Sycophancy

Sycophancy (pronounced sik-uh-fuhn-see)

(1) The usually self-seeking, servile flattery or fawning behavior of a sycophant.

(2) The character or conduct of a sycophant.

(3) An informer, a bearer of tales (obsolete).

1537: From the Latin sȳcophanta (informer, trickster), from the Ancient Greek sykophantia (false accusation, slander; conduct of a sȳcophanta) from συκοφάντης (sykophántēs), the construct being sûkon (fig) + phaínō (I show).  The gesture of "showing the fig" was an “obscene gesture of phallic significance”, made by sticking the thumb between two fingers, a display which vaguely resembles a fig and was symbolic of a vagina (sûkon also meant “vulva”), the gesture understood in many cultures in many places.  Technically, it was a way of expressing one’s thoughts without actually speaking an obscenity.  The politicians in Ancient Greece were said not to use this vulgar gesture but urged their followers to deploy it in the taunting of opponents, a tactic familiar to observers of modern politicians who like to delegate the dirty work to others.  It was cognate with Italian sicofante and the Spanish sicofanta and the later Greek form was sykophantia, from sykophantes.  Sycophancy, sycophantism & sycophant are nouns, sycophantize is a verb, sycophantic & sycophantish are adjectives and sycophantishly is an adverb; the noun plural is plural sycophancies (sycophants is more commonly used).

When young, Lindsay Lohan had her troubles and in a 2012 interview blamed them on loneliness, “sycophants and bad influences”, adding “be careful who you surround yourself with”.

As late as the sixteenth century, sycophancy was still used in the now long obsolete sense of “informer, talebearer, slanderer” which was from the French sycophante and directly from Latin sȳcophanta.  Such was the influence of the often fanciful notions of Medieval scholars whose writings were copied with such frequency that by virtue of sheer volume they assume authority that it wasn’t until the twentieth century the old tale that a sycophant was “one who informed the authorities against someone unlawfully exporting figs” was universally discredited.  The general sense of “a parasite; mean, servile flatterer” (especially of those in power) was in use in English by the 1570s.  The phrase “yes-man” (a man who agrees from self-interest or fear with everything put to him by a superior) was first used in 1912, a creation of American English, the male-centric wording indicative of the predominance at the time of men in corporate structures but there's no exclusivity of gender, women too can be “yes-men” although “yes-women” doesn't as easily roll from the tongue and nor does the collective “yes people”.  To even suggest someone is a “yes man” or “yes woman” may be at least a micro aggression so to avoid compounding the offence with another “yes person” is recommended.

The sexy fig.

The modern meaning is that of the "insincere flatterer", the "yes man", the motive presumed usually to be personal gain.  Historians from antiquity suggest the origin of the word lies in agricultural policy, Plutarch (46–circa 120) writing that the source was in laws forbidding the export of figs, and that those who made accusations against others of illegally exporting figs were therefore called sycophants.  Plutarch was citing "Solon's Laws" which included regulations which stipulated also: “(1) trees should not be planted within five feet of a neighbour’s property, except in the case of olives and fig-trees, which were not to be planted within nine feet (for these trees spread out their roots farther than others, and spoil the growth of any others by taking away their nourishment and by giving off hurtful juices), (2) Trenches and pits must be dug as far away from another man’s property as they were deep and (3) no hive of bees was to be placed within three hundred feet of those already established by another man.”  Because the laws permitted only the export of oil, the export of figs was forbidden and the men who informed against those who had done so were therefore called sycophants (fig-shower).

Later, Sir William Blackstone's (1723–1780) Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1770) noted there were laws making it a capital offense to break into a garden and steal figs, and that law was thought so odious that informers were given the name sycophants.   Another variant in the fig jam was that a sycophant was a shaker of trees: before the court, the sycophant's false accusations makes the accused yield up the truth; in the fig grove, sycophant's shaking forces the tree to yield up its fruit.  Certainly, the fig linkage runs strong in the language, the making of false accusations held to be such an insult to the accused it was said to be "showing the fig", an obscene gesture “of phallic significance" and that false charges were often so flimsy as to be worth “not a fig".

Modern historians enjoy the explanations but tend to be dismissive of their veracity though all seem to agree the original sense is of a word used to disparage one who, by the levelling of unjustified accusations, has perverted the legal system beyond a mere abuse of process.  Pervading all is the suggestion the term was thought always at least slightly obscene, the linkage presumably because of the symbolism of the fig in ancient Greek culture in that sense.  The attachment to legal process in Athenian culture, separate from any hint of obscenity, did grow and the net was cast wide, sycophants not only vexatious litigants but also those who issued writs merely to try to induce defendants to make a payment in exchange for dropping the case or third parties otherwise unconnected to the sometime ancient matters before the court, appearing only to seek an undeserved profit.  In time, to accuse a litigant of sycophancy became a serious thing, such was the opprobrium society had come to direct towards the conduct and there are surviving texts written by those defending themselves from the charge.  Athenian law responded, imposing fines on litigants whose matters were found vexatious or which were clearly an abuse of process and there are echoes still of these acts in modern Greek domestic law where, as in France, sycophant is used still in the original sense.    The phenomenon attracted the playwrights too, explored by Aristophanes (circa 446 BC-circa 386 BC) in his satires.

Impact Of Wealth (1563) by Philips Galle (1537–1612) & Hadrianus Junius (1511–1575).

In the English-speaking world, the meaning shift seems to have happened during the Renaissance, meanings old and new running in parallel until the sense of the "insincere flatterer" came to prevail.  It was an organic linguistic morphing, not something induce by some event or individual, the common thread probably that both behaviors were perceived parasitic and insincere. 

