(1) Highest point or part, as of a hill, a line of travel, or any object; top; apex; peak, pinnacle; acme, zenith, culmination.
(2) One’s highest point of attainment or aspiration.
(3) A meeting of heads of government.
(4) In mountaineering, any point higher than surrounding points (distinguished by topographic prominence as subsummits (low prominence) or independent summits (high prominence)).
(5) In mountaineering to ascend to the peak.
1425–1475: From the Late Middle English somete, borrowed from the Middle French and drawn from the Old French sommette, diminutive of som (highest part, top of a hill). Ultimate source was the Latin summum, the noun use of neuter of summus (highest) + -ete or -et as the suffix and it’s from here English ultimately picked-up super. Summit is a noun & verb; subsummit & summiteers are nouns, summital & summitless are adjectives and summited & summiting are verbs; the noun plural is summits. The nouns minisummit & presummit are creations of twentieth century diplomacy and have (not always happily) been applied adjectivally.
Summits (meetings between those in charge of tribes, groups, nations etc to discuss issues) predate civilization but the adoption of the word for this purpose is recent. Usually summits are public but some have been secret and in the age of modern communications, they’re not the novelty once they were. Some are famous, such as Henry IV’s (1050–1106; Holy Roman Emperor 1084-1105) Walk to Canossa in 1077 to beg the forgiveness of Pope Saint Gregory VII (circa 1015–1085; pope 1073-1085) and seek absolution of his excommunication. Others were cynical; the notorious 1938 Munich Conference was attended by the heads of government of France, Germany, Italy and the UK. The meaning "meeting of heads of government" is from Winston Churchill's (1875-1965; UK prime-minister 1940-1945 & 1951-1955) 1950 metaphor of "…a parley at the summit" and was first widely used in 1955 when the phrase “Geneva Summit” appeared on press releases, menus and the final communiqué. The classic summits were probably the great set-piece events conducted during World War II (1939-1945) and subsequently those of the high Cold War but there have since been many summits (notably the G5, G7, G8, G20 et al) but the term has somewhat become devalued because it’s not uncommon for events not involving heads of government so to be described. While treasurer, Paul Keating (b 1944; Prime Minister of Australia 1991-1996) once suggested “a summit” which didn’t include the prime-minister; Bob Hawke (1929–2019; Prime Minister of Australia 1983-1991) soon corrected his error.
Great power summits have over the years excited more expectations than ever they have delivered. Noted summiteer Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974) was aware of this but in his prolific post-presidential career as an author altered his rationalizations depending on the point he wished to make. While he could write that he was "...well aware that our highly successful summit meeting in 1972 might spawn euphoric expectations among the American people... [and that] I knew knew I stood politically to benefit from such euphoria, I tried to damp it down and keep our successes in perspective", he admitted elsewhere that "...creation of a willowy euphoria is one of the dangers of summitry". Warming to the idea of a confession (not a feeling which often overcame him), he added of the public atmosphere in 1972 that "... I must assume a substantial part of the responsibility for this. It was election year and I wanted the political credit." The contradictions are just part of what makes Nixon the most interesting president of the modern era.
Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears and Paris Hilton on the infamous front page in Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post, 29 November 2006. The car was a Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199; 2003-2010).
In mountaineering, a summit is any point higher than surrounding points (distinguished by topographic prominence as subsummits (low prominence) or independent summits (high prominence)) and those who attempts to summit a peak are summiteers. Thus when summiteers Sir Edmund Hillary (1919-2008) and Sherpa Tenzing Norgay (1914-1986) in 1953 summited the summit of Mount Everest, they became the first people ever to stand on the highest point on Earth. That achievement provided a fun footnote in the long list of crooked Hillary Clinton’s (b 1947; US secretary of state 2009-2013) lies (which she calls “misspeaking”), one of which was “My mother named me after Sir Edmund Hillary”. The claim was based on her finding his climbing of Mount Everest so inspiring, thus explaining the double-l spelling of her name but the assent of the summit came a half decade after her birth. The story was later “clarified” when a Clinton spokeswoman said she was not named after the famous mountaineer but the account “...was a sweet family story her mother shared to inspire greatness in her daughter, to great results I might add.” Despite this, it remains unclear if crooked Hillary lied about her own name or was accusing her mother of lying. Still, given everything else, “…at this point, what difference does it make?”
(1) A
member of a people of Tibetan stock (thought ultimately of Mongolian origin) living
on the southern slopes of the Nepalese Himalayas, noted as mountaineers and well-known
for their frequent service as porters on mountain-climbing expeditions.
(2) The Southern Tibetan language of the Sherpa people.
(3) An official
(chosen by or allocated to a government representative or delegate at a summit
meeting or conference) who assists with preparation and related matters.
(5) A native inhabitant of a region, employed by visiting journalists, NGO (non-government organization) employees etc to assist in resolving local administrative and other difficulties (also sometimes called "fixers").
(5) A synthetic fabric with a long, thick pile, in the style of faux fur, lambs wool or fleece and often used in cold climates to line coats or jackets.
1847:
An adoption of colonial English, under the Raj, from the Tibetan Sherpa,
literally "dweller in an eastern country". Sherpa is a verb, noun & proper noun; the two noun plural forms are being Sherpas,
(especially collectively) & Sherpa, all forms capitalized or not depending on context.When
used in the context of summit meetings and such, sherpa is sometimes used as a verb but
some insist this remains irregular.
Lunch
at the G7 Summit hosted in 1982 by François Mitterrand (1916–1996; President of France 1981-1995) at the Palace
of Versailles.
The origin of the use of sherpa in international diplomacy dates
from the mid 1970s.Not alone in his
feelings, French president Valéry Giscard d'Estaing (1926–2020; President of
France 1974-1981) was finding international meetings increasingly too formal and
bureaucratic and decided what was needed was a smaller aggregation consisting
essentially of those who mattered.From
this idea emerged the G5, seen originally as a kind of informal fireside chat among
the leaders of France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US, the membership
mirroring that of the Group of Five (finance ministers) which had coalesced in
the aftermath of the disruptions caused by the first oil shock in
1973-1974.Italy was quickly added to the
formation to create a group of six and, a couple of years later, Canada joined,
this formation enduring to this day as the Group of Seven (G7). Russia was added in 1997 (creating the G8) but expelled in 2014 when Moscow began it's military adventures in the Crimea. In many of the early meetings at Versailles the heads of government were often accompanied by only a single advisor and they came to be called "sherpas", an allusion to the idea of mountain guides marking the way through strange surroundings.
Lindsay Lohan in sherpa-lined jacket, Falling for Christmas (Netflix, 2022).
Counter-intuitively,
the attraction of the gathering was that it was vested with no formal powers
which, paradoxically appears to have made it work rather better as a decision-making
apparatus.Being informal and thus
smaller, without the usual array of advisors and experts, it was also more nimble,
the original vision being a single high-level official from each country
preparing the summit by negotiating on behalf of the head of government.This was the birth of the sherpa, the metaphor
well-borrowed because just as Sherpas of the Himalayas use their familiarity
with the technically difficult terrain of the mountains to assist the better-known
climbers on their summit ascents, so their G7 counterparts carry the
discussions to just short of the summit so their heads of government can plant
the flags on the peak.Historically, the sherpa was meant to be so low-profile as to be almost unknown by most in the
general public except the real political junkies.
In
recent years, there have been changes, the entourages have grown and the
awareness of the sherpa process has risen, especially as the G7 focused increasingly
on issues of international development, thus becoming a target for the
professional lobbyists attached to the NGOs which feed of the processes.Nevertheless, the sherpas continue to try to
resolve as much contentious material ahead of time, reputedly even drafting the
final communiqués well in advance of the meetings beginning.Despite the changes, more than one Sherpa has
noted the G7 in many ways still reflect the original ideal of an intimate
conversation whereas the G20 meetings with the phalanxes of aides and
representatives of many institutions is by comparison a huge structure of
stage-management.
