Showing posts sorted by date for query Gate. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Gate. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, January 22, 2026

Janus

Janus (pronounced jey-nuhs)

(1) In Roman mythology, a god of doorways (and thus also of beginnings), and of the rising and setting of the sun, usually represented as having one head with two bearded faces back to back, looking in opposite directions, historically understood as the past and the future.

(2) When used attributively, to indicate things with two faces or aspects; or made of two different materials; or having a two-way action.

(3) In zoology, a diprosopus (two-headed) animal.

(4) In chemistry, used attributively to indicate an azo dye with a quaternary ammonium group, frequently with the diazo component being safranine.

(5) In astronomy, a moon of the planet Saturn, located just outside the rings.

(6) In figurative use, a “two-faced” person; a hypocrite.

(7) In numismatics, (as Janus coin),a coin minted with a head on each face.

(8) In architecture, as the jānus doorway, a style of doorway, archway or arcade, the name derived from the Roman deity Iānus (Janus) being the god of doorways.

Mid-late 1500s: From the Latin Iānus (the ancient Italic deity Janus), to the Romans of Antiquity, the guardian god of portals, doors, and gates; patron of beginnings and endings.  The Latin Iānus (literally “gate, arched passageway”) may be from the primitive Indo-European root ei- (to go), the cognates including the Sanskrit yanah (path) and the Old Church Slavonic jado (to travel).  In depictions, Janus is shown as having two faces, one in front the other in back (an image thought to represent sunrise and sunset reflect his original role as a solar deity although it represents also coming and going in general, young and old or (in recent years) just about anything dichotomous).  The doors of the temple of Janus were traditionally open only during the time of war and closed to mark the end of the conflict, the origins of allusions to the “temple of Janus” being used metaphorically to mean conflict or wartime and the month of January is named after Janus, the link being to “the beginning of the year.  The most commonly used forms are Janus-faced & Janus-headed while specialized uses include Janus cat (a cat with diprosopus (a condition in which part of the face is duplicated on the head)) and Janus particle (in nanotechnology and physics, a spherical microscopic particle which has hemispheres with sharply differing properties, such as one hydrophilic hemisphere and one hydrophobic hemisphere).  Janus is a noun or proper noun and Janus-like, janian, janiform & januform are adjectives.

Prosthetic in studio (left), Ralph Fiennes (b 1962) on-set in character (centre) and Peter Dutton (b 1970; leader of the opposition and leader of the Liberal Party of Australia 2022-2025) imagined in the same vein (right).

The prosthetic used in the digitally-altered image (right) was a discarded proposal for the depiction of Lord Voldemort in the first film version of JK Rowling's (b 1965) series of Harry Potter children's fantasy novels; it used a Janus-like two-faced head.  It's an urban myth Peter Dutton auditioned for the part when the first film was being cast but was rejected as being "too scary".  If ever there's another film, the producers could do worse than to cast him and should Mr Dutton not resume (God Forbid) his political career, he could bring to Voldemort the sense of menacing evil the character has never quite achieved, fine though Mr Fiennes' performance surely was.  Interestingly, despite many opportunities, Mr Dutton has never denied being a Freemason.

Roman cast bronze coin from the aes grave series, circa 225-217 BC; it shows the bearded head of Janus opposite the prow of a war galley.

In the lushly populated pantheon of Roman gods, Janus (Iānus) was one of the oldest, represented with two faces, one looking forwards and the other backwards (ie artistically, to the left & right).  In some of the myths, Janus was a native of Rome where, at some point, he ruled with Camesus while others claimed he came from Thessaly and ended up in Rome as an exile, welcomed there by Camesus, who shared his kingdom with him.  He ruled alone after the death of his host and in many tales Janus built a city on a hill (consequently called Janiculum as would have been the convention).  He had come to Italy with his wife (Camasenea or Camise) and the best known of their children was Tiberinus.  Janus received Saturn when he was driven from Greece by Jupiter, Saturn ruling over Saturnia, a village situated on the heights of the capitol.  By consensus, it seems that during the reign of Janus people unfailingly were honourable & honest (the stories from Antiquity are well-named as “myths”) and there was universal peace and prosperity.  While trade was as old as humanity and it’s clear there had been various means of exchange, it’s Janus who is credited with inventing “money” in the modern sense in which currency is understood, the oldest known Roman bronze Roman coins cast with an effigy of Janus on one side and the prow of a boat on the reverse.  Where the myth-tellers differ is whether the “civilizing” of the first natives of Latium can be attributed to Janus or Saturn but upon his death he was deified so there was some sense of gratitude.

The fate of Tarpeia, pressed (bludgeoned in some stories) to death by the shields of the Sabines.

In the way the myths did tend to multiply, other legends became attached to his memory, the most famous being the events which transpired after Romulus and his companions had carried off the Sabine women, prompting Titus Tatius and the Sabines to attack the city.  One night, driven by her lust for Tatius, the treacherous Tarpeia delivered the citadel into the hands of the Sabines but rather than wedding her as he had promised, Tatius had her put to death on the very Roman basis: “nobody likes a snitch”.  His soldiers had already scaled the heights of the Capitol when Janus launched a jet of hot water which put them to flight; to commemorate this military miracle, it was decreed that in time of war the door of the Temple of Janus should always be left open so in times of trouble the god could come to the aid of the Romans.  It was closed only if the Roman Empire was at peace.  Janus was said also to have married the Nymph Juturna who gave him a son, the god Fontus (or Fons).

(John) Foster Dulles (1888–1959; US Secretary of State 1953-1959, left) with Dwight Eisenhower (1890-1969; US POTUS 1953-1961, right), Washington DC, 1955.

The terms “Janus-faced” or “Janus-headed” are used in engineering an architecture to describe designs where the “face” or “head” of an object or shape is duplicated but the idea usually is applied to people.  To speak of someone as being “two faced” is to suggest, variously, they’re deceitful, duplicitous or hypocritical.  Many have been damned (and sometimes even admired) as “two-faced” but on one occasion, after someone had observed Foster Dulles was “a bit two-faced” about something, Winston Churchill (1875-1965; UK prime-minister 1940-1945 & 1951-1955) responded he couldn’t be because “…if he had two faces, he wouldn’t use that one.  During his not infrequent criticisms of Dulles, habitually Churchill would speak of his “great slab of a face” although in retirement the old enmities (mostly) were forgotten and in May 1959 he visited him in his hospital room in Washington DC.  The two had “a pleasant chat” and within a fortnight Dulles was dead.

Noses down: In the Berghof on the Obersalzberg on 21 June 1939, Albert Speer (1905–1981; Nazi court architect 1934-1942; Nazi minister of armaments & war production 1942-1945, (left) and Adolf Hitler (1889-1945; Führer (leader) and German head of government 1933-1945 & head of state 1934-1945, right) study plans for Linz's new opera house (photograph by Heinrich Hoffmann (1885–1957; Nazi court photographer), Bavarian State Library's Fotoarchiv Hoffmann.

Sometimes, such realizations, literal or figurative, come too late.  In the entry Speer made on 30 November 1946 in his clandestine prison diary (Spandauer Tagebücher (Spandau: The Secret Diaries) (1975)) is the passage: “Once again I am obsessed by the thought of Hitler’s two faces, and that for so long a time I did not see the second behind the first.  It was only toward the end, during the last months, that I suddenly became aware of the duality; and, significantly, my insight was connected with an aesthetic observation: I suddenly discovered how ugly, how repellent and ill proportioned, Hitler’s face was. How could I have overlooked that for so many years?”  Clearly, such thoughts stayed with him because on 8 December 1953 he noted: “Last night I had the following dream: In a rather sizable group, sometime toward the end of the war, I declare that everything is lost, that there is no longer a chance and the secret weapons do not exist.  The others in the dream remain anonymous. Suddenly Hitler emerges from their midst I am afraid that he will have heard my remark and may order my arrest.  My anxiety increases because Hitler’s retinue displays extreme iciness.  Nobody says a word to me.  Suddenly the scene changes.  We are in a house on a slope, with a narrow driveway.  Only gradually do I realize that it is Eva Braun’s [Eva Hitler (née Braun; 1912–1945)] house.  Hider comes to tea, sits facing me, but remains frosty and forbidding.  He chews the comers of his fingernails, as he so often did.  There are bloody places where they are bitten down to the quick.  Looking into his swollen face, I realize for the first time that perhaps Hitler wore his moustache in order to divert attention from his excessively large, ill-proportioned nose.  Now I am afraid that I will be arrested any moment because I have perceived the secret of his nose.  Heart pounding, I wake up.

An eighteenth century carving of Janus in the style of a herm.

A part of the etymological legacy of the Roman Empire, the name Janus appears in several European languages.  In Danish (from the Latin Iānus), it’s a Latinization of the Danish given name Jens.  In Faroese, it’s a male given name which begat (1) Janussson or Janusarson (son of Janus) and (2) Janusdóttir or Janusardóttir (daughter of Janus).  In Estonian it’s a male given name.  In Polish, it’s both a masculine & feminine surname (the feminine surname being indeclinable (a word that is not grammatically inflected).  There is no anglicized form of the Latin name Janus.  Although it was never common and is now regarded by most genealogy authorities as "rare", when used in the English-speaking world the spelling remain "Janus".  Often, when Latin names were adopted in English, even when the spelling was unaltered, there were modifications to suit local phonetics but Janus is pronounced still just as it would have been by a Roman.

Tristar pictures used the Janus motif in promotional material for I Know Who Killed Me (2007).  Not well-received upon release, it's since picked up a cult following.

Dating from the 1580s, was from the Latin ianitor (doorkeeper, porter), from ianua (door, entrance, gate), the construct being ianus (arched passageway, arcade" + tor (the agent suffix).  The meaning “usher in a school” and later “doorkeeper” emerged in the 1620s white the more specific (and in Scotland and North America enduring) sense of “a caretaker of a building, man employed to attend to cleaning and tidiness” seems first to have been documented in 1708 (the now unused feminine forms were janitress (1806) & janitrix (1818).  Why janitor survived in general use in Scotland and North America and not elsewhere in the English-speaking world is a mystery although the influence of US popular culture (film and television) did see something of a late twentieth century revival and in  sub-cultures like 4chan and other places which grew out of the more anarchic bulletin boards of the 1980s & 1990s, a janitor is the (often disparaging) term for a content moderator for a discussion forum.

Augustus Orders the Closing of the Doors of the Temple of Janus (circa 1681), oil on canvas by Louis de Boullogne (1654–1733), Rhode Island School of Design Museum.

Among the more annoying things encountered by those learning English are surely Janus words, those with opposite meanings within themselves.  Examples include:  Hew can mean cutting something down or adhering closely to it.  Sanction may mean “formal approval or permission” or “an official ban, penalty, or deterrent”.  Scan can mean “to look slowly and carefully” or “quickly to glance; a cursory examination”.  Inflammable, which many take to mean “easy to burn” but the treachery of the word lies in the in- prefix which is often used as a negative, with the result that inflammable can be deconstructed as “not flammable”.  Trip can (and usually does) suggest clumsiness but can also imply some nimbleness or lightness of foot, as in the saying “trip the light fantastic”.  Oversight is a particularly egregious example.  To exercise oversight over someone or something is provide careful, watchful supervision yet an oversight is an omission or mistake.  In the ever-shifting newspeak of popular culture, the creation of the janus-word is often deliberate.  Filth can mean “of the finest quality”, wicked can mean “very good” and in the way which might have pleased George Orwell (1903-1950) "bad" has become classic “newspeak” (coined by Orwell for Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) and used now to describe ambiguous, misleading, or euphemistic words, used deliberately to deceive, typically by politicians, bureaucrats or corporations).  “Bad weed” can mean the drug was either of fine or poor quality depending on the sentence structure: “that was bad weed” might well suggest it was of not good while “man, that was some bad weed” probably means it was good indeed.  Saying nice now seems rarely to mean what dictionaries say nice has come to mean but can variously describe something wonderful, appalling or disgusting.

