Wimp (pronounced whimp)
(1) A
weak, ineffectual, timid person.
(2) In particle
physics, a speculative particle: Weakly Interacting Massive Particle.
(3) In computer science, a summary of the elements of the graphical user interface (GUI): (Windows, Icons, Menus (or Mice), Pointing device (or Pull-down menus).
1915-1920: In the sense of "someone weak or timid", it's an Americanism of uncertain origin although etymologists have concluded it almost certainly is a back-formation from whimper. The earliest known use in print dates from 1920 but it seems not to have re-appeared until 1960 although wimpish persisted. In the US, the meaning must by the 1930s have had some currency because two pop-culture characters used a form of nominative determinism (a relationship between an individual's name and their qualities, habits or vocation) in their names: J. Wellington Wimpy who was devious but cowardly and the quiet, ineffectual Wallace Wimple. The idiomatic form "wimp-out" is a synonym of "chicken out" and often used as "wimped out". The use by the US Marine Corps (USMC) as the abbreviation for "weak in mountain phase" was a way of expressing an opinion of those cadets who lacked the endurance or other qualities demanded by the "mountain phase" of training conducted in Dahlonega, Georgia. The use in computer user interfaces is said to date from 1980 and have been coined by computer scientist Merzouga Wilberts, about whom little appears to be known. The name "Merzouga Wilberts" may have started as some sort of in-joke which has come to be spread by the internet (a la the "inventor of the toaster") and the credit for the pioneering work on computer GUIs is usually afforded to the work done by Xerox Corporation's PARC (Palo Alto Research Center) during the 1970s. Less well-known use as an acronym in computing includes Windows Interface Manipulation Program, Windows impersonator and (as WiMP), Windows Media Player. The spelling whimp was probably an imperfect echoic for the time when use was predominately oral. Wimp is a noun, verb & adjective, wimping & wimped are verbs, wimpish & wimpy are adjectives; the noun plural is wimps.
The biggest data
Based on the biggest data sets ever gathered, cosmologists use mathematics to calculate the actual parameters of the universe and the numbers which have emerged from the equations suggest some ninety percent of matter (or energy) has yet to be discovered, observed or defined. One possibility is mechanical; the math is wrong. The other explanation is the data is incomplete because or means of measuring or observing the cosmos is not able to see anything. Scientists, as impressed as economists by the beauty of their mathematical models, prefer the later. To account for all that’s “missing”, they speak of dark matter and dark energy and divide their energies between looking for the dark stuff and developing theories which might explain its nature.
Weakly interacting massive particles (wimps) emerged as one theory; a speculative particle thought wholly or partially to constitute what is commonly referred to as "dark matter" but which may be "dark energy". The theory suggests a wimp interacts via gravity and any other forces and is inherently non-vanishing in its strength. For the theory to work, wimps must date from the earliest moments of the Universe and be "cold" dark something because modelling of a universe full of cold dark matter produces a distribution of galaxies close to what we today observe. However, a simulation with hot dark matter reduces a universe to a sort of cosmic sludge.
Wimps may be out there and if they're they're there, they're everywhere. Enhanced images from the Hubble Space Telescope.
The term "weakly interacting massive particles" was coined by US theoretical physicist Pierre Sikivie (b 1949) in 1983 but the underpinnings of the concept lie in the work of two US theoretical physicists Howard Georgi III (b 1947) & US theoretical physicist Sheldon Glashow (b 1932) who in 1974 published what is considered the first “grand unified theory”, a framework which could accommodate “everything” in the universe and thus explain its structure and formation (though not the origin). Immensely influential, physicists, cosmologists & mathematicians have since been “plugging-in” data and theories to this now much-modified framework. Georgi & Glashow had proposed entities which behaved like stable, weakly interacting massive particles as a possible explanation for dark matter but it was Sikivie who came up with the memorable term. In the way these things happen in science, there are also now SWIMPs (super weakly interacting massive particle) and GIMPs (a class of SWIMP which interacts only gravitationally).
In
the mysterious world of particle physics, this stuff is understood by a relative
few and even among them there are disagreements but the hypothetical WIMPS can
be described as particles which interact through the weak nuclear force and
gravity, but not through electromagnetic or strong nuclear forces, which is why
they are considered “weakly interacting”.
Speculative theories in physics have become not uncommon because,
although in the last hundred-odd years the understanding of the universe has
been transformed, the “standard” model of the place contains anomalies and into
these gaps, theories are plugged. WIMPs
however are like the various flavours of string theory in that while there’s a
perfect internal logic, not only have the notions never been tested but it not
possible to design a test. Despite that,
such is the mathematical elegance that some hypothetical entities and
structures are so compelling that adherents cling to them with the driven intensity
of seventeenth century Jesuit priests.