Tony
Blair (b 1953; UK prime-minister 1997-2007) & Alastair Campbell (b 1957; variously spokesman, campaign director,
press secretary and director of communications for Labour Party (1994-2005)
& Tony Blair
It’s an unusual role in
that many more are qualified for the job than are suitable to fulfill it given
it simultaneously demands both the skills and knowledge of a politician yet needs
someone who prefers not to be in the spotlight.Inevitably some sherpas do become well-known, sometimes by design and
sometimes not.Alastair Campbell often
acted as sherpa for Tony Blair and he noted in his diary that the nature of the sherpa’s role was to “…get all of the shit, none of the glory, and you spend a
lot of the time taking seriously people you despise.You would not be human if that did not make
you angry.”
(1) In
aircraft design, a design of pilot’s canopy (originally military slang for what
designers dubbed the “bubble canopy”, a Perspex molding which afforded exceptional
outward visibility).
(2) An
automobile using a transparent structure over the passenger compartment,
replacing the usual combination of roof & windows.
(3) A
descriptor of certain automobiles of the early 1960s, based on the shape rather
than the method of construction, the conventional metal and glass used.
1940s: The construct
was bubble + top.Bubble
dates from the late fourteenth century and was from the Middle English noun bobel which may have been from the Middle
Dutch bubbel & bobbel and/or the Low German bubbel (bubble) and Middle Low German verb
bubbele, all thought to be of echoic
origin.The related forms include the
Swedish bubbla (bubble), the Danish boble (bubble) and the Dutch bobble.Top pre-dates 1000 and was from the Middle English top, toppe & tope (top,
highest part; summit; crest; tassel, tuft; (spinning) top, ball; a tuft or ball
at the highest point of anything), and the Old English top & toppa (top,
summit, tuft of hair), from the Proto-West Germanic topp, from the Proto-Germanic tuppaz
(braid, pigtail, end), of unknown origin.It was cognate with the Old Norse toppr
(top), the Scots tap (top), the North
Frisian top, tap & tup (top), the
Saterland Frisian Top (top), the West
Frisian top (top), the Dutch top (top, summit, peak), the Low German
Topp (top), the German Zopf (braid, pigtail, plait, top), the Swedish
topp (top, peak, summit, tip) and the
Icelandic toppur (top).Alternative forms are common; bubble-top in automotive
& aeronautical engineering and bubble top in fashion.Bubbletop is a noun and bubbletopped is an
adjective; the noun plural is bubbletops.
Evolution
of the Mustang's bubbletop: P-51C (top), P-51 III (centre) and P-51D (bottom).
“Bubbletop”
began as World War II (1939-1945) era military slang for officially was
described as the “bubble canopy”, the transparent structure sitting atop the
cockpit of fighter aircraft, the advantages being (1) superior visibility (the
purest interpretation of the design affording an unobstructed, 360° field-of-view,
(2) improved aerodynamics, (3) easier cockpit ingress & egress (of some
significance to pilots force to parachute and (4), weight reduction (in some
cases).Bubbletops had been seen on
drawing boards in the early days of aviation and some were built during World
War I (1914-1918) but it was the advent of Perspex and the development of industrial
techniques suitable for the creation of large, variably-curved moldings which
made mass-production practical.The best
known early implementations were those added to existing air-frames including
the Supermarine Spitfire, Republic P-47 Thunderbolt and North American P-51
Mustang.By 1943, the concept had become
the default choice for fighter aircraft and the technology was applied also to
similar apparatuses used elsewhere on the fuselage where they were styled usually
as “blisters”.In the post war years it
extended to other types, most dramatically in the Bell 47 helicopter where the
cabin was almost spherical, some 70% of the structure clear Perspex.
The
enormous and rapid advances in wartime aeronautics profoundly influenced designers
in many fields and nowhere was that more obvious than in the cars which began
to appear in the US during the 1950s.Elements drawn variously from aeronautics and ballistics did appear in
the first generation of genuinely new post-war models (most of what was offered
between 1945-1948 being barely revised versions of the 1942 lines) but it was
in the next decade the designers were able to embrace the jet-age (a phrase which
before it referred to the mass-market jet-airline travel made possible by the
Boeing 707 (which entered commercial service in 1958) was an allusion to
military aircraft, machines which during the Cold War were a frequent sight in
popular culture).On motif the designers
couldn’t resist was the bubble canopy, something which never caught on in
mass-production although Perspex roofed cars were briefly offered before word
of their unsuitability for use in direct sunlight became legion.
GM Firebird XP-21 (Firebird I, 1953).
Not content
with borrowing the odd element from aircraft, the General Motors (GM) team
decided the best way to test which concepts were adaptable from sky to road was
to “put wheels on a jet aircraft” and although they didn’t do that literally,
by 1953 when Firebird XP-21 was first displayed, it certainly looked as though
it was exactly that.Its other novelty
was it was powered by a gas turbine engine, the first time a major manufacturer
in the US had built such a thing although a number of inventors had produced
their own one-offs.When the XP-21
(re-named Firebird I for the show circuit) made its debut, some in the press
referred to it as a “prototype” but GM never envisaged it as the basis for a
production car, being impractical for any purpose other than component-testing;
it should thus be thought of as a “test-bed”.The bubble canopy looked as if it could have come from a US Air Force
(UFAF) fighter jet and would have contributed to the aerodynamically efficiency,
the 370 hp (280 kW), fibreglass-bodied Firebird I said to be capable of
achieving 200 mph (320 km/h) although it’s believed this number came from slide-rule
calculations and was never tested.Despite that, in its day the Firebird II made quite a splash and a
depiction of it sits atop the trophy (named after the car’s designer, Harley
Earl (1893–1969), the long time head of GM’s styling studio) presented each
year to the winner of NASCAR’s (National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing)
premiere event, the Daytona 500.
GM Firebird II (1956).
Compared
with its predecessor, the Firebird II (1956), rendered this time in titanium was
almost restrained, the Perspex canopy a multi-part structure over a passenger
compartment designed to seat “a family of four”.The family might have chosen to drive mostly
in darkness because the heat build-up under the midday sun would have tested the
“individually-controlled air conditioning”, a system upon which comfort
depended because the Perspex sections were fixed; there were no opening “windows”.Still, even if hot, the family would have got
places fast because the same 200 mph capability was claimed.
GM Firebird III (1958).
The Firebird
III was displayed at the 1958 Motorama and although GM never built any car
quite like it, within a season, elements of it did begin to appear on regular
production models in showrooms (notably the rear skegs which Cadillac used for
a couple of years) and some of its features are today standard equipment in
even quite modest vehicles.The striking
“double bubbletop” never made the assembly lines although some race cars have at
least partially implemented the concept.What proved more of a harbinger was the specification, the Firebird III fitted
with anti-lock brakes, cruise control, air conditioning, an automated “accident
avoidance system” and instead of a steering wheel, the driver controlled the
thing with a joystick, installed in a centrally-mounted “Unicontrol &
Instrument Panel”. All these were analogue-era electro-mechanical devices too bulky, fragile or expensive for mass production, wider adoption in the decades to come made possible by integrated circuits (IC) and micro-processors.
