Termagant
(pronounced tur-muh-guhnt)
(1) A
mythical deity popularly believed in Medieval Christendom to be worshiped by Muslims
and introduced into the morality play as a violent, overbearing personage in
long robes (a proper noun and thus used with initial capital).
(2) A
brawling, boisterous, and turbulent person or thing (archaic).
(3) A
censorious, nagging, scolding and quarrelsome woman (not exactly synonymous
with “harridan”, “virago” or “shrew” but with a similar flavor of
disapprobation); for those who find some women worse than others, the comparative
is “more termagant”, the superlative “most termagant”.
(4) The act
of behaving violently; turbulent conduct.
Circa 1500:
From the Middle English Termagaunt (one
of the three fictitious deities (others being Apollin & Mahound)
represented as being worshipped by Muslims; any pagan god), from the from the Anglo-Norman
Tervagant, Tervagaunt & Tervagan
and the Old French Tervagant & Tervagan, a name bestowed on a wholly fictitious
Muslim deity, created by Christian polemicists to use in medieval morality
plays as a symbol of the Islamic faith.
In the Old French, Tervagant
was a proper name in the eleventh century chanson
de geste (song of heroic deeds (from the Classical Latin gesta (deeds, actions accomplished)) Chanson de Roland (Song of Roland). The epic poem is the oldest known work of
substantial length in French still extant and was drawn from the exploits of
the Frankish military commander Roland at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass (778)
during the reign of Charlemagne (748–814; “Charles the Great” and
(retrospectively) the first Holy Roman Emperor 800-814). That the text (more correctly “texts” as a
number of variants have been identified) survived to this day is accounted for
by the work’s popularity; it was between the twelfth and sixteenth centuries among
the most widely distributed pieces of literature in Medieval and Renaissance Europe. The alternative spelling was termagant. Termagant is a noun & adjective, termagancy
& termagantism are nouns, termagantish is an adjective, and termagantly is
an adverb; the noun plural is Termagants.
The
ultimate origin of the word is a mystery but the most supported theory suggests
the construct being based on the Latin ter
(three times, thrice) (from the primitive Indo- European tréyes (three)) + vagāns
(rambling, wandering) (present active participle of vagor (to ramble, roam, wander), from vagus (rambling, roaming, wandering) (the source of which may be
the primitive Indo-European hwogos) +
-or (an inflected form of -ō (the suffix forming regular
first-conjugation verbs)). Given that
possible etymology, it’s argued the appearance of Termagant in Chanson de Roland as one of the three
deities allegedly worshipped by Muslims was an allusion to the wandering of the
moon (the crescent moon a well-known symbol of Islam) in the form of the
mythological goddesses Selene in heaven, Diana on Earth, and Proserpina in the
underworld. The adjective was derived
from the original proper noun, the sense of a “violent, overbearing person”
(later applied especially to “difficult” women) evolving because Christian
scribes always applied these characteristics to the figure; the meaning shift
was thus a “partial transfer” in that the unpleasant personality was carried
over to earthly flesh and blood with no suggestion of anything
supernatural.
Al Malik Al Ahmar (The Red Jinn-King) from an eighteenth century edition of the the Arabic manuscript of Kitab al Bulhan (Book of Wonders).
The
Termagant was a wholly mythical deity invented by Christian writers in Middle
Ages who claimed it was a figure worshiped by Muslims. Depicted as a violent, overbearing personage
in long robes, unlike a number of cross-cultural creations there was no figure which
existed specifically in Islamic belief, theology, or folklore that could be
said to be a model for the fanciful imaginings of Christian polemicists so it
was “fake news” rather than a distorted version of a figure in what was in the
West long called Mohammedanism (also a misleading tern because of the
implication Muhammad is worshiped by Muslims; In Islam only Allah (God) is
worshiped while Muhammad is venerated as His greatest prophet). This was all part of Christianity’s
misrepresentation of Islamic theology as not monotheist and thus in violation
of first two of the Ten Commandments in the Old Testament’s Book of Exodus: (1)
Thou shall worship no other Gods and (2) Thou shall not create false
idols. It was a blatant untruth because
strictly Islam was tawḥīd
(monotheistic) and
explicitly proscribed even the suggestion of a pantheon of gods. Unlike Christianity’s claims about Jesus
Christ, the prophet Muhammad was never said to be divine and was never
worshipped. Thus, the so-called “Saracen trinity”
in medieval texts has no basis in Islamic doctrine although that didn’t prevent
the notion spreading and being believed and variants of the techniques of
dissemination have since been practiced by propagandists such as priests and
politicians.
An Islamic miniature (1595) depicting Iblīs (top right) plotting against Muhammad watching over a meeting by the leaders of the Quraysh discussing the second pledge at al-Aqabah, being spied on by the anti-Islamic zealot “the Monk” Abu ʿĀmir al-Rāhib, who is part of Iblīs' plan, New York Public Library collection.
