Installation (pronounced in-stuh-ley-shuhn)
(1) Something
installed (which can be physical, as in plant or equipment or weightless, as in
software).
(2) The
act of installing (to install) or the state of being installed.
(3) In
military use, any permanent or semi-permanent post, camp, station, base etc, maintained
to support operations.
(4) In art,
an exhibit (widely defined) where the relation of the parts to the whole and
the context of the space where exhibited are sometimes claimed to important to
the interpretation of the piece.
(5) A
formal ceremony in which an honor is conferred or an appointment made to an
office (the state of being so honored or appointed being to be “installed”).
1600–1610:
From the Middle French installation, from the Medieval Latin installātiō. The construct was install + -ation. The verb install (which was used also as instal and before that enstall) was an early fifteenth century
form used to mean “place in ecclesiastical office by seating in an official
stall”. It was from the Middle English installen, from the fourteenth century Old
French installer, from the Medieval Latin īnstallō
(to install, put in place, establish), the construct being in- (in)- + stallum (stall),
from the Frankish stall (stall,
position, place), from the Proto-Germanic stallaz
(place, position), from the primitive Indo-European stel-, stAlǝn- & stAlǝm- (stem,
trunk). It was cognate with the Old High
German stal (location, stall), the Old
English steall (position, stall),
the Old English onstellan (to
institute, create, originate, establish, give the example of), the Middle High
German anstalt (institute), the German
anstellen (to conduct, employ), the German
einstellen (to set, adjust, position),
Dutch aanstellen (to appoint,
commission, institute) and the Dutch instellen
(to set up, establish). The
suffix -ation was from the Middle English -acioun
& -acion, from the Old French acion & -ation, from the Latin -ātiō,
an alternative form of -tiō (thus the
eventual English form -tion). It was
appended to words to indicate (1) an action or process, (2) the result of an
action or process or (3) a state or quality.
The mid
fifteenth century noun installation (action of installing) was a reference to
the processes (both administrative & ceremonial) of appointment to church
offices or other positions, and in that sense was from the Medieval Latin installationem (nominative installātiō), the noun of action from
past participle stem of installare. Of machinery (in the sense of plant &
equipment), the first known use in print, describing the “act of setting up a
machine; placing it in position for use” dates from 1882 but it may by then
have for some time been in oral use. Installation
& installationer are nouns and installational & installationlike are
adjectives; the noun plural is installations.
Installationism & installationist are non-standard forms used in art
criticism.
In
computing, an “installation” can be of hardware or software. With hardware, the point of distinction is an installation is something which is permanent (or, even if temporary, installed in a manner of something permanent), as opposed to a mere connection (such as plugging to a
USB cable). In software, the idea to is
transfer from an external source (the internet, a place on a network or transportable
media (diskettes, optical discs etc)) onto a device's permanent storage, the
installation process usually taken to include putting things into the state
where functional use is possible.
Installations can be as simple as copying a single file to a drive to
long, interactive processes involving multiple external media and on-line
registration or validation procedures.
Some installations are effortless while some are worse than others, as
those who have enjoyed the experience of installing the earlier
versions of Nvidia’s video drivers for some flavors of Unix can attest. Especially in software, the terms “pre-installation”
and “re-reinstallation” are common although “un-install” is more common than “un-installation”
(the terms “failed installation” and “corrupted installation” are also not unknown
although in most use, IT nerds usually clip “installation” to “install”).
Installations
and Performance Art
It’s
now unfashionable, and probably thought reactionary, to attempt to impose
definitions on the various expressions of Western art. There was a time, in living memory, when such distinctions were taken seriously, one squabble about whether an entrant in an
Australian portraiture competition could be considered “a portrait” (and by implication the work of “an artist”) or “a mere caricature”
(and the thus the scribblings of “a cartoonist”)
ending up in the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Attorney-General v Trustees of National Art Gallery of NSW & Another
(1945) 62 WN (NSW) 212.).
Portrait or caricature? Mr Joshua Smith (1943, left), oil on canvas by Sir William Dobell (1899–1970) and Joshua Smith (1905-1995, right).
Wisely,
Mr Justice Roper (1901–1958) decided the bench was not a place for amateur art
criticism and agreed the work was indeed “a portrait”, holding, inter alia, that “portrait”
“…means a
pictorial representation of a person, painted by an artist. This definition
denotes some degree of likeness is essential and for the purpose of achieving
it the inclusion of the face of the subject is desirable and perhaps also essential.” Of the work in question, he observed it was “…characterised
by some startling exaggeration and distortion which was clearly intended by the
artist, his technique being too brilliant to admit of any other conclusion. It bears, nevertheless, a strong degree of
likeness to the subject and is think, undoubtedly, a pictorial representation
of him. I find as a fact that it is a
portrait…” Given that, the
judge found it unnecessary to consider whether the painting was a “caricature”
or a “fantasy”
which was a shame, even if it wouldn’t have been something on which the verdict
hung.
