Foxbat or fox-bat (pronounced foks-bat)
(1) NATO reporting name
for the MiG-25 (Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25) high-altitude supersonic interceptor
and reconnaissance aircraft.
(2) A common name for members
of the Megachiroptera (the Pteropus (suborder Yinpterochiroptera), a genus of
megabats), some of the largest bats in the world.
Fox is from the Middle
English fox, from the Old English fox (fox), from the Proto-West Germanic fuhs, from the Proto-Germanic fuhsaz (fox), from the primitive Indo-European
púḱsos (the tailed one), derive possibly from puḱ- (tail).
It was cognate with the Scots fox
(fox), the West Frisian foks (fox), the
Fering-Öömrang North Frisian foos, the
Sölring and Heligoland fos, the Dutch
vos (fox), the Low German vos (fox), the German Fuchs (fox), the Icelandic fóa (fox), the Tocharian B päkā (tail, chowrie), the Russian пух (pux) (down, fluff), the Sanskrit पुच्छ (púccha)
(source of the Torwali پوش (pūš)
(fox) and the Hindi पूंछ (pūñch) (tai”).
Bat in the context of
the animal was a dialectal variant (akin to the dialectal Swedish natt-batta) of the Middle English bake & balke, from the North Germanic. The Scandinavian forms were the Old
Swedish natbakka, the Old Danish nathbakkæ (literally “night-flapper”)
and the Old Norse leðrblaka
(literally “leather-flapper”). The Old
English word for the animal was hreremus,
from hreran (to shake) and it was
known also as the rattle-mouse, an old dialectal word for "bat", attested
from the late sixteenth century. A more
rare form, noted from the 1540s, was flitter-mouse
(the variants were flinder-mouse
& flicker-mouse) in imitation of the
German fledermaus (bat) from the Old
High German fledaron (to flutter).
In Middle English “bat”
and “old bat” were used as a (derogatory) term to describe an old woman,
perhaps a suggestion of witchcraft rather than a link to bat as "a prostitute
who plies her trade by night". It’s
ancient slang and one etymologist noted the French equivalent hirondelle de nuit (night swallow) was "more
poetic". To “bat the eylids” is an Americanism
from 1847, an extended of the earlier (1610s) meaning "flutter (the wings)
as a hawk", a variant of bate.
Once the most controversial fighter in the skies, there was so much mystery surrounding the MiG-25 that US, British and NATO planners spent years spying on it with a mixture of awe, fear and dread. Conceived originally by USSR designers to counter the threat posed by Boeing’s B-70 Valkyrie bomber, development continued even after the B70 project, rendered redundant by advances in missile technology, was cancelled. First flown in 1964 and entering service in 1970, nearly 1200 were built and were operated by several nations as well as the USSR. Able (still) to outrun any other fighter, only the US Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird was faster but fewer than three dozen of those were built and those were configured only for strategic reconnaissance. When first the West became aware of the Foxbat, it caused quite a stir because, combining stunningly high speed with high altitude tolerance and a heavy weapons load, it did appear to be the long-feared platform which would render Soviet airspace immune from US penetration. It was the threat the Foxbat was thought to pose which was influential in the direction pursued by US engineers when developing the McDonnell Douglas F15.
The Foxbat however
never realized its apparently awesome implications. Because the original design
brief was to produce a device which could combat the fast, high-flying B-70, many
of the characteristics desirable in a short-range interceptor were neglected in
the quest for something which could get very high, very quickly. At that it was a breathtaking success but
there were compromises, the fuel burn was epic and, with a very high take-off
and landing speed, it could operate only from the longest runways. Still, at what it was good at it was really good
and its very presence meant the US had to plan any mission within range of a
Foxbat, cognizant of the threat it was thought to present. Unbeknown to the West, at lower altitudes it
presented little threat and was no dog-fighter; it was essentially a dragster built
for the skies, faster than just about anything in a straight line but really
not good at turning.
It wasn’t until 1976
when a Soviet defector landed a new Foxbat in Japan in 1976 that US engineers
were able to examine the airframe and draw an understanding of its
capabilities. What their analysis found
was that the limitations in Soviet metallurgy and manufacturing techniques had
resulted in a heavy airframe, one which really couldn’t maneuver at high
speeds, and handled poorly at low altitudes. The surprisingly primitive radar
was of limited effectiveness in conventional combat situations against enemy
fighters, which, combined with the low altitude clumsiness meant that its drawbacks
tended to outweigh the advantage it had in sheer speed at altitude, something
which meant less to the US since missiles had replaced the B-70 strategic
bomber (which never entered production).
In its rare combat outings, those advantages did however confer the occasional benefit. In 1971, a Soviet Foxbat operating out of Egypt used its afterburners to sustain Mach 3 for an extended duration, enabling it to outrun three pursuing Israeli F4-Phantoms and one downed a US Navy F/A-18 Hornet during the first Gulf War (1991). During the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the Iraqi Air Force found them effective against old, slow machinery but sustained heavy losses when confronted with the Iran’s agile F-14 but most celebrated was probably the Foxbat’s success during the Gulf War in claiming both of the last two American aircraft lost in air-to-air combat. Otherwise, the Foxbat has at low altitude proved vulnerable, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) shooting down several in the war over Lebanon (1981) although they have of late been used, most improbably, in a ground attack role in the Syrian Civil War, the Syrian Arab Air Force, lacking a more appropriate platform, pressing the Foxbats into a ground support role, in at least one case using air-to-air missiles to attack ground targets. The Soviet designers took note of the operating environment when developing the Foxbat’s successor, the MiG-31 (NATO reporting name Foxhound), a variant which sacrificed a little of the pure speed and climb-rate in order to produce a better all-round fighter.