Notable Sycophants in History and Literature

Dr Joseph Goebbels (1897-1975; Nazi propaganda minister 1933-1945) had been an early critic of Adolf Hitler (1889-1945; Führer (leader) and German head of government 1933-1945 & head of state 1934-1945) so to redeem himself, spent the rest of his career in fawning devotion, initiating the Heil Hitler salute and insisting on the use of Der Führer (the leader, originally just a party title) as an official title. His letters and diaries are full of groveling praise and his propaganda campaigns created the modern personality cult.  In fairness to Goebbels, his work was inspired and sometimes brilliant and when the fortunes of war turned there was even the hint of criticism (his acute sense of things picking up the difference between a "leadership crisis" and a "leader crisis") but other sycophants in the Third Reich were less impressive.  While Goebbels’ work sparkled, youth leader, Baldur von Schirach (1907-1974; party functionary 1931-1945), wrote verse after verse of dreary poetry in praise of Hitler though there’s no suggestion the Führer much troubled himself to read his oeuvre.  At least Goebbels and Schirach stayed loyal to the end (though the latter would recant when on trial for his life in Nuremberg (1945-1946) and avoid the hanging he deserved.  Sycophant number one and head of the SS, Heinrich Himmler (1900-1945; head of the SS 1929-1945), called himself “the truest of the true” and Hitler agreed, often referring to the Reichführer-SS as “der treue Heinrich" (the faithful Heinrich), and, although never part of the inner circle, was much valued for his sycophancy and unconditional obedience.  Himmler though, by 1944 and perhaps earlier, worked out things weren’t going too well and eventually, in negotiating with the enemy and planning ways to ingratiate himself to General Dwight Eisenhower (1890-1969; US president 1953-1961), delivered the Führer a final stab in the back and the one which seems to have hurt the Führer the most.  By then it was already too late and Hitler has long concluded none of his sycophants were worthy enough to be his successor, deciding Rudolf Hess (1894–1987; Deputy Führer 1933-1941) had gone mad and Hermann Göring (1893–1946; leading Nazi 1922-1945) had lost the sympathy of the German people.  Both judgements were fair enough but his reason for rejecting Himmler made sense only in Hitler's bizarre world view: He thought the Reichführer-SS "unartistic".

Julia Gillard looking at Penny Wong.

Appointed to cabinet by Prime Minister Julia Gillard (b 1961; Australian prime minister 2010-2013), Australian politician Penny Wong (b 1968) Australian minister for Foreign Affairs since 2022 (and one of the Australian Senate's three "mean girls")) was never reticent in praising Gillard’s fine judgment and feminist solidarity.  That was until she finally worked out things weren’t going too well and so voted to back-stab Gillard and resuscitate the previously knifed Dr Kevin Rudd (b 1957; Australian prime-minister 2007-2010 & 2013).  Modern identity politics helpfully provides Wong with handy cover; any criticism, however justified, she can condemn as misogyny, homophobia or racism.  Centuries before, early in the reign of Caligula (Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, 12–41; Roman emperor 37-41), he fell ill, inspiring one Roman to offer to sacrifice own life if the emperor recovered. This kind, if extravagant, vow was declared publicly, in the hope his show his deep loyalty would elicit some generous award.  Caligula did recover but the sycophant’s tactic backfired; the dutiful emperor decided to accept the chap’s offer and ordered his execution.

Secretary of State Dr Henry Kissinger and President Richard Nixon, East Room, White House, 22 September 1973.  

There are many who list former US National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, Dr Henry Kissinger (1923-2023; US national security advisor 1969-1975 & secretary of state 1937-1977) as among the famous sycophants, a reasonable achievement in Washington DC, a city full of the breed, but it’s probably unfair although, in his fascinating relationship with President Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974), he certainly aimed to please.  Kissinger met with Israeli prime-minister Golda Meir (1898–1978; prime-minister of Israel 1969-1974) in 1973 and she asked him to pressure Moscow to allow more Soviet Jews to emigrate to avoid persecution.  Nixon, intent on détente with the USSR, sought to avoid the request. Kissinger, himself Jewish, responded “…the emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy and if they put Jews into gas chambers in Russia, it’s not an American concern… maybe it’s a humanitarian concern”.  Not for nothing was Dr Kissinger thought dean of the school of power-realists.

Plácido Domingo (b 1941) in Giuseppe Verdi’s (1813–1901) Otello (1993), a studio recording from Paris noted for its technical perfection.  It featured Cheryl Studer (b 1955) as Desdemona and in Act IV she delivered perhaps the loveliest version of the Willow Song available on disc.

In David Copperfield (1849-1850), Charles Dickens (1812–1870) created one of literature’s most repulsive sycophants, the reptilian Uriah Heep.  Dickens, never one to understate his characters, ensures readers will revile Heep by emphasizing his physical creepiness: cadaverous and lanky, with clammy hands and sleepless eyes.  Trained in being “umble” by his father, Heep is always quick to affirm his lowly station and abase himself.  Chaplain to the Bishop of Barchester, the duplicitous Obadiah Slope in Anthony Trollope’s (1815-1882) Barchester Towers (1857), epitomizes the "lick up-kick down" sycophant,  fawning before the powerful, tyrannical towards subordinates.  For Australians, one of the real pleasures in reading Barchester Towers is imagining Bronwyn Bishop (b 1942; speaker of the Australian House of Representatives 2013-2015) when picturing the bishop’s wife (both deserving the memorable phrase "that ghastly woman").  Nobody however did it better than William Shakespeare (1564–1616) in Othello (1603).  The play is a roll-call of strategies for ingratiation, subversion, and destruction, as Iago corrupts the mind of the noble Othello. No work in English better shows the devastating personal consequences of sycophancy or so starkly renders its intricate ties to other vices for Shakespeare knew the sycophant is capable of every fraud, every hypocrisy, every deceit.

Mr Dutton in one of his happier moments.  Interestingly, despite many opportunities, Mr Dutton has never denied being a Freemason.

In politics, the word sycophantic seems surprising rare, probably because punchier forms like “arse-kisser”, “arse-licker”, “brown noser”, “suck-up”, “lap-dog”, “flunky” & “lackey” are preferred, at least behind closed doors because all these would probably be ruled “unparliamentary”.  Of course it’s behind closed doors the more amusing stuff happens, the internecine party squabbles and factional battles more intense and pursued with more passion than the often confected sturm und drang between actual opponents.  Still words like “obsequious” and “sycophantic” have the advantage they can be used on the floor or parliament and in May 2024, in the Australian House of Representatives, sycophantic made a rare appearance when Peter Dutton (b 1970; leader of the opposition and leader of the Australian Liberal Party since May 2022) spoke: “Why did this weak and incompetent prime minister [Anthony Albanese (b 1963; prime-minister of Australia since 2022)] put his close and sycophantic relationship with Jacinda Ardern ahead of the safety of Australians?”

