Prosaic
(pronounced proh-zey-ik)
(1)
Of writing or speaking, straightforward; matter-of-fact; lacking the feeling or
elegance of poetry.
(2) Something commonplace or dull; matter-of-fact
or unimaginative; overly
plain, simple or commonplace, to the point of being boring.
(3) Of or having the character or form of prose,
the ordinary form of spoken or written language, rather than of poetry (now of
technical use only).
1650-1660: From the fifteenth century Middle French prosaïque and directly from the sixteenth century Medieval
Latin prōsaicus (in prose), from the Classical Latin prōsa (prose), from prorsus (straightforward, in prose), from the Old Latin provorus (straight ahead), the construct
being pro-
(forward) + vorsus (turned), from vertō (to turn), from the primitive Indo-European
wer- (to turn, to bend). The original meaning was technical,
distinguishing text as prose rather than poetry and in this sense was usually
written as prosaicus (in prose). The first hints of literary hierarchy were
first noted in French in 1746 when used to contrast the “character” of prose in
contrast to the “feeling” of poetry. The
sense of describing something ordinary or mundane first seen in French in 1813,
a meaning soon adopted in English. Prosaic & prosaical are adjectives,
prosify is a verb, prosified & prosifying are verbs & adjectives, prosaicness
is a noun and prosaically is an adverb.

Figurative use of poetic & prosaic: Jaguar E-Type (XK-E, 1961-1974) (left) & Jaguar XJ-S (1975-1996) (right). "Poetry in motion" is a cliché but when the E-Type first was seen, that was the phrase some journalists chose.
Whether Enzo Ferrari (1898-1988) ever called the E-Type "the most beautiful car in the world" remains uncertain (though he certainly never issued a denial) but over the decades plenty have echoed the sentiment, sometimes using the phrase "poetry in motion". By 1975, the world had changed and there were now rules with which to comply and although the XJ-S (later XJS) wasn't really a replacement for the E-Type, because of the timing, that was the basis on may of the early reports based at least some of their critique. Dynamically, on about any objective measure, it was a better car than the E-Type but nobody is known to have claimed it was better looking and in some contemporary reviews, the styling was described as "prosaic". It might have been more accurate to use the word "pragmatic" and the lines perhaps aged better than many at the time anticipated, the car in (almost) continuous production for over twenty years and the platform endured until 2006, providing the underpinnings for the first generation of Jaguar's XK8 (1996-2005) and the Aston Martin DB7 (1997-2004), both of which looked better than the XJ-S although neither matched the timeless E-Type. Upon release, there was much comment about the styling lacking the appeal of the E-Type but the XJ-S was less a replacement than an entry into a new market segment, the anyway declining sports car segment abandoned. Regarding its capabilities, the press were fair, one publication noting it was smooth, quiet and luxurious yet "capable of speeds that would have won a grand prix not 15 years ago". That comparison was admittedly with Formula One's voiturette (1.5 litre, naturally aspirated) era but it was an indication that even in the troubled 1970s, there had been progress.

1983 Jaguar XJ-S Lynx Eventer shooting brake.
What many regard as the best-looking XJS version were the "shooting brakes" (a kind of station wagon) made by specialist coach-builders, the best-known of which was the Lynx Eventer, 67 of which were made. Critics at the time noted the rear treatment rendered a better balanced shape and much the same observation was made of the convertible (1988-1996) version (less so the SC "cabriolet" (1983-1988)). Although the pre-war shooting brakes often were built for the HFS (hunting, fishing & shooting) set who needed space for shotguns, fishing rods, hunting hounds and such, in the 1980s they emerged in the niche of the "horsey" set although there was obviously appeal for those who liked the image even if they never sat in a saddle. In naming the Eventer, Lynx may have had in mind the sport of "eventing", an equestrian sport in which a single horse & rider compete against others across the three disciplines of dressage, cross-country, and show jumping, the roots in the drills European armies conducted to ensure officers seeking a commission in the cavalry possessed the requisite skills. Eventing has a reasonably impressive death toll of both riders and beasts but it continues to exert a pull with women especially drawn; that's not surprising because some girls fall in love with horses at pony club and never quite recover.