Borrowing
from the Firebird II, Cadillac also used a bubble top for the Cyclone (XP-74)
concept car which in 1959 toured the show circuit.Although it was powered by the corporation’s
standard 390 cubic inch (6.5 litre) V8, there was some adventurous engineering
including a rear-mounted automatic transaxle and independent rear suspension
(using swing axles, something not as bad as it sounds given the grip of tyres
at the time) but few dwelt long on such things, their attention grabbed by
features such as the bubble top (this time silver coated for UV (ultra violet) protection)
which opened automatically in conjunction with the electrically operated
sliding doors.The Perspex bubble
canopies from fighter aircraft never caught on for road or race cars but so aerodynamically efficient was the shape it found several niches.
1953 Ferrari
F166MM Spider by Vignale (left) and 1968 MGCGT (centre & right).
Bubbles
often appeared atop the hood (bonnet) to provide clearance for components
inconveniently tall.Most were centrally
located (there was the occasional symmetrical pair) but the when BMH (British Motor
Holdings, the old BMC (British Motor
Corporation) shoehorned their big, heavy straight-six into the MGB (1963-1980),
it wouldn’t fit under the bonnet, the problem not the cylinder head but the
tall radiator so the usual solution of a “bonnet bulge” was used.However, for that to clear the forward carburetor,
the bulge would have been absurdly high so a small bubble (and usually, ones this size are referred to as "blisters") was added.It probably annoyed some there wasn’t a
matching (fake) one on the other side but it’s part of the MGC’s charm, a
quality which for years most found elusive although it’s now more appreciated.For MGC owners wish to shed some weight or
for MGB owners who like the look, the “bonnet with bubble” is now available in
fibreglass.
The winning
Ford GT40 Mark IV (J-Car) with bubble to the right, Le Mans 1967 (left) and the after-market (for
replicas) “Gurney Bubble” (right).
US racing
driver Dan Gurney (1931–2018) stood 6' 4" (1.9 m) tall which could be accommodated
in most sports cars and certainly on Formula One but when he came to drive the Ford
GT40 Mark IV it was found he simply didn’t fit when wearing his crash helmet.The original GT40 (1964) gained its name from
the height being 40 inches (1016 mm) but Mark IV (the “J-Car”, 1966) was lower
still at 39.4 inches (1,000 mm).Gurney
was the tallest ever to drive the GT40 and the solution sounds brutish but fix
was effected elegantly, a “bubble added to the roof to clear the helmet.Gurney and AJ Foyt (b 1935) drove the GT40 to
victory in the 1967 Le Mans 24-hour endurance classic and the protrusion clearly
didn’t compromise straight-line speed, the pair clocked at 213 mph (343 km’h), on
the famous 3.6-mile Mulsanne Straight (which was a uninterrupted 3.6 miles (5.8
km) until the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (the FIA; the
International Automobile Federation and world sport’s dopiest regulatory body)
imposed two “chicanes”),Known ever
since as the “Gurney Bubble”, such is the appeal that they’re now available for
any GT40 replica: Like the AC Shelby Cobra, the GT40 “reproduction” industry is
active and there are many times more of these than there are survivors of 105 originals.
Ferrari 250
GT “Tour de France” LWB Berlinettas by Zagato: The “double bubble” roof (left),
the Hofmeister kink (centre) and the famous “Z” kink, (right).
The Italian
coachbuilding house Zagato was founded in 1919 by Ugo Zagato (1890-1968) and
since the early post-war years, their designs have sometimes been polarizing (the
phrase “acquired taste” sometimes seen), their angularity often contrasted with
the lines of other, notably Pinninfarina and Bertone but unlike many which have
over the years folded, Zagato remains active still.One Zagato design never criticized was his
run in 1956 of five Ferrari 250 GT “Tour de France” LWB Berlinettas, memorable
also for introducing the signature “Zagato double-bubble roof.The roof was practical in that it better accommodated
taller occupants but it really was a visual trick and a variation on the trick
Mercedes-Benz used on the “Pagoda” (W113; 230, 250 & 280 SL; 1963-1971) which they
explained by saying “We didn’t lower the roof, we rained the windows”.The other famous feature (which appeared on
only one) was the fetching “Z” shape on the rear pillar, replacing the “Hofmeister
kink” used on some others.
1962
Chevrolet Impala “bubbletop” Sport Coupe (left), 1963 Ford Consul Capri
(centre) and 1972 BMW 3.0CS (E9, right).
The 1959
Chevrolet quickly came to be nicknamed “bubbletop” and the style spread, both
within GM and beyond.The “bubbletop”
reference was to the canopy on aircraft like the P-51D Mustang but was an
allusion to the shape, not the materials used; on cars things were done in traditional
glass and metal.Across the Atlantic,
Ford in the UK applied the idea to their Consul Capri (1961-1964), a two-door hardtop
which the company wanted to be thought of as a “co-respondent's” car (ie the
sort of rakish design which would appeal to the sort of chap who slept with
other men’s wives, later to be named as “co-respondent” in divorce
proceedings).The Capri was a
marketplace failure and the styling was at the time much criticized but it’s
now valued as a period piece.Chevrolet
abandoned the look on the full-size cars after 1963 but it was revived for the
second series Corvair (1965-1969).A
fine implementation was achieved in the roofline of the BMW E9 (1968-1975)
which remains the company’s finest hour.
The bubble
shirt and bubble tops.
The bubble skirt (worn by Lindsay Lohan (centre)) is one of those garments which seems
never to quite die, although there are many who wish it would. Once (or for an unfortunate generation,
twice) every fashion cycle (typically 10-12 years), the industry does one of
its "pushes" and bubble skirts show up in the high street, encouraged
sometimes by the odd catwalk appearance; it will happen again. While the dreaded bubble skirt is easily
identifiable, the “bubble top” is less defined but there seem to be two
variations: (1) a top with a “bubble skirt-like” appendage gathering unhappily
just above the hips (left) and (2) a kind of “boob tube” which, instead of
being tightly fitted is topped with an additional layer of material, loosely
gathered. The advantages of the latter
(which may be thought of as a “boob bubble”) are it can (1) without any
additional devices create the illusion of a fuller bust and (2) allow a
strapless bra to be worn, something visually difficult with most boob tubes
because the underwear’s outline is obvious under the tight material.
(1) A publisher's or printer's distinctive emblem (or imprint,
label, logo, mark, symbol trademark etc), used as an identifying device on its
books and other works, appearing variously within the covers and at the base of
the spine (replicated in the same place on a dust jacket).
(2) An inscription (historically at the end of a book or
manuscript but of late frequently printed towards the beginning), widely used since
the fifteenth century (although the practice pre-dates the invention of
printing) and providing the title or subject of the work, selected details about
the author(s), the name of the printer or publisher, the date and place of
publication and (less commonly), technical details such as typefaces, bibliophilic
information or the paper and method of binding used.
(3) By extension, in internet use, a page on a website
identifying the details of its creation, such as the author's name, the
technologies used (including copyright attribution) and many other details, some
or all of which may replicate the metadata associated with objects in other
digital contexts.
(3) In entomology, a genus of beetles in the stag beetle
family Lucanidae.
(4) In art, music, poetry etc, a finishing stroke or
crowning touch (archaic except as an artistic affectation).
(5) An city in Ancient Greece (in Lydia, Asia Minor); one
of the twelve Ionian cities banded together in the eighth century BC and
substantially depopulated in 286 BC (always initial capital).It was romanized as Kolophṓn.
1615-1625: From the Late Latin colophōn, from the Ancient Greek κολοφών (kolophṓn) (peak, summit; finishing touch; a finishing stroke),
from the primitive Indo-European root kel
(to be prominent; hill).A colophon
should not be confused with colophonite (in mineralogy a coarsely granular
variety of garnet) or technical words from medicine words like coloplasty (surgery
on the colon (especially partial resection or an instance of such surgery)).The adjective Colophonian is applied to (1)
an inhabitant of the Lydian city of Colophon or (2) matters of or pertaining
to that city.The term colophony (for the
type of rosin) is from colophonia resina (from the Ancient Greek Κολοφωνία ῥητίνη (Kolophōnia rhētinē)) which describes the hardened resin
from the pine trees of Colophon, a substance valued by the craftsmen who made stringed
musical instruments because its properties were uniquely helpful in increasing the
friction of bow hairs (and now used in pharmaceutical preparations
& soldering fluxes though it’s still prized by those who play the violin,
viola, cello etc).Colophon is a noun
and colophonic is an adjective; the noun plural is colophons.