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Chopstick

Chopstick (pronounced chop-stik)

(1) A harmonically and melodically simple waltz for piano played typically with the forefinger of each hand and sometimes having an accompanying part for a second player.  Originally, it was called The Celebrated Chop Waltz, written in 1877 by British composer Arthur de Lulli (the pen name of Euphemia Allen (1861-1949)); it’s used often as a two-finger exercise for those learning the piano and then name comes from the idea of the two fingers being arrayed in a chopstickesque way (should be used with an initial capital).

(2) In hand games, a game in which players hold up a number of fingers on each hand and try, through certain moves, to eliminate their opponent's hands.

(3) A pair of thin sticks (of ivory, wood, plastic etc), typically some 10 inches (230 mm) in length, used as eating utensils by the Chinese, Japanese, and others in East Asia as well as by those anywhere in the world eating food associated with these places.

(4) As an ethnic slur, a person of East Asian appearance.

(5) In fishing gear, a long straight stick forming part of various fishing tackle arrangements (obsolete).

(6) In parts of Australia where individuals are subject to “attack” by “swooping” magpies, the use of cable ties on bicycle helmets to produce long, thin (ie chopstickish) protrusions which act as a “bird deterrent”.

(7) In automotive slang, the “parking guides” (in some places known as “gutter scrapers”) mounted at a vehicle’s extremities to assist when parking or navigating tight spaces.  They have been replaced by sensors and cameras but were at the time an impressively effective low-tech solution.

1590s (contested): The construct was chop + stick.  The use to describe the eating utensil was first documented in 1637 and may have been a transfer of the sense from the earlier use to describe fishing tackle (in use since at least 1615) which was based on the physical resemblance (ie long & thin).  The “chop” element was long listed by dictionaries as being from the Chinese Pidgin English chop (-chop) (quick), a calque from the Chinese 筷子 (kuàizi) (chopstick”), from 快 (kuài) (quick) but this is now thought improbable because there is no record of Chinese Pidgin English until the eighteenth century.  The notion of the link with Chinese Pidgin English appeared first in the 1880s with the rationale: “The Chinese name of the article is ‘kwai-tsz (speedy-ones)” which was a decade later refined with the explanation “Possibly the inventor of the present word, hearing that the Chinese name had this meaning, and accustomed to the phrase chop-chop for ‘speedily,’ used chop as a translation.  This became orthodoxy after being picked-up for inclusion in the OED (Oxford English Dictionary (1893)), a publication so authoritative it spread to most until English language dictionaries from the late 19th century onwards.  The chronological impossibility of the Pidgin English theory was first noted by Kingsley Bolton (b 1947) in Chinese English: A Sociolinguistic History (2003).  The English form is now thought to come simply from the use of the Chinese, modified over time and oral transmission.  The current orthodoxy is the Pidgin English chop (quick; fast) was from the Cantonese word chāu (快) (quick).  The construct of the Chinese kuàizi (筷子) was kuài (筷) (quick) + zi (子) (a diminutive suffix).  Stick was from the Middle English stikke (stick, rod, twig), from the Old English sticca (twig or slender branch from a tree or shrub (also “rod, peg, spoon”), from the Proto-West Germanic stikkō, from the Proto-Germanic stikkô (pierce, prick), from the primitive Indo-European verb stig, steyg & teyg- (to pierce, prick, be sharp).  It was cognate with the Old Norse stik, the Middle Dutch stecke & stec, the Old High German stehho, the German Stecken (stick, staff), the Saterland Frisian Stikke (stick) and the West Flemish stik (stick).  The word stick was applied to many long, slender objects closely or vaguely resembling twigs or sticks including by the early eighteenth century candles, dynamite by 1869, cigarettes by 1919 (the slang later extended to “death sticks” & “cancer sticks).  Chopstick, chopstickful, chopstickery & chopsticker are nouns, chopsticking & chopsticked are verbs and chopstickish & chopstick-like are adjectives; the noun plural is chopsticks and the word is almost always used in the plural (sometimes as “a pair of chopsticks”).  The adjective chopstickesque is non-standard.

Niche market: a pair of chopsticks in 18-carat gold, diamonds, pearls, and ebony by Erotic Jewellery, Gold Coast, Australia.  The chopsticks were listed at Aus$139,000 and have the environmental benefit being of endlessly reusable and are also dual-purpose, the pearl mounted at the end of one chopstick detachable and able to be worn as a necklace.

In English, chopstick has proved productive.  A chopsticker is one who uses chopsticks, chopstickery describes the skill or art of using chopsticks, a chopstickful describes the maximum quantity of food which can be held in one pair of chopsticks (a la “mouthful”), chopstick land was a slang term for China (used sometimes of East Asia generally) but is now listed as a microaggression, chopstick legs (always in the plural) is a fashion industry term describing long, thin legs (a usually desirable trait), chopstickology is a humorous term used by those teaching others the art of using chopsticks (on the model of “mixology” (the art of making cocktails), “Lohanology” (the study of Lindsay Lohan and all things Lohanic), “sockology” (the study of socks) etc), a chopstick rest is a small device upon which one's chopsticks may be placed while not in use (known also as a chopstick stand), chopstickless means lacking or not using, chopsticks, chopsticky is a adjective (the comparative “more chopsticky”, the superlative “most chopsticky”) meaning (1) resembling a chopstick (ie “long and thin”) (chopstick-like & chopstickish the alternative adjectives in this context), (2) suitable for the use of chopsticks or (3) characterized by the use of chopsticks (the companion noun chopsticky meaning “the state of being chopstickish”.  Chopstickism was once used of things considered Chinese or Asian in character but is now regarded as a racist slur (the non-standard chopstickistic similarly now proscribed).

They may be slender and light but because annual use is measured in the millions, there is a significant environmental impact associated with chopsticks including deforestation, waste and carbon emissions.  Beginning in the early twenty-first century, a number of countries in East Asia have taken measures designed to reduce the extent of the problem including regulatory impositions, technological innovation and public awareness campaigns.  In 2006, the Chinese government levied a 5% consumption tax on disposable wooden chopsticks and later began a “Clean Your Plate” publicity campaign to encourage sustainable dining practices.  In Japan, although disposable chopsticks (waribashi) remain common, some local governments (responsible for waste management) promote reusable options and businesses have been encouraged to offer reusable or bamboo-based alternatives although the RoK (Republic of Korea (South Korea)) went further and promoted reusable metal chopsticks, devices which could last a lifetime.

The Chork

Although the materials used in construction and the possibilities of recycling have attracted some interest, there has in hundreds of years been no fundamental change in the chopstick’s design, simply because it long ago was (in its core function) perfected and can’t be improved upon.  However, in 2016, the US fast food chain Panda Express (which specializes what it describes as “American Chinese cuisine”) displayed the chork (the construct being ch(opstick) + (f)ork).  Designed presumably for the benefit of barbaric Westerners unable to master a pair of chopsticks (one of the planet’s most simple machines) the chork had been developed by Brown Innovation Group (BIG) which first revealed its existence in 2010.  BIG has created a website for the chork which explains the three correct ways to use the utensil: (1) Employ the fork end as one might a conventional fork, (2) break the chork in two and use like traditional chopsticks or (3) use what BIG call cheater/training mode in which the chopstick component is used with the fork part still attached.  Unfortunately for potential chorkers, Panda Express used the chork only as a promotional tool for the "General Tso's Chicken" launch but they remain available from BIG in packs of 12 & 24, both manufactured in the PRC (People's Republic of China).

Richard Nixon, détente and soupgate

Comrade Nikita Khrushchev (1894–1971; Soviet leader 1953-1964, left) and (then vice president) Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974, right)during the Кухонные дебаты (Kukhonnye debaty) (kitchen debate), conducted in a “model American kitchen” built for the American National Exhibition, Sokolniki Park, Moscow, 24 July 1959.  The pair (through interpreters) debated the respective virtues of communism verses capitalism, the backdrop being what was said to be a model of a “typical American kitchen”, packed with labor-saving appliances and recreational stuff “able to be afforded by the typical American family”.  Neither party persuaded the other but when finally able to choose between dialectical materialism and consumer materialism, most former Soviet comrades opted for the latter.

Richard Nixon (right) and HR Haldeman (1926–1993; White House chief of staff 1969-1973, left), the White House, 1 January 1972.

Although this photograph is sometimes captioned as being taken in the Oval Office, Nixon used that room only for formal meetings or ceremonial events and usually worked from this smaller, adjoining office.  The stacks of paper are not untypical examples of what workplaces often were like before personal computers transformed things and although the printed page has proved remarkably enduring, the days of the stacks mostly are done.  There was though one exception to that.  When in 2014 the House Select Committee on Benghazi (one of the many scandals involving crooked Hillary Clinton (b 1947; US secretary of state 2009-2013) was sitting, the State Department requested crooked Hillary provide all the emails stored on her “personal mail server” which, controversially, she’d used for official US government business and "other purposes".  A period of negotiations with her legal team ensued (given crooked Hillary’s past, it was a busy team) and what ended up being provided was a dozen file boxes filled with print-outs of over 30,000 emails (calculated to be around 64 reams of paper or a stack some 10½ feet (3.25 metres) high).  The reason crooked Hillary refused to provide the material in digital form was presumed to be (1) in digital form it would have been easier for analysts to search for data and (2) concerns that even though she’d had her staff delete from the server some 32,000 messages (claimed to be “personal”), a forensic analysis of a granular message file might have revealed all or some of what had been deleted.  Crooked Hillary’s use of her so called "home-brew" mail server has never satisfactorily been explained and the contents of the deleted emails may never be known.

Richard Nixon became famous for some things and infamous for others but one footnote in the history of his administration was that he banned soup.  In 1969, Nixon hosted a state dinner for Pierre Trudeau (1919–2000; prime minister of Canada 1968-1979 & 1980-1984) and the next day complained to HR Haldeman that formal dinners “take forever”, suggesting “Why don’t we just leave out the soup course?”, adding “Men don’t really like soup.” (other than wives & waitresses, state dinners were then substantially a male preserve).  Well-acquainted with the social ineptitude of his boss, Haldeman had his suspicions so called the president's valet and asked: “Was there anything wrong with the president’s suit after that dinner last night?  Why yes…”, the valet responded, “…he spilled soup down the vest.”  Not until Gerald Ford (1913–2006; US president 1974-1977) assumed the presidency was soup restored to White House menus to the relief of the chefs who couldn’t believe a dinner was really a dinner without a soup course.

