Mean (pronounced meen)
(1) To have or convey a particular idea;
connote, denote, import, intend, signify.
(2) To have in mind as a goal or purpose;
aim, contemplate, design, intend, plan, project, propose, purpose, target.
(3) Characterized by intense ill will or
spite; black, despiteful, evil, hateful, malevolent, malicious, malign,
malignant, nasty, poisonous, spiteful, venomous, vicious, wicked, bitchy.
(4) Having or proceeding from low moral
standards; base, ignoble, low, low-down, sordid, squalid, vile.
(5) Ungenerously or pettily reluctant to
spend money; cheap, close, close-fisted, costive, hard-fisted, miserly,
niggard, niggardly, parsimonious, penny-pinching, penurious, petty, pinching,
stingy, tight, tight-fisted.
(6) Of low or lower quality; common,
inferior, low-grade, low-quality, mediocre, second-class, second-rate, shabby,
substandard.
(7) Of little distinction; humble, lowly,
simple.
(8) Lacking high station or birth,
baseborn, common, declassed, humble, ignoble, lowly, plebeian, unwashed,
vulgar; base.
(9) Affected or tending to be affected with
minor health problems; ailing indisposed, low, off-color, rocky, sickly; under
the weather (now rare).
(10) So objectionable as to deserve
condemnation; abhorrent, abominable, antipathetic, contemptible, despicable,
detestable, disgusting, filthy, foul, infamous, loathsome, lousy, low, nasty,
nefarious, obnoxious, odious, repugnant, rotten, shabby, vile, wretched.
(11) Having or showing a bad temper,
cantankerous, crabbed, cranky, cross, disagreeable, fretful, grouchy, grumpy,
ill-tempered, irascible, irritable, nasty, peevish, petulant, querulous,
snappish, snappy, surly, testy, ugly, waspish.
(12) In mathematics, something, as a type,
number, quantity, or degree that represents a midpoint between extremes on a
scale of valuation; average, median, medium, norm, par.
(13) In the plural (as means), that by
which something is accomplished or some end achieved.
(14) In the plural (as means) all things,
such as money, property or goods having economic value.
(15) In statistics, the expected value (the
mathematical expectation).
(16) In music, the middle part of
three-part polyphonic music; now specifically, the alto part in polyphonic
music (or an alto instrument); now only of historic or academic interest.
As a verb:
Pre 900: From the Middle English mēnen (to intend; remember; lament;
comfort), from the Old English mǣnan (to mean, signify; lament; intend to do something) from the Proto-West Germanic menjojanan & mainijan, from the Proto-Germanic mainijaną (to mean, think; lament), from the primitive
Indo-European meyn- (to think), or
alternatively perhaps from the primitive Indo-European meino- (opinion, intent) & meyno-,
an extended form of the primitive Indo-European mey- (source also of Old Church Slavonic meniti (to think, have an opinion), the Old Irish mian (wish, desire) & the Welsh mwyn (enjoyment)). It was related to the Old Saxon mēnian (to intend) and cognate with the
West Frisian miene (to deem, think)
the Old Frisian mēna (to signify),
the Dutch menen (to believe, think,
mean), the Middle Dutch menen (to
think, intend), the German meinen (to
think, mean, believe) and the Old Saxon mēnian. The Indo-European cognates included the Old
Irish mían (wish, desire) and the
Polish mienić (to signify,
believe). It was related to the modern
moan. The present participle was meaning
and the simple past and past participle was meant although the now obsolete meaned was once a standard spelling.
The transitive (to convey (a given sense);
to signify, or indicate (an object or idea) or, of a word, symbol etc (to have
reference to, to signify), was documented as early as the eighth century. The transitive, usually in passive (to intend
(something) for a given purpose or fate; to predestine was from the sixteenth
century. The transitive (to have conviction in (something said or expressed) or
to be sincere in (what one says) is from the eighteenth century. The transitive (to cause or produce (a given
result) or to bring about (a given result) is from the nineteenth century. The synonyms included convey, signify &
indicate. The annoying (and frequently
redundant) conversational question “You
know what I mean?” is not recent, attested since 1834.