Year
later, in an essay he titled The White
Bird (1987), the English painter & art critic John Berger (1926–2017)
would discuss the relationship between artist, artwork & viewer and the tension
between accurate depiction (“imitation” as he sometimes called it, a growing trend in
modern portraiture) and creative expression: “The notion that art is the mirror of nature
is one that only appeals in periods of scepticism. Art does not imitate nature; it imitates a
creation, sometimes to propose an alternative world, sometimes simply to amplify,
to confirm, to make social the brief hope offered by nature. Art is an organised response to what nature
allows us to glimpse occasionally. Art sets out to transform the potential
recognition into an unceasing one.” With that, one suspects Mr Justice Roper would have concurred.
Finding
legal proceedings tiresome, the art industry solved the problem of
what does and does not belong in galleries by embracing “installations” and “performance
art”, two categories without definitional boundaries and thus able to
accommodate anything which can’t be squeezed into one of the traditional
slots. In retrospect, it is course easy
to identify stuff stretching back many centuries which could be classified as
either but in the modern age, there’s certainly a perception curators are now artistically
more promiscuous. It thus both
impossible and pointless to try to define “installation” and “performance art”
but some characteristics certainly are identifiable.
Installation
art tends to be three-dimensional, is often site-specific and designed to transform
the perception of a space in which it exists and the range of materials used is
unlimited, the genre notable especially for the use of everyday objects, video
& audio content and often, interactive components. Installation art has encompassed unmade beds
so there’s some scope. Just as there’s
no one type of installation, nor are there defined parameters for the mode of display:
installations have been hung from ceilings, wrapped around buildings and sat on
the seabed. In gallery spaces however,
the most frequently seen installations are those on the floor with sufficient
room surrounding them for the viewer to walk around, experiencing the work from
multiple angles and perspectives. Installations
can be temporary or permanent or even in some way vanish, decay or be destroyed
during the exhibition and in more than one case, the “installation” didn’t
actually exist.
The context of location can also dictate the definition. Wax figures of Lindsay Lohan & Paris Hilton might be all or part of an installation if exhibited in a gallery but when on display at Madame Tussauds in New York City (left), they are a tourist attraction. More typically, installations combine artistic technique with social or political comment: Gabriel Dawe's (b 1973) Plexus series (centre) was made with a reputed 60 miles (97 km) of embroidery thread hooked from floor to ceiling in a repeating overlay while Judy Chicago’s (b 1939) The Dinner Party, 1974-79 (right) was a feminist piece but one which later attracted criticism because some degree of “ethnic exclusionism” was detected.
Performance art, as the term implies, is a form of “live art” where “something happens”, the actions of the artist or performers components of the work. Perhaps best thought of as a form of encapsulated theatre, performance art would seem to depend on movement, sound, color and sometimes text although, being art, some performance art has been wholly static. For that reason, Empire (1965), Andy Warhol’s (1928–1987) eight-hour, slow-motion film of an unchanging view of the Empire State Building must be considered performance art although, given the nature of the experience, it really must be the viewer who is thought the subject. Performance art is of course intrinsically ephemeral and Empire played with that idea, each moment of the production seemingly the same yet in tiny ways different, rather like the exercise in textual definitional philosophy lecturers like to give students to ponder: “Is the river the ‘same’ river from one day to the next when almost all the molecules of water are different?”
The muse as performing installation: US rapper, singer, songwriter, record producer, hip hop identity & fashion designer Ye (formerly the artist known as Kanye West (b 1977)) and Australian architect & model Bianca Censori (b 1995), annual Grammy Awards, Los Angeles, 2 February 2025.
The
recent, much publicized appearances by Mr Ye and Ms Censori attracted all sorts
of comments and the consensus was the project (one presumably restricted to the
warmer months) was a promotional device for him and to some extent that seems
to have worked, despite Mr Ye being mostly unnoticed while in the presence of
his photogenic muse. Although there are
references to the pair being “married”, it’s not clear if that is their legal
status and in artistic terms that may be significant. What is of interest is whether in these
appearances Ms Censori should be thought a “performance artist” or Mr Ye’s “installation”;
both have been suggested and there’s no reason why the two states can’t be
simultaneous. Most intriguing has been the suggestion Ms Cansori is being paid by Mr Ye on a "per outfit" basis and is thus a kind of "walking installation". That would make it a very "modern" marriage and one of which not all would approve but there have been relationships (artistic and otherwise) based on more dubious arrangements.