It’s true
that there were then (as there are now) in Islam many figures of authority
cloaked in long, dark robes but that was true also of Christianity and other
faiths. By the late Middle Ages, even if
the fake theology was proving unconvincing, the secular appeal of such a
menacing figure was real and especially in English theatre (where there was
often more leeway granted by the censors of church & state than elsewhere
in Europe), the termagant evolved into a stock character: ranting, tyrannical,
bombastic and often dressed in a costume of a type which late in the twentieth
century the Palestinian-American academic Edward Said (1935–2003) in Orientalism (1978) identified as a clichéd
“exoticized Eastern
costume” (another Western construct). Of Termagant Apollin & Mahound, although
there are in the Islamic tradition no true analogues, there are figures
(perhaps better thought of as “concepts”) in which there are vague or superficial
resemblances to the stereotype although there was never a hint they should be worshiped. The جنّ (Jinn) were supernatural beings made of “smokeless fire” and although some
were rebellious or violent, depending on this and that, they might be benevolent,
neutral, or malevolent but were certainly not deities to be worshipped and seem
never to have been depicted as despotic tyrants in the theatrical sense of the Termagant
of the Christian imagination. Best known
in the West was إبليس (Iblīs/Shayṭān (Satan)) who existed as the primary
adversarial figure in Islam and one representing arrogance, rebellion, and
temptation. Iblīs however seems closer to the Christian Satan than a “false
god”, not being nor portrayed as a blustering theatrical tyrant in robes. Most interesting in the tradition were the طاغية (ẓālim; the tyrannical rulers), a crew made
especially interesting in the last few months, following the ayatollahs’ recent
bloody crackdown on the streets of Iran to ensure regime survival, the
death-toll in January 2026 believed to have exceeded 30,000 and the author and
public policy analyst Robert Templer (b 1966) has estimated that on at least
two days that month, there were more were killed in state-sanctioned violence
than on any day since the end of World War II (1939-1945), his calculations
including the genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda and the Balkans. The Qurʾān
condemns unjust rulers (such as the Pharaohs) and to make the point, the ẓālim tended to be overbearing, violent
and arrogant. Those Iranians killed by
the thousand while chanting “Death to the dictator!” would have recognized what
the Qurʾān
condemns but the pattern is known from history.
Lindsay
Lohan (b 1986, right) with former special friend Samantha Ronson (b 1977, left). The couple were a tabloid staple in 2008-2009
but at the time the question often asked was whether a relationship between one
“quite termagant” and another “more termagant” could long be sustained. As was predicted, things ended badly. There
seems no evidence there ever was a collective noun for Termagants. If one is needed, it’s be something like a “tempest”,
“scold”, “railing” or “fury” of termagants.
By March 1945, it was obvious to most in Berlin that the end was nigh
and one individual brought to the attention of Adolf Hitler (1889-1945; Führer
(leader) and German head of government 1933-1945 & head of state 1934-1945)
a salient passage in his political manifesto Mein Kampf (1925-1926): “The task of
diplomacy is to ensure that a nation does not heroically go to its destruction
but is practically preserved. Every way that
leads to this end is expedient, and a failure to follow it must be called
criminal neglect of duty. State
authority as an end in itself cannot exist, since in that case every tyranny on
this earth would be sacred and unassailable. If a racial entity is being led toward its
doom by means of governmental power, then the rebellion of every single member
of such a Volk is not only a right, but a duty.” Unmoved, Hitler responded: “If the war is
lost, the people will be lost also. It
is not necessary to worry about what the German people will need for elemental
survival. On the contrary, it is best for us to destroy even these things. For the nation has proved to be the weaker,
and the future belongs solely to the stronger eastern nation. In any case only those who are inferior will
remain after this struggle, for the good have already been killed.”
Presumably, Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (1939-2026; Supreme Leader,
Islamic Republic of Iran 1989-2026) would have concurred with the sentiments
for, just as the Germans had “failed
Hitler”, those Iranians chanting “Death to the dictator!” had failed him, thus
the holy duty to kill them, not for a motive as base as “regime survival” but
because the protesters were attacking Islam and thus Allah himself. In the Supreme Leader’s theological construct,
killing thousands in defense of God was not merely justified but an obligation.
Over time, in
English, “a termagant” came to mean a scolding or overbearing person, a meaning
wholly detached from its supposed origin in religion and under a number of
influences, it came to be used mostly of women.
The most significant of these influences was literature and the stage,
use shifting from elaborate epics about the crusades to popular entertainment. As a constructed theological fiction Termagant
was anyway perfect for the playwright and had it not existed it surely would
have been created, violence, bluster, and irrational fury staples of
drama. For students of such things, the
shift from the ranting tyrant to the “stock stage villain” was interesting
because in the latter role the Termagant needed sometimes to be a comic
character, bombastic and shouting with deliberate “overacting” often in the
stage directions.
