Handshake (pronounced hand-sheyk)
(1) A gripping and shaking of (traditionally the right) hands by two
individuals, as to symbolize greeting, congratulation, agreement or farewell.
(2) In digital communication, as handshaking, an exchange
of predetermined signals between a computer and a peripheral device or another
computer, made when a connection is initially established or at intervals
during data transmission, in order to assure proper synchronization.
1801: The construct was hand + shake. Hand was from the Middle English hond & hand, from the Old English hand,
from the Proto-West Germanic handu,
from the Proto-Germanic handuz (and
related to the Dutch, Norwegian Nynorsk & Swedish hand, the Danish hånd, the German Hand and the West Frisian hân)
of uncertain origin although there may be a link to the Old Swedish hinna (to gain), the Gothic fra-hinþan (to take captive, capture),
the Latvian sīts (hunting spear), the
Ancient Greek κεντέω (kentéō) (prick)
and the Albanian çandër (pitchfork; prop). Shake was from the Middle English schaken, from the Old English sċeacan & sċacan (to shake), from the Proto-West Germanic skakan, from the Proto-Germanic skakaną (to shake, swing, escape), from the
primitive Indo-European skeg-, keg-, skek- & kek- (to
jump, move). It was cognate with the Scots
schake & schack (to shake), the West Frisian schaekje (to shake), the Dutch schaken
(to elope, make clean, shake), the Low German schaken (to move, shift, push, shake) & schacken (to shake, shock), the Old Norse skaka (to shake), the Norwegian Nynorsk skaka (to shake), the Swedish skaka
(to shake), the Danish skage (to
shake), the Dutch schokken (to shake,
shock) and the Russian скака́ть (skakátʹ) (to jump”). The present participle is handshaking
and the familiar past participle handshaked but some dictionaries still list
the rare handshook as an alternative; the noun plural is handshakes.
The handshake not a universal cultural practice (the
Japanese famously favor the bow although in recent decades it’s executed often
as more of a nod) but, in one form or another, it is global and involves
usually two people grasping hands and moving them in a brief, up-and-down
movement. The right hand tends to be
favored (left-handers sinister obviously) and this has been linked to the symbolism of that being the usual
choice when wielding a weapon but that is speculative and the global
preponderance of right-handedness may be of greater significance. Quite when the handshake became a cultural
practice isn’t known but it is certainly ancient, at least among those
important enough to be depicted in forms of art because the oldest
representations date back more than the-thousand years.
Some handshakes promised much; results were varied. Clockwise from top left: Mao Tse-tung & Richard Nixon (1972), Yitzhak Rabin & Yasser Arafat (1993), Mikhail Gorbachev & Ronald Reagan (1985), Donald Trump & crooked Hillary Clinton (2016), Martin McGuinness & Queen Elizabeth II (2012) and Nelson Mandela & FW de Klerk (1994).
Handshake (hand-shake) is a surprisingly modern construction, dating only from 1801 and "hand-shaking" is attested from 1805; the phrases “to shake hands” & “shaking hands” have been in use since the sixteenth century and the use of the noun “grip” to mean "a handshake" (especially one of a secret society) dates from 1785. Secret handshakes are created so members of clubs and societies may make their affiliation known to another person without needing to use words. For a secret handshake to be effective it must be specific enough to be recognized by another member yet subtle enough that a non-member would not find the nature of the grip strange or unusual. Because of the limited possibilities offered by fingers and thumbs, some secret handshakes involve also actions such as using the other hand to touch an earlobe in a certain way or a tapping a foot. The concept has been documented since Antiquity and is most famously associated with the Freemasons but to speak of the “secret Masonic handshake” is misleading, some researchers claiming there are at least sixteen distinctly identifiable Masonic handshakes and most have speculated there will be dozens more. Indeed, except in the early years, Freemasonry has never been monolithic and there are known cases of one faction (even within a lodge) developing their own so that they might discuss matter freely without the risk they may be spilling secrets to the other faction. The mechanics of the secret handshakes used by members of the Secret Society of the Les Clefs d’Or are not known.
Lindsay Lohan meets Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (b 1954; prime-minister or president of the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanı) since 2003), Ankara, 2017.
The golden handshake is a clause in executive employment
contracts that provides for a generous severance package in certain circumstances. Created originally as a relatively modest inducement
to attract staff to companies in a perilous financial position, they evolved to
the point where multi-million dollar pay-outs were common and they became controversial
because they appeared to reward failure and there were suggestions (not only by
conspiracy theorists) they were used even as Trojan horses to entice a CEO to
drive down a company’s share price (thus becoming eligible for a golden handshake)
in the interest of asset strippers and others.
The best operators were able to engineer things so they enjoyed both a
golden handshake and a golden parachute (the generous package payable upon
retirement in the normal course of things).