The context of Mr Dutton’s waspish attack was the matter of Ministerial Directive 99 (MD-99) of 23 March 2023, issued by Andrew Giles (b 1973; Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs since 2022), an instruction to his department which required the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the AAT, a statutory authority soon to be replaced by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) & Administrative Review Council (ARC)) to consider the cases of non-citizens facing deportation pursuant to section 501 (as revised in 2014) of the Migration Act (1958) by applying a number of criteria including “Strength, nature and duration of ties to Australia”.  Previously, the law required mandatory visa cancellations for any non-citizens sentenced to jail for twelve months or more, or those convicted of a child sex offence.  The way MD-99 was applied by the tribunal resulted in a number of serious offenders not being deported, some of whom subsequently re-offended, one currently awaiting trial for murder.

Two Fabians: Jacinda Ardern and Anthony Albanese, press conference, Sydney, July 2022.  It has been confirmed the man taking the photograph is not Mr Dutton.

The origin of MD-99 was in a dinner in July 2022 between Mr Albanese and Jacinda Ardern (b 1980; Prime Minister of New Zealand 2017-2023).  The matter of criminals who hadn’t lived in New Zealand for decades, sometimes having left as infants, had been a matter of concern to successive New Zealand Governments but until 2023 no Australian government had been prepared to alter the policy.  However, Ms Ardern was at the time something of a political pin-up of the left and a role model to social democrats around the planet and their admiration for her progressive policies and general “wokeness” at least verged on the sycophantic.  Mr Albanese and Mr Giles are both members of the Australian Labor Party’s (ALP) Socialist Left (or Progressive Left) faction, a label which means less than once it did and shouldn’t be taken too literally but the tribal aspect of the factionalism is as strong as ever.

The idea of dozens (literally) of violent criminals being released into the community whereas prior to MD-99 they would have been deported created a furore and not even the usual suspects felt it wise to leap to a defence of the policy.  Following the manual, Mr Giles for a few toughed it out with the usual obfuscation but seldom has the tactic sounded so unconvincing.  He was defended (at least to the extent of not being sacked) by the prime minister which really he was compelled to do because it would have been his instruction to Mr Giles which resulted in MD-99.  Mr Albanese also stuck to the manual, having the department trawl the archives so he could quote instances of criminals being released into the community a decade-odd earlier when Mr Dutton was immigration minister.  Unlike the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), there was no International Military Tribunal (IMT) to deny use of the tu quoque defense.

Andrew Giles, House of Representatives, Canberra, Australia, May 2024.

However, after a few days it became obvious deniability was never going to become plausible and the issue couldn’t be spun out of the media cycle.  Mr Albanese announced MD-99 would be dumped, replaced by the overriding direction that “…community safety must be considered the top priority in deciding whether to allow someone to remain in Australia”.  Mr Giles said the new direction would “…ensure the protection of the community outweighs any other consideration", adding this had always been the government's “highest priority”.  Neither Mr Albanese nor Mr Giles have commented on the tone of their discussions behind closed doors and it’s assumed an account is unlikely to appear in any memoir either may write.

Emend & Amend

Emend (pronounced ih-mend)

(1) To edit or change a text by means of by critical editing.

(2) To free from faults or errors; to correct.

1375–1425: From the late Middle English emend, from the Middle French emender, from the Latin Latin ēmendāre (to correct), the construct being ē- (in the sense of “out”) + mend(um) (fault) + -āre (the infinitive suffix).  The adjective emendable (capable of being emended, corrigible) was from the Latin emendabilis (the comparative more emendable, the superlative most emendable).  Emendation was from the Middle English emendatioun, from the Latin emendationem (nominative ēmendātiō) (a correction, improvement), a noun of action from past-participle stem of emendare (to free from fault) and is the only form of emend to have survived to see occasional use in the twenty-first century, specialists finding three niches: (1) The act of altering for the better, or correcting what is erroneous or faulty; correction; improvement, (2) an alteration by editorial criticism, as of a text so as to give a better reading; removal of errors or corruptions from a document and (3), in zoology & taxonomy, an intentional change in the spelling of a scientific name (something usually proscribed).  The verb emend emerged probably simultaneously with the noun, the original sense being “remove faults from, alter for the better”.  Emend is a verb, emendation is a noun, emending & emended are verbs (historically emended was used as an adjective) and emendable is an adjective (eˈmendable the historic alternative spelling); the noun plural is emendations.  The derived forms included nonemendable, unemendable, unemended (all rare and historically rarely hyphenated).

Amend (pronounced uh-mend)

(1) To alter, modify, rephrase, or add to or subtract from (a motion, bill, constitution etc) by a formal procedure or device.

(2) To change something for the better; improve

(3) In the sense of “to amend one's ways”, to grow or become better by “reforming” one’s character or behavior oneself.

(4) In the sense of “to make amends”, an act of righting a wrong; compensation.

(5) To remove or correct faults in something; to rectify defects or in some way improve.

(6) To heal (someone sick); to cure (a disease etc) (obsolete).

(7) To be healed, to be cured, to recover (from an illness) (obsolete).