1986 "Daimler S Design Study".
The
shooting brake coachwork eliminated the buttresses that were the design's most
distinctive feature and interestingly, they were sacrificed also when the
factory in 1986 undertook a “design-study” for a proposed "luxury
version", to be sold as the “Daimler S”.
The shape was judged most pleasing, unlike the “Coupé” version of the
Jensen Interceptor (1966-1976), a reputed 60 of which were built in 1975-1976. Without the dramatically expansive rear window (nicknamed "the fishbowl"), the design didn't please many and it was later revealed that, struggling to recover from the mid-1970s recession and collapse in demand for big, thirsty cars (both a consequence of the first oil shock), the company had exhausted their supply of closed body shells so "cobbled together" a top to be attached to some of remaining convertible (1974-1976) bodies awaiting completion. That's may account for why it looked like something of a design college project that may (generously) have been graded a "C-" but, approaching bankruptcy, Jensen was in its death throes.

The original Jensen Interceptor (1966-1976, left) "saloon" and the hastily improvised Coupé (1975-1976, right). The vinyl glued to the roof didn't help and it was a difficult time for the dying company but Jaguar's execution of the same concept (add a roof to a convertible) on the one-off Daimler S was more accomplished. Verging on the brutish, nobody ever called the Interceptor's lines "poetic" but the appeal has endured and even today there are companies offering "refurbishment packages" including modern power-trains and electronics.
One thing the Daimler S had
in common with the unfortunate Interceptor Coupé was the project being
relatively cheap to execute because much of the engineering work had already been
done in creating open versions (a full convertible by Jensen; the “SC” version of
the XJS with a Triumph Stag-like fixture atop).
Sales of the XJ-S SC were sufficiently encouraging for a team to be formed to produce a
conventional convertible, one aspect of the project a removable hard-top (always a
factory option for the smaller E-Type).
Because of the sheer size (and consequently weight) of such a structure,
that proved unviable but, the styling done, the idea of a “notchback coupé” was
explored, the “Daimler” brand available to enable the thing to be sold at a higher
price. The prototype Daimler S required
more than welding on the aborted hard-top but not much more, the main
differences the different rear-side windows and fluted fittings on the
grill & trunk (boot) lid trim. The
planned interior fit-out (a more lavish use of timber veneers, carpet &
leather) was never fitted to the prototype and wilder thoughts in the engineering
office included AWD (all-wheel drive) but none of the speculation ever even reached
the drawing boards. The one-off Daimler S
did get as far as US focus groups for "market reaction" to be assessed but it had
the misfortune of being displayed with a prototype XJ-S convertible and while the response to the coupé was polite, the convertible was received with an enthusiasm matched by the US dealer network, none of whom needed a focus group to tell
them where demand lay. While the lines of neither the Lynx Eventer or Daimler S would be likely to attract the epithet "poetic", both shapes improved on the original.
Prosaic
is an example of the figurative adoption of a word with a precise technical
meaning assuming such popularity that the original sense became relegated to specialists. Once, any text not poetic was “prosaic”
(ie “written in prose”), and this description
denoted nothing negative; it was just a way of distinguishing between written
forms, reflecting prosaic’s origins in the Latin prosa (prose). However, by
the seventeen century, poetry had come to be regarded as a most superior form
of expression, considered more beautiful, imaginative, and emotional, prose relegated
to the status of the mundane and procedural.
The figurative use evolved from this and prosaic came to be used to refer to
anything thought ordinary or unimaginative including music, ideas, architecture, Jaguars etc. The adjective thus
transformed into a synonym for "colorless, drab, lifeless, lacklustre, humdrum,
dull, pedestrian, unimaginative" etc and this resulted in phrases which once would have been
thought bizarre or tautological: “prosaic poetry” & “prosaic prose”. In its original technical sense (distinguishing the
style of writing used for poetry from other literature), the word is now rarely used other than by those somewhere in the "literature business" and, even there, use can be challenging because of the implications of the modern sense(s). Still, for those who wish to emphasise certain bad
texts are worse even than others, the comparative
is "more prosaic" and the superlative, "most prosaic".