The elongated John
Cleese (b 1939) and Andrew Sachs (1930-2016) in Basil the Rat (25 October, 1979) the final episode in the BBC
comedy series Fawlty Towers (12
episodes in two series (1975 & 1979)). It was in the Fawlty Towers episode The Germans (24 October, 1975) that the phrase “Don't mention the war” was introduced by Basil at his most termagant and in that case Shakespeare would have instructed Cleese to “out-herod Herod”.
So in early
Modern English, the shift began from character to adjective and with the use in
stage drama expanding during the sixteenth century, the transition accelerated. When William Shakespeare (1564–1616) had Sir
John Falstaff faking his own death (Act 5, Scene 4) in Henry IV, Part 1 (circa 1596), he spoke of the fierce Scottish
rebel, Archibald, Earl of Douglas as “that hot termagant Scot” and by then there was
no hint of any connection to alleged Islamic deities; it was just about the man’s
turbulent, violet nature. Shakespeare’s characters
run the gamut of the human condition, something sometimes misunderstood by
those who associate him only with what’s understood as “high culture” but he knew that while “overacting” sometimes was essential for comic
effect otherwise it needed sedulously to be avoided. In his stage instructions
for Hamlet (circa 1600) he cautioned
the cast: “Oh,
it offends me to the soul to hear a robustious periwig-pated fellow tear a
passion to tatters, to very rags, to split the ears of the groundlings, who for
the most part are capable of nothing but inexplicable dumb-shows and noise: I
would have such a fellow whipped for o'erdoing Termagant; it out-herods Herod:
pray you, avoid it.” That
instruction also assumed a new life, appearing in modified form in All's Well That Ends Well (circa 1602)
as “out-villain'd
villainy” before in the 1800s “out-herods Herod” came widely to be used as a
critique of any behaviour thought “excessive” and by then, in stage productions,
“termagant” explicitly was invoked as verbal shorthand for the sort of strident
ranting sometimes required.
The
suggestion that Basil Fawlty may be thought a “Shakespearian” character is not
flippant and is in the vein of the observation by the English actor Sir Peter Ustinov
(1921–2004) that were the Italian painter of the Early Renaissance Sandro
Botticelli (circa 1445-1510) alive today: “he'd be working for Vogue”. One suspects Shakespeare would have been proud
to have created a figure like the evil J.R. Ewing (from the US TV series Dallas (1978-1991)) or penned a line
like “Round up
the usual suspects!” (from the movie Casablanca (1942)). The
works of Sir Pelham “P.G.” Wodehouse (1881–1975) have a certain charm which
exerts a powerful pull on some critics and often he’s cited as a twentieth
century popular author reaching a similar audience to that for which
Shakespeare wrote centuries earlier. The
politician and diarist Woodrow Wyatt (1918–1997) reckoned: “There are almost
as many quotations in Wodehouse as Shakespeare” and the usually acerbic
Auberon Waugh (1939–2001) mused: “The failure of academic literary criticism to take any
account of Woodhouse’s supreme mastery of the English language or the profound
influence he has had on every worthwhile English novelist of the last 50 years
demonstrates in better and concise form than anything else how the English
literature industry is divorced from the subject it claims to study.” His point was well-made although it may have
been a little back-handed, old Auberon Waugh probably not thinking the last
fifty years had produced many “worthwhile” novelists.
Color plate of Sir John Falstaff by Giovan Battista Galizzi (1882-1963) from The Life and Death of Sir John Falstaff (1923, with an introduction by lawyer George Radford (1851-1917)).
Even before
the scientific and technical advances of the last two centuries-odd led to a proliferation
of creations, the English language's vocabulary was famously large and while
some categories have been more more productive than others, few proved quite as
imaginatively fecund as (1) coinings and re-purposings to describe female body
parts and (2) terms with which to demonize or disparage women (termagant one of
the latter). After the dubious link with
Islam had been discarded, termagant was understood as someone blustering, noisy
and tyrannical; it was in the late sixteenth century there was a distinct
gender shift and the word became specifically female, associated less with
domineering violence and more with shrillness, emotional excess, and scolding,
performed in a theatrical style that audiences coded as unseemly or grotesque,
applying the word to “difficult” women in the world beyond. It was a time of profound social and
political change and as social norms in England hardened around ideals of female
deference, obedience and modesty, the label migrated: While for men “termagant”
had meant (depending on context) threatening or ridiculous, when applied to
women it suggested social transgression.
It wasn’t quite Taliban-level repression but women with minds of their
own were apt to be judged quarrelsome, overbearing and scolding, terms like “shrew”
& “virago” becoming termagant’s companion terms. At this point, lexical fossilization set in
and by the mid-1700, the original sense (the fictional deity) had faded into
obscurity with the meaning stabilized as “a domineering, bad-tempered woman”,
thus the adjectival form “termagant behaviour”.
To etymologists, the long process was an interesting case study in that
the mechanism of changed happened in phases, the theatrical and religious
origins surviving only as residual footnotes while the metonymic shifts were driven
by changing cultural norms, not grammatical rules.