Richard Nixon, détente and chopsticks

A chopstick neophyte in Beijing: Comrade Zhou Enlai (1898–1976; premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) 1949-1976, left), Richard Nixon (centre) and comrade Zhang Chunqiao (1917–2005, right) at the welcome banquet for President Nixon's visit to the PRC, Tiananmen Square, Beijing, 26 February 1972.  After the death of comrade Chairman Mao (Mao Zedong 1893–1976; chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) 1949-1976), in a CCP power struggle, Zhang (a prominent figure in the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976)) was arrested, becoming one of the “Gang of Four” (which included the late chairman’s last wife).  After a typically efficient CCP-approved trial, he was sentenced to death but was granted a two-year reprieve and his sentence was later commuted to life in prison before being reduced to 18 years.  Released on humanitarian grounds in 1998 to enable him to receive treatment for cancer, he died in 2005.

The event in Beijing was not a “state visit” because at the time no formal diplomatic relations existed between the two nations (the US still recognized the Taiwan-based RoC (Republic of China (which Beijing regards still as a “renegade province”)) as the legitimate government of China). For that reason, the trip was described as an “official visit”, a term not part of diplomatic protocol.  There are in history a few of these fine distinctions: technically, diplomatic relations were never re-established between Berlin and Paris after the fall of the Third Republic in 1940 so ambassadors were never accredited which means Otto Abetz (1903-1958), who fulfilled the role between 1940-1944, should be referred to as “de facto” German ambassador (as the letters patent made clear, he acted with full ambassadorial authority).  In July 1949, a French court handed Abetz a twenty-year sentence for crimes against humanity; released in 1954, he died in 1958 in a traffic accident on the Cologne-Ruhr autobahn and there are conspiracy theorists who suspect the death was “an assassination”.  The de facto ambassador was the great uncle of Eric Abetz (b 1958; Liberal Party senator for Tasmania, Australia 1994-2022, member of the Tasmanian House of assembly since 2024), noted in Australian legal history for being the first solicitor in the city of Hobart to include color on his firm's letterhead.

Longing for a chork.

Still, whatever the detail of the protocol, the PRC's hospitality was lavish and it certainly looked (and tasted) like a state visit.  Both the US and the PRC had their own reasons for wishing to emerge from the “diplomatic deep-freeze” (Moscow something of a pivot) and it was this event which was instrumental in beginning the process of integrating the PRC into the international system.  The “official visit” also introduced into English the idiomatic phrase “Nixon in China” (there are variations) which describes the ability of a politician with an impeccable reputation of upholding particular political values to perform an action in seeming defiance of them without jeopardizing his support or credibility.  For his whole political career Nixon had been a virulent anti-communist and was thus able to make the tentative approach to the PRC (and later détente with the Soviet Union) in a way which would not have been possible for someone without the same history.  In the same way the Democratic Party’s Bill Clinton (b 1946; US president 1993-2001) was able during the 1990s to embark on social welfare “reform” in a way no Republican administration could have achieved.

The chopstick as a hair accessory: Lindsay Lohan (b 1986, left) in The Parent Trap (1998) and Hilary Duff (b 1987, right) at Nickelodeon's 15th Annual Kids Choice Awards, Barker Hangar, Santa Monica, California, April, 2002.  These outfits might now be described as "cultural appropriation".

Following the visit, there was also a culinary ripple in the US.  Since the nineteenth century, Chinese restaurants had been a fixture in many US cities but the dishes they served were often very different from those familiar in China and some genuinely were local creations; fortune cookies began in San Francisco courtesy of a paperback edition of “Chinese Proverbs” and all the evidence suggests egg rolls were invented in New York.  The news media’s coverage of the visit attracted great interest and stimulated interest in “authentic” Chinese food after some of the menus were published.  Noting the banquet on the first night featured shark’s fin soup, steamed chicken with coconut and almond junket (a type of pudding), one enterprising chap was within 24 hours offering in his Manhattan Chinese restaurant recreation of each dish, a menu which remained popular for some months after the president’s return.  Mr Nixon’s favorite meal during the visit was later revealed to be Peking duck and around the US, there was a spike in demand for duck.

One of the menus from the official visit (not from a banquet but one of the "working dinners").  Clearly, the president's fondness for duck had been conveyed to the chef.

The graphic is the National Emblem of the People's Republic of China and in a red circle depicts a representation of Tiananmen Gate, the entrance gate to the Forbidden City imperial palace complex, where in 1949 comrade Chairman Mao Zedong declared the foundation of the PRC (People's Republic of China) in 1949.  The five stars are those from the national flag, the largest representing the CCP, the others the four revolutionary social classes defined in Maoism (the peasantry, proletariat, petty bourgeoisie & national bourgeoisie).  Although Maoism was criticized by comrade Stalin (1878-1953; Soviet leader 1924-1953) and others for being “ideologically primitive”, it has over the decades proved a practical and enduring textbook for insurgencies and revolutionary movements, especially where those involved substantially are rural-dwellers.  Although comrade Stalin may have been sceptical about comrade Mao's contribution to Marxist theory, Maoism has endured and its many (bloody) successes would have surprised Karl Marx (1818-1883) who saw the potential for revolution only in the urban proletariat slaving in factories, grumbling that peasants were impossible to harness as a movement because they: "...were like potatoes, all the same and yet all different."    

Friday, February 28, 2025

Corvette

Corvette (pronounced kawr-vet)

(1) In historic admiralty use, a flush-decked warship of the seventeenth & eighteenth centuries having a single tier of guns and one size down from a frigate; in the US Navy called a sloop of war (usually truncated to sloop).

(2) In current Admiralty use, a lightly armed and armored blue-water (ocean-going as opposed to white-water (coastal) or brown-water (internal waterways) warship, one size down from a frigate and capable of trans-oceanic duty.

(3) A GRP-bodied (glass reinforced plastic, soon better known in the US as "fiberglass") sports car produced in the US since 1953 by GM's (General Motors) Chevrolet division.

1630–1640: From the French, from the Middle French corvette (a small, fast frigate), from the Middle Dutch corferkorver, corver (pursuit boat), the construct on the model of corf (fishing boat (literally “basket”)) + -ette (the diminutive suffix) or the Middle Low German korf (small boat; literally “basket”).  The source of both was the Latin corbis (basket) and, despite there existing also in Latin the corbita (navis) (slow-sailing ship of burden, grain ship), again from corbis, the relationship between this word and the later European forms is disputed.  The suffix –ette was from the Middle English -ette, a borrowing from the Old French -ette, from the Latin -itta, the feminine form of -ittus.  It was used to form nouns meaning a smaller form of something.  The Italian corvette & the Spanish corbeta are French loan-words, the German equivalent being korvette.  The obsolete alternative spelling was corvet.  Corvette is a noun; the noun plural is corvettes.  The nouns & verbs corvetted & corvetting are archaic related forms of corvet (an archaic form of curvet (used in zoology to describe various movements)).

Naval Battle between the French corvette La Bayonnaise and the British frigate HMS L'Embuscade, 14 December 1798, by Jean Francois Hue (1751-1823).

Historically, the term corvette, as applied to warships by various navies, can be misleading, the vessels varying greatly in size, displacement, armament and suitability, making some mor suitable than others for use on the high seas (ie the so-called "blue water").  As a general principle, a corvette was understood to be a warship larger than a sloop, smaller than a frigate and with fewer and sometimes smaller-bore guns than the latter, always arrayed on a single deck.  Although envisaged originally as a blue-water ship, they were allocated mostly to costal duties (ie "white water") or the range of activities smaller vessels fulfilled in a fleet support role.  In the manner of military mission creep, overlap emerged and in some navies there were occasions when newer corvettes were at least as large and well-gunned as some frigates although the Royal Navy tended to maintain the distinctions, finding the smaller ships a useful addition in the seventeenth century, their fast build rate affording the Admiralty the means quickly to augment the reach and firepower of a fleet.  To the British Admiralty, they anyway were still called sloops and it wasn’t until the 1830s the first vessels designated corvettes left UK shipyards.  It seems to have been the French Navy which first described the “big sloops” as corvettes but, whether by strategic design or in an attempt to confound the espionage activities of opponents, by the late eighteenth century, French naval architects designing corvettes the British would have defined as frigates.

HMCS Bowmanville (K 493), Royal Canadian Navy Corvette of WWII.

Because of the nature of sea battles prior to World War II (1939-1945), ships the size of the corvette tended to be neglected, the interest in smaller warships centred on the ever smaller torpedo boats and the two work-horses of the fleets, the frigate and destroyer, both of which were better suited to support cruisers patrolling the trade routes of the empire and the battleships of the high-seas fleets.  What saw a revival of interest was the war-time need to protect the trans-Atlantic and Arctic Sea convoys.  While the small corvettes, marginal in blue-water conditions, weren’t ideal for the role, they could be produced quickly and cheaply and, as a war-time necessity, were pressed into service as a stop-gap until more destroyers became available.  An additional factor was their small size which meant they could be built in many of the small, civilian shipyards which would have lacked the capacity to construct a frigate, let alone a destroyer.  Since the war, corvette has as a designation essentially become extinct but in many navies there have long been in service frigates and fast patrol boats which correspond in size with the traditional WWII corvette.


The early Chevrolet Corvettes, C1, C2 & C3 

1953 Corvette.

By 1952, the success in the US of MG and Jaguar had made it clear to Chevrolet that demand existed for sports cars and the market spread across a wide price band so with the then novel GRP offering the possibility of producing relatively low volumes of cars with complex curves without the need for expensive tooling or a workforce of craftsmen to shape them, a prototype was prepared for display at GM's 1953 Motorama show.  Despite the perception among some it was the positive response of the Motorama audience which convinced GM’s management to approve production, the project had already be signed-off but the enthusiastic reaction certainly encouraged Chevrolet to bring the Corvette to market as soon as possible.  The name Corvette was chosen in the hope of establishing a connection with the light, nimble naval vessels and indisputably the modern lines made the essentially pre-war MGs look as archaic as they were and even the Jaguar XK120 was now obviously an evolution of the way sports cars might have looked by 1945 had the war not postponed progress.

1953 Corvette.

That haste however brought its own, unique challenges.  In 1953, Chevrolet had no experience of large-scale production of GRP-bodied cars but neither did anybody else, GM really was being innovative.  The decision was therefore taken to build a batch of three-hundred identical copies, the rationale being the workers would be able to perfect the assembly techniques involved in bolting and gluing together the forty-six GRP pieces molded by an outside contractor.  Thus, by a process of trial and error, were assembled three hundred white Corvettes with red interiors, a modest beginning but the sales performance was less impressive still, fewer than two-hundred finding buyers, mainly because the rate of production was erratic and with so few cars available for the whole country, dealers weren’t encouraged to take orders; uncertainty surrounded the programme for the whole year.  Seldom has GM made so little attempt actually to sell a car, preferring to use the available stock for travelling display purposes, tantalizing those who wanted one so they would be ready to spend when mass-production started.