Dylan Thomas (1914–1953, left) and his wife Caitlin Thomas (née Macnamara; 1913-1994, right) in the bar of Brown’s Hotel, Laugharne, Wales, 1938.
As the
origin in the Latin prosa or pronersa oratio (straightforward
discourse) suggests, “prose” is the language in its direct, unadorned form, flowing
in the way of style(s) written or spoken in everyday life. It differs from poetry or verse in not being restricted in
rhythm, measure or rhyme although, in literary theory, there exists also “poetic
prose” and the “prose poem”. Literary
theory however has, in the last sixty years-odd, constructed a large and
sometimes bewildering array of technical terms and categories and the possible
number of distinct prose forms may be close to limitless. Poetic prose is prose which approximates to
verse in the use of rhythm (perhaps even a kind of meter) in the elaborate and
ornate use of language, and especially in the use of figurative devices like
onomatopoeia, assonance and metaphor.
Except in experimental form, poetic prose usually is deployed only as a literary
device, appearing in short
works or in brief passages in longer pieces in order to achieve a (not always
entirely clear) specific effect although the common element seems to be something
like “an elevation of the emotional temperature”. Authors interpolating passages of poetic
prose have included Thomas De Quincey (1785–1859, best known for his Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821)),
Herman Melville (1819–1891), Arthur Rimbaud (1854–1891), James Joyce (1882–1941,
whose use of poetic prose wasn’t always immediately accessible), Virginia Woolf
(1882–1941) and William Faulkner (1897–1962).
Classic examples of the “hybrid form” are sectionsof the narrator’s
narrative in the radio play Under Milk
Wood (1952) by Dylan Thomas (1914–1953).

A prose
poem is a composition printed as prose but distinguished by elements common in
poetry, such as often elaborately contrived rhythms, figures of speech, rhyme,
internal rhyme, assonance, consonance and startling imagery. In academic use, it’s the tragic and only posthumously
recognized French proto-symbolist Aloysius Bertrand (pen name of Louis Jacques
Napoléon Bertrand, 1807-1841) who is acknowledged as having introduced prose
poetry to French writing and, more that others, it was him who
(retrospectively) made it a fashionable sub-genre among the avant-garde, the seminal
work being Gaspard de la Nuit-Fantaisies
à la manière de Rembrandt et de Callot (Gaspard of the Night-Fantasies in
the Manner of Rembrandt and Callot, 1842), a collection of fantasies in the manner of the Dutch
painter Rembrandt (Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn; 1606-1669) and Jacques
Callot (circa 1592–1635, a printmaker in the baroque style, born in the then
independent Duchy of Lorraine). Although
it was the intricacy of the ornate and rhythmical language that contributed to
the recognition of the prose poem as a literary form, upon publication, it made
little impact and only later became influential though for more than a century
it remained neglected in English. When
French critics finally took notice, the initial spread of the work owed much
to the dazzling images, a number of which were, by the standards of the age,
monumentally grotesque. The influence
on the French poet, essayist, translator and art critic Charles Baudelaire
(1821–1867) was obvious in his Le Spleen
de Paris (Paris Spleen, 1869 and better known by its subsequent title Petits Poèmes en prose (Little Poems in
Prose)), a collection of 50 short prose poems and one of the building blocks of literary
modernism. The symbolist poets and
surrealists also acknowledged a debt, as did T. S. Eliot (1888–1965) although
his fork of modernism was so striking it seems almost unfair much to dwell on
the precursors.

Lindsay Lohan, a poem by Amber Tambling, from the collection Dark Sparkler (2015).
Actress and
author Amber Tamblyn (b 1983) solved the writer's dilemma about whether to handle
the subject of Lindsay Lohan in prose or poetry by using no text at all. The publisher HarperCollins described her
third collection Dark Sparkler (2015)
as a “…hybrid
of poetry and art exploring the lives and deaths of actresses who began their
careers as child stars.” The
book, which included original artwork by a number of artists, was well
received, critically and commercially.