The Royal Navy's Talisman-class destroyer, HMS Termagant, 1916.
It was of course
a good name for a warship and between 1780 and 1965, the British Admiralty from
time to time had seven HMS Termagants attached to the Royal Navy’s fleets, the
last launched in 1943. One with a vague
connection to the original meaning was a Talisman-class destroyer, ordered originally
by the Ottoman Empire but in 1915 requisitioned by the Admiralty (as HMS
Narborough) before being renamed built HMS Termagant. Despite the expectations of decades, World
War I (1914-1918) was not a conflict of great naval clashes and although she
took part in the Battle of Jutland (1916, which seemed at the time
anti-climatic but was strategically decisive), her record was not illustrious
and, sold for scrap in 1921, she was broken up two years later.
Anthony
Albanese (b 1963; prime-minister of Australia since 2022, left) and his wife Jodie
Haydon (b 1979, centre) with Grace Tame (b 1994; activist and advocate for
survivors of sexual assault, right) in photo opportunity before a morning tea
at the Lodge (the prime minister’s residence), Canberra, Australia, January, 2025.
The “Fuck Murdoch” T-Shirt she made famous
was worn with a purpose. Happy to
discuss the provocative fashion piece, Ms Tame said the message wasn’t aimed
just at media mogul Rupert Murdoch (b 1931) but rather the “obscene greed,
inhumanity and disconnection that he symbolises, which are destroying our
planet. For far too long this world and
its resources have been undemocratically controlled by a small number of
morbidly wealthy oligarchs. If we want
to dismantle this corrupt system, if we want legitimate climate action, equity,
truth, justice, democracy, peace, land back, etc, then resisting forces like
Murdoch is a good starting point. Speaking
truth to power starts at the grassroots level with simple, effective messages.
It’s one of my favourite shirts.” Few seem to think Mr Murdoch might have feelings too and may find the T-shirt's message hurtful but those who do probably take the view: “but anyway, fuck him”.
A difficult woman's sceptical glance: Grace Tame (right) looking at
Scott Morrison, Canberra, Australia, January 2022.
Ms Tame had
previously provided photographers with some good snaps, most memorably her stony
“side-eye” expression to Scott Morrison (b 1968; Australian prime minister 2018-2022), another politician she deemed not to have treated allegations of
sexual assault and toxic workplace culture in federal parliament with
sufficient seriousness, noting his casual dismissal of her as having “had a terrible life”. Less than amused at
some of the commentary about her sideways glance, she tweeted on X (the called
Twitter) that some in the media appeared to have reduced the matter of survival
from abuse to a culture “…dependent on submissive smiles, self-defeating surrenders
and hypocrisy”, adding “What I did wasn’t an act of martyrdom in the gender
culture war.” Expanding
things to a construct, she explained: “It’s true that many women are sick of being told to smile,
often by men, for the benefit of men. But it’s not just women who are
conditioned to smile and conform to the visibly rotting status-quo. It’s all of
us.”
If Anthony Albanese didn't previously think Grace Tame was “a difficult woman”, he probably now does.
In
Australian political discourse, “termagant” has not often been heard but ALP
(Australian Labor Party) luminary Kim Beazley (b 1948) did in 2008 so label the
Liberal Party’s Tony Abbott (b 1957; prime-minister of Australia 2013-2015);
while a by then untypical use, it did prove the word was still used of
men. Unfortunately, that seems not to
have stuck in the mind of mind of the ALP’s Anthony Albanese (b 1963; prime-minister
of Australia since 2022) who, during a “rapid-fire word association game” at a function
organized by Mr Murdoch’s News Corp, was prompted with “Grace Tame” to which he responded
“difficult”. The remarks were noted by Ms Tame who had in
the past been critical of politicians who she claimed treated her as a “problem to be
managed” rather than doing anything substantive to prevent sexual
abuse or assist survivors. Whether it
would have been any better had he be called her “termagant” rather than “difficult”
is debatable but at least the history of Mr Abbott being so labelled would have
meant it could be argued it wasn’t a “gendered” word (the history of the last
few centuries notwithstanding). Probably
the best choice for Mr Albanese would have been “formidable” in the sense of
the French très formidable meaning something
like “wonderful” or “terrific”, such a woman being une femme formidable. Formidable
was from the Middle English formidable,
from the Old French formidable & formible, from the Latin formīdābilis (formidable, terrible),
from formīdō (fear, dread); it was
another example of a meaning shift. In
fairness to Mr Albanese, it was a spur-of-the-moment response to an unexpected
prompt and, in an attempt to make things better, he explained: “I was asked to
describe people in one word and Grace Tame you certainly can’t describe in one
word. She has
had a difficult life, and that was what I was referring to. If there was any misinterpretation, then I
certainly apologise. I think that Grace Tame has taken what is personal trauma
and that awful experience that she had and channelled that into helping, in
particular, other young women, being a strong and powerful advocate, being
quite courageous in the way that she has gone out there.” That probably made things worse. Unimpressed, Ms Tame (a most adept media
player) issued a statement: “Spare me the condescension, old man”, suggesting
Mr Albanese was paraphrasing Scott Morrison who’d once explained her attitude as the
consequence of a “terrible life”. Continuing
her critique, she added: “We all know what you meant. A badge of honour anyway. A confession that I’ve ruffled him.” On social media, she found much support, one posting: “‘Difficult’ is the misogynist’s code for a
woman who won’t comply. History tends to
call her ‘courageous’.”