1175–1225: From the Middle English amenden (to free from faults, rectify), from the twelfth century Old French amender (correct, set right, make better, improve), from the Latin ēmendō (free from faults), the construct being ex- (from, out of) + mendum (fault), from ēmendāre (to correct), the construct being ē- (out of, from) + mend(a) (blemish) + -āre (the infinitive suffix).  The primitive Indo-European mend (physical defect, fault) was the source also of the Sanskrit minda (physical blemish), the Old Irish mennar (stain, blemish), the Welsh mann (sign, mark) and the Hittite mant- (something harming).  The parallel development of the words spelled with an initial “a” & “e” was not usual in English but happened also in Italian and Provençal and Italian.  The meaning “to add to legislation” (ostensibly to improve or correct) appears first in British parliamentary records in 1777.  The noun amendment (betterment, improvement) was in use by the late thirteenth century of persons to suggest their “correction or reformation”; it was from the Old French amendement (rectification, correction; advancement, improvement), from amender (to amend) and in the 1600s the use expanded to the law including “correction of error in a legal process” and later “alteration of a writ or bill to remove fault”.  The noun amends in the sense of “recompense, compensation for loss or injury” was a collective singular, from the Old French amendes “fine, penalty, reparation, compensation”, the plural of amende (reparation) from amender (to amend) and use began in the early 1300s.  The adjective amendable (capable of correction or repair) dates from the 1580s while the injunction “unamendable” came into use (often with an exclamation mark) in the early twentieth century, presumably as a punchier version of “not to be amended”.  Amend is a noun & verb, amender (aˈmender the historic alternative spelling), amendability, amendment & amendation are nouns, amending is a verb, amended is a verb & adjective, amendable (aˈmendable the historic alternative spelling) & amendful are adjectives; the common noun plural is amendments.  The derived forms included nonamendable, unamendable, reamend  & unamended (all except unamended now rare and sometimes hyphenated).

Lindsay Lohan and her lawyer in court, Los Angeles, December 2011.

There is sometimes a quality of randomness in the way English evolves.  Amend & emend both once meant “to improve by correcting or by freeing from error” but amend is now a general term which can mean “correct (errors in content, spelling, punctuation, grammar” or “make a change” (which may have no substantive effect).  Emend however specifically refers to a conjectural correction of error in a manuscript or proof copy; it’s thus now a technical term from publishing describing the correction of a text in the process of editing or preparing for publication and at least implies improvement in the sense of greater accuracy.  There have however been a number of instances where “emendations” have been controversial, often in the transcription from original log or diary entries written contemporaneously to printed form for purposes of record or public consumption.  Examples include the sanitized version of the “Chronicle” (the so-called “Speer Chronik” or “Office Journal”), the diary of departmental activities undertaken under Albert Speer (1905–1981; Nazi court architect 1934-1942; Nazi minister of armaments and war production 1942-1945) and the “War Diary” of Field Marshal Douglas Haig (Earl Haig, 1861–1928; commander-in-chief of British Army forces on the Western Front 1915-1918).  So synonyms like change, augment, alter, enhance, modify, rectify, revise, remedy, better, ameliorate & correct can all be used of amend but only forms like correct, rectify or remedy really convey the modern sense of emend.

Tincture

Tincture (pronounced tingk-cher)

(1) In pharmacology, a solution of alcohol or of alcohol and water, containing animal, vegetable, or chemical drugs (an alcohol solution of a non-volatile medicine (obsolete)).

(2) A slight infusion, as of some element or quality; the dipping of something into a liquid to gain to color.

(3) A trace; a smack or smattering; tinge.

(4) In heraldry, any of the colors, metals, or furs used for the fields, charges etc, of an escutcheon or achievement of arms.

(5) A pigment or other substance that colours or dyes; specifically, a pigment used as a cosmetic (obsolete).

(6) To impart a tint or color to; tinge.

(7) To imbue or infuse with something.

(8) A slight flavour, aroma, or trace

(9) In medicine as "tincture of steel", an alcoholic solution of the chloride of iron (obsolete).

(10) A small flaw, an imperfection; a blemish or stain (now rare except as a literary device).

(11) In Christianity, a synonym of baptism (based on the idea of being "dipped into or sprinkled with Holy Water". 

(12) A (small) alcoholic drink (used humorously).

(13) In alchemy, an immaterial substance or spiritual principle which was thought capable of being instilled into physical things; also, the essence or spirit of something; a material essence thought to be capable of extraction from a substance.

(14) In chemistry, the part of a substance thought to be essential, finer, and/or more volatile, which could be extracted in a solution; also, the process of obtaining this.

1350-1400: From the Late Middle English tincture (dye, pigment; colour, hue, tint; process of colouring or dyeing; medicinal ointment or salve (perhaps one discolouring the skin); use of a medicinal tincture; (alchemy) transmutation of base metals into gold; ability to cause such transmutation; substance supposed to cause such transmutation)), the construct being the Latin tīnct(ūra) (act of dyeing) + the Middle English -ure (the suffix indicating an action or a process and the means or result of that action or process).  The construct of tīnctūra was tīnc(tus) (coloured, tinged; dipped in; impregnated with; treated”) + -tūra (the suffix forming action nouns expressing activities or results) while tīnctus was the perfect passive participle of tingō (to colour, dye, tinge; to dip (in), immerse; to impregnate (with); to moisten, wet; to smear), ultimately from the primitive Indo-European teng- (to dip; to soak), (source also of the Old High German dunkon (to soak) and the Greek tengein (to moisten).  It was cognate with the Ancient Greek τέγγω (téngō) and from the Latin Modern English has picked up tint, taint and tainture (an obsolete synonym of tincture).  Tincture is a noun & verb, tinct, tincturation, tincturing & tinction are nouns, verbs & adjectives, tinctured is a verb & adjective, tinctorial & tinctorious are adjectives and tinctorially is an adverb; the noun plural is tinctures.  The noun tinctura is listed by most dictionaries as obsolete but it is still in use poetically.

The fifteenth century use by apothecaries to refer to medicinal ointments (the assumption by historians this use was associated particularly with those used to discolor the skin or from being imbued with the essential principles of the substance).  In pre-modern medicine the meaning lingered, the idea of a tincture being a “solution of medicine in a mixture of alcohol” recorded in the professional texts in the 1640s.  In fashion, parchment preparation and then still rare applications such as wallpaper, the word was used to describe a “process of coloring" from early in the fifteenth century.  The verb was derived from the noun and came into use in the 1610s in the sense of “imbue with color”.  Tincturation (preparation of a tincture) was in use by the mid nineteenth century while tinction has been used to mean “preparation for dyeing, coloring matter ready for use” since the 1890s.

Not following the rules: The Lohan family crest.