1954 Corvette.

The first Corvettes had been produced on a small assembly line in Flint, Michigan to allow processes closely to be observed & optimized but by late 1953, Chevrolet was ready for high-volume runs, moving production to a plant in Saint Louis, Missouri with the capacity to make ten-thousand a year.  In anticipation of the Corvette being a regular-production model, three additional colors (black, red, and blue) were offered and the black soft-top was replaced by one finished in tan.  However, despite the enhancements, demand proved sluggish and fewer than four-thousand were sold in 1954 and there were reasons.  In 1961, Jaguar would stun the world with its new sports car, powered by a triple-carburetor 3.8 litre straight-six but in 1953, although Chevrolet’s Corvette boasted the same specification and a much admired body, it wasn’t anything like the sensation the E-type would be at Geneva.  The 1954 Corvette had gained a revised camshaft which increased power by 5 horsepower (HP), an output respectable by the standards of the time but the only transmission available was the Powerglide, a two speed automatic which for robustness and reliability matched the Blue Flame six-cylinder engine (an updated version of the pre-war "Stovebolt") to which it was attached but neither exhibited the dynamic qualities which had come to be expected from a sports car although owners would have to get used to it: the Powerglide would be the only automatic transmission offered in a Corvette until 1968.  In truth, the Corvette was betwixt & between; not quite a sports car yet lacking the creature comforts to appeal to those wanting a relaxed GT (grand-tourer).

1954 Corvette.

One intriguing element on the C1 Corvette was the use of protrusions to house the taillights.  When in 1953 the Corvette was released, the fins with which US cars of the era were to become so associated had been around for a few year but hadn’t yet grown (variously upwards & outwards) to the absurd proportions they would later assume and there was nothing unusual in taillights being housed in some construction integrated with the bodywork; once just “bolted-on” lens, taillights had become a design element.  What appeared on the early Corvettes are not really fins and are most analogous with the streamlined nacelles which appeared on contemporary aircraft as enclosures for jet engines; that aspect of aviation architecture would for years be a popular motif for the taillight stylists (by then a highly valued member of the team).  Despite that, the accepted term describing the sculptural extensions is “taillight pod”.  Interestingly, in some of the internal corporate memos the term “nacelle” was used but “pod” became the accepted standard.

1954 Corvette taillight (left) in pod with finlets.

The pair of small blades adorning the upper surface (although sometimes referred to as “finettes”) were in the documents of the GM Design Studio called “taillight bezels” or “ornamental finlets” and, modest as they were, the C1 Corvette probably was the first production car with “four fins”.  Later that would change as GM and Chrysler in particular embarked on a process of “finflation” and those on the Corvette were at least in a similar aspect ratio to those which appeared on actual jet engine nacelles where they were used to direct airflow in the desired direction.  On the Corvette, there would have been a slight aerodynamic effect (for better or worse) but the finlets were essentially decorative as GM’s memos indicated and similar additions even appeared on some dagmars (such as the 1954 Buicks).  The Corvette’s designers clearly though the moment had passed for when the restyled 1956 range was released, the pods had been banished, never to return.

1959 Pontiac Bonneville Convertible (left) and 1959 Pontiac Catalina Convertible (right).  Pontiac used the elongation of the elliptical taillights as a marker of a model's place in the divisional hierarchy.

On the Corvette, the “taillight pod” and “ornamental finlets” combo didn’t make it into the 1956 range but the idea clearly became lodged somewhere in the GM collective memory because, on a grander scale, both were reprised on the 1959 Pontiacs; longer, higher and wider than the 1953 original, the look might have attracted more publicity had GM’s take on fins that year not been dominated by the Cadillac with the “twin bullet taillights” and the Chevrolet’s “bat wings”.  Compared with those extravagances, what Pontiac did was almost subtle and anyway overshadowed by two of the division’s more enduring debuts, the “split grill” and “year of the wide-track” campaign, the former coming and going, the latter lasting for more than a decade.  In a harbinger of what was to come (and ultimately doom Pontiac), all five GM divisions built their cars using the single platform of the GM B-Body and it was remarkable the stylists were able to achieve noticeably different appearances despite sharing the same structural core.

1955 Corvette V8.

Chevrolet in 1955 solved the problem of the Corvette’s performance deficit by slotting in the new 265 cubic inch (4.3-litre) V-8 which would later come to be called the small-block and become a corporate stable, appearing over the decades by the million in various forms in just about every Chevrolet and some models from other divisions (though this corporate sharing would not be without controversy).  Rated now at 195 HP which felt more convincing than the previous year’s 155, it was offered also with a three-speed manual transmission so it could run with the Jaguars, Mercedes-Benz and Ferraris on both road and track; the Corvette had become a sports car and while not cheap, compared with the competition, it was conspicuously good value.  Most 1955 Corvette V8s were fitted with the two-speed Powerglide automatic transmission but some "special" orders were fulfilled by using the three-speed manual although the estimates of the numbers vary between 19 and 80; the manual option seems never to have appeared in the sales literature.  Rarely has an option been as well-received and instantly successful as the V8 for the 1955 Corvette and at US$135 it was so compelling that upon it appearing on the list, of the 700 built for the 1955 season, only seven customers opted for the Blue Flame six.

1984 Pontiac Fiero 2M4.

In the mid-1970s it was feared something like this may be the future of the Corvette.  At the time, some in the press and Congress were claiming a report by the US CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) said the world would "run out of oil" by 1983; the CIA said nothing like that but some politicians and journalists like an eye-grabbing headline.  What the CIA had done was an analysis using conventional economic models and that found that significant "supply & demand imbalances" were likely to exist by the mid-1990s unless the industry undertook the required changes in exploration and production.  This the industry did rather too well because by 1984 there was a global "oil glut" which didn't please everyone but Corvette owners certainly welcomed the lower gas (petrol) price. 

It was in July 2019 the eighth generation (C8) was launched in a ceremony at Cape Canaveral’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.  Unlike most of the launches staged there, the machines stayed on the ground but they were anyway notable because for the first time since its introduction in 1953, the Corvette was mid-engined and although such things were no longer the novel escapees from the race tracks they’d appeared in the 1960s, the C8 was GM’s first such machine since the Pontiac Fiero (1984-1988).  An intriguing concept (a small, economical, two-seat commuter car with styling cues from Fiat & Lancia sports cars), it proved ill-fated because it was unusually prone to spontaneous combustion, an unfortunate quality which led to many transposing the “e” & “r” to dub it the “Fireo”.  In its afterlife the Fiero found a niche as a platform for “body kits” which transformed it into something intended to resemble a Lamborghini Countach (1974-1990) or a Ferrari (usually the 208/308 GTB (1975-1985) or 328 GTB (1985-1989)) and while some were quite well executed many were not, a similar disclaimer extending to the many which inevitably were repowered by a variety of (usually Chevrolet) V8 engines.  Unlike the Fiero, the C8 can be ordered as sports car or supercar; it’s a matter just of ticking the option boxes.

1955 Corvette V8 badge.

So with the engine moved amidships, the C8 was a major event in the Corvette lineage but arguably the most significant change came in 1955 with the introduction of the V8 engine, the presence of which has since defined the breed, out-lasting pre-oil crisis flirtations with the Wankel rotary and heretical thoughts of four cylinders during the troubled 1970s.  One stylistic curiosity of 1955 Corvettes with the optional V8 was that visually, they were almost indistinguishable from the version with the Blue Flame six which, uniquely that year, ran in parallel.  The restraint was untypical in the industry at a time when the accepted practice was to adorn exteriors and interiors with (often chrome-plated) markers of difference, assuring those watching a more expensive version had been bought.  With the 1955 Corvette, literally the only obvious visual difference was an exaggerated “V” (in anodized bronze), overlaid atop the “Corvette” script which sat on the flanks behind the front wheel.  The subtlety was very much in the European tradition; witness the later Mercedes-Benz W109 (1965-1972) where despite costing more than three times as much, the 300 SEL 6.3 was distinguishable from the 280 SEL only by a small “6.3” badge on the trunk (boot) lid.  Bling would come later for the Germans.

1956 Corvette.

The response of (literally) 99% of buyers had convinced Chevrolet where the future lay; for 1956 the Corvette became exclusively V8-powered, a specification by 2026 still not deviated from (although auxiliary electric motors would in the next century appear).  To emphasize the dual role the car now plausibly could fulfil, the Powerglide became optional and revisions to the engine meant power was up to 210 HP although for those who wanted more, a dual four-barrel carburetor setup could be specified which raised that to 225.  Still made from GRP, the revised styling hinted at some influence from the Mercedes-Benz 300SL (W198, 1954-1963) but had practical improvements as well, external door handles appearing and conventional side windows replaced the fiddly removable curtains, a civilizing addition some British roadsters wouldn’t acquire until well into the next decade.  There was also the indication Chevrolet did take seriously the dual role for in addition to the Powerglide remaining available, buyers could now specify a power-operated soft top and internal company documents noted the appeal of this feature "to women", a target market even then.  Whether it was sports car or GT was now up to the customer.

Jaguar E-Type advertising copy, 1971.

Chevrolet's experience in finding the six-cylinder Corvette had limited appeal once their V8 became available was in 1971 reprised across the Atlantic when Jaguar released the Series 3 E-Type (sometimes known in the US as XKE).  Jaguar's V12 project had a long gestation and by the time eventually it entered production, the 420G (1961-1970 and known originally as the Mark X) which had been intended as its first recipient, had been retired.  The task of engineering the much smaller XJ (introduced in 1968) to house the V12 was absorbing much energy so it was the E-Type in which the new engine was first used.  Jaguar made the effort to prepare the new S3 E-Type to use both the long-running, 4.2 litre (258 cubic inch) XK straight-six and the 5.3 litre (326 cubic inch) V12, including printing promotional material, even glossy, full-color, multi-lingual brochures.

Jaguar E-Type advertising copy, 1971.

However, before series production began, the decision was taken to offer the S3 only with the V12 and although there are tales of six XK-engined prototypes having been built, the Jaguar-Daimler Historic Trust insists the true number was four (2 roadsters & 2 coupés with one right hand drive (RHD) and one left hand drive (LHD) version of each); the LHD coupé with a manual transmission survived although when offered at auction in England, its rarity (genuinely it is unique) didn't attract a premium as it sold for a price little different from what might be expected for a V12 in the same condition.  By 1974, when the effects of the spike in the price of oil began to affect demand for engines as thirsty as the V12, the E-Type was in its last days so the company made no attempt to resurrect one with the smaller engine, unlike Mercedes-Benz which quickly made available in the R107 roadster and C107 coupé the 2.7 litre (168 cubic inch) six as an alternative to the 3.5 (214 cubic inch) & 4.5 (276 cubic inch) V8s.  Although it couldn't at the time have been predicted, the R107 in both six & eight cylinder form remained available until 1989 so the efforts taken during the first oil shock proved worthwhile.  It wouldn't be until 1983 Jaguar offered the XJS (1975-1996 and (sort of) the E-Type's replacement) with a six-cylinder engine and, remarkably, the XJS would enjoy a longer life even than the R107, the last not leaving the factory until 1996.           

1957 Corvette (fuel injected).

In 1957, things started to get really serious, a four-speed manual transmission was added, the V8 was bored out to 283 cubic inches (4.6 liters) which increased power and, in an exotic touch which matched the Mercedes-Benz 300 SL, Rochester mechanical fuel-injection was an (expensive) option, allowing the Corvette to boast an engine with one HP per cubic inch, something in the past achieved only by the big dual-quad Chrysler Hemis, offered only in heavyweight machines which, although fast, were no sports cars, heavy cruisers rather than corvettes.  Unlike the electronic fuel-injection systems others flirted with in the era, Rochester's mechanical system proved reliable although it did demand well-trained mechanics to ensure it remained in tune.

