Engagement (pronounced en-geyj-muhnt)
(1) The act of engaging or the state of being engaged.
(2) A mutual pledge of marriage, betrothal.
(3) An appointment or arrangement.
(4) A pledge, obligation, agreement or other condition that binds.
(5) Employment, or a period or post of employment, now especially in the performing arts.
(6) In military use, an encounter, conflict, or battle.
(7) In mechanics, the act or state of interlocking.
(8) In contract law, a promise (archaic).
(9) In economics (usually in the plural), financial obligations (archaic).
(10) In obstetrics, the entrance of the foetal head or presenting part into the upper opening of the maternal pelvis.
1615: The construct was engage + -ment. Engagier was from the Middle English, from the Old French engagier (under pledge), via Frankish from the Proto-Germanic wadiare (pledge). The word spread widely in European languages in cluding the Frankish anwadjōn (to pledge), from Proto-Germanic wadjōną (to pledge, secure), wadją (pledge, guarantee). It was cognate with the Old English anwedd (pledge, security) & weddian (to engage, covenant, undertake), the German wetten (to bet, wager) and the Icelandic veðja (to wager); the word illustrating the general, common evolution of Germanic to French (eg Guillaume from Wilhelm). The -ment suffix was from the Middle English -ment, from the Late Latin -amentum, from -mentum which came via Old French -ment. It was used to form nouns from verbs, the nouns having the sense of "the action or result of what is denoted by the verb". The suffix is most often attached to the stem without change, except when the stem ends in -dge, where the -e is sometimes dropped (abridgment, acknowledgment, judgment, lodgment et al), with the forms without -e preferred in American English. The most widely known example of the spelling variation is probably judgment vs judgement. In modern use, judgement is said to be a "free variation" word where either spelling is considered acceptable as long as use is consistent. Like enquiry vs inquiry, this can be a handy where a convention of use can be structured to impart great clarity: judgment used when referring to judicial rulings and judgement for all other purposes although the approach is not without disadvantage given one might write of the judgement a judge exercised before delivering their judgment. To those not aware of the convention, it could look just like a typo. The meaning "attract the attention of" is from 1640s; that of "employ" is from 1640s, derived from "binding as by a pledge." Specific sense of "promise to marry" is variously cited as dating from between 1610 and 1742 and the military meaning emerged in 1664. Related forms are the nouns non-engagement and re-engagement, now almost always hyphenated. Engagement is a noun, engage is a verb, engaging is a noun, verb & adjective and engaged is a verb & adjective; the noun plural is engagements.
A long tradition
The western concept of engagement is derived from the Jewish law (Torah), codified in the last Talmudic tractate of the Nashim (Women) order in which the marriage process is defined in two parts, the erusin (or kiddushin), a betrothal ceremony of sanctification and the nissu'in (or chupah), the formal act of marriage. This is wholly analogous with the modern tradition of (1) the engagement which reflects a change of relationship between the couple and (2) the marriage which changes their legal status under either, or both, state and church law. In antiquity, both Hellenic Greece and Rome borrowed and adapted the Hebrew practice with little change.
In the West, canon lawyers proved more exacting, secular lawyers more avaricious and engagements assumed an increasingly contractual form. While either party could break a betrothal, it was once possible for the spurned partner to sue the other for breach of promise, which, in some jurisdictions, was called heart-balm. In Australia, these actions were rendered obsolete when Lionel Murphy's (1922–1986; attorney-general of Australia 1972-1975) Family Law Act (1975) replaced the old Matrimonial Causes Act, a matter of some regret to bishops, Liberal Party lawyers and other moralists. Also affected were publications like Melbourne’s now sadly defunct Truth which, in its divorce reports, published not only salacious details of infidelity but also the photographs produced as evidence, shots taken typically through the windows of St Kilda hotel rooms.
In Australia, in the narrow technical sense, engagements are compulsory in that one month must elapse between the submission of the Notice of Intended Marriage form and the marriage proper although a prescribed authority may approve a shorter notice time in some limited circumstances (such as when former Governor-General Sir John Kerr (1914-1991) wished rapidly to marry his second wife Anne (aka Nancy (née Taggart, previously Robson)). Engagements in Australia thus, generally, have a statutory minimum duration of one month. There's no maximum, but there’s no record of one matching the longest known engagement, a sixty-seven year arrangement between a Mexican couple; there may have been commitment issues.
On Sunday 28 November 2021, Lindsay Lohan announced her engagement to her boyfriend of two years, Bader Shammas (b 1987), a Dubai-based vice-president with Credit Suisse. The announcement was made in the twenty-first century way: Instagram.