In heraldry, the “rule of tincture” (described as “a design philosophy”) is the convention “metal should not be put on metal, nor colour on colour”.  There appears to be no historical basis for the emergence of this rule in the early fifteenth century and the favored modern explanation is that imposing it simply made it easier for the craftsmen of the era, it being technically challenging to inlay metals in metals, the practical point being a high wastage rate of expensive materials (the client paying only for the finished product).  However, the rule took hold rather in the manner the strictures in some religions (such as prohibitions on the consumption of shellfish or pig products) began as public health measures in the pre-refrigeration age endured to become orthodox articles of faith.  Centuries later, although the application of the “rule” began to be relaxed, such was the enduring influence that artisans' guilds formally codified a list of “exemptions” from the rule.

Meaning shift

The historic meaning of tincture (a synonym for dye or pigment) is now entirely obsolete; a tincture is now a subtle shade, tint or variation of an original colour or a smattering of another.  It can be applied to any field vaguely analogous such as tastes or aromas and can be used pejoratively to suggest someone’s knowledge of something might be less than advertised.  It has also found a niche is recipes printed in up-market publications as a word to use instead of "hint".

Lindsay Lohan tinctures: copper and auburn variations of red.

The Dendrobates tinctorius “Giant Orange” (the common name the "Dyeing Poison Dart Frog" (based on the early belief natives used brightly colored frogs to dye feathers & fabrics)).  Described by retailers as a “great beginner frog” (the reason for that presumably understood by collectors) and “best kept in pairs”, the RRP (recommended retail price) is US$59.99.

The adjective tinctorious dates from the late eighteenth century and appears first to have been used of colorful plants.  Even in horticulture it has become rare but an echo survives in the Dendrobates Tinctorius, a frog much prized by collectors and photographers for its striking colors and patterns.  Unsurprisingly referred to usually as "tincs" (the standard abbreviation of "tincture") Dendrobates Tinctorius is one of the largest species of poison dart frogs, although in global terms still hardly large, the largest some 2 inches (50 mm) length. They are native to the rainforests of South America and appear in dramatic color combinations including hues of blue, black, yellow and orange.  They can safely be kept by hobbyists because in captivity they're not poisonous, their toxicity in the wild by virtue of their preferred diet of small invertebrates, not consumed in a captive environment.  Prices of adults in the most desired color mixes can exceed US$120.

Access

Access (pronounced ak-ses)

(1) The ability, right, or permission to approach, enter, speak with, or use; admittance.

(2) A way or means of approach.

(3) The state or quality of being approachable.

(4) In Christian theology, the path to God through Jesus Christ our Lord & Savior.

(5) An attack or onset, as of a disease or symptom (the access in the sense of the vector of transmission or infection).

(6) Admission to sexual intercourse (now rare even in technical use but still used in zoology) and usually in the legal phrase “non access”.

(7) A sudden, strong burst of emotion; an outburst or paroxysm (and sometimes confused with excess) (now rare, even poetically).

(8) In Scots English, complicity or assent.

(9) In pre-modern international relations, an increase (of territory) by addition; accession (archaic).

(10) To make contact with or gain access to; be able to reach, approach, enter etc.

(11) In computing, (of a program or system component) to retrieve (data) for use by another program or application or for transfer from one part of the system to another.

(12) In computing, as “access level”, an expression of the point on a security layer afforded to a user, process or device.

(13) In family law in many jurisdictions, the right of the non-custodial parent to visit their child or have the child spend time with them.

(14) In broadcasting and related activities, (of programming, scheduling etc), the extent of the availability of the content.

1275–1325: From the Middle English accesse, from the Old French acces or directly from the Latin accessus (a coming to, an approach; way of approach, entrance), the construct being acce(d-) (a variant stem (a noun use) of accēdere (to accede; to approach)) + -ss- +-(t)us (the suffix of verb action).  Derived forms (preaccess, nonaccess, reaccess unaccessed, deaccess etc) are created as required, especially in computing and are sometimes hyphenated.  Access is a noun & verb, accessibility & accessor are nouns, accessed & accessing are verbs, accessible & accessless are adjectives and accessively is an adverb; the noun plural is accesses.

Lady Gaga (the stage-name of Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta (b 1986)) concert passes, the one on the right the coveted “Access All Areas” backstage pass.

The use in computing appears to date (in the sense of “gain access to, be able to use”) from 1962 although in the days when mainframes sat in rooms behind locked doors, the word access in its more traditional sense would frequently have been used.  The use in English meaning “an entrance” emerged in the early seventeenth century, directly from the Latin while the notion of the “habit or power of getting into the presence of (someone or something)” was in use by at least the late fourteenth.  The adjective accessible (affording access, capable of being approached or reached) was from the early fifteenth century and was from the Old French accessible (and directly from Late Latin accessibilis, a verbal adjective from the Latin accessus).  The meaning “easy to reach” was a neutral form from the 1640s while when used of art, music or literature in the sense of “able readily to be understood” it could be positive or a kind of “back-handed compliment” by those who liked to disparage popular culture and preferred works more obscure or difficult, understood only by an elite. 

Lindsay Lohan interviewed on Access, Los Angeles, January 2019.

Access Hollywood began in 1996 as a weekday show focused on entertainment (it was known as "Access" only between 2017-2019).  A survivor in a crowded market, Access Hollywood has appeared through many distribution channels over the last 25 years (a period of much media churn as well as M&A (mergers & acquisitions activity) in the industry; it’s most associated with the NBC network and currently is contracted to produce episodes for 2024 & 2025.