As an adjective:
Pre 900: From the Middle English mēne (shared by all, common, general), a
variant of imene & imeane (held or shared in common), from
the Old English mǣne & gemǣne (common, public, general, universal, mutual), from the Proto-West Germanic gamainī, from the Proto-Germanic gamainiz (common; possessed jointly) and related to the Proto-West
Germanic & the Old High German gimeini
(common, mean, nasty) and the Latin commūnis
(common (originally with no pejorative sense (as in shared, general))) from the
Old Latin comoinem and cognate with
the Danish gemen, the West Frisian
mien (general, universal), the Gothic gamains,
(common, unclean), the Dutch gemeen
(common, mean), the German gemein
(common), the Gothic gamains (in
common) and the primitive Indo-European mey-
(to change, exchange, share). The
comparative was meaner and the superlative, meanest
The sense of “common or general” is long
obsolete. What endured was “common or
low origin, grade, or quality; low in quality or degree; inferior; poor;
shabby; without dignity of mind; destitute of honor; low-minded; spiritless;
base; of little value or worth; worthy of little or no regard; contemptible;
despicable. The sense of parsimonious,
ungenerous or stingy is known throughout the English-speaking world but tends
to be less prevalent in the US because of the dominance of the other
meaning. The meaning “cruel or malicious
has survived but is now less common. The
colloquial form meaning “accomplished with great skill; deft; well-executed is
used also in the negative with the same effect: (1) She rolls a mean joint and
(2) she’s no mean roller of a joint.
However, to say (3) she’s mean with the weed in her joints has the
opposite meaning so in that context anyway, the meaning of mean needs carefully
to be deconstructed. This inverted sense
of mean as "remarkably good" appears not to have existed prior to
circa 1900. The derived forms from the
adjectival sense include (and some are less common than others) bemean,
meandom, meanie, meanness, mean streak & meany.
The pejorative sense of "without dignity
of mind, destitute of honor, low-minded" dates from the 1660s; the
specific sense of "stingy, niggardly" noted since 1755 whereas the
weaker sense of "disobliging, pettily offensive" didn’t emerge until
1839, originally as American English slang.
This evolution in meaning was influenced by the coincidence in form with
mean in the sense of "middle, middling," which also was used in
disparaging senses.
As a noun:
1300–1350: From the Middle English meene, mene & meine, from
the Middle French meen & mean, a
variant of meien, from the Old French
moien & meien (from which French gained moyen),
from the Latin mediānus (middle, in
the middle; median (in context)) from the Latin medius (middle).It was cognate with mid, and in the musical sense,
the cognate was the Italian mezzano. A doublet of median and mizzen.
A specific meaning of mean (in the sense of
middle) was “middling; intermediate; moderately good, tolerable” which is long
obsolete. The sense of “a method or
course of action used to achieve some result”, now used almost exclusively in
the plural, is from the fourteenth century.
The sense of something which is intermediate or in the middle; an
intermediate value or range of values (a medium) is from the fourteenth century
although the use of mean (in the singular) meaning “an intermediate step or
intermediate steps” is obsolete.
Originally from the fifteenth century, the use in music is now of
historical or academic interest. It
referred to the middle part of three-part polyphonic music; now specifically,
the alto part in polyphonic music (or an alto instrument). In statistics, since the fifteenth century,
mean is simply understood as the average of a set of values, calculated by
summing them together and dividing by the number of terms (the arithmetic
mean). In mathematics a mean can be (1)
any function of multiple variables that satisfies certain properties and yields
a number representative of its arguments, (2) the number so yielded (a measure
of central tendency) or (3) either of the two numbers in the middle of a
conventionally presented proportion.
In mathematics and statistics, the mean is
what is informally called “the average”, the sum of a set of values divided by
the number (count) of those values. The
median is the middle number in a set of values when those values are arranged
from smallest to largest, while the mode of a set of values is the most
frequently repeated value in the set.
Mean is one of those words which pepper
English; one word, one spelling, one pronunciation, yet a dozen or more
meanings. Mean however doesn’t come
close to the top ten words in English with the most meanings, the Oxford
English Dictionary (OED) list is below but the editors caution by the time the
next edition of the OED is released in 2037, for some there could be more
meanings still; the influencing of computing has apparently already added
several dozen to “run”.
Run: 645 definitions
Set: 430 definitions
Go: 368 definitions
Take: 343 definitions
Stand: 334 definitions
Get: 289 definitions
Turn: 288 definitions
Put: 268 definitions
Fall: 264 definitions
Strike: 250 definitions
Kimberley Kitching (1970–2022) was an
Australian Labor Party (ALP) Senator for Victoria (2016-2022) who died from a
heart attack in March 2022 at the age of 52.
