Now (pronounced nou)
(1) At the present time or moment (literally a point in
time).
(2) Without further delay; immediately; at once; at this
time or juncture in some period under consideration or in some course of
proceedings described.
(3) As “just now”, a time or moment in the immediate past
(historically it existed as the now obsolete “but now” (very recently; not long
ago; up to the present).
(4) Under the present or existing circumstances; as
matters stand.
(5) Up-to-the-minute; fashionable, encompassing the
latest ideas, fads or fashions (the “now look”, the “now generation” etc).
(6) In law, as “now wife”, the wife at the time a will is
written (used to prevent any inheritance from being transferred to a person of
a future marriage) (archaic).
(7) In phenomenology, a particular instant in time, as
perceived at that instant.
Pre 900: From the Middle English now, nou & nu from
the Old English nū (at the present
time, at this moment, immediately), from the Proto-West Germanic nū, from the Proto-Germanic nu, from the primitive Indo-European nū (now) and cognate with the Old Norse nu, the Dutch nu, the German nun, the Old
Frisian nu and the Gothic nū.
It was the source also of the Sanskrit and Avestan nu, the Old Persian nuram,
the Hittite nuwa, the Greek nu & nun, the Latin nunc, the
Old Church Slavonic nyne, the Lithuanian
nū and the Old Irish nu-. The original senses may have been akin to “newly,
recently” and it was related to the root of new. Since Old English it has been often merely
emphatic, without any temporal sense (as in the emphatic use of “now then”,
though that phrase originally meant “at the present time”, and also (by the
early thirteenth century) “at once”. In
the early Middle English it often was written as one word. The familiar use as a noun (the present time)
emerged in the late fourteenth century while the adjective meaning “up to date”
is listed by etymologists as a “mid 1960s revival” on the basis the word was
used as an adjective with the sense of “current” between the late fourteenth
and early nineteenth centuries. The phrase
“now and then” (occasionally; at one time and another) was in use by the mid
1400s, “now or never” having been in use since the early thirteenth century. “Now” is widely used in idiomatic forms and as
a conjunction & interjection. Now is
a noun, adjective & adverb, nowism, nowness & nowist are nouns; the
noun plural is nows.
Right here, right now: Acid House remix of Greta Thunberg’s (b 2003) How dare you? speech by Theo Rio.
“Now” is one of the more widely used words in English and
is understood to mean “at the present time or moment (literally a point in
time)”. However, it’s often used in a
way which means something else: Were one to say “I’ll do it now”, in the narrow
technical sense that really means “I’ll do it in the near future”. Even things which are treated as happening “now”
really aren’t such as seeing something.
Because light travels at a finite speed, it takes time for it to bounce
from something to one’s eye so just about anything one sees in an exercise in
looking back to the past. Even when
reading something on a screen or page one’s brain is processing something from
a nanosecond (about one billionth of a second) earlier. For most purposes, “now” is but a convincing (an
convenient) illusion and even though, in certain, special sense, everything in
the universe is happening at the same time (now) it’s not something that can
ever be experienced because of the implications of relativity. None of this causes many problems in life but
among certain physicists and philosophers, there is a dispute about “now” and
there are essentially three factions: (1) that “now” happened only once in the
history of the known universe and cannot again exist until the universe ends, (2)
that only “now” can exist and (3) that “now” cannot ever exist.
The notion that “now” can have happened only once in the history
of our universe (and according to the cosmological theorists variously there
may be many universes (some which used to exist, some extant and some yet to be
created) or our universe may now be in one of its many phases, each which will
start and end with a unique “now”) is tied up with the nature of time, the
mechanism upon which “now” depends not merely for definition but also for existence. That faction deals with what is essentially
an intellectual exercise whereas the other two operate where physics and
linguistics intersect. Within the
faction which says "now can never exist" there is a sub-faction which holds that to say “now” cannot exist is a
bit of a fudge in that it’s not that “now” never happens but only that it can
only every be described as a particular form of “imaginary time”; an address in
space-time in the past or future. The
purists however are absolutists and their proposition is tied up in the nature
of infinity, something which renders it impossible ever exactly to define “now”
because endlessly the decimal point can move so that “now” can only ever be
tended towards and never attained. If
pushed, all they will concede is that “now” can be approximated for purposes of
description but that’s not good enough: there is no now.
The “only
now can exist” faction find tiresome the proposition that “the moment we
identify something as happening now, already it has passed”, making the point
that “now” is the constant state of existence and that a mechanism like time
exists only a thing of administrative convenience. The “only now can exist” faction are most
associated with the schools of presentism or phenomenology and argue only the
present moment (now) is “real” and that any other fragment of time can only be
described, the past existing only in memory and the future only as anticipation
or imagination; “now” is the sole verifiable reality. They are interested especially in what they
call “change & becoming”, making the point the very notion of change
demands a “now”: events happen and things become in the present; without a “now”,
change and causality are unintelligible.
The debate between the factions hinges often on differing
interpretations of time: whether fundamentally it is subjective or objective,
continuous or discrete, dynamic or static. Linguistically and practically, “now” remains central
to the human experience but whether it corresponds to an independent
metaphysical reality remains contested.
No comments:
Post a Comment