Common uses of “access” tied to a moderator includes “access code” (usually numeric or alpha-numeric strings used for doors, computers etc), “access control” (security systems for various purposes), “access day” (in educational and other institution a kind of “open day” when areas usually restricted can be entered), “access journalism” (a critique of journalism affords the which affords the rich and powerful greater access rather than prioritizing journalistic objectivity or integrity), “access method” (in computing the means used to provide connectivity between devices or systems (and sometimes used generally of doors gateways etc (each of these an “access point”))), , usually a software or hardware component of a mainframe, to access data on an external storage device, “access modifier” (in coding (object-oriented programming (OOP)), an “access specifier” (a keyword applied to a variable, method etc, used to indicates which other parts of the program are permitted access)), “access node”, “access time” & “access date” (in security logs and audit trails, entries recording details of a user’s or device’s access to something), “access token” (an object that describes the security context of a process or thread, such as the user's identity and privileges which can be related to an related to an “access violation” (an access not in accord with the granted rights); the special use of “access violation” being a “segmentation fault” (an error in software which occurs when a program attempts to access a memory location that is not permitted), “direct access” (any form of access by an unrestricted path which in computing is a (rarely used) synonym of “random access” (the ability to access any element of a sequence in real time, without having to seek through preceding elements)), “remote access” (what used to be called telecommuting, the various means by which computing resources can be accessed without some form of close or direct (classically hard-wired) connections), “read-only access” (in computing a privilege level which permits a user to view a resource but not modify or delete), “public access” (used generally of any place where the public are permitted and as “public access broadcasting (PAB)”, a special use dating from the pre-internet era when broadcasting was limited to those who paid governments licence fees for “bandwidth spectrum”, PAB a means whereby local, non-profit community groups could broadcast (although usually with low-powered transmitters and thus in a sense “narrowcasting”) and “non-access” (a term from eighteenth century common law which described the “impossibility of access for sexual intercourse”, the significance being in cases such as where a husband had been at sea or in some other place for such a time that he couldn’t have fathered the baby his wife had delivered, the court would hold the child to be “a bastard” (illegitimate).

Microsoft Access 97’s sample “Northwind” database with the dreaded “Clippy”, the company’s VA (virtual assistant).

Retired with the coming of Office XP in 2001 after complaints the paperclip variously was “intrusive”, “annoying”, “condescending” or “masonic” (some were more graphic about what Microsoft should do with their Clippy), Clippy staged an unexpected comeback in a sticker-pack bundled with Teams, (Microsoft's collaboration application).  Being less obtrusive than in its original incarnation, this time there have been few complaints.  Microsoft didn't have much luck with trying to make people's desktops "more accessible", the BOB user environment of the mid-1990s lasting not even a year. 

Clippy fell on hard times after being sacked from Microsoft and, in reduced circumstances, eked out an existence in memes.

A relational database, Microsoft Access was introduced in 1992 and in many markets it was offered at price which was at the time remarkably low (Aus$179 in Australia) and it found a niche, one real attraction being the increasingly tight integration with other applications in the MS-Office suite, notably the Excel spreadsheet, used usually as a front-end to display, sort and manipulate data held in Access tables.  Produced after Microsoft’s Omega database project proved abortive, after the company acquired FoxPro, the official position was Access would be aimed at the home and SMB (small & medium business) market while FoxPro would be for large corporates running databases at a scale yet not requiring big machines like mainframes.  The attraction of FoxPro was the extent of compatibility with and ease of conversion from records stored in the xBASE format although the need to maintain the dual-lines didn’t last long into the twenty-first century, the final release of a FoxPro patch made in 2007.

Who has access to the resources of the state?

The disturbing number of women killed by men (usually their present or estranged “intimate partner” (ie husband or boyfriend)) in Australia has in recent years risen to the extent that some activists thought it necessary to establish Counting Dead Women Australia (31 women killed by violence between 1 January-26 May 2024 (ie more than one a week)) to track the body count.  While intimate partner violence by women against men does happen the numbers are tiny and tend to be in self-defense or as a “pre-emptive or preventative strike”.  That phenomenon of male violence and sexual predation is of course something ancient and summed up by US anthropologist Robert Ardrey (1908–1980) in his African Genesis: A Personal Investigation into the Animal Origins and nature of Man (1961): “But we were born of risen apes, not fallen angels, and the apes were armed killers besides. And so what shall we wonder at? Our murders and massacres and missiles, and our irreconcilable regiments?”

In evolutionary terms, man rose to dominate all the Earth’s other beasts in a remarkably short time and one of the things organized society had to do to make civilization possible was repress those most basic instincts of men.  In that there has obviously been much success but repression is not eradication and Ardrey further explored the implications of evolutionarily determined instinct among humans toward territoriality in The Territorial Imperative: A Personal Inquiry into the Animal Origins of Property and Nations (1966).  As man owns his land and can do with it what he will, so too he owns his woman, a view in some way reflected in the theology and law of a number of “civilized nations” as late as the twentieth century.

The repression of our worst instincts is a social construct but where that fails it must be enforced by the organs of the state, the institution which reserves for itself an exclusivity of right to the exercise of public violence, using lethal force if need be.  It’s that social contract which has made civilized life possible and it should be to the state women can appeal for protection if threatened.  In Australia, on paper, that’s exactly how things appear to be so the problem is not inherently “structural” (despite many critics having such fondness of the word they apply it anyway) but operational and the question to be asked is” who has access to the resources of the state?  Who gets protection and who does not?

What is striking in Australia is the frequency with which it’s revealed, as the murder of another woman dutifully is reported, that she or her family, often on multiple occasions, approached the police asking from protection, only to be turned away, told there was nothing which could be done because her circumstances didn’t comply with the required criteria which would produce a response.  The bureaucratic nature of such things was illustrated in the matter of a recent killing of a woman and her daughter by a man the police had three times been warned presented an “imminent threat” to his estranged wife.  The police were aware of the tension between the two because, at her request, a month earlier officers had attended the family home so she could in safety remove her possessions and move out.  Lawfully, the man had in possession more than a dozen registered guns including two handguns.  Subsequently, while hunting for her, he went to the house of her friend, a woman who had offered shelter, demanding to see his wife.  Realizing she wasn’t there, in circumstances not yet understood, he killed the woman and her teenage daughter before using one of the two guns he was carrying to take his own life.  The bureaucratic quirk is that because, technically, the murderer and the victims were unknown to each other, the police do not treat this as a case of “domestic violence”.  The killer’s daughter was interviewed in the aftermath, say “My mother and I made it clear that our lives were at risk – we were repeatedly ignored, repeatedly failed.  These failures have cost the lives of two incredible women.  I did everything I could to protect my mother — when my father couldn't find us he murdered her best friend and her best friend's daughter.”  In commenting on the case, the commissioner of police said that although officers had submitted a family violence incident report after the women made contact, they were not able to issue a restraining order because “The circumstances would not have met the threshold of a 72-hour police order.”  He added the police will conduct “…a thorough investigation into the incident.”