The etymological relationship between the colophon in
publishing and the Ancient Greek city of Colophon lies in the original meaning
of the word and the reverence in the West for the classical world which would
have found a Latin or Greek form preferable to something in brutish English like
“details page”.The Greek word κολοφών (kolophṓn) meant “peak” or “summit” and
thus the ancient Lydian city in Asia Minor (what is now the land mass of the
modern Republic of Türkiye) which was said to be the oldest of the twelve of
the Ionian League came to be known as Colophon because it was built upon a
ridgeline which rose between Ephesus & Lebedos.From the, in Greek, kolophṓn came to be used to mean “a city or town at the summit of
a hill or a signpost at the end of a trail that indicated the name and location
of the place” and thus “a finishing touch; a finishing stroke”.From this duality of meaning came the use in publishing,
the bibliographic addendum called a “colophon” in the metaphorical sense of a “crowning
touch” and the historic placement at the end of a book or manuscript an
allusion to “the signpost at the end”.Although it would be centuries before anything like a standardized form
emerged, the concept of the colophon has been identified in texts from
antiquity, recognizable versions existing as early as the second century AD.
An emulation of a colaphon.
A colophon is not an essential component of a book but
many publishers have long included one.
In its most simple modern form, a colophon is a summary of technical
information which includes data such as the name & insignia of the
publisher, the font(s) used, the details of photographs or art used on the
covers and the names of the author(s) or editor(s), along with whatever biographical
data they may care to reveal. The nature
of the text also influences what’s included, books with a technical bent (and
certainly those covering IT matters) likely to list software used in the
composition while those which focus on photography are likely to include much
about cameras. Reflecting environment
concerns, increasingly colophons include mentions of thing like sustainability
in the process (which can mean much or little) or the use of recycled
materials. A colophon differs from a
blurb (often printed on the back cover or a cover flap) which is a blend of
promotional puff-piece and a précis of the contents. Traditionally part of the back matter, they’re
now often found among the front pages along with the title page (a more modern
innovation than the colophon) appearing with the usual entries such as the date
& place of publication, the copyright stamp, ISBN references etc. In a sense, a colophon can be considered a
form of metadata (which references the concept of structured information which
is about other data).
Hardtop & Hard Topor Hard-Top ( pronounced hahrd-top)
(1) In
automotive design, as hardtop, a design in which no centre post (B-pillar) is used between the
front and rear windows.
(2) As "hard top" or "hard top", a rigid, removable or retractable roof used on convertible cars (as distinct from
the historically more common folding, soft-top).
(3) Mid
twentieth-century US slang for an indoor cinema with a roof (as opposed to a
drive-in).
1947-1949:
A compound of US origin, hard + top.Hard was from the Middle English hard, from the Old English heard, from the Proto-West Germanic hard(ī),
from the Proto-Germanic harduz, from
the primitive Indo-European kort-ús,
from kret- (strong, powerful). It was
cognate with the German hart, the
Swedish hård, the Ancient Greek
κρατύς (kratús), the Sanskrit क्रतु (krátu) and the Avestanxratu.Top was from the Middle English top & toppe, from the
Old English top (top, highest part;
summit; crest; tassel, tuft; (spinning) top, ball; a tuft or ball at the
highest point of anything), from the Proto-Germanic tuppaz (braid, pigtail, end), from the primitive Indo-European
dumb- (tail, rod, staff, penis).It was
cognate with the Scots tap (top), the
North Frisian top, tap & tup (top), the Saterland Frisian Top (top), the West Frisian top
(top), the Dutch top (top,
summit, peak), the Low German Topp (top),
the German Zopf (braid, pigtail,
plait, top), the Swedish topp (top,
peak, summit, tip) and the Icelandic toppur
(top).
Although the origins of the body-style can
be traced to the early twentieth century, the hardtop, a two or four-door car
without a central (B-pillar) post, became a recognizable model type in the late
1940s and, although never the biggest seller, was popular in the United States
until the mid 1970s when down-sizing and safety legislation led to their
extinction, the last being the full sized Chrysler lines of 1978.European manufacturers too were drawn to the
style and produced many coupes but only Mercedes-Benz and Facel Vega made four-door
hardtops in any number, the former long maintaining several lines of hardtop
coupés.
1965
Lincoln Continental four-door sedan (with centre (B) pillar).
The convention of
use is that the fixed roofed vehicles without the centre (B)-pillars are called
a hardtop
whereas a removable or retractable roof for a convertible is either a hard
top or, somewhat less commonly a hard-top.The folding fabric roof is either a soft
top or soft-top, both common forms; the word softtop probably doesn't exist although it has been used by manufacturers of this and that to describe various "tops" made of stuff not wholly solid. In the mid-1990s, the decades-old idea of the
folding metal roof was revived as an alternative to fabric.The engineering was sound but some
manufacturers have reverted to fabric, the advantages of solid materials
outweighed by the drawbacks of weight, cost and complexity.A solid, folding top is usually called a retractable roof or folding hardtop.
1957
Ford Fairlane Skyliner.
Designers had toyed with the idea of the solid
retractable roof early in the twentieth century, and patents were applied for in the
1920s but the applications were allowed to lapse and it wouldn't be until
1932 one was granted in France, the first commercial release by Peugeot in
1934.Other limited-production cars
followed but it wasn't until 1957 one was sold in any volume, Ford's Fairlane
Skyliner, using a system Ford developed but never used for the Continental Mark II (1956-1957) was an expensive top-of-the range model for two years.It was expensive for a reason: the complexity
of the electric system which raised and lowered the roof.A marvel of what was still substantially the
pre-electronic age, it used an array of motors, relays and switches, all
connected with literally hundreds of feet of electrical cables in nine different
colors.Despite that, the system was
reliable and could, if need be, be fixed by any competent auto-electrician who
had the wiring schematic.In its
two-year run, nearly fifty-thousand were built. The possibilities of nomenclature are interesting too. With the hard top in place, the Skyliner becomes also a hardtop because there's no B pillar so it's a "hardtop" with a "hard top", something only word-nerds note.
2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK55 AMG with retractable metal roof.
After 1960, the concept was neglected,
re-visited only by a handful of low-volume specialists or small production runs
for the Japanese domestic market.The
car which more than any other turned the retractable roof into a mainstream
product was the 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK which began as a show car, the favorable
response encouraging production.Successful, over three generations, it was in the line-up for almost twenty-five years.
Roof-mounted hard top hoist: Mercedes-Benz 560 SL (R107).
The
Fairlane Skyliner's top was notable for another reason: size and weight. On small roadsters, even when made from
steel, taking off and putting on a hard top could usually be done by someone of
reasonable strength, the task made easier still if the thing instead was made
from aluminum or fibreglass. If large
and heavy, it became impossible for one and difficult even for two; some of even the smaller hard tops (such as the Triumph Stag and the R107 Mercedes SL roadster) were
famous heavyweights. Many owners used trolley
or ceiling-mounted hoists, some even electric but not all had the space, either for
the hardware or the detached roof.