In computer communications, a handshake is a signal exchanged
between two or more devices or programs to confirm authentication and
connection. In the same way that the
human handshake is a process: (1) an offer of a hand, (2) the taking of that
hand and (3) the shaking of the hands, in computing, the sequence is (1) seeking
a connection, (2) verifying the connection and (3) effecting the
connection. The breaking of the
handshake and the termination of the connection in each case constitutes the
final, fourth setup. The purpose of handshaking
is to establish the parameters for the duration of the session which involves
the devices agreeing on vital stuff like (1) both being switched on, (2) both
ready to transmit & receive and (3) that certain technical protocols will
be used (familiar to many as famous strings like “9600,N,8,1”). Handshaking historically was a process separate
from the security layers which had to be satisfied once communication was established
and again, this is analogous with the handshake in the process of human
interaction.
The Duce emulates an illustrious Roman forebear.
As a cultural practice with a history known to date back at least ten thousand years, the handshake has proven a resilient tradition which has survived the vicissitudes of many millennia and even the preference of elbow-bumping and such during the COVID-19 pandemic seems only to have been a minor interruption. Not all however approved. The Duce (Benito Mussolini, 1883–1945; prime minister and Duce (leader) of Italy 1922-1943) thought handshaking effete and unhygienic (he was ready for pandemics) and preferred the fascist salute he thought (apparently on the basis of statues from Ancient Rome) more martial. Still, when meeting friends (even those forced on him by the brutishness of political necessity) he shook hands and a handshake was both his first and last interaction with the Führer (Adolf Hitler, 1889-1945; German head of government 1933-1945 and of state 1934-1945). Their smiles when shaking hands always seemed genuine and were noticeably warm when they parted after the attempt on Hitler’s life in July 1944.
One historian entitled his work on the relationship between Hitler and Mussolini The Brutal Friendship and that it was but it was certainly enduring. They shook hands on many occasions, the last of which would happen on the railway station platform close to where the attempt on the Führer's life failed. At this time, Hitler was using his left hand to shake, the right arm injured in the blast. After this, they would never meet again.
For politicians, handshakes are a wonderful photo opportunity
and some have been famously emblematic of the resolution of problems which have
been intractable for decades or more.
However, such photographs can be unpleasant and sometimes embarrassing
reminders of a past they’d prefer was forgotten. When Donald Rumsfeld (1932–2021; US secretary
of defense 1975-1977 & 2001-2006) shook hands with Saddam Hussein
(1937–2006; president of Iraq 1979-2003) in Baghdad in December 1983, it was as a presidential
envoy of Ronald Reagan (1911–2004; president of the US 1981-1989) and he was
there to do business with the dictator. Iraq
at the time had started a war with Iran and was using chemical weapons
while practicing abuses of human rights on parts of the Iraqi population and Saddam
Hussein had even made known to the US administration Baghdad’s intention to
acquire nuclear weapons. Thus was special
envoy Rumsfeld dispatched to offer Washington’s hand of friendship, anybody
opposed to the Ayatollahs held in high regards in Washington DC.
Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein, Baghdad, 1983.
Despite what Mr Rumsfeld would claim twenty years on, he made no mention of chemical weapons or human rights abuses, his discussions instead focusing on the projection of US military force in the Gulf and the need to guarantee and protect the supply of oil. Later, as international pressure increased on the US to condemn the use of chemical weapons by Iraq it responded with a low-key statement which made no mention of Iraq and actually stressed the need to protect Iraq from Iran’s “ruthless and inhumane tactics”. When Mr Rumsfeld returned to Baghdad in 1984, during the visit the United Nations (UN) issued a report which stated chemical weapons had been used against Iran, something already known to both the Pentagon and state department. In Baghdad, the matter wasn’t mentioned and when Mr Rumsfeld departed, it was with another warm handshake.
Nancy Pelosi and Bashar al-Assad, April 2007.
By virtue of her education in a Roman Catholic school, Nancy Pelosi (b 1940; speaker of the US House of Representatives 2007-2011 and since 2019, member of the house since 1987) was well acquainted with the Bible so after shaking hands with Bashar al-Assad (b 1965, President of Syria since 2000) in April 2007, to use the phrase “The road to Damascus is a road to peace” must have been a deliberate choice. It might also be thought a curious choice given that at the time the president was providing shelter and protection to a range of terrorist groups involved in attacking US forces in Iraq. As speaker of the house, Ms Pelosi would have received high-level intelligence briefings so presumably was acquainted with the facts and had she been uncertain, could have had aides prepare a summary from publicly available sources. As recent events in the Far East have illustrated, the speaker’s forays into foreign affairs are not helpful to the State Department.