1958 Corvette.

A noted change for 1958 was the tachometer moving from the centre of the dashboard to a place directly in from to the driver, probably a wise move given the propensity of the fuel-injected engine to high-speed and output continued to rise, by 1960 315 HP would be generated by the top option.  One big styling trend in 1957 had been the quad headlamps allowed states relaxed their lighting regulations and these were added, unhappily according to some, to the Corvette for 1958.  However, even many of those of those who admired the four-eyed look thought the lashings of chrome a bit much.  Chrome was quite a thing in Detroit by 1958 and De Sotos, Lincolns, Buicks and such were displaying their shiny splendour but it probably didn’t suit the Corvette quite so well which was unfortunate given it was adorned with much, even the headlight bezels getting a coating.  A change of management at the top of GM's styling studio ensured 1958 was peak-chrome for the roadster; cars from other divisions would for some time continue to drip the stuff but the Corvette would be notably more restrained.

1962 Corvette.

Although the changes since 1963 had been many, the Corvette was still in its first generation but the 1962 model would be the end of the line.  The front end had earlier been revised from its chromed origin and in 1961 a redesigned rear arrived which saw the debut of the quad-taillight design which would for decades remain a distinctive feature.  1962 saw the introduction of a 327 cubic-inch (5.3 litre) V8, the fuel-injected version now up to 360 HP.  The C2 would be the last to include a trunk (boot) lid until the release for the C5 for the 1998 season, access to the storage area in the "lidless" era being a reach behind the seats.  Rear-deck mounted luggage racks became a popular option and one which to this day remains polarizing.

1963 Corvette Coupe. This was one of GM's official publicity stills and one can see why the decision was taken not to include a trunk lid but the absence enhanced structural integrity and it was this Chevrolet chose to emphasize.

For 1963, unusually, the big news wasn’t what was under the hood (bonnet).  The 327 V8 was carried over from 1962 but, other than the drive-train, it was a new car (later referred to as the C2, the 1953-1962 models retrospectively dubbed C1), offered for the first time as a coupe as well as the traditional convertible and there was a revised frame which included independent rear suspension, at the time a rarity on US-built vehicles.  Officially, Chevrolet had no involvement in racing but understood the Corvette’s appeal to those who did and in 1963 offered Regular Production Option (RPO) Z06 (Special Performance Equipment) which included the 360 HP (L84) fuel-injected 327 V8, a close-ratio four-speed manual transmission, Positraction LSD (limited-slip differential), stiffer spring & shock absorbers, a thicker front anti-sway (anti-roll) bar and a brake package consisting of HD (heavy-duty), finned aluminum drum brakes with sintered metallic linings, a dual-circuit master cylinder, vacuum booster and cooling ducts.  Just 199 Z06 split-window coupes were built, a number which reflected not a planned production schedule but the limited demand for a package which offered much to race drivers but made the car less suitable for street use, added to which it added a hefty US$1,818.45 to the base-price of a coupe over the base coupe price of $4,252.00 (ie it increased the price by 42%).  The 1963 Z06s most sought by collectors are the 63 ordered with RPO N03, a fibreglass, 36.5-gallon (30 Imperial gallon; 138 litre) fuel tank intended for endurance racers which cost US$202.30; such machines can at auction now sell for over US$500,000 so for an original owner the US$2,020.75 would have been a reasonable investment although nothing like what would have been realized had in 1963 been invested in a stock-index fund but who knew?

One quirk of the 1963 coupes was the "split-window" design of the rear glass.  After the release, it became a source of debate within Chevrolet and eventually, the "anti-split" faction prevailed, a single piece of glass in 1964 substituted which, of course, rendered the 1963 cars instantly dated.  As a result, a small-scale industry sprung up offering owners the chance to update their look, lest they be seen driving "last year's model" and that wasn't exclusively a '63 Corvette thing, the idea even having enjoyed corporate support.  When the 1936 Ford V8 was introduced, so effective was the restyling that despite behind the cowl it being essentially identical to the 1935 model, the effect was something was which looked "all new".  That was thought to create a marketing opportunity and in a novel exercise, the factory offered dealers a a kit containing all the front-clip sheet metal needed to make a '35 look like a '36.  The marketing textbooks probably would suggest that was a bad idea because presumably it would reduce sales of new Fords but economic realities anyway made it a one-off venture: at US$213.28 plus a US$69.00 labor charge, the kit seemed compelling to few when a brand new 1936 Ford V8 could be bought for as little as US$510.00.  Years after the "fake" 1964 Corvettes were created, the uniqueness of the split-window cars made them a a much prized collectable and another small-scale industry briefly flourished converting modified ones back and, whether true or urban myth, it’s said as many as 2% of the split-window coupes which now exist may be later models with a bit of judicious back-dating.

1963 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sports, Nassau Speed Week, December 1963.  The additional apertures on the rear facia were not for taillights but air-extraction ports to prevent the panel acting like a "parachute" which not only reduced speed but also induced lift, creating instability.  Note the single-piece rear window fitted to all three coupes.

One aborted C2 project was the Grand Sport (GS) Corvette, a competition oriented model (which raced sometimes with an all-aluminum 377 cubic inch (6.2 litre) version of the small-block V-8 (making a reputed 550 HP)) built with a structure which had been subject to an extensive weight-reduction programme.  It had been intended to build a run of 125 (some sources say 100 in competition trim with a further 25 as "road" versions with creature comforts) in order to homologate it in certain racing categories but GM, still (unlike its competitors) taking seriously the need to make it appear it was maintaining the industry's agreed ban on participation in motorsport, cancelled the programme after five (three coupes and two roadsters) had been built; all survived and are now multi-million dollar collectibles, something which has inspired the creation of a number of clones.  One quirk of the GS was the coupes were fitted with a one-piece rear window and so the three are the only 1963 Corvettes to leave the factory without the famous split-screen (which really was two separate pieces of glass).  The very presence of the split screen was the subject of a well-documented squabble within Chevrolet and ultimately, the design team prevailed with a single piece of glass appearing for the 1964 coupes. 

1965 Corvette 396 Convertible with hard-top, side exhaust pipes and Kelsey-Hayes cast aluminum wheels (still with knock-off hubs that year).

Although the Corvette had gained powerful, fuel-injected engines and an effective independent rear suspension, the drum brakes remained the package’s weak link.  In 1964 option J65 (US$53.80) bundled the power assistance (as stand-alone option J50 retailing at US$43.05) with sintered metallic linings for the brakes but while this improved the retardation and especially the propensity for effectiveness fade under sustained use, the combo couldn’t match what could be achieved with disk brakes.  Still, the motoring press commended the option and it persuaded 4,780 buyers to tick the box.  At a hefty US$629.50 however there was option J56, described as “Special Sintered Metallic Brake Package” and that it was available only with a fuel-injected engine, a four-speed transmission and a Positraction rear end was an indication it was intended only for those who operated in “extreme conditions” (ie on race tracks).  Effective they certainly were but, noisy and with high pedal pressures, they were not suitable for street use and a scant 29 customers were tempted.  In what was an overdue upgrade, Chevrolet made four-wheel disc brakes standard for the 1965 model year although the drums remained available (as delete-option code J61) for anyone who wished to save a few dollars.  Those who opted to eschew the dramatic improvement in braking offered were probably specialists; because of internal friction the discs did impose a (very slight) performance and economy reduction which was why drums were long preferred on the NASCAR ovals where brakes are rarely applied and fractions of a second per lap can be the difference between winning and losing.  Only 316 Corvette buyers chose to save the US$64.50 and the disks definitely were a good idea if the newest engine was chosen.  Although developed by  Kelsey-Hayes, the brakes were manufactured for Chevrolet by Delco Moraine and included a pair of small drum brakes in the rear hubs to provide a parking brake, something difficult to engineer with disks.  Kelsey-Hayes also produced the optional aluminium wheels but at US$322.80 the take-up rate was low and many C2 Corvettes now are fitted with modern reproductions of the originals; the same applies to the side exhaust-pipes (a new option for 1965 at US$134.50), many more Corvettes now so equipped than the 759 which in 1965 left the factory. 

The distinctive "bent needles" were last used on the Corvette's instruments in 1964.

As a mid-year release in 1965, the big-block 396 cubic-inch (6.5 litre) V-8 became available and it was rated at 425 HP, a figure few doubted after seeing the performance figures.  Predictably, given the fuel-injected 327 was rated at 375 HP but cost US$538.00 against US$292.70 for the more muscular big-block, only 771 chose the former while 2157 opted for the 396 which must have seemed a bargain compared to the US$202.30 Chevrolet charged for the 36 (US) gallon (136 litre) fuel tank (available only for the coupe).  This cost-breakdown must be considered in the context of the Corvette's base price (US$4106.00 for the convertible and US$4321.00 for the coupe) and the air-conditioning ordered by only 2423 buyers (9.7%); at US$421.00 it increased the invoice by some 10%).  There were charms only the fuel-injected unit deliver but the customer is always right and before the year was out, the Rochester option was retired and it wouldn’t be until 1982, in the age of the micro-chip, that Chevrolet would again offer a fuel-injected Corvette.  Buyers clearly were convinced by the big-block idea but the sections of the motoring press were ambivalent, Car & Driver's (C&D) review suggesting that while "...there are many sports cars which really need more power, the Corvette isn’t one of them."  Unlike the chauvinistic English motoring press which tended to be a bit one-eyed about things like Jaguars and Aston-Martins, there were many in the US motoring media who really didn’t approve of American cars and wished they were more like Lancias.  People should be careful what they wish for.

1967 Corvette L88 convertible with side exhaust pipes and Kelsey-Hayes cast aluminum wheels (with five-stud hubs that year).

Maybe even Chevrolet had moments of doubt after reading their copy of C&D and thought the 396 Corvette might have been a bit much because after providing cars for the press to test, they issued a statement saying the 396 wouldn’t be available in the Corvette after all but would be offered in the intermediate Chevelle as well as the full-sized cars.  The moment however quickly passed, the 396 Corvette remaining on the books and by 1966 Chevrolet certainly agreed there was no substitute for cubic inches, the 396 replaced by a 427 cubic-inch (7.0 litre) iteration of the big-block.  For 1966 it was still rated at 425 HP but in 1967, a triple carburetor option sat atop the top engine, bumping the number to 435.  There was however another, barely advertised and rarely discussed because of its unsuitability for street use and this was the L88, conservatively rated at 430 HP but actually developing between 540-560.  Essentially a road-going version of the 427 used in the (unlimited displacement FIA Group 7 sports-car) Can-Am race series, just 20 were sold in 1967, the survivors among the most sought-after Corvettes, one selling at auction in 2014 for US$3.85 million.