Her death gained instant attention because in the days prior, two
prominent sportsmen had also suffered heart attacks at the same age (one of them
fatal) and there was the inevitable speculation about the possible involvement
of the mysterious long-COVID or vaccinations.
No connection with either has yet been established. One connection quickly made was with a
triumvirate of female politicians, the ALP’s senate leadership group who were
quickly dubbed “the mean girls”, a
reference to 2004 Lindsay Lohan movie in which the eponymous girls were the “plastics”
three self-obsessed school students whose lives were consumed by material
superficialities and plotting & scheming against others.
The mean girls (2022), left to right: Penny
Wong (b 1968; cabinet minister in the Rudd / Gillard /Rudd governments
2007-2013, senator for South Australia since 2002), Katy Gallagher (b 1970;
chief minister of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) 2011-2014, senator for
the ACT 2015-2018 & since 2019) & Kristina Keneally (b 1968; premier of
New South Wales 2009-2011, senator for New South Wales since February 2018).
The mean girls (2004), left to right: Karen
Smith (Amanda Seyfried (b 1985)), Regina George (Rachel McAdams (b 1978)
& Gretchen Wieners (Lacey Chabert (b 1982)).
Allegations the mean girls had bullied the
late senator emerged just hours after her death and on social media there was
little reluctance to link the events. In
a carefully-worded statement, Senators Gallagher, Keneally & Wong responded
to what they described as “hurtful
statements” denying they had bullied Senator Kitching and that other
assertions were “similarly inaccurate”
although they did concede “robust
contests and interactions” were frequent in politics. Senator Wong did admit to having made one
unfortunate comment to Senator Kitching two years earlier and that, after it
came to public attention, she had apologized.
Her office later expanded on this, issuing a statement saying “Senator Wong understood that apology was
accepted. The comments that have been
reported do not reflect Senator Wong's views, as those who know her would
understand, and she deeply regrets pain these reports have caused.”
In the thoughtful eulogy delivered at her
funeral, Senator Kitching’s husband, Andrew Landeryou (b 1969; colorful ALP
identity), referred on several occasions to the “unpleasantness” she had faced in the Senate, praising the moral courage
his wife had displayed during her six years in the senate and her genuinely
substantive contribution to public life, contrasting her with the “useful idiots, obedient nudniks and bland
time-servers” so often seen sitting for decades on parliamentary
benches. “The simple truth of it is that Kimberley’s political and moral judgment
was vastly superior to the small number who opposed her internally” he
said, adding that “… of course, there’s a
lot I could say about the unpleasantness of a cantankerous cabal - not all of
them in parliament - that was aimed at Kimba, and the intensity of it did
baffle and hurt her.” Perhaps
generously, he added he “…did not blame
any one person or any one meeting for her death”, thought to be a reference
to a recent meeting of the ALP’s Right faction at which her pre-selection for
an electable Senate spot at the next election was reportedly threatened.
Senators Gallagher, Keneally & Wong all
attended the funeral as did the leader of the ALP and opposition leader Anthony
Albanese (b 1963; leader of the opposition since 2019 and variously a minister
or deputy prime-minister in the Rudd / Gillard / Rudd governments 2007-2013). Mr Albanese rejected calls for an inquiry
into claims of bullying, saying he had received “no complaints at any time” from Senator Kitching regarding bullies
within the party and sought to shut down any further questions on the matter,
saying they were disrespectful to Senator Kitching. In saying that he certainly caught the spirit
of the moment, none of the mainstream media making anything but the most
oblique of references to the late senator’s colorful and sometimes
controversial history as an ALP factional player and trade union operative
but quite how long lasts the convention of not speaking ill of the dead will
soon be revealed.
Mr Albanese wanting to kill the story is
understandable and if he’s sure he has plausible deniability of prior knowledge it’s a
reasonable tactic but it’s at least possible the best thing to do might have
been to admit (1) all political parties have factions, (2) inter-faction
bullying is the way business is done, (3) intra-faction bullying is endemic,
(4) women and men are both victims and perpetrators but women tend to suffer more, (5) ‘twas ever thus and
(6) it shall forever be thus.