Ms Tame must have resisted the temptation to
order a batch of “Fuck Albo” T-shirts which shows some generosity of spirit but
the Australian Femicide Watch's Red Heart Movement is offering “Difficult Woman”
T-shirts with Aus$5.00 from each sale donated to the Grace Tame Foundation. The garments are made with 100% combed
organic cotton grown without the use of herbicides or pesticides and certified
as compliant to the GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard). Depressingly, Australian Femicide Watch tracks
the death toll of women in Australia killed in “intimate partner violence”; in
2025 the rate was 1.44 per week and by the first week in April 2026, 1.23.
Anthony Albanese, shaggate & melongate
Applied
kinesics: Linguists and anthropologists call the use of hand gestures as an accompaniment
to speech (much associated with Italians): “gesticulations”. Mr Albanese gesticulates (left) and Nova’s
promotional banner for Nikki Osborne’s “Bushie” persona on Bush Deep (right).
Mr Albanese
seems not a quick learner. In July 2026,
appearing in the Bush Deep podcast
being interviewed by comedian Nikki Osborne, he was asked to play the “shag, marry, date”
game, three Australian females from pop culture (singer Kylie Minogue (b
1968), actor Nicole Kidman (b 1967) & singer Rhonda Burchmore (b 1960)) offered as his options. He started well by
mentioning he was “newly married” (to his second wife) but Ms
Osborne was tenacious and after boxing him into admitting “Kylie, clearly”, managed to press
him into saying (with a slight giggle): “all
of the above” (that apparently in answer to: “You’d marry Kylie? And shag her? And date
her?” rather than thoughts of intimacy with all three nominees but Ms Osborne, seeming pleased, did conclude: "all right, a triple" so who knows?). The public
reaction wasn’t good (although muted compared with what would have been the
outrage had the remarks been made by a conservative) and quickly his office
issued a one-line statement: “I apologise unequivocally for the comments”. Educated by the Congregation of Christian
Brothers (a branch of the Roman Catholic Church), the Australian arm of which
was dissolved after shifting the bulk of its assets to a related but legally
separate entity to protect them from civil litigation brought by victims child
sexual abuse by Christian Brothers), Mr Albanese (selectively) operates on the church's long-established principle of “confess and be forgiven”. What he should
have done was make the joke one of self-deprecation, telling his host a more
interesting question would be to ask the trio if any of them would contemplate
shagging him and all three were anyway “too
good for him”. His second wife, by
now well-acquainted with politics, would have forgiven him.
Pampered
crown
melons in a Shizuoka hothouse.
It turned out to be an eventful podcast
because he also told the tale of meeting Sanae Takaichi san (b 1961, Prime
Minister of Japan since 2025) during her Australian visit in May 2026. Knowing a comedian would likely be not
interested in trade negotiations or maritime boundaries in the South China Sea, he instead described
his surprise when presented with the gift of a pair of crown melons, a fruit
grown only in the western region of Japan's Shizuoka Prefecture. The nation’s most exalted and expensive melons,
farmers tending the vines in climate-controlled greenhouses each season cut
away all but the most obviously fecund bud so each plant’s energy & nutrients feed a single
fruit, ensuring “perfect melons”. Understandably, crown melons are
a gift presented to someone as a mark of respect or appreciation, often in the
intricately constructed packaging famously used in Japan for goods from
sandwiches to stilettos. Mr Albanese
described the gift as “strange” but said he found them “quite good”. While it's not reasonable to expect him to have been aware of the cultural significance in Japan of a fruit he’d have associated with
the Aus$3.99 item familiar in Australian supermarkets, his office presumably
was informed so it was bad staff work he wasn’t briefed on what to say. An additional reason for the choice of gift
was to mark the “delectably honey-sweet” melons now being exported (tariff-free) to Australia.
Pamela
Anderson (mostly real) on the cover of
Playboy magazine, November 1994.
