Bulla (pronounced bool-uh or buhl-uh)
(1) A
seal attached to an official document; in the Holy See, a leaden seal affixed
to certain edicts issued by the papal chancellery (a papal bull), having a
representation of the saints Peter and Paul on one side and the name of the
reigning pope on the other.
(2) In archaeology,
a clay envelope or hollow ball, typically with seal impressions or writing on
its outside indicating its contents.
(3) In
Ancient Rome, type of ornament worn, especially an amulet worn around the neck (as
a pendant (or boss), usually by children of “the better classes” (mostly boys) as
a protective charm).
(4) In medicine,
a large vesicle; alternative name for blister.
(5) In
pathology, the tympanic part of a temporal bone (having a bubble-like
appearance); any of several hollow structures as features of bones.
(6) In
zoology, a blister-like or bubble-like prominence of a bone, as that of the
tympanic bone in the skull of certain mammals.
(7) In
archaeology, a clay envelope or hollow ball, typically with seal impressions or
writing on its outside indicating its contents.
(8) In
archaeology and linguistics, a clay envelope, hollow ball or token used in
ancient Mesopotamian record-keeping; the link being the rounded, bubble-like
form of the objects.
(9) A
rich Jamaican cake made with molasses and spiced with ginger and nutmeg.
(10) In
surgical use, as bullectomy (a procedure in which small portions of the lung
(known as bulla, large areas (>10 mm diameter) in the lung filled with
oxygen-depleted air) and bullostomy (the making of a hole through a bulla).
Circa 1845: From the Latin bulla (round swelling, stud, boss, knob (literally “bubble”)), either from the Latin Latin bullire (to boil), or from the Gaulish, from the primitive Indo-European bew- or beu- (a swelling) or bhel- (to blow, inflate, swell) which may have formed a large group of words meaning “much, great, many” (and also words associated with swelling, bumps, blisters and such and the source also of the Lithuanian bulė "buttocks and the Middle Dutch puyl (bag); etymologists remain divided over any link with the Latin bucca (cheek). In medieval times, it referred to the seal (or stamp) attached to official documents because of its rounded, blister-like shape, familiar from many uses. The speculative link with the Latin bullire (to boil) was an allusion to the need for heat to be applied to melt or partially melt the material (gold, lead, wax etc) used in the making of seals (once thus softened, the impression was applied). Historically, while wax seals wear the most common, official imperial seals were gold and papal seals of lead (although some were gold). The use to describe certain documents issued by the papal chancellery is an adoption of Medieval Latin. Although it was never an absolute rule (the seal with a representation of the saints Peter and Paul on one side and the name of the reigning pope on the other has appeared variously), its existence usually indicates a papal document is a bulla, a specific type of papal document distinguished by its formality, purpose, and its authentication. Bulla is a noun; the noun plural is bullas (the Latin bullae used of the papal documents).
Bulls begin with the phrase Episcopus Servus Servorum Dei (The Bishop, Servant of the Servants of God) and are written in a formal style. The significance of a document being a bull is that technically it is a decree with enduring legal & doctrinal authority including ex cathedra pronouncements or administrative acts (which can be as procedural as creating religious orders or dioceses). In this they differ from (1) encyclicals which are letters intended for broader purposes, addressed to bishops, clergy, and the faithful, often dealing with theological or social issues, (2) Apostolic Constitutions which usually deal with issues of governance, the promulgation of liturgical texts or matters pursuant to earlier bullae and (3) Motu Proprio (literally “on his own initiative”) which are edicts issued personally by the pope and these can be used for just about any purpose although they’re most associated with rulings which provide an “instant solution” to a troublesome or controversial matter on which it’s not been possible to find consensus; the Moto Proprio may thus be compared to a "royal decree". Papal bulls were more common in the medieval and early modern periods when formal seals were the primary means of authentication but today they are rare, most communication from the Vatican in the form of apostolic letters or exhortations, not all with origins in the papal chancellery.
The
last papal resignation but one
Even when absolute monarchies were more common, kings usually took care to placate at least elite opinion and today, although the constitutional arrangements in Saudi Arabia, Brunei, Oman and Eswatini (the old Swaziland) remain, on paper, absolute monarchies, even there things are not done quite as once they were. The Holy See remains an absolute monarchy and is now the only theocracy so structured although doubtlessly many popes have lamented their authority seems to exist more in the minds of canon lawyers than among the curia or his flock, something exacerbated now malcontents can no longer be burned at the stake (as far as is known) and Francis (b 1936; pope since 2013) may recall the words of a world-weary Benedict XIV (1675–1758; pope 1740-1758): “The pope commands, his cardinals do not obey, and the people do what they wish.”
Papal Bull issued by Urban VIII (1568–1644; pope 1623-1644). By the mid-fifteenth century, papal bulls had ceased to be used for general public communications and were restricted to the more formal or solemn matters. The papal lead seals (the spellings bulla & bolla both used) were attached to the vellum document by cords made of hemp or silk, looped through slits.