The title was well-chosen because Dark
Sparkler was a catalogue of murder and suicide but what attracted much
comment was the inclusion of one living soul: Lindsay Lohan, her entry (on page
47) blank but for her name as the title.
An author’s relationship ultimately is with their readers but first it’s
with their critics and the response to that one proved it’s possible to
deconstruct text even when it doesn’t appear. As the postmodernists explained, even a blank page is "text" to be deconstructed to find meaning and should the conclusion be there is "no meaning", that too is "a meaning". Whether fashionable or not, postmodernism made a contribution to literary criticism and remains available for readers to take from it what they will. Some of the critical reaction to Ms Tambling's Lindsay Lohan was something in vein of those who
approached John Cage’s (1912–1992) 4:33 (1952) in that, without much with which
to work, the only obvious question seemed to be “What did you mean?” Ms
Tamblyn did say she found it “upsetting” when, after reading several of the poems
dedicated to starlets who died young, she spoke the words “Lindsay Lohan” and
the audience laughed; perhaps, in the age of the TikTokers she’d not now be surprised. The poet claimed the inclusion of the piece in its unusual
form was not to say “you’re next” but explicitly to avoid writing anything
about a life in progress, the idea being Ms Lohan’s life was her own story to
write. Like
any work of prose or poetry, page 47 was there for people to take from it what
they found but presumably, the interpretative range might be wider than for
those reading something like John Keats’ (1795-1821) ode To Autumn (1820).
Prose &
poetry: shifting sensibilities
Products in
the marketplace, prose and poetry are as subject to the whims of fashion as
cars or frocks. Some products fail while
others succeed and that success may be fleeting or endure for generations but “success”
is also nuanced, some items receiving critical acclaim but few sales while
other are derided by the critics yet achieve either a brief or sustained
popularity. More intriguingly, some fade
into obscurity for a century or more, only to be “re-discovered” by a new
generation, often to enjoy a brief revival (as happens in fashion) or even
enter the canon (as happened with the music of the Italian composer of the
Baroque Antonio Vivaldi (1678–1741) who, neglected for centuries, gained
recognition in the 1920s). The trend of “coming
and going” from favour is a feature of literature, partly explained by the use
of language shifting, making something once accessible seem to new generations
stilted and clumsy. A handful of authors
have benefited from this, William Shakespeare’s (1564–1616) texts in many
places needing explanatory notes yet valued as “period pieces”, the works
surviving by virtue of timeless thematic power.
Similarly, were a modern author to adopt the style of Jane Austen
(1775–1817) it would seem absurd but her writings remain valued because they’re
imagined as “capturing the moment of
their time” (although the evidence suggests even the subset of society she
documented were likely in speech not often so precise).

Frontpiece for first edition of
The Faerie Queene (1590). It's an example of one of those works essential in the study of English literature yet now hardly read (at least by choice, students may find it imposed).
Even among professional
critics, opinions will be divided, the English poet & satirist Alexander
Pope (1688-1744) in his last days noting approvingly of Edmund Spenser’s (circa
1552-1599) Epic poem The Faerie Queene
(1590-1596; some 35,000 lines in stanzas): “…there is something Spenser that pleases one as strongly in one’s old age as it did in one’s youth. I read the Faerie
Queene when I was about twelve with a vast deal of delight; and I think it gave
me as much when I read it over about a year or two ago.”
Although dutifully still acknowledged as Spenser’s magnum opus, it’s now read only by students of literary history or
linguistics; it’s unlikely many of them go much beyond what they need for their
purposes to extract because it’s so tiresomely archaic. Even in the nineteenth century it was thought
“hard work
with not enough reward”, the Whig historian Thomas Babington “T.B.”