Things got
worse. Ms Osborne likened the melons to Canadian-US
actor Pamela Anderson (b 1967) which must have amused Mr Albanese because
almost instinctively he raised his hands to his chest and, making a cupping
gesture, observed: “She brought two… as you do”. There was laughter in the recording studio
and it would have been a good joke in the locker room of the South Sydney Rabbitohs
(the NRL (National Rugby League) club the prime minister takes every
opportunity to remind the country he supports) but as the clip went around
the world, he’d have understood he’d put his foot in it… again. Well into the twenty-first century, it might
be assumed politicians would by now be adept in handling the “new media”
(social media, podcasts and such) but, beyond a certain age, many remain
uncertain and often make the worst mistake of all: trying very hard to be
“authentic” which is, of course, recognized instantly as “inauthentic”. Politicians have before had to attempt to
master “changes in platforms”. In the
nineteenth century, it was the shift from speeches being made on the floors of
parliaments to public meetings; early in the twentieth it was the advent of
radio (a medium better mastered by George V (1865–1936; King of the
United Kingdom & Emperor of India 1910-1936) than most of his ministers),
then in the post-war world it was television.
Social media & podcasts are just the latest “shock of the new” and
hopefully the ALP’s operatives will arrange additional training. Still, something good did come from the interview: Ms Osborne learning the Japanese prime minister is female. As the first woman ever to gain the office, there had in 2025 been extensive international coverage of her accession but presumably that was something crowded out of Ms Osborne's news-feeds by the algorithms selecting matters of greater interest such as Ariana Grande's (b 1993) weight or Kylie Jenner's (b 1997) new hairstyle.
Lord
Voldemort, played in this scene by Ralph Fiennes (b 1962).
Making the “melons quip” was
a bit hypocritical because it hadn’t long before that Mr Albanese had issued a
schoolmasteresque rebuke to a member of his shadow cabinet (Tanya Plibersek b 1969),
saying she’d made “a mistake” in likening the Liberal Party’s Peter Dutton (b
1970; leader of the Liberal Party of Australia 2022-2025) to the villainous Lord
Voldemort in the film adaptations of the Harry Potter children’s books. Had the comparison been one of their
political philosophy or methods (something that might still be worth pursuing) it would have been OK but in saying “I think there
will be a lot of children who have watched a lot of Harry Potter films who will
be very frightened of what they are seeing on TV at night” it did
seem she was commenting on some physical similarity. Asked to clarify, she said: “I am saying he
looks a bit like Voldemort. We will see
whether he can do what he promised he would do when he was last running for
leader, which is smile more.”
Perhaps sensing danger, she added: “I am just saying he is not the warm and friendly face of
the Liberal party and, if this last election taught us anything, it taught us
that the Liberal party has moved too far to the extremes of politics.” Before long, a statement was issued from Ms Plibersek’s
office saying she had “reached out” to Mr Dutton “unreservedly” to apologize,
adding she acknowledged the remark should not have been made. Mr Albanese went further, saying: “It was a mistake.
It shouldn’t have been said, we all make
mistakes from time to time. What we need
to do is to move on from them and it is how we respond to them. Tanya Plibersek responded appropriately. Tanya
Plibersek did the right thing by apologising.
We should not refer to people’s appearance.”
Mr Dutton
at Mr Boswell’s funeral.
Mr Dutton called the comments “unfortunate” but said they were “water off a
duck’s back” and there was no need for politicians to be “nasty and mean”,
concluding the affair by saying “I’m not the prettiest bloke on the block but I hope that
I’m going to be pretty effective.”
Students of political phraseology enjoyed that last remark, the original
used by John Howard (b 1939; Prime Minister of Australia 1996-2007) as an
election campaign hook for the not at all photogenic Queensland National Party’s
Senator Ron Boswell (1940–2026; senator for Queensland 1983-2014): “He may not be
pretty but he’s pretty effective”.
That worked well and, in retirement, Mr Boswell wrote his memoirs,
published as Ron Boswell: Not Pretty, But
Pretty Effective (2023). As leader
of the opposition, Mr Dutton’s effectiveness was limited, suffering the ignominy of losing his own seat
in parliament at the 2025 general election in which the Liberal party suffered
its worst defeat since formation in 1944.
During the campaign, Mr Dutton limited his media appearances mostly to
Mr Murdoch’s Sky News (now re-branded News24) where he could be asked “helpful” questions by other
right-wing fanatics, the exchanges enjoyed by the channel’s small audience of
the already converted, the only sceptical faction of which complained Mr Dutton
was “not conservative enough”. Had he
dabbled in the anarchic world(s) of the Tiktokers and podcasters things might have been worse
still so his handlers were right to “draw the line somewhere”.
The
photogenic TERF Katherine Deves (left) and that
tweet (right).