By the 1960s it was common for hard-tops to be on the option list of a roadster (in the era there was even one company which briefly (and unsuccessfully) offered GRP versions for Detroit's full-size convertibles) but Chevrolet gave C2 Corvette buyers the choice to have both a hard-top & soft-top or just one of the two.  Remarkably (and presumably in places where rain events were predictable), a number of buyers did take the hard-top only course and the configuration wasn't unique to Chevrolet, Mercedes-Benz between 1967-1971 offering its "Pagoda" roadster (W113; 1963-1971) with only a hard-top although it was listed a separate model: the "SL Coupé" (nicknamed the "Californian Coupe") which, despite the name, was still a convertible and one which offered the additional practicality of a folding bench seat in the rear compartment, permitting (cramped) seating for two.  In the UK, Sunbeam in 1963 introduced a "hard-top only" version of the little Alpine (1959-1968) roadster which included some luxury features and it enjoyed some success although a similar version of the Tiger (1964-1967 and a V8 version of the Alpine) was aborted after only 15 were built.  Given 5,794 (just over 8%) buyers of the 72,418 C2 Corvette buyers eschewed the folding roof, it was in the era the most successful of the "hard-top only" breed.   

Even if Joe Biden (b 1942; US president 2021-2025) had ever seen Mean Girls (2004), by 2022 he'd have forgotten and if anyone mentioned the title, he'd probably have assumed they were talking about crooked Hillary Clinton (b 1947; US secretary of state 2009-2013) and Kamala Harris (b 1964; US vice president 2021-2025).

Given Mr Biden was already 62 when Mean Girls was released in 2004, most assumed it must have been an intern who provided the intelligence: (1) that October 3 is "Mean Girls Day" and (2) "Get in loser, we're going shopping" is a line waiting to be a meme.  Thus the tweet in 2022 although there was some subterfuge involved, the photograph actually from a session at his Wilmington, Delaware estate on July 16 2020.  The excuse for not taking a new snap probably was legitimate, the Secret Service most reluctant to let him behind the wheel (and they probably had many reasons to be worried).  The presidency is often called the most powerful office in the world but he's still not allowed to drive his own Corvette (all ex-presidents actually forbidden again to take the wheel on public roads) and George HW Bush (George XLI, 1924-2018; US president 1989-1993) encountered push-back when he refused to eat broccoli, apparently still scarred by the experience when young of having the green stuff forced on him by his mother.  He was far from the only head of state or government to have had unresolved issues with his mother.

Joe Biden in his 1967 Corvette Convertible.

President Biden's Corvette Sting Ray (it was two words in the C2 era) was ordered with the base version of the 327 rated at 300 HP, coupled to a four-speed manual gearbox.  For what most people did most of the time the combination of the base engine and the four-speed was ideal for street use although there were some who claimed the standard three-speed transmission was even more suited to the urban environment, the torque-spread of even the mildest of the V8s such that the driving experience didn't suffer and fewer gearchanges were required.  Those wanting the automatic option were restricted still to the old two-speed Powerguide, the newer Turbo-Hydramatic with an extra ratio simply too bulky to fit (some subsequently have modified their early cars with a Turbo-Hydramatic but they didn't have to organize the production line upon which thousands would be built).  The 1967 cars were actually an accident of history, the C3 (slated for release as a 1967 model) delayed (the issues said to be with with aerodynamics which in the those days meant spending time in the wind tunnel and on the test track, computer modelling of such things decades away) by one season.  Sales were thus down from 1966 as the new, swoopy body was much anticipated but the 1967 cars are now among the most coveted.

1967 Corvette 427-400 Tri-Power Convertible with Powerglide.

The original 1953 Corvette had used the two-speed Powerglide automatic transmission because Chevrolet at the time didn’t have available a suitable manual gearbox.  The company was however innovative in the implementation, the floor-shift mechanism being the first known instance of the location for an automatic’s lever and it protruded from the side of the housing, something which doubtless seemed exotic but was really a short-cut by the engineers because it meant they could use the existing take-up for the linkage (Chrysler as late as 1963 used the same arrangement 300J).  The configuration really didn’t detract much from the driving experience because the Powerglide was, by the standards of the era, quick-shifting (though with only two ratios such events were anyway rare) and efficient which, combined with the light weight of the GRP body, made the thing a match in performance for many, heavier, V8-powered cars.  Even after manual gearboxes were added to the option list (a three-speed in 1955 and a four-speed two year later), the Powerglide remained available although in a typical year it was chosen by some 10% of buyers and as more powerful engines appeared (some with dual four-barrel carburetors, some with fuel-injection), these were offered only with the manual gearbox and the preference of the buyers who preferred the automatic was always slanted to the least powerful.

1967 Corvette 427-390 Coupe with Powerglide and air-conditioning.

When the big-block 396 debuted in the Corvette in mid 1965, it was available only with the four-speed manual, a limitation continued when it was replaced for the next season by the 427.  Unexpectedly however, the Powerglide in 1967 appeared on the option list for both the 390 (four barrel) and 400 (3 x 2 barrel) HP iterations although the more powerful (which used solid valve lifters and had higher redlines), retained the manual-only restriction.  Demand for the big-block / Powerglide combination was subdued: of the 2324 1967 Corvettes ordered with the automatic gearbox, 1725 used the 300 HP 327 and only 599 the 427, 392 with the 390 HP version, 207 with the 400.  In an indication of Chevrolet’s expectations of the Corvette buyer profile attracted to the Powerglide, air-conditioning was available with both the 390 & 400 HP engines.  It was the last year the Powerglide would appear in the Corvette, the platform of the succeeding C3 designed to accommodate the physically larger Turbo-Hydramatic.  A more modern and much superior design, the availability of the new three-speed transmission was welcomed but the old two-speed did have the charm of being able to hit 90 mph (145 km/h) in first gear, something of genuine benefit to the drag racing crowd who to this day continue to prize the Powerglide for (1) its robustness and (2) the ability to complete a quarter-mile (402 m) run with only one gear change, slicing priceless fractions of a second from the ET (elapsed time).  One trend which began with the debut of the new transmission in the Corvette was the take-up rate in the sports car essentially doubled; in 1969 the Turbo-Hydramatic was chosen by some 20% of buyers and the not only would tat continue to rise by 1982 (its last year of production), the Corvette was automatic only and by then the lower power and torque ratings meant the Turbo-Hydramatic had been replaced by a unit which was more efficient (although, as some would discover, it was also less robust).  When the mid-engined C8 Corvette was released in 2020, there was no conventional manual gearbox available, that decision taken for the same reason Ferrari had discontinued use almost a decade earlier: the automatic out-performed the manual in every aspect.  Curiously, among the Ferrari crowd, the famous open-gate shifters never lost the appeal and the factory must have noted both the emergence of a small industry converting modern Ferraris to use a fully manual transmission and buyer feedback because in 2025 it was reported there may soon again be a Ferrari with a clutch pedal and gated shifter.    

Same L72 engine, different stickers: An very early one (left) with a "450 HP" sticker and a later build (right) with a "425 HP".  

Most fetishized by the Corvette collector community are (1) rare models, (2) rare options singularly or in combinations and (3) production line quirks, especially if accompanied by documents confirming it was done by the factory.  There were a few of all of these during the Corvette’s first two decades and some of them attract a premium which is why the things can sell for over US$3 million at auction.  Other quirks bring less but are still prized, including the handful of 1966 cars rated (sort of) at 450 HP.  The L72 version of the 427 cubic inch engine was initially listed as developing 450 HP @ 5800 rpm, something GM presumably felt compelled to do because the 396 had been sold with a 425 HP rating and the first few cars built included an air-cleaner sticker reflecting the higher number.  However, the L72 was quickly (apparently for all built after October 1965) re-stickered at 425 HP @ 5600 rpm although the only physical change was to the sticker, the engines otherwise identical.  Chrysler used the same trick when advertising the 426 Street Hemi at 425 HP despite much more power being developed at higher engine speeds and that reflected a trend which began in the mid-1960s to under-rate the advertised output of the most powerful engines, a response to the concerns already being expressed by safety campaigners, insurance companies and some politicians.  Later Corvettes would be rated at 435 HP and it wasn’t until the 1970 model year that Chevrolet would list a 450 HP option (the 454 cubic inch (7.4 litre) LS6) but that was exclusive to the intermediate Chevelle and it remains the highest advertised rating of the muscle car era.  GM did plan that year to release a LS7 Corvette rated at 465 HP, building at least one prototype and even printing the brochures but the universe had shifted and the project was stillborn.

1966 Corvette air cleaner decals from Auto Accessories of America.  
The part number for the 427/450 sticker is #37032.

So, all else being equal, an early-build 1966 Corvette with a 450 HP sticker on the air-cleaner should attract a premium but Chevrolet kept no records of which cars got them and with reproduction stickers available for under US$25, it's obvious some have been "backdated", thus the negligible after-market effect.  Nor is there any guarantee some later-build vehicles didn't receive the stickers at the factory so even the nominal October 1965 “cut-off” isn't regarded as iron-clad, many assembly lines at the time known to use up superseded parts just to clear the inventory and something like a “425” or “450” sticker (of no mechanical significance) is unlikely much to have much occupied the minds of plant managers.  Not easily replicated however was another rarity from 1966.  That year, only 66 buyers chose RPO N03 (the 36.5 gallon fuel tank, by then reduced in price to US$198.05).  Depending on the engine/transmission combination and final-drive ratio chosen, a Corvette's fuel economy was rated usually between “bad” and “worse” so the big tank did usefully increase the range but it was really aimed at those using their cars in endurance racing.


Kelsey-Hayes cast aluminum wheels for C2 Corvette, the knock off version (option code P48, 1963-1966, top) and the later five-stud (option code N89, 1967, bottom).  They were manufactured by Western Wheel Corporation (a division of Kelsey-Hayes).  The images of the centre-cap components (right) are in the right hand column.

Available as a factory option on C2 Corvettes between 1963-1967, the Kelsey-Hayes cast aluminum wheels remained visually similar throughout the run but there were several detail differences in finish and, in the final year, a major structural change.  No series production 1963 Corvettes appear to have been factory-fitted with the wheels though they were at the time used on some race-cars (with two rather than three-eared hubs) and some of Chevrolet’s pre-production (the so called “pilot cars”) had them; these were the vehicles used in for the photo-sessions for the original brochures where the wheels appear.  The 1963-1964 run used a natural aluminum finish between the fins with a chrome centre cone; in 1965 the color was changed to a charcoal grey metallic while in 1966 the cone received a brushed finish.  The wheels were attached with “knock off” hubs which gained their name from the use of a hammer to “knock them off” (and back on) when a wheel needed to be removed.  Chevrolet in the tool kit of Corvettes fitted with the wheels included a 2 lb mallet with a lead face & core because damage can result if a steel hammer or mallet is used.  Lead being soft, with repeated use the stuff can wear away and expose the steel cylinder within so periodically the device should be inspected.  The major change came for 1967 when thinner fins appeared and, as a consequence of newly imposed federal regulations, the knock off hubs were replaced with the more familiar five-stud securing arrangement.  In 1967, the option code for the wheels changed from P48 to N89 and, reflecting the lower cost of production entailed in the simpler construction, the price was reduced from US$316.00 to US$263.30 but that added some 6% to the base cost and they were fitted to only 720 of the 22940 (3.14%) 1967 Corvettes produced although many more now exist with reproductions.  The new centre caps came to be known as “Starbursts”.

Starburst sea anemone.