John Barilaro in the Delegate Country Club kitchen where he cooked and served lasagna made with his own recipe, March 2017.  Nobody has ever said a bad word about Mr Barilaro's lasagna which is said to be the best in NSW.

The police of course operate within the framework of laws passed by legislators but they also exist in a political environment and this must to some extent influence who has access to them and who does not.  The fate of the many women who have without success begged police for protection from their “intimate partner” can be contrasted with the case of John Barilaro (b 1971) member of the NSW Legislative Assembly (Monaro) 2011-2021; cabinet minister 2014-2021 and Leader of the National Party (ex-Country Party) and thus deputy premier of NSW 2016-2021).  Shortly after a YouTuber posted content which upset Mr Barilaro, the producer of the channel on which the content appears was arrested by the NSW Police’s Fixated Persons Unit which operated under the Counter Terrorism and Special Tactics Command.  The Fixated Persons Unit was formed in May 2017 after the Lindt café siege in the Sydney CBD, the press release at the time explaining its purpose was to stop “lone wolf terrorists”.

It’s quite a contrast between a heavily armed anti-terrorism squad raiding the home of the producer of a YouTube channel who had made accusations of misconduct against a politician with the women turned away by police, soon to be murdered by those from whom they were seeking protection.  It might have been expected that if Mr Barilaro did contact police about the matter, he might have been told there were civil remedies he could pursue but instead, an anti-terrorism unit was deployed, apparently on the basis of a brief, non violent, interaction between producer and politician in a public place.  Mr Barilaro denied explicitly asking for the raid to take place but that really is the point, his position meant he was granted access to the resources of the state without having to ask, the police “working towards the deputy premier”.

Regarding the rising death toll of unfortunate women, one has to have some sympathy for the police who are in the difficult position of being expected to “do something” without it being clear exactly what.  The recent spike in the death toll has produced well-attended protest marches and reassuring statements from politicians but nothing suggests there’s any interest from them in providing the funding to support the services (safe housing and such) activists have identified as being what’s needed to reduce the death toll.  The Counting Dead Woman page is likely to have to continue counting.

Waft

Waft (pronounced wahft)

(1) To carry lightly and smoothly through the air or over water.

(2) To send or convey lightly, as if in flight.

(3) To signal to, summon, or direct by waving (obsolete).

(4) A sound, odor etc, faintly perceived.

(5) A light current or gust of air; a brief, gentle breeze.

(6) In historic admiralty use, a signal flag hoisted or furled to signify various messages depending on where it was flown (archaic).

(7) In historic admiralty use, as "wafter", an armed convoy or escort ship (obsolete), the use later extended to an agent of the Crown with responsibility for protecting specific maritime activities, such as shipping or fishing (obsolete).

(8) In nautical use, a flag used to indicate wind direction (a la the windsocks used at aerodromes) or, with a knot tied in the centre, as a signal (a waif or wheft).

(9) To convey by ship (obsolete).

1535-1545: From the Middle English waften, of uncertain origin. It may have been from the unattested Old English wafettan, from wafian (to wave) or a modified from of the Middle Dutch wachten (to guard, provide for).  Related forms include the German wabern (to waft), the Faroese veiftra (to wave) and the Icelandic váfa (to fluctuate, waver, doubt).  In the obsolete sense of "conveying by ship", the word was a back formation from the late Middle English waughter (armed escort vessel) from the Dutch and Low German wachter (guard; a watchman or convoy vessel) which in some historic documents is confused with waff.  The familiar modern meaning “gently to pass through air or space, to float" was in use by the early eighteenth century and etymologists conclude it was in some way connected with the northern dialect word waff (cause to move to and fro) which dates from the 1510s.  The phrase “waft off” is a polite form of “fuck off” and is expressed non-orally by “a wafting motion with the hands indicating the subject should proceed in the opposite direction”.  Waft & wafting are nouns & verbs, waftage, wafture & wafter are nouns, wafted is a verb and wafty is an adjective; the noun plural is wafts.

How to Waft

Waft, in the practical laboratory work of chemistry and other sciences, is a term used in safety manuals when describing the recommended way to sniff stuff.  Successfully to waft, one uses an open hand with the palm facing the body, moving the hand in a gentle circular motion over or about the substance or gas of interest so as to lift vapours towards the nose.  This permits a lower concentration to be inhaled, especially important with anything dangerous like ammonia, hydrochloric acid etc.

Right & wrong: A student in the chemistry lab wafting correctly (left) and George W Bush (b 1946; US President 2001-2009) inhaling incorrectly (right).  Answering the now ritualized question of whether he'd ever smoked weed, Mr Bush admitted inhaling.

Waftability

It was in 2009 Tom Purves (b 1949; CEO of Rolls-Royce Motor Cars 2008-2010) announced the neologism “waftability” was “the essence of the brand”, the new coining he defined as meaning “calm perfect motion and accelerating quickly without fuss”.  Back then (and it seems now distant history) the CEO was describing the relationship between the appearance of a Rolls-Royce as a static object as something which embodied that definition, revealing the internal name for the “gentle, upswept line of the sill” on the new Ghost model was a “waftline” (actually borrowed from the fashion business), the idea being it created “a powerful, poised stance and makes the car appear to be moving when stationary.”

That was when Rolls-Royce was still in the business of making large-displacement petrol engines sound and behave as if they were electric motors but by 2023 they were ready to announce their first pure electric car, the Spectre.  It had taken a while but the connection with things electric actually predated even the formation of the company in 1904.  Sir Henry Royce (1863–1933) was an engineer was an engineer who designed dynamos, electric crane motors and patented the bayonet-style light bulb fitting while Charles Rolls (1877–1910) drove an electric car as early as 1900 and declared it the almost ideal form of propulsion, observing “The electric car is perfectly noiseless and clean. There is no smell or vibration, and they should become very useful when fixed charging stations can be arranged. But for now, I do not anticipate that they will be very serviceable – at least for many years to come.”  So it proved.  By 2023 however, the technology was ready and so (more debatably) was the infrastructure and there is nothing better at waftability than something large, luxurious and electric, Rolls-Royce saying in 20230 they will manufacture and sell their last car running on fossil fuel.