Mr Albanese’s
reaction to the brief “Plibersek-Voldemort-Dutton affair” must have been something of a
special case. Although there are some
things he’s done his best to forget (hoping others will do the same), otherwise
his memory is typically ALP-sharp and he certainly remembered the
occasions when Ms Plibersek told people she rather than him would have won the
ballot for the party leadership had she chosen to contest. Had a close factional ally pointed out Mr
Dutton’s resemblance to Lord Voldemort, Mr Albanese’s reaction might have been
limited to a quite chat (over a beer and a laugh) rather than a public
censuring. Sadly, the one who seemed to
receive no sympathy was Lord Voldemort who was slighted by being called, by
implication, “Duttonesque”; surely he had as much right to be offended by the
comparison. Amusingly, even within the
Liberal Party, there are those who have seen the resemblance and
commented. Lawyer Katherine Deves (b
1978) is a (self-described) TERF (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) with a
cult-following in the party and on Twitter (now X) on 1 December, 2021,
while watching the televised proceedings of parliament, she tweeted: “New speaker
[presiding officer of the House of Representatives] …struggles to keep order as Albo
[Mr Albanese, then leader of the opposition) …calls Voldemort [Mr Dutton, then
minister of defence] …‘boof head’”
The tweet has since been deleted.
Harold Macmillan (1894–1986; UK prime-minister 1957-1963, left) being shown the Sinclair ZX Spectrum home computer by Sir Clive Sinclair (1940–2021, right), London, 1984.
Old Harold
Macmillan had his problems with women
(being bi-sexual, he may not have been wholly blameless for his wife’s
infidelity) but was fortunate to be prime minister during the last days when journalists
were still deferential towards politicians (at least until they smelled blood
in the water). Clearly, at least in his
dealings with the press, he’d led a sheltered life because in his memoirs he compared
the still polite English journalists to the breed he encountered in Australia
during his Commonwealth tour (Jan-Feb 1958), noting they were as capable as the
bowlers in the nation’s cricket team of “sending down a few fast deliveries”. By the standards of 2026 the questions he
received (and played mostly with a straight bat although there was the occasional
square cut) would be thought “tame” and while it can’t be certain how the old
Etonian would have handled TikTokers, podcasters and YouTubers, he’d
doubtlessly have been appalled and thought them all vulgarians to be avoided.
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi san: In what was obviously a misspent youth, she was a drummer in a heavy metal band and still sometimes "
picks up the sticks". A Deep Purple (a heavy metal band formed in 1968)
fan-girl, she got to meet the band during their 2026 tour of Japan.
Mr Albanese
probably wishes he could avoid appearances on the “new media” but knows a
significant chunk of those with a vote long ago tuned-out of the “old media”
where he for decades honed to a high-level his skills of spin and obfuscation;
his office also would prefer his appearances be restricted to “more easily
managed” platforms but know they must play the cards dealt. Those in his office take pride at being
thought “political pros” but curiously, by August 2026 they appeared to have
forgotten the wise adage from the Watergate affair (1972-1974) that claimed the
scalp of Richard Nixon (1913-1994; VPOTUS 1953-1961 and POTUS 1969-1974) that
in politics what’s lethal: “is not the crime, it's the cover-up”. Just returned from holiday, Mr Albanese “furiously denied” making a crude joke about Sanae Takaichi san’s ‘melons’ in the anyway notorious ‘shag Kylie
Minogue’ interview. At this
point, rather than digging deeper, it would have been a better tactic to
apologize and hope for forgiveness but Mr Albanese learned his stuff in the “non-Trotskyite”
wing of the ALP’s Socialist Left faction in which “never apologize” was less a
mantra than a way of life. In what was
described as a “terse
statement” a spokeswoman for Mr Albanese denied the comments were a
joke about prime ministerial mammary glands, stating: “This assertion is wrong.” Unfortunately, the "damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead!" approach is a tactic and not a strategy, the efficacy of "plausible deniability" depending not on the term's second element but the first.
So the
seeking of forgiveness option (if “workshopped”) must have been discarded, the
office instead opting for attack, an approach perhaps ill-advised because
the spokeswoman was responding to a opinion piece (published in Mr Murdoch’s
national daily The Australian) by Tokyo’s
former ambassador to Canberra, Shingo Yamagami san (Japanese ambassador to
Australia 2020-2023) that criticized the comments as “insulting”, speculating even that
they may have damaged Sanae Takaichi san’s reputation: “However light-hearted it was intended to be,
the recent joke delivered by prime minister Anthony Albanese at the expense of
Japanese prime minister Sanae Takaichi is how he might be remembered by
Japanese who most value the friendship with Australia. It is a time for toiling and not for crude
jokes at another’s expense. So, prime minister,
please enjoy Japan’s sweet and juicy melons without thinking about a woman’s
anatomy, and instead focus on what our two countries must do together.” As a former Director-General of the Intelligence
and Analysis Service of the MoFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Shingo Yamagami
san was well-informed and concluded his opinion piece by reminding Mr Albanese
of the special cultural significance of the revered fruit: “A crown melon is
the most prized fruit in Japan and treasured as something special. Moreover,
this particular fruit was painstakingly nurtured under intensive care in a
special greenhouse. A single melon costs more than 30,000 yen (Aus$270).” Translation: “Albo has gained melons but has lost face.”
Exhibit One: Shaggate.