Mr Albanese had used the “I know nothing”
defense before and that too attracted a popular-culture comparison. In 2013, ALP politician Craig Thomson (b
1964; former trade union official, member of parliament for the division of
Dobell (NSW) 2007-2013, for the Australian Labor Party (ALP) until 2012, as an
independent thereafter) was facing accusations of fraud, committed while a
trade union official including the use of a union-issued credit card to pay for
the services of prostitutes. His legal
problems have since worsened including further charges of fraud and domestic
violence.
In 2013, in the midst of the scandal, Mr
Albanese, then deputy prime-minister, and Mr Thomson were photographed having a
couple of beers at Sydney’s Bavarian Bier Café.
It attracted some attention, even from within the party, one ALP
luminary thinking it strange an ALP deputy prime minister should meet for a
drink with someone accused of fraud and who the party had expelled from
membership, labeling the meeting as “completely
indefensible." It was of interest
too to the Liberal Party opposition which floated the idea that what was
discussed over a few beers was a deal in case the ALP needed Mr Thomson's vote
in another hung parliament, one spokesman framing things as "Fake Kevin Rudd (Kevin Rudd. b 1957; prime
minister of Australia 2007-2010 & 2013)
says, on the one hand, we're cleaning things up and, on the other hand, he is
doing secret deals to try and run a minority government now and into the future."
Like Mr Albanese, Mr Rudd claimed to know
nothing about his deputy’s meeting with Mr Thomson or its purpose. Asked to comment, Mr Rudd said it was not his
business who his deputy decided to drink with, saying he did “many things in life but supervising the
drinking activities of my ministerial colleagues is not one of them." "And
who they choose to sit down with" he added. Later, detailed questions were sent to Mr
Rudd’s office which declined to comment about whether Mr Rudd knew beforehand
of the meeting or if he had asked what had been discussed. A spokesman said Mr Rudd had “nothing further to add.” Mr Thomson insisted it was an innocent drink
after the two former party colleagues ran into each other and there was no
discussion of any political deals or of Mr Thomson returning to the ALP. "I'm not wooable" Mr Thomson was
quoted as saying adding, “It was a
completely innocent beer. There is no
conspiracy theory here.”
Mr Albanese said Mr Thomson was not a close
friend of his but added that he often ran into colleagues at bars and that it
was just “…a personal chat, that's all.
No big deal." That didn’t
impress the Liberal Party’s then leader in the Senate, Senator Eric Abetz (b
1958; senator for Tasmania since 1994, minister in various Coalition
governments 2001-2015) who questioned how the pair could drink together given
Mr Thomson's legal team was suing the LP, claiming the NSW ALP state secretary Sam
Dastyari (b 1983; senator for NSW 2013-2018 before resigning in the midst of a Chinese-related
donations scandal) had pledged to pay his legal costs. "What
is the deputy prime minister doing consorting in a Sydney bar with disgraced MP
Craig Thomson at the Mr Thomson's lawyer is suing the NSW ALP?” Senator
Abetz asked, presumably rhetorically.
Sydney Daily Telegraph, front page, Thursday
8 August 2013.The Sydney tabloid The Daily Telegraph took the “I know
nothing” excuses of Albanese and Rudd to their front page, the trope being the Hogan’s Heroes TV show produced by US
network CBS between 1965-1971, one of the signature lines from which was “I know nothing” by Kommandant Colonel Clink’s slow-witted but affable Sergeant of the
Guard, Hans Schultz. Technically it
worked but tropes and memes do rely on the material used registering in the
public consciousness and that can be difficult when using a forty year old TV
show no longer in widespread syndication.
For the Telegraph’s readers, mostly of an older demographic, it probably
did register but some research might have been necessary for younger people,
many of whom receive news only through social media feeds.
For the same reason Donald Trump was
disappointed his jibe about Pete Buttigieg (b 1982; contender for Democratic
Party nomination for 2020 US presidential election, US secretary of
transportation since 2021) and the absurdity of imagining Americans would vote
for “Alfred E Neuman”, didn’t resonate.
It was just too long ago and too few knew about Mad magazine. While there
was quite a resemblance, and decades before it would have been a good line, in
2020 Buttigieg could dismiss it a “...must be a generational thing”. By contrast, the mean girls line worked as
well as it did because the film it references is both much more recent and,
having hardly dated, retains an ongoing appeal.