Usually unrelated: 1957 Morris Minor Traveller (left) and 1960 Jaguar XK150 FHC (right).
Although
for the whole of the Jaguar XK150’s production run (1957-1961) the Morris Minor
Traveller (1952-1973) was also being made in factories never more than between
20-60 odd miles (32-100 km) distant, so different in form and function were the
two it’s rare they’re discussed in the same context. One was powered by an engine which had five
times won the Le Mans 24 hour endurance classic while the other was one of
several commercially-oriented variants of a small, post-war economy car,
introduced in the austere England of 1948.
The Traveller did however have charm and it was also authentic in its
construction the varnished ash genuinely structural, an exoskeleton which
provided the strength while the panels behind were there just to keep out the
rain. By contrast, by the mid-1950s, the
US manufacturers had abandoned the method and produced “woodies” with a
combination of fibreglass (fake timber) and DI-NOC, (Diurno Nocturna, from the
Spanish, literally “daytime-nighttime” and translated for marketing purposes as
“beautiful day & night”) appliqué, an embossed vinyl or polyolefin material
with a pressure-sensitive adhesive backing produced since the 1930s and
perfected by Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing (3M). In phased releases over 1957-1958, Jaguar made
available the usual three versions of its XK sports car, the DHC (drophead
coupé, a style which elsewhere was usually called a cabriolet or convertible)
and FHC (fixed head coupé, ie coupé), later joined by the more minimalist OTS
(open two-seater, a roadster) and the line was a link between flowing lines of
the 1930s and the new world, celebrated by the E-Type’s sensational debut at
the 1961 Geneva Motor Show.
Minor modification: 1960 Jaguar XK150 3.4 Shooting Brake (“Foxbat”).
What is claimed to be the planet’s only extant Jaguar XK150 shooting brake was built by industrial chemist and noted Jaguar enthusiast, the late Geoffrey Stevens, construction undertaken between 1975-1977. It was made by combining a donor XK150 FHC with the rear coachwork of a Morris Minor Traveller of similar vintage. Early in the build, Mr Stevens hadn’t given much thought to a name for his hybrid creation but when in 1976 the Soviet air force pilot defected to Japan (arriving with his MiG-25 Foxbat), it was such an unexpected event it made headlines around the world and that was inspiration enough, the designer deciding the sight of a timber-framed XK150 shooting brake would be just as unexpected. In a nice touch (and typical of an engineer’s attention to detail), a “Foxbat” badge was hand-cut, matching the original Jaguar script. Other than the coach-work, the XK150 is otherwise “matching-numbers” (chassis number S825106DN; engine number V7435-8).
The origin of the term “bootlegging” dates from the late eighteenth century when it was used by British customs and excise officers to describe the trick smugglers used hiding valuables in their large sea-boots. Since then, it’s been applied variously including (1) the distilling, transporting and selling of unlawful liquor (2) unlicensed copies of software and (3) unauthorized recordings of music and film. In music, bootleg recordings began to appear in some volume in the 1960s and originally were often from live performances. Often created from tapes of dubious quality with little or no editing, these bootlegs generally were tolerated by the industry because they tended to circulate among fans who anyway purchased the official product and were thought of just a form of free promotional material. Later, when things became more organized and bootleggers began distributing replicas of official releases, the attitude changed and for decades the software industry fought ongoing battles against bootleg copies (which in some non-Western markets represented in excess of 90% of installations).
On the Wings of a Russian Foxbat, re-released (in re-mastered form with bonus tracks) in 1995 as Live in California, Long Beach Arena, 1976.
Taken from a performance by the English heavy metal band Deep Purple at the Long Beach Arena, Los Angeles on 27 February 1976, the bootleg On the Wings of a Russian Foxbat was released in 1977 and was another example of the effect on popular culture of the Soviet pilot’s defection. The link with the event in Japan was that the quality of the band’s performance was unexpectedly good, their reputation at the time not good (they would break-up only weeks after the Long Beach show). Additionally, the sound quality was outstanding (certainly by the usual bootleg standards), something not then easy to achieve in outdoor venues with a raucous audience. Curiously, the original On the Wings of a Russian Foxbat bootleg used for the cover art a picture of unsmiling soldiers from the PLA (People’s Liberation Army) from the Republic of China (then usually called “Red China” or “Communist China); presumably the bootleggers decided the star on the caps was “sufficiently Russian”. In 1995, re-mastered, the recording (with a few bundled “extras”) was re-issued as an “official” release, the fate of many a bootleg. With memories of the diplomatic incident in 1976 having faded, although On the Wings of a Russian Foxbat still appeared on the cover, the album was marketed as Live in California, Long Beach Arena, 1976.
No comments:
Post a Comment