But popes still have great powers not subject to checks & balances or constitutional review, the best known of which is “papal infallibility”. The Roman Catholic Church’s dogma of papal infallibility holds that a pope’s rulings on matters of faith and doctrine are infallibility correct and cannot be questioned and when making such statements, a pope is said to be speaking ex cathedra (literally “from the chair” (of the Apostle St Peter, the first pope)). Although ex cathedra pronouncements had been issued since medieval times, as a point of canon law, the doctrine was codified first at the First Ecumenical Council of the Vatican (Vatican I; 1869–1870) in the document Pastor aeternus (shepherd forever). Since Vatican I, the only ex cathedra decree has been Munificentissimus Deus (The most bountiful God), issued by Pius XII (1876–1958; pope 1939-1958) in 1950, in which was declared the dogma of the Assumption; that the Virgin Mary "having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory". Pius XII never made explicit whether the assumption preceded or followed earthly death, a point no pope has since discussed although it would seem of some theological significance. Prior to the solemn definition of 1870, there had been decrees issued ex cathedra. In Ineffabilis Deus (Ineffable God (1854)), Pius IX (1792–1878; pope 1846-1878) defined the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, an important point because of the theological necessity of Christ being born free of sin, a notion built upon by later theologians as the perpetual virginity of Mary. It asserts that Mary "always a virgin, before, during and after the birth of Jesus Christ", explaining the biblical references to brothers of Jesus either as children of Joseph from a previous marriage, cousins of Jesus, or just folk closely associated with the Holy Family.
Technically,
papal infallibility may have been invoked only the once since codification but
since the early post-war years, pontiffs have found ways to achieve the same
effect, John Paul II (1920–2005; pope 1978-2005) & Benedict XVI (1927–2022;
pope 2005-2013, pope emeritus 2013-2022) both adept at using what was in effect
a personal decree a power available to one who sits at the apex of what is in constitutional
terms an absolute theocracy. Critics
have called this phenomenon "creeping infallibility" and its
intellectual underpinnings own much to the tireless efforts of Benedict XVI
while he was head of the Inquisition (by then called the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and now renamed the Dicastery for the Doctrine of
the Faith (DDF)) during the late twentieth century (the Holy See probably
doesn't care but DDF is also the acronym, inter alia, for “drug & disease
free” and (in gaming) “Doom definition file” and there's also the DDF Network
which is an aggregator of pornography content).
So while not since 1950 formally invoked, popes have not been reluctant
to “play the de facto infallibility card”, possibly thinking of the (probably apocryphal)
remark attributed to John XXIII (1881-1963; pope 1958-1963): “When one is
infallible, one has to be careful what one says.”
But for
a pope’s own purposes, a bulla can prove invaluable. Pietro Angellerio (1215-1296) was for five
months between July and December 1294 installed as Pope Celestine V. Prior to his elevation, Celestine had for
decades been a monk and hermit, living a anchorite existence in remote caves
and subsisting on little more that wild vegetables, fruits, honey and the
occasional locust, his unworldly background meaning he emerged as the ultimate
compromise candidate, declared pope after a two-year deadlock in the church’s
last non-conclave papal election. The
cardinals had been squabbling for all those two years which so upset the hermit
in his cave that he wrote them a letter warning divine retribution would be
visited upon them if they didn't soon elect a pope. Realizing he was entirely un-political,
without enemies and likely pliable, the cardinals promptly elected him by
acclamation.
Shocked, the hermit declined the appointment, only to have his own arguments turned on him, the cardinals insisting if he refused the office he would be defying God himself; trapped, he was crowned at Santa Maria di Collemaggio in Aquila, taking the name Celestine V. The anchorite, lost in the world of power politics and low skulduggery was utterly unsuited to the role and within weeks expressed the wish to abdicate and return to his solitary cave in the Abruzzi Mountains. The cardinals told him it wasn’t possible and only God could release him from the office (will all that implies) but they couldn’t stop him consulting the lawyers who drafted for him two bulls, the first codifying the regulations concerning a pope’s abdication and the second a sort of “enabling act”. The second bull (Quia in futurum (for in the future)) restored the constitution (Ubi periculum (Where there lies danger)), and re-established the papal conclave (the constitution had been suspended by Adrian V (circa 1216-1276; pope 1276)). The bulls having put in place the required mechanisms, while at Naples, Celestine V abdicated.
That done, he resigned, intending to return to his cave but his successor, Boniface VIII (circa 1231-1303; pope 1294-1303) had no wish to have such a puritanical loose cannon at large (he feared some dissidents might proclaim him antipope) and imprisoned him (in an agreeable circumstances) in the castle where ultimately he would die. His resignation from the office was the last until Benedict XVI who in 2013 did rather better, retiring to a sort of papal granny flat in the Vatican where he lived (uniquely) as pope emeritus. Celestine was canonized on 5 May 1313 by Clement V (circa 1265-1314; pope 1305-1314) and no subsequent pontiff has taken the name Celestine.
No comments:
Post a Comment