As a noun & verb, “starburst” widely has been used in slang and commerce but its origin is owed to astronomers of the 1830s and in the field it’s been used variously to describe (1) a violent explosion, or the pattern (likened to the shape of a star) supposed to be made by such an explosion and (2) a region of space or period of time (distinct concepts for this purpose) with an untypically or unexpectedly high rate of star formation.  In SF (science fiction), starbursts can be more exotic still and have described machines from light-speed propulsion engines to truly horrid doomsday weapons.  In typography, a starburst is a symbol similar in shape to an asterisk, but with either or both additional or extended rays and it’s used for a brand of fruit-flavored confectionery, the name implying the taste “explodes” in the mouth as one chews or sucks.  In corporate use, starburst is slang for the breaking up of a company (or unit of a company) into a number of distinct operations and in software it was in the early 1980s used as the brand name of an application suite (based around the Wordstar word-processor) which was (along with Electric Office) one of the first “office suites”, the model Microsoft would later adopt for its “Office” product which bundled, Word, Excel, the dreaded PowerPoint and such.  It was the name of a British made-portable surface-to-air missile (MANPADS) produced in the late twentieth century, in botany it’s a tropical flowering plant (Clerodendrum quadriloculare), the term applied also to a species of sea anemone in the family Actiniidae and, in human anatomy, certain cell types (based on their appearance).  In photography, the “starburst effect” refers to the diffraction spikes which radiate from sources of bright light.         

1969 Corvette L88.

The C2 Corvette had a short life of only five years and it would have been shorter still had not there been delays in the development of the C3 which went on sale in late 1967.  Dramatically styled, the C3 eventually debuted for the 1968 model year, the lines reminiscent of the Mako Shark II  (1965) concept car and the coupe included the novelty of removable roof panels.  Underneath the swoopy body, the C3 was essentially the same as the C2 except the old two-speed Powerglide was retired, the automatic option now whichever of the three-speed Turbo-Hydramatics suited the chosen engine.  The C3 also saw one of the early appearances of fibre-optic cables, used to provide an internal display so drivers could check the functionally of external lights and for 1969, the 327 was stroked to 350 cubic inches (5.7 litres), one of the surprisingly large number of changes which can make the 1968 Corvette something of a challenge for restorers, there being so many parts unique to that model-year.  Still available was the L88 and in the two seasons it was offered in the C3, 196 were sold (80 in 1968 and 116 in 1969) but even in its most successful year, the option represented only around .003% of annual production.

C3 Corvette production Count, 1968-1982.

A classic roadster, the C3 Chevrolet Corvette L88: Convertible with soft-top lowered (top left), convertible with hard-top in place (top right), convertible with soft-top erected (bottom left) and coupe (roof with two removable panels (T-top)) (bottom right).  The four vehicles in these images account for 2.040816% of the 196 C3 L88 Corvettes produced (80 in 1968; 116 in 1969) and the L88 count constitutes .000361% of total C3 production.  196 C3 L88 Corvettes were produced (80 in 1968; 116 in 1969) and the L88 count constitutes .000361% of total C3 production.

1969 Chevrolet Corvette brochure (page 9).

Chevrolet never devoted any of its generous advertising budget to the promotion of the L88 engine, the attitude being those likely to buy one knew about it and these who didn't know about it would never buy one.  It did however (as a hyphenated L-88) rate a mention on page 9 of the 1969 Corvette brochure where it was called the Special High Performance Engine (Off Road Application Only)”.  In the context of the Corvette, the phrase “off road” did not suggest “suitable for dirt roads and four-wheel-drive”; it meant “intended for race tracks & drag strips” and the “special” nature was hinted at by being rated a notional 5 HP less than the output of the L71, the most powerful of the “street” engines.  Almost as an aside, the advertising copy mentions: “We even have a special engine (L-88) that we don't recommend for street use.

Joan Didion (1934-2021) and cigarette with her Daytona Yellow (OEM code 984) 1969 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray (on the C2 Corvette (1963-1967) and in 1968 the spelling had been "Sting Ray”) The monochrome image was from a photo-session commissioned in 1970 by Life magazine and shot by staff photographer Julian Wasser (1933-2023), outside the house she was renting on Franklin Avenue in the Hollywood Hills.  To great acclaim, her first work of non-fiction, Slouching Towards Bethlehem (1968), had just been published.

Writing mostly, in one way or another, about “feelings”, Joan Didion’s work appealed mostly to a female readership but when photographs were published of her posing with her bright yellow Corvette, among men presumably she gained some “street cred” although that might have evaporated had they learned it was later traded for a Volvo; adding insult to injury, it was a Volvo station wagon with all that implies.  She was later interviewed about the apparent incongruity between owner and machine and acknowledged the strangeness, commenting: “I very definitely remember buying the Stingray because it was a crazy thing to do.  I bought it in Hollywood.”  Craziness and Hollywood were then of course synonymous and a C3 Corvette (1968-1982) really was the ideal symbol of the America about which Ms Didion wrote, being loud, flashy, rendered in plastic and flawed yet underpinned by a solid, well-engineered foundation; the notion of the former detracting from the latter was theme in in her essays on the American experience.

A 1969 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray in Daytona Yellow.

Disillusioned, melancholic and clinical, Ms Didion’s literary oeuvre suited the moment because while obviously political it was also spiritual, a critique of what she called “accidie” of the late 1960s, the moral torpor of those disappointed by what had followed the hope and optimism captured by “Camelot”, the White House of John Kennedy (JFK, 1917–1963; US president 1961-1963).  In retrospect Camelot was illusory but that of course made real the disillusionment of Lyndon Johnson (LBJ, 1908–1973; US president 1963-1969) leading the people not to a “great society” but to Vietnam.  Her essays were in the style of the “new journalism” and sometimes compared with those of her contemporary Susan Sontag (1933-2004) but the two differed in method, tone, ideological orientation and, debatably, expectation if not purpose.

Joan Didion with Corvette, another image from Julian Wasser’s 1970 photo-shoot.  The staging in this one is for feminists to ponder.

While a stretch to say that in trading-in the Corvette for a Volvo station wagon, Ms Didion was tracking the nation which had moved from Kennedy to Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974), it’s too tempting not to make.  Of the Corvette, she used the phrase: “I gave up on it”, later recounting: “the dealer was baffled” but denied the change was related to moving after eight years from Malibu to leafy, up-market suburban Brentwood.  While she “…needed a new car because with the Corvette something was always wrong…” she “…didn’t need a Volvo station wagon” although did concede: “Maybe it was the idea of moving into Brentwood.”  She should have persevered because as many an owner of a C3 Corvette understands, the faults and flaws are just part of the brutish charm.  Whether the car still exists isn't known; while Corvette's have a higher than average survival rate, their use on drag strips & race tracks as well as their attractiveness to males aged 17-25 has meant not a few suffered misadventure.

Joan Didion with Corvette, rendered as oil on canvas with yellow filter.

The configuration of her car seems not anywhere documented but a reasonable guess is it likely was ordered with the (base) 300 HP version (ZQ3) of the 350 cubic inch (5.7 litre) small-block V8, coupled with the Turbo-Hydramatic 400 (TH400) (M40) three-speed automatic transmission (the lighter TH350 wouldn't be used until 1976 by which time power outputs had fallen so much the robustness of the TH400 was no longer required).  When scanning the option list, although things like the side-mounted exhaust system (N14) or the 430 HP versions (the iron-block L88 & all aluminium ZL1, the power ratings of what were barely-disguised race car engines deliberately understated, the true output between 540-560 HP) of the 427 cubic inch (7.0 litre) big-block V8 would not have tempted Ms Didion, she may have ticked the box for the leather trim (available in six colors and the photos do suggest black (402 (but if vinyl the code was ZQ4)), air conditioning (C60), power steering (N40), power brakes (J50), power windows (A31) or an AM-FM radio (U69 and available also (at extra cost) with stereo (U79)).  Given she later traded-in the Corvette on a Volvo station wagon, presumably the speed warning indicator (U15) would have been thought superfluous but, living in Malibu, the alarm system (UA6) might have caught her eye.  Coincidently, one of the two rarest and most valuable Corvettes (the ZL1) was also Daytona Yellow.     

1969 Corvette ZL1 Roadster in Monaco Orange (code 990).

Uniquely in 1969, there was one option more expensive than the L88, the RPO ZL1, sometimes described as “an all aluminium L88” but actually with a number of differences, some necessitated by the different metal while others were examples of normal product development.  Again the fruit of Chevrolet’s support for the Can-Am teams, the ZL1 was no more suited to street use than the L88 and at US$4,718.35 was three times as expensive.  In 1969, a basic Corvette listed at US$4,781.00 so if the ZL1 option box was ticked the price essentially doubled although beyond that temptations were few, like the L88, air conditioning, power steering, power brakes and even a radio not available.  It was thus unsurprising demand was muted and it's now accepted that of the those built (most sources cite between four to six), only one was sold (two depending on one's status with the originality police), the others used for engineering and promotional purposes, these “factory mules” scrapped or re-purposed after their usefulness was over.  The yellow coupe last changed hands in October 1991 when it was sold in a government auction for US$300,000 (then a lot of money) after being seized by the DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) and in January 2023, at auction, the Monaco Orange roadster realized US$3.14 million.  The yellow ZL1 for years sat in the museum attached to Roger Judski's Corvette Centre in Florida (a hive of DEA activity) but it was on 15 April 2025 announced that after sixty years of service to the Corvette community, Mr Judski was retiring and the centre was closed.

1969 Corvette ZL1 Coupe in Daytona Yellow.

So the orthodox wisdom is there are one or two “real” ZL1s and an unknown number of faux versions (described variously as clones, replicas, tributes etc, none of these terms having an agreed definition and thus not useful as indications of the degree to which they emulate a factory original).  The “ultra” faction in the Corvette community maintains the yellow coupe is a genuine one-off and claim the orange roadster left the factory with an L88 engine and in that form it was raced, as well as when it was fitted with a ZL1.  The faction further notes the orange machine is an early-build vehicle reported to have closed chamber heads whereas the RPO ZL1s used open chambers.  The “moderate” faction continues to regard the count as two although nobody seems now to support the rumors which circulated for a few years indicating a third (a white coupe) and even a fourth (the supposed “black roadster”, later confirmed to be faux) might exist.  Some clearly are accommodating of the murkiness in the orange car's history given in January 2023 it sold at auction for over US$3 million so were the yellow ZL1 to appear on the block, a new record price would be likely.  Roger Judski (b 1947), owner of the yellow ZL1, was in the Corvette business for sixty years (1965-2025) and is as authoritative an expert on the breed as anyone: he belongs to the moderate faction which supports the count of two factory ZL1s.  Evidence is where it's found and while no supporting documentation seems to have been published, there are reports of those who were involved in building the ZL1 Corvettes being quoted as saying as well as the yellow car, the other "real" ZL1 was a white coupe.

Although the L88 (as L-88) did rate one mention in Chevrolet’s brochures, the mid-year release of the all-aluminum ZL1 engine never made it onto glossy paper, evidence of its existence restricted to factory bulletins, specialist dealer specification sheets (where it was listed as "Special L88 (aluminum block)", engineering documents and such.  Had a potential buyer scanned the specification sheet although likely impressed by the mechanical details (the solid lifter camshafts in the L88 & ZL1 providing the most valve-lift of the whole muscle car era), they might have wondered why Chevrolet bothered to itemize the “extra-cost mandatory options” rather than just include their cost in a bundled "ZL1 engine package" (which would have been US$5,236.65).

