Microaggression (pronounced mahy-kroh-uh-gresh-uhn)
(1)
A casual comment or action directed at a marginalized, minority or other
non-dominant group that (often) unintentionally but unconsciously reinforces a
stereotype and can be construed as offensive.
(2)
The act of discriminating against a non-dominant group by means of such
comments or actions.
1970:
A construct of micro- + aggression coined by Chester Middlebrook Pierce (1927-2016),
former Professor of Education and Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. Micro (small, microscopic; magnifying; one
millionth) is a word-forming element from the New Latin micro- (small), from the Ancient Greek μικρός (mikrós) (small). The origin
is disputed between etymologists, the traditional view being it was derived
from the primitive Indo-European (s)meyg- & (s)mēyg- (small, thin,
delicate) and was cognate with the Old English smicor (beauteous, beautiful, elegant, fair, fine, tasteful), source
also of the Modern English smicker
and related to the German mickrig. However, there’s a highly technical
discussion within the profession, hinged around the unexplained “k” in the Greek and there’s the
suggestion of a pre-Greek origin on the basis of variation between initial /m/ and /sm/, as well as the variant forms μικός (mikós) and μικκός (mikkós). Aggression, dating from 1605–1615, is from the
French aggression, from the Latin aggressionem (nominative aggressio (a going to, an attack)), a
noun of action from past participle stem of aggredi
(to approach; attack) the construct being ad (to) + gradi (past participle gressus
(to step)) from gradus (a step). The Classical Latin aggressiōn (stem of aggressiō),
was equivalent to aggress(us) + iōn derived from aggrēdi (to
attack). The psychological sense of
"hostile or destructive behavior" had its origin in early psychiatry,
first noted in English in 1912 in a translation of Freud.
Chester Middlebrook Pierce (1927-2016)
Microaggression is an adaptable and possibly infinitely variable concept which probably most belongs in sociology and is typically defined as any of the small-scale verbal or physical interactions between those of different races, cultures, beliefs, or genders that are presumed to have no malicious intent but which can be interpreted as aggressions. The criteria can be both objective and subjective and it’s noted compliments or positive comments can be microaggression; the standard psychology texts suggest the behavior manifests in three forms:
Microassault: An explicit racial derogation which can be verbal or nonverbal which can include labelling, avoidant behavior and purposeful discriminatory actions.
Microinsult: Communications that convey
rudeness or insensitivity and demean a person's racial heritage or identity;
subtle snubs which may be unknown to the perpetrator; hidden insulting messages
to the recipient of color.
Microinvalidation: Communications that exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person belonging to a particular group.
The concept emerged to address the underlying racism which endured even after overt, deliberate expressions of racism had become socially unacceptable. It held that microaggressions generally happened below the level of awareness of well-intentioned members of the dominant culture and were different from overt, deliberate acts of bigotry, such as the use of racist epithets because the people perpetrating microaggressions often intend no offense and are unaware they are causing harm. In the abstract, this positions the dominant culture as normal and the minority one as aberrant or pathological.
Although the word’s origin is in the politics of race and ethnicity, it proved readily adaptable to other areas such as gender, sexual orientation, mental illness, disability and age. Within the discipline, there’s a (typically) highly technical debate about the nature of microaggression and the intersectionality at the cross-cutting cleavages of non-dominant groups. As regards the media, the discipline had a well-refined model to describe how microaggressions were either reinforced or encouraged by a news and entertainment media which reflected the hegemony of the dominant culture. The sudden shock of the emergence of social media has changed that in both diversity of source and content and its substantially unmediated distribution. To date, much work in exploring this area has been impressionistic and it’s not clear if the analytical metrics, where they exist, are sufficiently robust for theories in this area to be coherent. In a sense, social media and the development of DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) are synergistic.