1962 Pontiac Catalina convertible with Riveria "Esquire" Series 300 hard top.
No manufacturer attempted a retractable hard top on the
scale of the big Skyliner but at least one aftermarket supplier thought there
might be demand for something large and detachable. Riveria Inc, based in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, offered
them between 1963-1964 for the big (then called full or standard-size) General Motors
(GM) convertibles. Such was GM’s
production-line standardization, the entire range of models, spread over five
divisions and three years, could be covered by just three variations (in length) of hard top. Made from fibreglass with an external texture which emulated leather, weight
was a reasonable 80 lb (30 kg) but the sheer size rendered them unmanageable for
many and not all had storage for such a bulky item, the growth of the American automobile
meaning garages accommodative but a few years earlier were now cramped.
1962
Chevrolet Impala SS (Super Sport) convertible with Riveria "Esquire" Series 100 hard top.
Riveria offered their basic (100 series) hardtop in black
or white, a more elaborately textured model (200 series) finished in gold or
silver while the top of the range (300 series) used the same finishes but with simulated
“landau” irons. No modification was
required to the car, the roof attaching to the standard convertible clamps, the soft-top remaining retracted. Prices started at US$295 and the company seems
to have attempted to interest GM's dealers in offering the hard tops as a
dealer-fitter accessory but corporate interest must have been as muted as buyer
response, Riveria ceasing operations in 1964.
1960 or 1961 Lincoln
Continental four-door hardtop (pre-production).
One of the
anomalies in the history of the four-door hardtops was that Lincoln, in its
classic 1960s Continental, offered a a four-door pillared
sedan, a by then unique four-door convertible and, late in the run, a two-door hardtop but no four-door hardtop.That seemed curious because the structural
engineering required to produce a four door hardtop already existed in the
convertible coachwork and both Ford & Mercury had several in their ranges,
as did the many divisions of GM & Chrysler. According to the authoritative Curbside Classic, the four-door hardtop was cancelled almost on the eve of the model's release, the factory’s records indicating either ten or eleven were built (which seem to have been pre-production vehicles rather than prototypes) and
photographs survive, some of which even appeared in general-release brochures with a B-pillar air-brushed in. So late was the decision taken not to proceed that Lincoln had already printed service bulletins, parts lists and other documents, detailing the four-door (pillared) sedan (Body Code 53A), four-door convertible (74A) & four-door hardtop (57C). Curbside Classic revealed that of the 57C count, either six or seven were converted to sedans while the fate of the "missing four" remains a mystery, there being nothing to suggest any of the phantom four ever reached public hands.Collectors chase rarities like these but they’ve
not been seen in 65-odd years so it’s presumed all were scrapped once the
decision was taken not to proceed with production.
1966 Lincoln
Continental two-door hardtop.
The consensus among Lincoln gurus is the rationale for the decision was based wholly on cost.While the
Edsel's failure in the late 1950s is well storied, it’s often forgotten that nor were the huge Lincolns
of that era a success and, with the Ford Motor
Company suddenly being run by the MBA-type “wizz kids”, the Lincoln brand too
was considered for the axe. After Lincoln booked a cumulative loss of US$60 million (then a great deal of money although that number, like the Edsel's US$250 million in red ink, might have been overstated to take advantage of the tax rules related to write-offs), that idea was considered but Lincoln was given one last chance at redemption, using
what was actually a prototype Ford Thunderbird; that was the car which emerged
as the memorable 1961 Lincoln.But given the lukewarm reception to the last range, to there
was no certainty of success so it seems the decision was taken to restrict the
range to the pillared sedan and the four-door convertible, a breakdown on the
production costs of the prototype four-door hardtops proving they would be much
more expensive to produce (it would have had to use the convertible's intricate side-window assemblies). Additionally, Curbside Classic reported, testing had revealed that at speed, the large expanse of metal in the roof was prone to distortion which, while barely perceptible, allowed some moisture intrusion through the window seals. The only obvious solution was to use heavier gauge metal but that would have been expensive and a delay in the model's release and, with some uncertainty about the prospects of success for the brand, the decision was taken to prune the line-up. While never the biggest sellers, the four-door hardtops had always attracted attention in showrooms but for that task, Lincoln
anyway had something beyond the merely exclusive, they had the unique four-door
convertible.
1976 Jaguar XJ 5.3C. With the ugly vinyl removed, the lovely roof-line can be admired. Although long habitually referred to as a "coupé", the factory called them the "XJ Two-Door Saloon", reserving the former designation for the E-Type (1961-1974) and XJ-S (later XJS) (1975-1996).
Coincidently, a decade later Jaguar in the UK faced a similar problem when developing the two-door hardtop version (1975-1977) of their XJ saloon (1968-1992). It was a troubled time for the UK industry and although first displayed in 1973, it wasn't until 1975 the first were delivered. One problem revealed in testing was the roof tended slightly to flex and while not a structural issue, because regulations had compelled the removal of lead from automotive paint, the movement in the metal could cause the now less flexible paint to craze and, under-capitalized, Jaguar (by then part of the doomed British Leyland conglomerate) didn't have the funds to undertake a costly re-design so the Q&D (quick & dirty) solution was to glue on a vinyl roof. It marred the look but saved the car and modern paint can now cope so a number of owners have taken the opportunity to restore their XJC to the appearance the designers intended. Other problems (the dubious window sealing and the inadequate door hinges, the latter carried over from the four-door range which used shorter, lighter doors) were never fixed. It's an accident of history that in 1960 when the fate of the Lincoln four-door hardtop was being pondered, vinyl roofs (although they had been seen) were a few years away from entering the mainstream so presumably the engineers never contemplated gluing one on to try to "fix the flex" although, given the economic imperatives, perhaps even that wouldn't have allowed it to escape the axe.
End of the line: 1967 Lincoln
Continental four-door convertible.
It did work, sales volumes after a slow start
in 1961 growing to a level Lincoln had not enjoyed in years, comfortably
out-selling Imperial even if never a challenge to Cadillac. The four-door convertible's most famous owner was Lyndon Johnson (LBJ, 1908–1973; US president 1963-1969) who would use it to drive visitors around his Texas ranch (often with can of Pearl beer in hand according to LBJ folklore). While never a big seller (21,347 made over seven years and it achieved fewer than 4,000 sales even in its best year), it was the most publicized of the line and to this day remains a staple in film & television productions needing verisimilitude of the era. The convertible was
discontinued after 1967 when 2276 were built, the two-door hardtop introduced the year before
out-selling it five to one. The market had spoken; it would be the last convertible Lincoln ever
produced and it's now a collectable, LBJ's 1964 model in 2024 selling at auction for US$200,000 and fully restored examples without a celebrity connection regularly trade at well into five figures, illustrating the magic of the coach-work.
John Cashman (aka "The Lincoln Guru") is acknowledged as the world's
foremost authority on the 1961-1967 Lincoln Continental Convertibles.Here, in a video provided when LBJ's car (in
Arctic White (Code M) over Beige Leather (Trim 74)) was sold on the Bring-a-Trailer
on-line auction site, he explains the electrical & mechanical intricacies of
the machinery which handles the folding top and side windows. The soft-top is a marvel of analogue-era mechanical engineering.
Deconstructing the oxymoronic "pillared hardtop"
1970 Ford LTD four-door hardtop (left) and Ford's press release announcing the 1974 "pillared hardtop", September 1973.
So
it would seem settled a hard-top is a convertible’s removable roof made with
rigid materials like metal or fibreglass while a hardtop is a car with no
central pillar between the forward and rear side glass. That would be fine except that in the 1970s, Ford
decided there were also “pillared hardtops”, introducing the description on a
four-door range built on their full-sized (a breed now extinct) corporate
platform shared between 1968-1978 by Ford and Mercury. The rationale for the name was that to differentiate
between the conventional sedan which used frames around the side windows and
the pillared hardtops which used the frameless assemblies familiar from their
use in the traditional hardtops. When
the pillared hardtops were released, as part of the effort to comply with
pending rollover standards, the two door hardtop switched to being a coupé with
thick B-pillars, behind which sat a tall “opera window”, another of those
motifs the US manufacturers for years found irresistible.