The high price and unsuitability of the ZL1 for street use made demand minimal and only a handful were built, some retained for a while by the engineering department to be used as test-beds for suspension, brake and drive-train equipment on the reasonable basis that the engine with the highest output would impose on the components of interest the greatest stress.  However, the engine plant’s records indicate 94 ZL1 engines with Corvette prefixes passed final quality control tests in 1969 (80 coded for use with a manual transmission and 14 with an automatic) and it’s almost certain most were sold to racing teams although some may have been used for other purposes.  Before it was (probably) broken up or scrapped, one of the ZL1 test mules was tested by Road & Track magazine which reported the car (weighing in at 2,945 lb (1,336 kg)) achieved a 0-60 mph (97 km/h) run of 4.0 seconds while the ET (elapsed time) over the standing ¼ mile was 12.1 seconds @ 116 mph (187 km/h); impressive numbers even today.  It was though close to the end of the era and the even more powerful ZL2 planned for 1970 was cancelled after one prototype had been built.

1971 Corvette with RPO ZR2 LS6 454.  This is one of two convertibles, the other 10 1971 ZR2s being coupes.

The 1969 ZL1 and L88 however would prove to be peak C3 Corvette.  Times were changing and in 1970 it was the Chevelle which was offered with Chevrolet’s top big-block street engine, the now 454 cubic-inch (7.4 litre) LS6 rated at 450 HP, the industry’s highest (official) rating of the era; plans for a 460 or 465 HP (both numbers quoted in internal documents) LS7 Corvette were cancelled as insurance premiums soared and the regulatory environment began to tighten around the high-powered monsters although serious power remained available: while the LS5 454 was rated at 390 HP, the performance it delivered suggested it was perhaps a little healthier.  The Corvette highlight of the 1970s however came in 1971 with the availability of the RPO ZR2 for the LS6 engine, described in dealer sheets as the “RPO ZR2 Special Purpose LS6 Engine Package” and it can be regarded as a successor the L88, supplied with the Muncie M22 close-ratio (Rock-Crusher) four-speed manual transmission, transistorized ignition, a heavy-duty aluminum radiator (with shroud delete, a hint it really didn’t belong on the street), heavy-duty power disc brakes, F41 Special Suspension with specific springs, shocks and special front and rear sway bars.  Like the L88s, air-conditioning and a radio were not on the option list, neither much used on race-tracks.  For 1971, the LS6 454 was rated at 425 HP and it added US$1,221 to the base car’s sticker price of US$5,496 sticker price; with insurance rates rising to prohibitive levels and more government regulations imminent, it was clear to all the craziness of the last few years was nearly done and reflecting that, a mere 188 ordered a LS6 for their Corvette.  Chevrolet built only a dozen ZR2 Corvettes (two of which were convertibles) in 1971, not because production deliberately was limited but because of the cost (the list price was a then substantial US$7,672.80) and their unsuitability for everyday use meant demand was subdued.  Although scheduled for 1970, industrial relations problems delayed production of the ZR2 until 1971 by which time stricter regulations had compelled cancellation of the LS7 454 so RPO ZR2 was re-purposed for the LS6 and its 425 HP rating, although conservative, didn’t fool the insurance industry.  

800 cfm (cubic feet per minute) carburetor on 1970 Corvette LT-1.

Lurking behind the thunder of the 454 however was the most charismatic of the small-block Corvettes since the days of the fuel-injected 283 & 327.  This was the 350 LT-1, a high-revving engine very much in the tradition of the Camaro Z28's (in the early days it appeared also as Z-28 & Z/28) 302 cubic inch (4.9 litre) V8 used in the Trans-Am series.  The LT-1 featured heavy-duty internals and high performance additions including solid valve lifters, forged pistons, an 11:1 compression ratio, four-bolt main bearing caps, forged steel crank, hi-lift camshaft, baffled sump and a free-flowing induction and exhaust system.  At US$447.60, the LT-1 option was some 35% more expensive than the big block LS5 454 which listed at US$289.65 (echoes of the days of Rochester fuel-injection), it was almost twice the price of a 454 but was a persuasive package and over three seasons 1287 were made.  Available only with a four-speed manual transmission, it lasted until 1972 and although the lowering of the compression ratio meant power ratings dropped season-by-season (1970:370 HP; 1971:330; 1972:255), the 1972 number reflected also the industry's change from quoting gross (SAE) to net (DIN) HP so the reduction wasn't as dramatic as it might appear.  Although still fast by most standards, the 1972 cars were somewhat less potent, the compensation being that by reducing the redline to 5600 RPM (from 6500), the belt would no longer be "thrown" from compressor so in its swansong season the LT-1 could be ordered with air-conditioning; of the 1741 Corvette LT1s built in 1972, 240 were so-equipped (it was the first time since 1965 the combination of AC and a high performance small-block was possible).  The intricacies of the detail differences (such as the different oil pan used on cars with a CTU engine suffix and the availability of power steering with the CTX engine) mean assessing an LT-1 (there are fakes in the wild) is an exact science and the judging bodies (the best known of which is the NCRS (National Corvette Restorers Society)) have codified the process so are able to produce a single "authenticity metric".  They don't insist the fuel in the tank or air in the tyres be original but where possible, everything should be "as delivered".

1972 Chevrolet Corvette LT1 Convertible (left) and Coupe (right) in Mille Miglia Red (Code 973) over Black Leather (404).  Coincidentally, both these 1972 Mille Miglia Red Corvette LT1s are fitted with some of that season’s most desirable options including Power Windows (A31), Custom Shoulder Belts (A85), AC (C60), Power Brakes (J50), Close Ratio four-speed Transmission (M21), Power Steering (N40), Tilt-telescopic Steering Column (N37) and Power Steering (N40).

The Mille Miglia was a road-race from Rome to Brescia and back and by the mid 1950s the cars had become very fast (speeds of 180 mph (290 km/h) were recorded and the 1955 race was won by a Mercedes-Benz 300 SLR (W196S) with an average speed close to 100 mph (160 km/h)).  At the time, that was dangerous enough even on a purpose-built circuit but the Mille Miglia was run on public roads which, while closed for the occasion, were poorly supervised and crowd control was in many places non-existent, people forming along the roadside to ensure the best view, literally inches from cars travelling at high speed.  Over thirty years, the race claimed the lives of 30 souls but the eleven in 1957 would be the last because within days, the Italian government banned all motor racing on public roads although since 1977 an event of the same name over much the same course has been run for historic vehicles which competed in the event in period (or were accepted and registered).  Now very much a social occasion for the rich, it's not a high-speed event.  The original race had been one of the classic events on the calendar in an era in which top-line drivers counted on attending a couple of funerals a year (possibly their own) and it’s the 1955 & 1957 events to which a particular aura still lingers.

A little opportunistically given no Corvette was ever entered in the classic race, Chevrolet made Mille Miglia Red available for the Corvette between 1971-1975 (the factory codes variously 973, 976 & 4147), the connection being that over the years many cars in the event were painted in variants of the by then semi-official "Italian Racing Red" including Maseratis, Lancias, Fiats, Alfa Romeos, OSCAs and, most famously, Ferraris; Chevrolet’s Mille Miglia Red was very close to many of Ferrari’s mixes of Rosso Corsa (Racing Red).  Despite the latter day reputation of "resale red", fewer than 10% of 1972 Corvettes were ordered in Mille Miglia Red and of today's favored hues, black wasn't even on the list, gray was less popular than red with white only slightly more so while silver was least chosen.   

1970 Corvette LT-1 ZR1; note the metal fan shroud.

Most desirable (for a buyer with specific needs) of the LT-1s were those ordered with the ZR1 package, 53 of which were delivered between 1970-1972.  A US$968.95 option in 1970 (in 1970 the MSRP (Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price) for the new sub-compact Chevrolet Vega was US$2,090.00), the ZR1 options were focused not on more power but rather rendering the chassis better suited for use in competition, the target market those who wanted to participate in competitions run by the SCCA (Sports Car Club of America).  Accordingly, what was included was a “cold-air” hood, transistorized ignition, the famed (and noticeably audible) Muncie M22 (rock crusher) four-speed manual transmission, electronic ignition, upgraded power brakes, stiffer shock-absorbers (dampers) & springs and a front anti-sway (stabilizer) bar (despite the existence of some documentation, no ZR1 seems ever to have been factory-fitted with a rear bar).  There was also a larger capacity cooling system with an aluminum radiator, augmented by a metal shroud and fan combination optimized for high-speed operation although the 1972 ZR1s were shroudless.  In an indication of the purposes of many buyers, a popular option was the 4.11 Positraction rear axle (Code G81 @ US$12.65), ideal for drag strips and some race tracks but less suited to highway driving.

1970 Corvette LT-1 ZR1 Convertible with factory hard-top (Code C07 @ US$273.85) fitted.

The ZR1 engines did however have detail differences from most of the standard LT-1s, all fitted with the 6 quart (5.7 litre) oil pan (used on the early 1970 LT-1s with a CTU engine suffix, later (CTX) cars using a 5 quart (4.7 litre) version) and a smaller, lighter flywheel & clutch combination (a la the L88s) while some (apparently restricted to those delivered in California which even then had stricter emission standards) also had a special venting device for the carburetor.  Given the emphasis, choosing the ZR1 package meant that (like the big-block L88 & ZL1), the fitting of luxuries like power windows, power steering, air conditioning, the rear-window defroster, the fancy wheel covers, alarm system and a radio was precluded.  ZR1 buyers inhabited a certain niche and the things are now highly prized.

Not so highly prized: 1980 Corvette (California model with LG4 305 V8) in Frost Beige (paint code 59) over Dark Doeskin leather (trim code 59C).  It looked the part, even if the engine and transmission were shared with station wagons and pick-up trucks.

The LT-1 is fondly remembered but from then on, mostly it was downhill for the C3 although in its twilight years its popularity reached new heights which would have gratified the corporation because it was one of GM's most profitable lines.  In 1975 both the convertible and the (by then much-detuned 454) big-block V8 were cancelled but tellingly, in what came to be called the "malaise era", the C3 enjoyed a long India summer, its performance stellar on the sales charts if not the track and, with no appetite for speed, Chevrolet devoted attention to creature comforts, seats and air-conditioning systems much improved.  A sort of nadir is attached to the 1980 models sold in Californian which, because of more stringent emission rules, were fitted only with an automatic transmission and the LG4 305 cubic inch (5.0 litre) engine found often in Impala station wagons and pick-up trucks although it managed to be a little brisker than the Blue Flame powered original of 1953.  The Californian 305 was claimed to generate 180 HP which was actually 15 more than the unfortunate 350 (L48) in the 1975 model (the optional L82 listed with 205).  The method of calculating stated HP changed in 1972 from gross to net so the earlier numbers should not directly be compared with the newer but there's no doubt the Corvettes after the early-1970s were making a lot less power than the tarmac-melting fire-breathers of a few years before and though things had improved by the early 1980s, it wasn't by much.  Both the tamest of the 1975 cars and the 1980 Californian 305 tend to be coupled as the least desired of the breed but, enjoying solid demand to the end, the C3 remained in production until 1982, the last sold the following year.  In fairness to the "malaise era" Corvettes, they should be compared not with what came before or later but with what else was on the market at the time and judged thus, the Corvette was one of the better performers and still offered much for the money, looking good (if something of a caricature) to the last.