Macaulay (1800–1859) in 1831 summing up: “Spenser, though assuredly one of the greatest poets that
ever lived, could not succeed in the attempt to make allegory interesting. It was in vain that he lavished the riches of
his mind on the House of Pride and the House of Temperance. One unpardonable fault, the
fault of tediousness, pervades the whole of The Faerie Queene. We become sick of cardinal virtues and deadly
sins, and long for the society of plain men and women.” His call for modernism would within decades be
answered and his view of the poem’s fate in the hands of readers would not
differ greatly if written today: Of the persons
who read the first canto one in ten reaches the end of the first book, and not
one in a hundred perseveres to the end of the poem. Very few and very weary are those who are in
at the death of the Blatant Beast.”
Even before TikTok, attention spans had shortened.
By the
twentieth century, tastes certainly had shifted to prose that was punchier and conveyed
meaning with less of the author’s display of erudition. Writing of Gertrude Stein (1874–1946), the author
and critic (Percy) Wyndham Lewis (1882-1957; best remembered for his seminal
contribution to short-lived Vorticist movement that was extinguished by the
blast of World War I (1914-1918)) dismissed her prose as “…a cold, black suet-pudding. We can represent it as a cold suet roll of
fabulously reptilian length. Cut it at
any point, it is the heavy, sticky, opaque mass all through and all along . . .
it is mournful and monstrous composed of dead and inanimate material.” As Vorticism demonstrated, even in artful
form, Lewis knew how to make meaning clear, but Stein may have had the last
laugh, he mostly forgotten while she often still is referenced although that’s
more for her place in the LGBTQQIAAOP pantheon than any literary contribution.

Portrait of Virginia Woolf (circa 1917), oil on canvas by Roger Fry (1866-1934).
S
till, Gertrude Stein is at
least remembered for something. In
the rich field of novelists with diminished reputations there’s no example
better than the Scottish author Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832), among the most
widely read (to the bafflement of some critics) of the nineteenth century. His legacy endures curiously in those he
inspired (notably Jane Austen) but the wordy style didn’t survive the onset of
modernity, E. M. Forster (1879–1970) in Aspects
of the Novel (1927) finding him prolific yet slight, saying: “He is seen to
have a heavy mind and a trivial style. He
cannot construct. He has neither artistic
detachment nor passion, only a temperate heart, gentlemanly feelings and an
intelligent affection for the countryside; this is not basis enough for great
novels.” The English vicar John
Skinner (1772–1839) made scant contribution to theology but is remembered as
one of the amateur antiquarians and archaeologists England produced in the days
of empire and his writings make clear he had the qualities of patience of perseverance
demanded by all his callings. He’d have
needed both to plod through Scott’s The
Black Dwarf (1816 and one of the “Waverley
Novels”), Skinner noting in his diary in 1830: “…strive to amuse myself by reading novels
and have finished that of the Black Dwarf by Sir Walter Scott. I must be reduced to a sad state when I feel obliged
to read such nonsense for a pastime.” While unfair to suggest any connection, some
years later, Skinner committed suicide, blowing his brains out with a shotgun. Although still sometimes the subject of
academic study (it transpired Scott’s texts were rich pickings for the
deconstructionists of postmodernism), Scott is now little read although, counterintuitively,
Virginia Woolf (1882–1941) was a fan, in 1932 lamenting him as among the last
to echo the Shakespearean style in dialogues: “We have lost the art of the poetic speech”
she concluded. When madness overtook
her, Woolf chose a more romantic form of suicide.
The
Tay Bridge Disaster
William
Topaz McGonagall (circa 1825–1902) was a Scottish poet of Irish ancestry, now acknowledged
as perhaps the worst poet ever to have been published in English, a fair achievement
given the wealth of modern competition. His
best known work remains The Tay Bridge
Disaster (1880), lamenting the disaster of 28 December, 1879 when, during a
severe gale, the central section of Dundee's Tay Rail Bridge collapsed, sending
to their deaths in the freezing water the 80-odd souls aboard the Wormit-Dundee
train passing at the time. Regarded during its brief existence as a triumph of Victorian (1837-1901) engineering, the Tay Rail Bridge was nearly two
miles (3.2 km) long and then the longest in the world but it had been built with an
insufficient allowance for lateral wind-load, the structure that night succumbing
to the gale-force winds estimated at 80 mph (130 km/h, 70 knots). An enquiry was conducted and the designer,
Sir Thomas Bouch (1822-1880) (dubbed a Knight Bachelor at Windsor Castle on 26 June, 1879 by Victoria (1819–1901; Queen of the UK 1837-1901) in recognition of the quick
and economic construction of the bridge) was found for primarily responsible
for the disaster. His health suffered as a consequence of the event and within a year of the collapse, he was dead.

