Wimp (pronounced whimp)
(1) A
weak, ineffectual, timid person.
(2) In particle
physics, a speculative particle: Weakly Interacting Massive Particle.
(3) In
computer science, a summary of the elements of the graphical user interface: (Windows,
Icons, Menus
(or Mice), Pointers.
For
(1), 1915-1920, an Americanism of uncertain though thought generally to be
related to whimper. Word first used in
1920 but didn’t appear again until 1960 although wimpish persisted. For (2) 1985-1990. For (3) 1980, said to have been coined by computer scientist Merzouga
Wilberts, about whom little appears to be known.
Big data
Based on the biggest data sets ever gathered, cosmologists use mathematics to calculate the actual parameters of the universe and the numbers which have emerged from the equations suggest some ninety percent of matter (or energy) has yet to be discovered, observed or defined. One possibility is mechanical; the math is wrong. The other explanation is the data is incomplete because or means of measuring or observing the cosmos is not able to see anything. Scientists, as impressed as economists by the beauty of their mathematical models, prefer the later. To account for all that’s “missing”, they speak of dark matter and dark energy and divide their energies between looking for the dark stuff and developing theories which might explain its nature.
Weakly interacting massive particles (wimps)
emerged as one theory; a speculative particle thought wholly or partially to
constitute dark matter. A wimp interacts
via gravity and any other forces and is inherently non-vanishing in its
strength. For the theory to work, wimps
must date from the earliest moments of the Universe and be cold dark matter
because modelling of a universe full of cold dark matter produces a distribution
of galaxies close to what we today observe.
However, a simulation with hot dark matter reduces a universe to a sort
of cosmic sludge.
Wimps may be out there. Images from the Hubble Space Telescope.
Although wimps remain wholly hypothetical, assuming the math is correct, wimps do successfully fill the astrophysical gaps and there is a near consensus today among cosmologists that most of the mass in the Universe is dark. That said, the answer remains, “don’t know”.
No comments:
Post a Comment