1976
Cadillac Eldorado convertible, at the time: “the last American convertible”. Unlike the convertibles, the US industry's four-door hardtops were never resurrected from the 1970s coachwork cull. The styling of the original FWD Eldorado (1967) was one of the US industry's finest (as long as buyers resisted ordering the disfiguring vinyl roof) which no subsequent version matched, descending first to the baroque before in the 1980s becoming an absurd caricature. In 1976, the lines of “the last American convertible” were really quite restrained compared with the excess of earlier in the decade.
The
wheels in the picture are a minor footnote in the history of US
manufacturing.When GM’s “big” FWD (front
wheel drive) coupes debuted (the Oldsmobile Toronado for 1966, the Eldorado the
following season), although the styling of both was eye-catching, it was the
engineering which intrigued many.On
paper, coupling 7.0 litre (the Eldorado later to reach 8.2 (500 cubic inch)) V8s with FWD sounded at least courageous but even in the early, more powerful,
versions, GM managed remarkably well to tame the characteristics inherent in
such a configuration and the transmission (which included a chain-drive!)
proved as robust and the other heavy-duty Turbo-Hydramatics.Unlike other ranges, the Toronado and
Eldorado offered no options in wheel or wheel-cover design and because the
buyer demographic was very different for those shopping for Mustangs, Corvettes
and such, there was initially no interest from wheel manufactures in offering
an alternative; being FWD, it would have
required a different design for the mounting and with such a small potential market,
none were tempted.Later however,
California’s Western Wheel Company adapted their “Cyclone Special” (a “turbine”
style) and released it as the “Cyclone Eldorado”.It wasn’t a big seller but the volumes must
have been enough to justify continuation because Western also released a
version for the 1979-1985 Eldorados although the two were not interchangeable,
the bolt-circle 5 x 5" for the older, 5 x 4.75" for the newer.The difference in the offset was corrected
with a spacer while the wheels (Western casting #4056) were otherwise
identical.When Cadillac in the 1980s
offered a factory fitted alloy wheel, that was the end of the line for Western's Cyclone
Eldorado.
The “last
American convertible” ceremony, Cadillac Clark Street Assembly Plant, Detroit,
Michigan, 21 April 1976.
The phrase “last
American convertible” was used by GM to promote the 1976 Eldorado and sales
spiked, some to buyers who purchased the things as investments, assuming in years to come they’d have a collectable and book a tidy profit on-selling to
those who wanted a (no longer available) big drop-top.Not only did GM use the phrase as a marketing
hook for when the last of the 1976 run rolled off the Detroit production line
on 21 April, the PR department, having recognized a photo opportunity,
conducted a ceremony, complete with a “THE END OF AN ERA 1916-1976) banner and a "LAST" Michigan license plate.The final 200 Fleetwood Eldorado convertibles
were “white on white on white”, identically finished in white with white soft-tops,
white leather seat trim with red piping, white wheel covers, red carpeting
& instrument panel; the red and blue hood accent stripes to marked the nation’s
bicentennial.
The “last
American convertible” ceremony, Cadillac Clark Street Assembly Plant, Detroit,
Michigan, 21 April 1976.
Of course
in 1984 a convertible returned to the Cadillac catalogue so some of those who
had stashed away their 1976 models under wraps in climate controlled garages
weren’t best pleased and litigation ensued, a class action filed against GM alleging
the use of the (now clearly incorrect) phrase “last American convertible” had
been “deceptive
or misleading” in that it induced the plaintiffs to enter a contract
which they’d not otherwise have undertaken.The suit was dismissed on the basis of there being insufficient legal
grounds to support the claim, the court ruling the phrase was a “non-actionable
opinion” rather than a “factual claim”, supporting GM's contention it
had been a creative expression rather than a strict statement of fact and thus
did not fulfil the criteria for a deceptive advertising violation.Additionally, the court found there was no
actual harm caused to the class of plaintiffs as they failed to show they had
suffered economic loss or that the advertisement had led them to make a
purchase they would not otherwise have made.That aspect of the judgment has since been criticized with dark hints it
was one of those “what’s good for General Motors is good for the country”
moments but the documentary evidence did suggest GM at the time genuinely
believed the statement to be true.What
wasn’t brought before the court was that the industry wasn’t disappointed in
the demise of the convertible, sales since the 1960s have fallen to the point
the volumes simply didn’t justify the engineering effort required and even
before the (never realized) threat of a government ban had been discussed, some
models had already been withdrawn from production.
Ronald Reagan in riding boots & spurs with 1938 LaSalle Series 50 Convertible Coupe (one of 819 produced that year), Warner Brothers Studios, Burbank California, 1941. LaSalle was the lower-priced (although marketed more as "sporty") "companion marque" to Cadillac and a survivor of GM's (Great Depression-induced) 1931 cull of brand-names. The last LaSalle would be produced in 1940. Mr Regan remained fond of Cadillacs and when president was instrumental is shifting the White House's presidential fleet from Lincolns to Cadillacs.
When ceasing production of the true four-door hardtops, Ford also dropped the convertible from the full-sized line, the industry orthodoxy at the time that a regulation outlawing the style
was imminent, and such was the importance of the US market that expectation that
accounted also for Mercedes-Benz not including a cabriolet when the S-Class
(W116) was released in 1972, leaving the SL (R107; 1971-1989) roadster as the
company’s only open car and it wasn’t until 1990 a four-seat cabriolet returned
with the debut of the A124. Any
suggestion of outlawing convertibles ended with the election in 1980 of Ronald
Reagan (1911-2004, US president 1981-1989).
A former governor of California with fond memories of drop-top motoring
and a world-view that government should intervene in markets as little as
possible, under his administration, convertibles returned (including Cadillacs) to US showrooms.
The on-off ban on convertibles in the US is an amusing tale of interest to political scientists and economists US federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) included FMVSS 208 (roll-over protection, published in 1970), one obvious implication of which was the banning of “real” convertibles in the US market and while the local manufacturers challenged in court some of the provisions in FMVSS 208, they made no attempt to challenge the demise of the convertible, their sales of the configuration having fallen to the point the body-style was no longer offered in most lines and even without the intervention of government it’s likely availability would anyway further have been restricted to the odd specialist product.Indeed, Chevrolet, aware of the coming edict, had in 1968 released the coupe version of the third generation (C3) Corvette as a kind of targa, the so-called “T-top” with removable roof panels, the remaining structure essentially a “roll-bar able to “drive through” FMVSS 208.
Compliant and not with FMVSS 208 as drafted. 1978 Chevrolet Corvette Coupe with T-Top roof (left) and 1978 Chrysler New Yorker, the last of the four-door hardtops (right). The indefinite extension of the "temporary exemption" of convertibles from FMVSS's roll-over standards created the curious anomaly that Chrysler could in theory have maintained a New Yorker convertible (had one existed) in production while being compelled to drop the four-door hardtop. Market realities meant the federal court never had to set to resolve that and no manufacturer sought an exemption for the latter.
