Intertwingle (pronounced in-tur-wing-guhl)
(1) To
confuse or entangle together; to enmesh, to muddle.
(2) As intertwingularity,
in computing and systems analysis & organization (of documents, data etc), to
interconnect or interrelate in a complex way which appears to a user simple and
lineal.
Late 1800s:
Thought to be a portmanteau word, the construct being a blend of intertw(ine) +
(interm)ingle and of interest to students of linguistics because it
appears independently to have been coined at different times in different
places. The prefix inter- was from the Latin
inter- (between, amid), a form of the prepositional inter (between). Twine was from the Middle English twyn, twine
& twin, from the Old English twīn (double thread, twist, twine,
linen-thread, linen), from the Proto-West Germanic twiʀn (thread, twine), from the primitive Indo-European
dwisnós (double), from dwóh (two). The
construct of mingle ming (from the From Middle English mingen & mengen,
from the Old English mengan (to mix, combine, unite, associate with, consort,
cohabit with, disturb, converse), from the Proto-West Germanic mangijan (“to
mix, knead”), from the primitive Indo-European menk- (to rumple, knead)). It
was cognate with the Dutch mengen (to mix, blend, mingle), the German mengen
(to mix), the Danish mænge (to rub), the Old English ġemang (mixture, union,
troop, crowd, multitude, congregation, assembly, business, cohabitation)) + -le (a frequentative suffix of verbs, indicating
repetition or continuousness). It was
cognate with the Dutch mengen (to mingle, mix) and the German mengen (to
mingle, mix). Interwingle is a noun & verb, intertwingling
& intertwingularity are nouns and intertwingled is an adjective; the noun
plural is intertwingularities. By
implication, the nouns intertwinglism & intertwinglist should exist but
seem not to have been used.
Intertwingle
was used by Manmatha Nath Dutt (1855–1912) in The Dharma Sastra (Volume 1, 1896), one of his collections of
translations into English of ancient Sanskrit & Hindu texts; under the Raj,
he was a prolific translator and author and his use appears to the first known
coining. As a comic device, it was used
by Montgomery Gordon Rice of Bradley Polytechnic Institute in a performance of
Esmeralda (a fictional character in Victor Hugo's (1802–1885) novel Notre-Dame de Paris. 1482 (The Hunchback
of Notre-Dame, 1831)) conducted during the April 1901 graduation ceremony and
many instances of use have been jocular.
As a noun, the author Henry James (1843–1916) applied it as a nickname
for a group of his Emmet female cousins (all of who were painters) and the use
in that sense was in the vein of the way Admiral Lord Charles Beresford
(1846-1919) would use “the souls” of some female acquaintances he
thought discussed their feelings entirely too much. For the US portraitist John Singer Sargent
(1856–1925) it was his nickname for his early twentieth century genre paintings
of his nieces, the Ormond sisters. Sargent’s
reference was to “element interchangeability”: his use of shawls as a motif
and the easy substitution of one model for another, their artistic presence
defined less by individual identity than the convoluted poses. Coincidentally, as well as being one of Henry
James’ “intertwingles”, the US artist Jane Emmet de Glehn (1873–1961) was one
of Sargent’s muses. )
As the
twentieth century progressed and in a number of fields there emerged a new
literature exploring the concept of “everything being connected to everything
else” and Tracy Baldwin Augur (1896-1974) found it handy (apparently as an
eye-catching linguistic novelty) in a 1954 paper discussing urban planning, a
discipline where truly there is much intertwingling. Between 1933-1948 Augur had been principal
planner for the TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) and by the 1950s he was
working for the URA (Urban Renewal Administration) and HHFA (Housing and Home
Finance Agency), the proliferation of the alphabet soup of acronyms which had
begun under the administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR, 1882–1945, US
president 1933-1945) not slowing in the post-war years. In the discipline of town-planning the phrase
“inextricably intertwined” was used in many contexts so perhaps the appearance
of intertwingle was inevitable.
The use in
IT and the analysis & organization of documents, data and such was in 1974
described as “intertwingularity”
and defined as the deep and complex interconnection or interrelation of digital
objects of any kind, and in a teleological sense the purpose was to make the
connections permanently stable and accessible to users in a way which would seem
seamless and lineal. The noun intertwingularity
was coined by US sociologist Dr Theodor Holm "Ted" Nelson (b 1937) and
it appeared first in his book Computer
Lib/Dream Machines (1974) which discussed the complexity of interrelations
in human knowledge. Dr Nelson’s most
enduring legacy is Project Xanadu which, remarkably, has been in development
since 1960, the objective (which evolved eventually) being a kind of
macro-network, unifying all data, accessible through a simple, intuitive user
interface. Conceptually, that does of
course sound like the vision imagined when the www (world wide web) was bolted
onto to the internet but Dr Nelson’s critique of that sprawling, ubiquitous
thing is that its “web page” approach is inherently flawed because, as IRL (in
real life) when pages can be thrown away, deleting a page means a dozen or a
billion hyperlinks once active around the planet are rendered instantly
“broken”; what’s lacking is global content management to keep track of it all. The project’s roots in 1960 envisages what
would later be understood as hypertext but acceptance of Dr Nelson’s ideas took
some time because he was speculating about hardware and software which did not
then exist and would not for decades attain critical mass and the landmark Computer Lib/Dream Machines, while
fleshing out the details, did so in a discursive manner better suited to
modernist experimental fiction.