The Tay Bridge after the collapse (National Library of Scotland image).
Whether
the The Tay Bridge Disaster can be
said to be prosaic is debatable because there are probably better adjectives
but critics have long been united that it's a very bad piece of poetry and it's
doubtful a re-rendering in prose would be much of an improvement, one writing
of it that McGonagall was “deaf to poetic
metaphor, employing inappropriate rhythms that resulted in unintentionally amusing
poetry.” Said to be wholly oblivious
to the invective almost universally directed to his oeuvre of over two-hundred
pieces of verse, his sheer awfulness and tenacity caused him to be remembered to
this day for at least something while countless poets who were merely earnest
and competent are long forgotten. Whether The Tay Bridge Disaster is the "worst ever" poem is up to readers but the problem with poetry is that its appreciation is a specific skill-set and not all possess the skill. Were the critics to have praised the piece as a work or rare genius and pronounced it a masterpiece, many of us would have taken their word for it.
The
Tay Bridge Disaster by William McGonagall
Beautiful
Railway Bridge of the Silv’ry Tay!
Alas!
I am very sorry to say
That
ninety lives have been taken away
On
the last Sabbath day of 1879,
Which
will be remember’d for a very long time.
’Twas
about seven o’clock at night,
And
the wind it blew with all its might,
And
the rain came pouring down,
And
the dark clouds seem’d to frown,
And
the Demon of the air seem’d to say-
“I’ll
blow down the Bridge of Tay.”
When
the train left Edinburgh
The
passengers’ hearts were light and felt no sorrow,
But
Boreas blew a terrific gale,
Which
made their hearts for to quail,
And
many of the passengers with fear did say-
“I
hope God will send us safe across the Bridge of Tay.”
But
when the train came near to Wormit Bay,
Boreas
he did loud and angry bray,
And
shook the central girders of the Bridge of Tay
On
the last Sabbath day of 1879,
Which
will be remember’d for a very long time.
So
the train sped on with all its might,
And
Bonnie Dundee soon hove in sight,
And
the passengers’ hearts felt light,
Thinking
they would enjoy themselves on the New Year,
With
their friends at home they lov’d most dear,
And
wish them all a happy New Year.
So
the train mov’d slowly along the Bridge of Tay,
Until
it was about midway,
Then
the central girders with a crash gave way,
And
down went the train and passengers into the Tay!
The
Storm Fiend did loudly bray,
Because
ninety lives had been taken away,
On
the last Sabbath day of 1879,
Which
will be remember’d for a very long time.
As
soon as the catastrophe came to be known
The
alarm from mouth to mouth was blown,
And
the cry rang out all o’er the town,
Good
Heavens! the Tay Bridge is blown down,
And
a passenger train from Edinburgh,
Which
fill’d all the peoples hearts with sorrow,
And
made them for to turn pale,
Because
none of the passengers were sav’d to tell the tale
How
the disaster happen’d on the last Sabbath day of 1879,
Which
will be remember’d for a very long time.
It
must have been an awful sight,
To
witness in the dusky moonlight,
While
the Storm Fiend did laugh, and angry did bray,
Along
the Railway Bridge of the Silv’ry Tay,
Oh!
ill-fated Bridge of the Silv’ry Tay,
I
must now conclude my lay
By
telling the world fearlessly without the least dismay,
That
your central girders would not have given way,
At
least many sensible men do say,
Had
they been supported on each side with buttresses,
At
least many sensible men confesses,
For
the stronger we our houses do build,
The
less chance we have of being killed.