In an example of the way government and industry in the US interact (mostly through the mechanism of “campaign financing” with lobbyists as the intermediaries), in 1971 the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) granted a “temporary exemption” for convertibles from the rollover parameters and originally the sunset clause was set to 31 August 1977 (ie, the end of the 1977 season), a date chosen because by then Detroit’s existing convertible lines were schedule to have reached their EoL (end of life).The FMVSS 208 standards were otherwise maintained and that was what doomed to four-door hardtops which, lacking a central (B) pillar would have been prohibitively expensive to engineer into compliance.However, late in 1972 an unexpected ruling from a federal court held that FMVSS 208 existed under the provisions of the NTMVSA (National Traffic & Motor Vehicle Safety Act (1966)) and this was found to contain no statutory basis which could extend to the banning of convertibles.In fact, the judgment stated, the act obligated the agency “to afford such vehicles special consideration.” Detroit no more expected that than did the NHTSA but while the manufacturers were sanguine about no longer producing convertibles, the regulators were compelled to decide what to do about their regulation and, given Detroit’s attitude, they decided to kick the can down the road and simply extend the “temporary” exemption, nominating no end-date.
1966 Lincoln Continental Sedan (left) and 1974 Buick Century Luxus Colonnade Hardtop Sedan (right). Luxus was from the Latin luxus (extravagance) and appeared in several Germanic languages where it conveyed the idea of "luxury".
With "pillared hardtops", it
was actually only the ostensibly oxymoronic nomenclature which was novel, Ford’s
Lincoln Continentals combining side windows with frames which lowered into the doors and a B pillar; Lincoln
called these a sedan, then the familiar appellation in the US for all four-door
models with a centre pillar. Curiously,
in the 1960s another descriptive layer appeared (though usually not used by the
manufacturers): “post”. Thus where a
range included two-door hardtops with no pillar a coupés with one, there was
among some to adopt “coupé” and “post coupé” as a means of differentiation and
this spread, the term “post sedan” also still seen today in the collector
markets. Other manufacturers in the
1970s also used the combination of frameless side glass and a B-pillar but Ford’s
adoption of “pillar hardtop was unique; All such models in General Motors’ (GM)
“Colonnade” lines were originally described variously as “colonnade hardtop
sedans” (Buick) or “colonnade hardtops” (Chevrolet, Oldsmobile & Pontiac) and
the nickname was borrowed from architecture where colonnade refers to “a series
of regularly spaced columns supporting an entablature and often one side of a
roof”. For whatever reasons, the advertising
copy changed over the years, Buick shifting to “hardtop sedan”, Chevrolet &
Oldsmobile to “sedan” and Pontiac “colonnade hardtop sedan”. Pontiac was the last to cling to the use of “colonnade”;
by the late 1970s the novelty has passed and the consumer is usually attracted
by something “new”. Because the GM range
of sedans had for uprights (A, B & C-pillars plus a divided rear glass),
the allusion was to these as “columns”.
Ford though, was a little tricky.
Their B-pillars were designed in such as way that the thick portion was recessed
and dark, the silver centrepiece thin and more obvious, so with the windows
raised, the cars could be mistaken for a classic hardtop. It was a cheap trick but it was also clever,
in etymological terms a “fake hardtop” but before long, there was a bit of a
vogue for “fake soft-tops” which seems indisputably worse.
1975 Imperial LeBaron (left) and 1978 Chrysler New Yorker. The big Chryslers were the last of the four-door hardtops produced in the US.
The
Americans didn’t actually invent the pillarless hardtop style and although coach-builders on both sides of the Atlantic had built a handful in both two and four door form, in the
post-war years it was Detroit which with gusto took to the motif. The other geo-centre of hardtops was the JDM (Japanese Domestic Market)
which refers to vehicles produced (almost) exclusively for sale within Japan
and rarely seen beyond except in diplomatic use, as private imports, or as part
of the odd batch exported to special markets.
As an ecosystem, it exerts a special fascination for (1) those who study the
Japanese industry and (2) those who gaze enviously on the desirable versions the RoW (rest of the world) was denied. The range of high performance versions and variations in coachwork available in the JDM was wide and for those with a fondness for Japanese cars, the subject of cult-like veneration. By the late 1970s,
the handful of US four-door hardtops still on sale were hangovers from designs
which dated from the late 1960s, behemoths anyway doomed by rising gas (petrol) prices
and tightening emission controls; with the coming of 1979 (coincidently the
year of the “second oil shock”) all were gone.
In the JDM however, the interest remained and endured into the 1990s.
1965 Chevrolet Corvair Corsa (two-door hardtop, left) and 1969 Mazda Luce Coupé (right).
The
first Japanese cars to use the hardtop configuration were two-door coupés, the
Toyota Corona the first in 1965 and Nissan and Mitsubishi soon followed. One interesting thing during the era was the
elegant Izuzu 117 Coupé (1968-1980), styled by the Italian Giorgetto Giugiaro
(b 1938) which, with its slender B-pillar, anticipated Ford’s stylistic trick
although there’s nothing to suggest this was ever part of the design brief. Another of Giugiaro’s creations was the rare
Mazda Luce Coupé (1968), a true hardtop which has the quirk of being Mazda’s
only rotary-powered car to be configured with FWD. Giugiaro’s lines were hardly original because
essentially they duplicated (though few suggest "improved") those of the lovely second
generation Chevrolet Corvair (1965-1969) and does illustrate what an
outstanding compact the Corvair could have been if fitted with a conventional (front-engine
/ rear wheel drive (RWD)) drive-train.
1973 Nissan Cedric four-door Hardtop 2000 Custom Deluxe (KF230, left) and 1974 Toyota Crown Royal Saloon four-door Pillared Hardtop (2600 Series, right).
By
1972, Nissan released a version of the Laurel which was their first four-door although it was only the volume manufacturers for which the economics of scale
of such things were attractive, the smaller players such as Honda and Subaru
dabbling only with two-door models.
Toyota was the most smitten and by the late 1970s, there were hardtops
in all the passenger car lines except the smallest and the exclusive Century,
the company finding that for a relatively small investment, an increase in profit
margins of over 10% was possible. Toyota
in 1974 also followed Ford’s example in using a “pillared hardtop” style for
the up-market Crown, the exclusivity enhanced by a roofline lowered by 25 mm (1
inch); these days it’d be called a “four door coupé” (and etymologically that
is correct, as Rover had already demonstrated with a "chop-top" which surprised many upon its release in 1962). In the JDM, the last true four-door hardtops
were built in the early 1990s but Subaru continued to offer the “pillared
hardtop” style until 2010 and the extinction of the breed was most attributable
to the shifting market preference for sports utility vehicles (SUV) and such. In Australia, Mitsubishi between between 1996-2005
used frameless side-windows and a slim B-pillar on their Magna so it fitted the
definition of a “pillar hardtop” although the term was never used in marketing,
the term “hardtop” something Australians associated only with two-door coupés (Ford
and Chrysler had actually the term as a model name in the 1960s &
1970s). When the Magna was replaced by
the doomed and dreary 380 (2005-2008), Mitsubishi reverted to window frames and
chunky pillars.
Standard and Spezial coachwork on the Mercedes-Benz 300d (W189, 1957-1962).The "standard" four-door hardtop was available throughout the run while the four-door Cabriolet D was offered (off and on) between 1958-1962 and the Spezials (landaulets, high-roofs et al), most of which were for state or diplomatic use, were made on a separate assembly line in 1960-1961.The standard "greenhouse" (or glasshouse) cars are to the left, those with the high roof-line to the right.
Few European manufacturers attempted four-door hardtops and one of the handful was the 300d (W189, 1957-1962), a revised version of the W186 (300, 300b & 300c; 1951-1957) which came to be referred to as the "Adenauer" because several were used as state cars by Konrad Adenauer (1876–1967; chancellor of the FRG (West Germany) 1949-1963).Although the coachwork never exactly embraced the lines of mid-century modernism, the integration of the lines of the 1950s with the pre-war motifs appealed to the target market (commerce, diplomacy and the old & rich) and on the platform the factory built various Spezials including long wheelbase "pullmans", landaulets, high-roof limousines and four-door cabriolets (Cabriolet D in the Daimler-Benz system).The high roofline appeared sometimes on both the closed & open cars and even then, years before the assassination of John Kennedy (JFK, 1917–1963; US president 1961-1963), the greenhouse sometimes featured “bullet-proof” glass. As well as Chancellor Adenauer, the 300d is remembered also as the Popemobile (although not then labelled as such) of John XXIII (1881-1963; pope 1958-1963).