The electric Rolls-Royce Spectre.  Instead of the internal combustion V8 & V12 engines which faithfully have served the line sine 1959, the Spectre is powered by two electric motors producing a combined net 577 horsepower and 664 pound-feet of torque.  There was a time when Rolls-Royce would never have painted their cars purple but the catchment of those with the resources to buy or lease (rent) such things has expanded to include many whose tastes come from different traditions.  It's not the difference between good and poor taste; it's just there are different sophistications.

For Rolls-Royce, the engineering and financial challenges aside, the obstacles are few because, unlike an operation like Ferrari which for decades has based part of its mystique on the noise its engines make at full-cry, it has always put a premium of silence and smoothness.  Enzo Ferrari (1898-1988) said it was the howl of the V12 Packard engines (which he dubbed “the song of 12”) he heard on the race tracks which convinced him to make the V12 the signature configuration for the cars which would bear his name but for Charles Rolls the most influential sound was its absence.  In 1904, he had the opportunity to ride in Columbia Electric car and, knowing what so many of his customers craved, was most impressed, noting: “They should become very useful when fixed charging stations can be arranged.”  So, in 120-odd years not much has changed.  Ferrari are doubtlessly hoping the hydrogen refueling infrastructure develops at a similarly helpful rate, the exhaust note from exploding hydrogen able to be as intoxicating as that of burning hydrocarbons.

The waftline in fashion

Helena Bonham Carter (b 1966) in a Dolce & Gabbana waftline polka dot dress, British Academy Television Awards, London, June 2021.  Students of design should note the presence of "skirt-holding loops".

"Wafting" or "waftline" clothing (known also as "swishy skirts") are those voluminous creations made from lightweight, flowing fabrics which are cut to permit them gracefully to move, the material making a "swishing" sound (usually more imagined than real) when the wearer wafts by.  Characterized by their fluidity and movement, on the right figure (a term which is "fat-shaming" no matter how it's spun) they impart a sense of elegance and femininity while still offering designers some potential for playfulness.  Although the style can be applied to short skirts (although this does increase the danger of "wardrobe malfunctions), the classic waftlines tend to be at least knee or calf-length and because there's so much surface area, it's easier to use prints like big, dramatic florals and large-scale geometric shapes.  The anthesis of the pencil skirt, the fabrics most suited to the waftline include taffeta, chiffon, silk and the lighter cottons but any synthetic which drapes well and "wafts around" can be used.

Lindsay Lohan, who likes to waft, in waftline dresses.  

Wafting East of Suez

A classic wafting garment is the thawb most associated with Arab men of the Gulf region but also (with some variations) worn more widely.  Known regionally as the kandurah, kandoora, gandurah or dishdashah, it’s a long-sleeved, ankle-length robe which is enveloping but loose.  The word thawb is from the Arabic ثَوْب (literally “dress” (in the sense of “garment”)) although in the colonial era it was romanized as thobe, thob or thaub, TE Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia; 1888–1935), often photographed wearing one (he used thawb), sometimes also with a zebun atop, a type of ankle-length sleeved-cloak, cut like a western bathrobe and unlike a thawb, often in a dark fabric.  Usually a thawb is bound loosely at the waist, using anything from a plain cord to a decorative belt depending on the taste and status of the wearer, functional attachments for carrying weapons (and in recent years cell phones) sometimes attached.

Crooked Hillary Clinton (b 1947; US secretary of state 2009-2013) (left) with the UAE's Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed Nahayan, Abu Dhabi  January 2011.  The crown prince is wearing a classic white thrab & keffiyeh, the latter secured with a black egel.  Crooked Hillary is in one of her signature pantsuits in Prussian blue.

The wafting quality of a thawb makes it a functional garment to wear in a hot climate like that of the Arabian Peninsula and studies of its thermodynamic and related properties have been undertaken, the findings concluding there are a number of factors which contribute to its utility:  (1) The material is usually a lightweight and breathable fabric such as linen or cotton which permits the circulation of air, facilitating the evaporation of sweat and consequent cooling of the body.  (2) Thawbs are traditionally white or light-hued, colors which reflect sunlight, unlike darker shades which tend to absorb and retain heat.  (3) By design, the robe is loose-fitting, encouraging ventilation and minimising direct contact between fabric & skin, reducing the thermodynamic effect known as “heat-soak”.  (4) The thawb covers most of the body’s surface area (including the arms and legs), almost negating direct exposure to the sun, preventing sunburn and reducing the risk of heat-related illnesses. (5) The thawb is part of a system, the inner layer which provides insulation against searing daytime temperatures but deserts can be cold places too, thus the addition of layers such as the zebun which protects from the cold.

Yasser Arafat, United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), 13 November, 1974.  Not many speeches delivered to the UN General Assembly are remembered; the one given by Yasser Arafat is one of the few to become famous without a shoe being removed.

The companion garment is the keffiyeh (or kufiyyeh or cheffiyeh), from the Arabic: كُوفِيَّة (kūfiyya (literally “coif”)) and again, because of tribal and linguistic diversity, it’s known also as the shemagh (شُمَاغ) (šumāḡ), ghutrah (غُترَة) or hattah (حَطَّة).  It is a headdress in the form of a square or rectangular scarf and except for those worn for formal or ceremonial purposes, is almost always made from cotton because these are the lightest and coolest to wear and the generous surface area allows it almost fully to envelope the face, protecting the lips and nose from dust, sand and sunburn.  To secure a keffiyeh in place (deserts can be windy too), it’s worn with an egel (عِقَال) (ʿiqāl) (or egal, agal or aqal).  An Egel is a cord which can be a simple, single strand in black or an elaborate and colourful multi-threaded construction; made traditionally from goat hair, synthetic fibres are now often used.  The keffiyeh attracted wider attention in 2024 when it came to be used as a political symbol, worn by demonstrators in Western cities protesting against Israel’s conduct of military operations in the Gaza strip.  The use as a political symbol is not new, old Yasser Arafat (Abu Ammar, 1929–2004; chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) 1969-2004) used to arrange with photographers who wanted a picture for them to use the angle at which his keffiyeh would fall across his right shoulder in the shape of a map of Palestine (with 1947 boundaries).