Dr Nelson seems always to have liked the word
“everything”
(although he does allow that for some things, “most” is better”) and the most
intriguing speculation, built on the notion of “everything being intertwingled”, was
tied up with quantum entanglement which suggests connectivity need not be based
on proximity or visible connection. In
this theory, what is now described as “dark energy” (the thus far undetectable stuff
in the universe which the math of what has been detected suggests must exist)
is thought potentially to be “time” itself, the universe’s most fundamental framework
where it’s not so much that everything is “entangled” but that everything is (on a grand
scale) a singularity and everything is happening at the same time with only the
operation of (distance-based) relativity creating an observer’s perception of
difference.
Intoxicatingly simple
in concept, the practical implications of the Xanadu resulted in something
which became more complex as layers were implemented because each made obvious that
more layers still were needed. Lacking
resources, Dr Nelson, cognizant of developments in computer networking,
announced Xanadu should be thought a mechanism for handing information (regardless
of physical location) as if existed in a unified repository. While he didn’t use the phrase “virtual
library” that seems to be how it would now be understood and in an interesting
harbinger of how Facebook would in the twenty-first century describe its curated
macro-space, he described Xanadu as a “docuverse”.
That was an interesting vision but development required cubic money and
it wasn’t until the early 1980s when the adoption by business of the original
IBM PC (1981) as a kind of corporate standard that funding was found, building
on a file addressing system based on “tumblers” which were an implementation of transfinite
numbers. Transfinite numbers exist in
the branch of set theory, a fundamental area of mathematical logic that studies
collections of objects; set theory is the formal framework onto which infinity can
be mapped. For Xanadu to be scalable to
an infinite number of documents, the numbers in use needed to be infinite but
because one layer of the process was indexing, those numbers needed to be distinct
in size and order, thus the utility of the transfinite. Except in some vague conceptual sense, it’s really
only (some) mathematicians who understand all this.
(1) Every
Xanadu server is uniquely and securely identified.
(2) Every
Xanadu server can be operated independently or in a network.
(3) Every
user is uniquely and securely identified.
(4) Every
user can search, retrieve, create and store documents.
(5) Every
document can consist of any number of parts each of which may be of any data
type.
(6) Every
document can contain links of any type including virtual copies
(“transclusions”) to any other document in the system accessible to its owner.
(7) Links
are visible and can be followed from all endpoints.
(8) Permission
to link to a document is explicitly granted by the act of publication.
(9) Every
document can contain a royalty mechanism at any desired degree of granularity
to ensure payment on any portion accessed, including virtual copies
(“transclusions”) of all or part of the document.
(10) Every
document is uniquely and securely identified.
(11) Every
document can have secure access controls.
(12) Every
document can be rapidly searched, stored and retrieved without user knowledge
of where it is physically stored.
(13) Every
document is automatically moved to physical storage appropriate to its
frequency of access from any given location.
(14) Every
document is automatically stored redundantly to maintain availability even in
case of a disaster.
(15) Every
Xanadu service provider can charge their users at any rate they choose for the
storage, retrieval and publishing of documents.
(16) Every
transaction is secure and auditable only by the parties to that transaction.
(17) The
Xanadu client-server communication protocol is an openly published standard.
Third-party software development and integration is encouraged.
By the early 1990s it was clear Xanadu “worked”, at least at the scale existing hardware made possible but the emergence of the www (World Wide Web) diverted the industry’s attention and by 1995 when it was clear the Web had gained critical mass, the view seemed to be Xanadu might be a slightly better or slightly worse mousetrap and soon comparisons were being with the “OS (operating system) war” between Microsoft’s Windows NT and IBM’s OS/2. Dr Nelson however was not deterred and successive releases of implementations of parts of the Project Xanadu model were in the twenty-first century released until OpenXanadu was in 2014 made available on the Web. Explaining how it differed from hypertext as it was done on the Web, Dr Nelson claimed HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) was inherently flawed because, the metaphor being one of bound pages, it was so prone to broken links as one page was torn off, that meaning collectively an array of dozens (or millions, trillions etc) of dead links to other dead pages. What tumblers did was provide an address able to maintain linkages to not merely a single object (which HTTP envisages as a “piece of paper”) but an infinite set of links, achieved because transfinite numbers can handle what can be visualized as a cascade of information, the linkages between which are unlimited; this was the inheritance of the “docuverse”. Those impressed by both the potential and drawbacks of the Blockchain will be struck by the overlaps.
For the 2001 federal election in Australia, a part of the opposition Australian Labor Party’s (ALP) platform was “Knowledge Nation”, a summary of its education policy, developed by polymath and former minister for science Barry Jones (b 1932). During the campaign, what was substantive in Knowledge Nation was little discussed because the government immediately attacked the illustrative chart which was a representation of the many components connected within the education system. Derided as “Noodle Nation”, it was an example of why it’s no longer wise for politicians to offer anything much beyond a TWS (three word slogan). The reaction today to a political party circulating something like The Federalist (a collection of 85 articles and essays (1787-1788) advocating the ratification of the Constitution of the United States) would be something like the “noodle nation moment”. These days, intertwingling is best neither seen nor heard.