While
readers of The Australian mostly years
ago made up their minds and concluded Mr Albanese is “a dud”, the reason Mr
Murdoch continues to print and distribute the paper (despite large losses) is the content widely is reported on other media platforms (old and new) and while
the influence is somewhat diminished, what appears can, on occasions, still “set
the day’s agenda”. However, it’s unlikely
Shingo Yamagami san’s piece was written in an attempt to change many minds in
Australia and was likely intended for “internal consumption” in Japan. It’s improbable many Japanese voters would
think their prime minister’s reputation much “damaged” by a foreign leader’s
social ineptitude but, for a number of reasons (some geo-political but mostly
economic), Sanae Takaichi san’s popularity has retreated from the stellar
heights she enjoyed after assuming the presidency of the LDP (Liberal Democratic
Party) and leading it to a stunning landslide in the 2026 general election (House
of Representatives (lower house)) so the thought is the MoFA may have co-opted Shingo
Yamagami san as a stalking horse to “muddy the waters”, seeking to exploit the “melons incident” for a bit of “blame-shifting”. Of course, in diplomatic circles, it was hardly a secret Shingo Yamagami san was "not a big fan" of the ALP government and he may have been "freelancing"; certainly there's been from Tokyo no suggestion an apology has been sought or is expected and observers suspect "melongate" will be a "three day wonder" that vanishes once Mr Murdoch's journalists conclude the story is "going nowhere" a likely to be a "storm in a D-cup".
Exhibit Two: Melongate.
One who seemed gleefully to relish the opportunity to defend Mr Albanese against accusations of having violated his own instruction to her (“We should not refer to people’s appearance”) was Tanya Plibersek (an unlikely but energetic Sancho Panzo to Mr Albanese’s Don Quixote) who appeared on morning TV with Barnaby Joyce (b 1967; thrice (between local difficulties) deputy prime minister of Australia 2016-2022 and now a convert from the National Party to One Nation), the latter not previously noted for his feminist credentials. Echoing her leader’s thoughts on the matter, Ms Plibersek said she thought the former ambassador was “…100 per cent wrong, and we have an excellent relationship with Japan. I think the former ambassador is wrong in his interpretation.” Now cast in the improbable role of the One Nation Party’s sole intellectual (he's a qualified accountant), Mr Joyce disagreed, saying it was “a really dangerous thing to say”, twisting the blade a little deeper by expressing some faux sympathy for his fellow panellist being bowled up to defend the indefensible: “I know you’re doing the best job you can on this, Tanya, but it’s just like the Kylie Minogue comment – completely wrong, completely trying to be clever. It wasn’t clever. It just demeans the office of prime minister, and it certainly has created a massive problem with one of our major partners. I know in your heart, Tanya, you know it’s wrong. Okay? And if you came out now and said, “Yeah, that was a stupid thing to say. You should have apologised for it. People say: ‘Tanya, it’s telling the truth.’”
Lay theologian Mr Joyce conjuring (with no apparent hint of irony) an impromptu encyclical on “truthfulness” was one of the more amusing episodes in the “melon incident”. Undeterred by that surreal moment, Ms Plibersek maintained focus and insisted it was a “complete misinterpretation by the former ambassador”, unwisely adding: “People watching it for themselves can make their own minds up.” Not one to miss a “full toss”, Mr Joyce responded: “They do, they do watch it, and they have made up their own mind. And it is inappropriate.” In cricketing terms, the English would have called that “being bowled a pie” (ie an “easy hit”) but anyway, Harold Macmillan politely would have applauded Mr Joyce's riposte through the slips to the boundary.
The last word in termagantism: Crooked Hillary Clinton
Crooked Hillary Clinton,
the termagant of the last four decades.
Although it’s
Donald Trump’s (b 1946; POTUS 2017-2021 and since 2025) “crooked” moniker which
will forever be attached to crooked Hillary Clinton (b 1947; US secretary of
state 2009-2013), more than most women who have dared trespass on the historic
male preserve of politics, she has attracted gender-based terms of
disparagement. Not content only with
words from English, Mr Trump also borrowed from Yiddish, referring to her
failure to secure the Democrat nomination for the 2008 presidential election as
having been “schlonged
by Barack Obama” (b 1961; POTUS 2009-2017) in the primaries. A schlong (from the Yiddish שלאַנג (shlang) (snake))
is “a penis” and usually carries the implication of “a big one” so his idea was
one of “man beats woman”; as “woman beats man”, the closest companion term is “pussy
whipped” which for men obviously is quite a put-down. Crooked Hillary has also been called “a tough little
termagant in a pantsuit”, “the virago of Pennsylvania Avenue”, “calculating”,
“disingenuous”,
“a radical
feminist”, “a harridan” (a bossy or belligerent old woman),
a “femocrat”,
a “feminazi”,
“a succubus”
(a female demon who had sex with sleeping men”, “Lady Macbeth in a headband”, “Ms bad-hair day”
and “a shrew”. All very sexist of course and there also been
a debate about whether she should be called a “habitual” or “pathological” liar but she shouldn't complain about that; she has “a bit of previous”.