Mr Ye & Ms Cansori at Paris Fashion Week, June 2024, the latter in character as an installation.
In the decadent West, when considering the sometimes dubious artistic merit of installations, professional and amateurs critics alike both usually focus on the work but ever since 1917 when a porcelain urinal appeared in an art gallery, the matter of location has had to be considered: "If something (including a porcelain urinal) is exhibited in an art gallery, is it thus a 'work of art'?" The question was by most treated as an absurdity but it troubled some critics and went on to sustain the pop-art movement. remaining a staple for post-modernists (they still exist), "cultural commentators" and such. For decades, the manifests of art galleries have included many items few prior to the modern era would have been prepared to call "art".
For some, professional careers have been built exploring the implication of the question while for most, it's all been variously annoying or amusing but there are places in which where an object sits can be critical and choosing a "shady" rather than "sunny" spot can be a capital offence. In the DPRK (Democratic Republic of Korea (North Korea)), Jang Song-thaek (1946-2013) was married to Kim Kyong-hui (b 1946; believed still alive), only daughter Kim Il-sung (1912-1994; Great Leader of DPRK 1949-1994) and only sister of (1941-2011; Dear Leader of DPRK; 1994-2011). He was thus the uncle (by marriage) of Kim Jong-un (b circa 1983; Supreme Leader of DPRK since 2011). Within the party, he had a mixed career but ups and downs within the structure were not unusual and later in the reign of the Dear Leader, he emerged as a important figure in both the political and military machines around which things in the DPRK revolve. His position appeared to be strengthened when the Supreme Leader assumed power but in 2013 he was accused of being a counter-revolutionary, was expelled from the party, dismissed from his many posts and was un-personed by having his photograph and mention of his name digitally erased from all official records. In December that year, the KCNA (Korean Central News Agency, the regime's energetic and highly productive state media organization) announced his execution.
Obviously guilty as sin: Jang Song-thaek (left) being brought before the court (right).
On the basis of the official statement issued by the KCNA, he must have been guilty, highlights of the press release including confirmation he was “an anti-party, counter-revolutionary factional element and despicable political careerist and trickster…, a traitor to the nation for all ages who perpetrated anti-party, counter-revolutionary factional acts in a bid to overthrow the leadership of our party and state and the socialist system”. It noted that despite receiving much trust and benevolence by the “peerlessly great men … The Great Leader, The Dear Leader and The Supreme Leader”, he behaved “worse than a dog, perpetrated thrice-cursed acts of treachery in betrayal of such profound trust and warmest paternal love”. Of note was his subversion of interior decorating, preventing “the Taedonggang Tile Factory from erecting a mosaic…” as a monument to the Great Leader, not in its deserved place in the sun but “…in a shaded corner”. Perhaps worse of all, he “let the decadent capitalist lifestyle find its way to our society by distributing all sorts of pornographic pictures among his confidants since 2009. He led a dissolute, depraved life, squandering money wherever he went.” In summary, the release added Jang was a “thrice-cursed traitor without an equal in the world” and that “history will eternally record and never forget the shuddering crimes committed by Jang Song Thaek, the enemy of the party, revolution and people and heinous traitor to the nation”.
Details of such matters are hard to confirm so it’s not known if the rumors of him being executed by anti-aircraft gun fire or a flame-thrower are true. Nor is it known if whatever remained of the corpse was thrown to a pack of wild dogs but the KCNA's press release did add: “…the revolutionary army will never pardon all those who disobey the order of the Supreme Commander and there will be no place for them to be buried even after their death” so the dog-food theory was at least plausible.
The Supreme Leader learned in detail about factory operations including the processes used in the microlite shop and artificial marble tile shop, the latter able to produce tiles in the same colors and patterns as those of natural marble. Addressing the workers, the Supreme Leader underlined the need to continue directing big efforts to improving the quality of products, noting that the quality of tiles depends on plane and right angle tolerable numerical value, contraction rate, intensity and resistance to cold. When seeing tiles of diverse colors and sizes, he expressed great satisfaction that, figuratively speaking, “all clothes and underwear are locally made”, a thoughtful observation which attracted much applause. It was on this visit the Supreme Leader became aware of the subversive and treasonous order from Jang Song-thaek that the mosaic erected as a monument to the Great Leader must be installed not in its deserved place in the sun but in a shaded corner.