A tale of two rooflines, the Rover 3.5 (P5B): Saloon (left) and Coupé (left); plans to produce the Coupé as a four-door hardtop proved abortive.
In the UK, Rover (a company with a history or adventurism in engineering which belies its staid image) tried to create a four-door hardtop as a more rakish version of their P5 sedan (3 Litre (P5, 1958-1957) & 3.5 Litre (P5B 1967-1973)) but were unable to perfect the sealing around the windows, something which afflicted also the lovely two-door versions (1975-1978) of the Jaguar & Daimler Series 2 XJs (1973-1979). Rover instead in 1962 released a pillared version of the P5 with a lowered roof-line and some different interior fittings, named the four-door the "Coupé" which puzzled those who had become used to "coupes" being two-door machines but etymologically, Rover was correct.
Pillars, stunted pillars & "pillarless"
1959 Lancia Appia Series III
Actually,
although an accepted part of engineering jargon, to speak of the classic
four-door hardtops as “pillarless” is, in the narrow technical sense,
misleading because almost all used a truncated B-pillar, ending at the
belt-line where the greenhouse begins. The
stunted device was required to provide a secure anchor point for the rear door's hinges (or latches for both if suicide doors were used) and in the case of the latter, being of frameless
construction, without the upright, the doors would be able to be locked in
place only at the sill, the physics of which presents a challenge because even
in vehicles with high torsional rigidity, there will be movement. The true pillarless design was successfully executed
by some but those manufacturers used doors with sturdy window frames,
permitting latch points at both sill and roof, Lancia offering the
configuration on a number of sedans including the Ardea (1939-1953), Aurelia
(1950-1958) & Appia (1953-1963). The
approach demanded a more intricate locking mechanism but the engineering was
simple and on the Lancias it worked and was reliable, buyers enjoying the ease
of ingress & egress. It's sad the company's later attachment to front wheel drive (FWD) ultimately doomed Lancia because in every other aspect of engineering, few others were as adept at producing such fine small-displacement vehicles.
1961 Facel Vega II (a two door hardtop with the unusual "feature" of the rear side-glass being hinged from the C-pillar).
Less
successful with doors was the Facel Vega Excellence, built in two series between
1958-1964.Facel Vega was a French
company which was a pioneer in what proved for almost two decades the
interesting and lucrative business of the trans-Atlantic hybrid, the combination
of stylish European coachwork with cheap, refined, powerful and reliable American engine-transmission
combinations.Like most in the genre,
the bulk of Facel Vega’s production was big (by European standards) coupés (and
the odd cabriolet) and they enjoyed much success, the company doomed only when
it augmented the range with the Facellia, a smaller car.Conceptually, adding the smaller coupés &
cabriolets was a good idea because it was obvious the gap in the market existed
but the mistake was to pander to the feelings of politicians and use a French
designed & built engine which proved not only fragile but so fundamentally
flawed rectification was impossible.By
the time the car had been re-engineered to use the famously durable Volvo B18
engine, the combination of the cost of the warranty claims and reputational
damage meant bankruptcy was impending and in 1964 the company ceased operation.The surviving “big” Facel Vegas, powered by a
variety of big-block Chrysler V8s, are now highly collectable and priced
accordingly.
1960 Facel Vega Excellence EX1
Compared
with that debacle, the problem besetting the Excellence
was less serious but was embarrassing and, like the Facellia's unreliable engine, couldn’t be fixed.The Excellence was a
four-door sedan, a configuration also offered by a handful of other
trans-Atlantic players (including Iso, DeTomaso & Monteverdi) and although volumes were low, because the platforms were elongations of those used on
their coupés, production & development costs were modest so with high prices,
profits were good.Facel Vega however
attempted what no others dared: combine eye-catching suicide doors, frameless side glass and coachwork which was truly pillarless, necessitating latching &
locking mechanisms in the sills.With the
doors open, it was a dramatic scene of lush leather and highly polished burl
walnut (which was actually painted metal) and the intricate lock mechanism was
precisely machined and worked well… on a test bench.Unfortunately, on the road, the
pillarless centre section was inclined slightly to flex when subject to lateral
forces (such as those imposed when turning corners) and this could release the
locks, springing the doors open.Owners reported
this happening while turning corners and it should be remembered (1) lateral
force increases as speed rises and (2) this was the pre-seatbelt era.There appear to be no confirmed reports of
unfortunate souls being ejected by centrifugal force through an suddenly open door (the author Albert Camus (1913–1960) was killed when the Facel Vega HK500 two-door coupé in which he was a passenger hit a tree, an accident unrelated to doors) but clearly the risk was there.Revisions to the mechanism improved the security but the problem was
never completely solved; despite that the factory did offer a revised second
series Excellence in 1961, abandoning the dog-leg style windscreen and toning
down the fins, both of which had become passé but in three years only a handful
were sold.By the time the factory was
shuttered in 1964, total Excellence production stood at 148 EX1s (Series One; 1958-1961)
& 8 EX2s (Series Two; 1961-1964).
The Mercedes-Benz R230 SL: Lindsay Lohan going topless (in an automotive sense) in
2005 SL 65 AMG with folding roof lowered (left), Ms Lohan's SL 65 AMG (with folding roof erected) later when on sale (centre)
& 2009 SL 65 AMG Black Series with fixed-roof (right).
At the time, uniquely in the SL lineage, the R230 (2001-2011) was available with both a retractable hard top and
with a fixed roof but no soft-top was ever offered (the configuration continued in the R231 (2012-2020) while the R232 (since 2021) reverted to fabric).Having no B pillar, most of the R230s were
thus a hardtop with a hard top but the SL 65 AMG Black Series (2008–2011, 400 of which were built, 175 for the US market, 225 for the RoW) used
a fixed roof fabricated using a carbon fibre composite, something which
contributed to the Black Series weighing some 250 kilograms (550 lb) less
than the standard SL 65 AMG. A production of 350 is sometimes quoted but those maintaining the registers insist the count was 400. Of the
road-going SLs built since 1954, the Black Series R230 was one of only three
models sold without a retractable roof of some kind, the others being the
original 300 SL Gullwing (W198, 1954-1957) and the “California coupé” option offered
between 1967-1971 for the W113 (1963-1971) "Pagoda" roadster (and thus available only
for the 250 SL (1966-1968) & 280 SL (1967-1971)).The "California coupé" (a nickname from the market, the factory only ever using "SL Coupé") was simply an SL supplied
with only the removable hard top and no soft-top, a folding bench seat included
which was really suitable only for small children.The name California was chosen presumably because
of the association of the place with sunshine and hence a place where one could
be confident it was safe to go for a drive without the fear of unexpected rain.Despite the name, the California coupé
was available outside the US (a few even built in right-hand drive form) and although
the North American market absorbed most of the production, a remarkable number seem to exist in Scandinavia.
A classic roadster, the C3 Chevrolet Corvette L88: Convertible with soft-top lowered (top left), convertible with hard-top in place (top right), convertible with soft-top erected (bottom left) and coupé (roof with two removable panels (T-top)) (bottom right). The four vehicles in these images account for 2.040816% of the 196 C3 L88 Corvettes produced (80 in 1968; 116 in 1969) and the L88 count constitutes .000361% of total C3 production.