Bathymetry (pronounced buh-thim-i-tree)
(1) The
science and practice of the measurement of the depths of oceans, seas, rivers or
other large bodies of water.
(2) The
data derived from such measurement, especially as compiled in a data set or topographic
map.
1860–1865:
The construct was bathy- + -metry. The
prefix bathy- (the alternative form in oceanography and related fields is batho-)
was from the Ancient Greek βαθύς (bathús)
(deep), zero-grade of the root of βένθος (bénthos),
possibly from the primitive Indo-European gehd- (to sink, submerge) or perhaps cognate with the
Sanskrit गाढ (gāḍha) (profound, intense, deep, dense, thick, fast,
deep (of a color)). Despite the appearance,
it’s unrelated wither to βυσσός (bussós)
or βυθός (buthós). The construct of the suffix –metry (used to form
nouns relating to measures and measurement) was -meter + -y. Metre
was from the Ancient Greek μέτρον (métron)
(measure), from the primitive Indo-European meh-
(to measure) + -τρον (-tron) (a
suffix denoting an instrument, as in ancient Greek ἄροτρον (plow) and familiar in English for the
used in electronics and physics such as cyclotron. The –y suffix is from the Middle English –y & -i, from the Old English -iġ
(-y, -ic), from the Proto-Germanic -īgaz (-y,
-ic), from the primitive Indo-European -kos,
-ikos, & -iḱos (-y, -ic).
It was cognate with the Scots -ie
(-y), the West Frisian -ich (-y), the
Dutch -ig (-y), the Low German -ig (-y), the German -ig (-y), the Swedish -ig (-y), the Latin -icus (-y, -ic), the Sanskrit -इक (-ika)
and the Ancient Greek -ικός (-ikós); a doublet of -ic. The –y suffix was added to (1) nouns and
adjectives to form adjectives meaning “having the quality of” and (2) verbs to
form adjectives meaning "inclined to".
Bathymetry
bathymetrist & bathymeter are nouns, bathymetric & bathymetrical are adjectives
and bathymetrically is an adverb; the noun plural is bathymetries. The derived noun paleobathymetry describes
the bathymetry of prehistoric seas.
Paleo was from the Ancient Greek παλαιός (palaiós) (old), from πάλαι (pálai)
(long ago). Most etymologists suggest it
was probably cognate with the Mycenaean Greek parajo, which is generally held to mean “old”. If true, this connection hints at a link with
the Proto-Hellenic palai(y)ós
and casts doubt on the once often proposed etymology from the primitive
Indo-European kwel.
When coined
in the mid-nineteenth century, bathymetry referred to the ocean's depth
relative to sea level, reflecting the information available, given the technology
of the time. In the twentieth century, it came to mean “sub-marine topography”,
the rendering in images of the depths and shapes of underwater terrain. In this it’s analogous with topographic maps
of land masses which represent the three-dimensional features (or relief) of
overland terrain. Bathymetric maps typically represent variations in sea-floor relief by depicting the changes with color and contour
lines called depth contours or isobaths.
Bathymetry provides the baseline data which made possible the modern discipline
of hydrography which measures the physical features of a water body. Hydrography compliments bathymetric data with
measurements of the shape and features of shorelines, the characteristics of tides,
currents and waves as well as the physical and chemical properties of the water
itself.
Bathymetry
is thus the study and mapping of the sea floor. It involves obtaining measurements
of the depth of the ocean and is the equivalent to mapping the height of features on land. Bathymetric data is used for a range of
purposes including charting and ship navigation, fisheries management, establishing baseline data to support environmental
monitoring, the determination of maritime boundaries, alternative energy
assessments (most obviously regarding offshore wind and wave & tidal energy),
research into coastal processes and ocean currents (the best known aspect of
which is tsunami modelling, assessment of the environmental impact on marine
geology of resource extraction proposals and the identification of geohazards,
such as underwater landslides
However,
despite the progress of over a century, relatively little is known about the sea
floor compared with the surface of the Earth, the Moon and indeed many of the solar
system’s other planets and moons. By
area, most map of the sea floor are derived from satellites an low resolution, provide
only a vague indication of water depth although whatever the limitations, the
technology is clever, the satellite altimetry measuring the height of the ocean
surface. If hills or maintains exist on
the seabed at the point of the image, the gravitational pull around that area
will be greater and hence the sea surface will bulge and from this measurement maps
can be generated showing general features over a large area at low resolution. More precise maps can be built using single
beam echosounders which produce a single line of depth points directly under
the equipment. Taken usually from a moving
vessel, they’re typically used to identify general sea floor patterns or
schools of fish. More accurate, high
definition maps can be generated by using devices called multibeam echosounders
(or swath echosounders) and airborne laser measurements (LADS) which capture
swathes of data by acquiring multiple depth points in each area, these data grabbers are accurate to within 1
metre (39 inches). It was a bathymetric
survey which revealed the world’s tallest mountain is not Mount Everest but the
Mauna Kea volcano on Hawaii. Much of its
base is on the ocean floor, some 6,000 m (19,685 feet) below the sea-surface and
its peak is the highest point in the state of Hawaii, giving an overall height
of 10,000 m (32,808 feet). Mauna Kea is thus
a significantly higher feature than Mount Everest which rises 8,800 m (28,870 feet) odd.
Modern
electronics represent quite an advance over the nineteenth century techniques
of bathymetric measurement which began with a heavy rope being thrown over the
side of a ship, the only data gained being recording the length of rope it took
to reach the seafloor. These measurements were however incomplete, and prone to
inaccuracy, the rope often shifted by sub-surface currents before reaching the seabed. At best the data was indicative because the rope
could measure depth only one point at a time and there was no way to tell
if the point of impact was flat or sloping. Depending on the area of interest, scientists
would have needed dozens, hundreds or even thousands of measurements, something
obviously rarely possible. Accordingly, until
the modern age, scientists and navigators estimated the topography of the
seafloor and for experienced sailors, the hills and valleys were sometimes easy
to predict but the sea can be deceptive and ocean trenches and sandbars often surprised
navigators. Many ships and cargos were lost
to ships running aground.
No comments:
Post a Comment