Futurism (pronounced fyoo-chuh-riz-uhm)
(1) A movement
in avant-garde art, developed originally by a group of Italian artists in 1909 in
which forms (derived often from the then novel cubism) were used to represent
rapid movement and dynamic motion (sometimes
with initial capital letter)
(2) A
style of art, literature, music, etc and a theory of art and life in which
violence, power, speed, mechanization or machines, and hostility to the past or
to traditional forms of expression were advocated or portrayed (often with initial
capital letter).
(3) As futurology,
a quasi-discipline practiced by (often self-described) futurologists who
attempt to predict future events, movements, technologies etc.
(4) In
the theology of Judaism, the Jewish expectation of the messiah in the future
rather than recognizing him in the presence of Christ.
(5) In
the theology of Christianity, eschatological interpretations associating some
Biblical prophecies with future events yet to be fulfilled, including the
Second Coming.
1909: From
the Italian futurism, the construct being futur(e) + -ism. Future was from the Middle English future & futur, from the Old French futur,
(that which is to come; the time ahead) from the Latin futūrus, (going to be; yet to be) which (as a noun) was the irregular
suppletive future participle of esse (to
be) from the primitive Indo-European bheue
(to be, exist; grow). It was cognate
with the Old English bēo (I become, I
will be, I am) and displaced the native Old English tōweard and the Middle English afterhede (future (literally
“afterhood”) in the given sense. The
technical use in grammar (of tense) dates from the 1520s. The –ism suffix was from the Ancient Greek
ισμός (ismós) & -isma noun suffixes, often directly,
sometimes through the Latin –ismus
& isma (from where English picked
up ize) and sometimes through the French –isme
or the German –ismus, all
ultimately from the Ancient Greek (where it tended more specifically to express
a finished act or thing done). It
appeared in loanwords from Greek, where it was used to form abstract nouns of
action, state, condition or doctrine from verbs and on this model, was used as
a productive suffix in the formation of nouns denoting action or practice,
state or condition, principles, doctrines, a usage or characteristic, devotion
or adherence (criticism; barbarism; Darwinism; despotism; plagiarism; realism;
witticism etc). Futurism,
futurology, & futurology are nouns, futurist is a noun & adjective and futuristic
is an adjective; the noun plural is futurisms.
Lindsay Lohan in Maison Martin Margiela Futuristic Eyewear.
As a descriptor of the movement in art and literature, futurism (as the Italian futurism) was adopted in 1909 by the Italian poet Filippo Tommaso Marinetti (1876-1944) and the first reference to futurist (a practitioner in the field of futurism) dates from 1911 although the word had been used as early as 1842 in Protestant theology in the sense of “one who holds that nearly the whole of the Book of Revelations refers principally to events yet to come”. The secular world did being to use futurist to describe "one who has (positive) feelings about the future" in 1846 but for the remainder of the century, use was apparently rare. The (now probably extinct) noun futurity was from the early seventeenth century. The noun futurology was introduced by Aldous Huxley (1894-1963) in his book Science, Liberty and Peace (1946) and has (for better or worse), created a minor industry of (often self-described) futurologists. Futures, a financial instrument used in the trade of currencies and commodities appeared first in 1880; they allow (1) speculators to be on price movements and (2) producers and sellers to hedge against price movements. In theology, the adjective futuristic came into use in 1856 with reference to prophecy but use soon faded. In concert with futurism, by 1915 it referred in art to “avant-garde; ultra-modern” while by 1921 it was separated from the exclusive attachment to art and meant also “pertaining to the future, predicted to be in the future”, the use in this context spiking rapidly after World War II when technological developments in fields such as ballistics, jet aircraft, space exploration, electronics, nuclear physics etc stimulated interest in such progress.
The Arrival (1913, oil on canvas by Christopher Richard Wynne Nevinson (1889-1946), Tate Gallery.
Given what would
unfold over during the twentieth century, it’s probably difficult to appreciate
quite how optimistic was the Western world in the years leading up to the World
War I. Such had been the rapidity of the
discovery of novelties and of progress in so many fields that expectations of
the future were high and, beginning in Italy, futurism was a movement devoted
to displaying the energy, dynamism and power of machines and the vitality and
change they were bringing to society. It’s
also often forgotten that when the first futurist exhibition was staged in
Paris in 1912, the critical establishment was unimpressed, the elaborate imagery
with its opulence of color offending their sense of refinement, now so attuned
to the sparseness of the cubists.
The Hospital Train (1915, oil on canvas by Gino Severini (1883-1966), Stedelijk Museum.
Futurism had
debuted with some impact, the Paris newspaper Le Figaro in 1909 publishing the manifesto
by Italian poet Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. Marinetti which dismissed all that
was old and celebrated change, originality, and innovation in culture and
society, something which should be depicted in art, music and literature.
Marinetti exalted in the speed, power of new technologies which were disrupting
society, automobiles, aeroplanes and other clattering machines. Whether he found beauty in the machines or
the violence and conflict they delivered was something he left his readers to
decide and there were those seduced by both but his stated goal was the repudiation of
traditional values and the destruction of cultural institutions such as museums
and libraries. Whether this was intended
as a revolutionary roadmap or just a provocation to inspire anger and controversy
is something historians have debated.
Uomo Nuovo (New Man, 1918), drawing by Mario Sironi (1885-1961).
As a technique, the futurist artists borrowed much
from the cubists, deploying the same fragmented and intersecting plane surfaces
and outlines to render a number of simultaneous, overlaid views of an object
but whereas the cubists tended to still life, portraiture and other, usually
static, studies of the human form, the futurists worshiped movement, their
overlays a device to depict rhythmic spatial repetitions of an object’s
outlines during movement. People did
appear in futurist works but usually they weren’t the focal point, instead
appearing only in relation to some speeding or noisy machine. Some of the most prolific of the futurist
artists were killed in World War I and as a political movement it didn’t
survive the conflict, the industrial war dulling the public appetite for the
cult of the machine. However, the
influence of the compositional techniques continued in the 1920s and
contributed to art deco which, in more elegant form, would integrate the new
world of machines and mass-production into motifs still in use today.
Jockey Club Innovation Tower, Hong Kong (2013) by Zaha Hadid (1950-2016).
If the characteristics of futurism in art were identifiable (though not always admired), in architecture, it can be hard to tell where modernism ends and futurism begins. Aesthetics aside, the core purpose of modernism was of course its utilitarian value and that did tend to dictate the austerity, straight lines and crisp geometry that evolved into mid-century minimalism so modernism, in its pure form, should probably be thought of as a style without an ulterior motive. Futurist architecture however carried the agenda which in its earliest days borrowed from the futurist artists in that it was an assault on the past but later moved on and in the twenty-first century, the futurist architects seem now to be interested above all in the possibilities offered by advances in structural engineering, functionality sacrificed if need be just to demonstrate that something new can be done. That's doubtless of great interest at awards dinners where architects give prizes to each other for this and that but has produced an international consensus that it's better to draw something new than something elegant. The critique is that while modernism once offered “less is more”, with neo-futurist architecture it's now “less is bore”. Art deco and mid-century modernism have aged well and it will be interesting to see how history judges the neo-futurists.