porsches awarded to subsequent PotYs over the years.  First introduced in 1963, the 911 is the improbable survivor of Europe’s rear-engined era and by 1975, even Porsche thought it was in its final days, Volkswagen and many others having long concluded the rear-engined configuration had no place in the modern world.  Indeed, work by 1975 was well advanced on Porsche’s new generation of front-engined cars which would use water-cooled four, five & eight cylinder engines.  In time, augmenting these, would be a new line of mid-engined sports cars which would benefit from the lessons learned by Porsche in the development of machines like the 908 and, of course, the famous 917.

Alternative approach: Porsche 911 with 500 cubic inch (8.2 litre) Cadillac V8.

It was a vision of the future which made complete sense to everyone except 911 buyers who made it clear they would accept no other configuration and regarded any quirks inherent in the layout not as insoluble problems or dangerous characteristics, but charming idiosyncrasies to be cherished in a way drivers of bland, predictable machinery would never get to experience or understand if they did.  The customer being always right, their view prevailed and the 911 survived, emerging much changed but still rear-engined and still recognizable, sixty-odd years on.  Nor have those inherent problems proved insoluble, modern electronics and tyres permitting Porsche’s engineers to create 911s with driving characteristics indistinguishable from more conventional layouts unless driven by experts at speeds higher than should ever be attempted on public roads.

So the 911 survived but the playmate-pink tradition did not, subsequent cars finished in colors chosen seemingly at random.  Quite why this happened is speculative but may be as simple as pink becoming less fashionable (even within the Playboy organization where the hues in the publication and the clubs were tending darker) and there’s no record of a feminist critique, even though the tradition began just as second-wave feminism was gaining critical mass.  There is a bulky literature documenting the many strains of feminist criticism of pornography and it's likely the matter of pink cars, if noticed, was thought not substantive.  Of course it may be that feminists really like pink, the secret which must never be spoken.   

The famous pink car which never really was

1959 Cadillac Series 62 Convertible.

There are many, many pink 1959 Cadillacs, the model regarded as having the most extravagant fins available during Detroit's crazy macropterous era, the effect heightened by the equally memorable "twin bullet" tail-lamps.  No 1959 Cadillac however left the factory painted pink, a rose-colored exterior hue offered in only 1956.  It was that Elvis Presley (1935-1977) owned a pink Cadillac and the use of the phrase in popular culture (song & film) that made the trend a thing although his car was a 1955 Fleetwood Sixty Special which was originally blue with a black roof.  The roof was later re-sprayed white but people adopting the motif usually go all-pink.