Still, the WIMP is an attractive candidate as at least part of the explanation
for dark matter because, as described, they fulfil a number of what all in the
field agree are critical criteria:
Stability
& longevity: To exist as imagined, WIMPs must be very long-lived and inherently stable, enabling them persist
throughout cosmic history. That doesn’t
contradict the notion of “nothing lasts forever” because need last only between
time beginning and ending and it’s assumed both states either have happened (perhaps
many times) or will happen.
Abundance:
There is nothing to suggest any reason why WIMPS couldn’t have been produced in
the earliest moments of the universe and thus been an inherent part of cosmic
inflation, meaning they might exist in sufficient quantities to account for the
observed amount of dark matter.
Strength
in interaction with other stuff: The WIMP’s weak interactions would explain why
they’ve yet to be detected, such is the rarity with which they interact with ordinary
matter.
So, although wimps remain wholly hypothetical, assuming the math is correct, wimps do successfully fill the astrophysical gaps and there is a near consensus today among cosmologists that most of the mass in the Universe is dark. That said, the answer remains, “don’t know”.
The exquisite wimp: Baldur Benedikt von Schirach
Exquisite is used almost exclusively as an adjective, applied typically to objects or performances but it’s also a noun, albeit one always rare. As a noun it was used to describe men who inhabited that grey area of being well dressed, well coiffured, well mannered and somewhat effeminate without being obviously homosexual; it was a way of hinting at something without descending to the explicit. PG Wodehouse (1881-1975) applied it thus in Sam the Sudden (1925) and historians Ann (1938-2021) & John Tusa (b 1936) in The Nuremberg Trial (1983) found no better noun to apply to former Hitler Youth Leader Baldur von Schirach, noting (as did his many enemies in the party) his feminine tastes in furnishings and propensity to pen poor poetry. The companion word to describe a similar chap without of necessity the same hint of effeminacy is “aesthete”. In The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir (1992), Brigadier General Telford Taylor (1908–1998; lead US counsel at the Nuremberg Trial) wrote of him that: “at thirty-nine, was the youngest and, except perhaps for Joachim von Ribbentrop (1893–1946; Nazi foreign minister 1938-1945) and Hans Fritzsche (1900–1953; Nazi propagandist), the weakest of the defendants. If wimps had then been spoken of, Schirach would have been so styled.”
Left to right: Adolf Hitler (1889-1945; Führer (leader) and German head of government 1933-1945 & head of state 1934-1945), Martin Bormann (1900–1945), Hermann Göring (1893–1946; leading Nazi 1922-1945, Hitler's designated successor & Reichsmarschall 1940-1945), and Baldur von Schirach (1907-1974; head of the Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth) 1931-1940 & Gauleiter (district party leader) and Reichsstatthalter (Governor) of Vienna (1940-1945)), Berchtesgaden, Bavaria, Germany, 1936. Of much, the other three were guilty as sin and would (at the last possible moment) commit suicide but von Schirach would survive to die in his bed at 67. There seems no record to confirm if that bed was in a “a snow white bedroom with delicate lace curtains” as the rougher types in the Nazi Party had once derided him for having.
Airey Neave (1916–1979) was the British military lawyer who served the indictments on the defendants at Nuremberg and in On Trial at Nuremberg (1978) he recalled the experience, cell by cell. His first impression of von Schirach was that his appearance was “…bi-sexual and soft with thé dansant eyes [thé dansant was a dance held while afternoon tea was served and in idiomatic use “thé dansant eyes” suggested the coquettish fluttering of the lashes a flirtatious young lady might deploy]”, adding “He looked a man who might be dangerous to small boys. At a second glance, I imagined him beneath the palms at Cannes in co-respondent shoes.” In this context, Neave used “co-respondent” in the sense of the man cited in divorce proceedings as the one who slept with the adulterous wife and a “co-respondent shoes (or car, suit, tie etc)” were distinguished by flashiness rather than quality.
Von Schirach went on trial before the IMT (International Military Tribunal) in the first Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), an event the author Rebecca West (1892–1983) attended in her capacity as a journalist and among her impressions she wrote of him, admitting she was at first “startled” because “…he was like a woman in a way not common among men who look like women. It was as if a neat and mousy governess sat there, not pretty but with never a hair out of place, and always to be trusted never to intrude when there were visitors: as it might be Jane Eyre.” Although indicted also under Count 1 (conspiracy to commit crimes against peace), for his role as head (1931-1940) of the Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth), von Schirach was convicted only under Count 4 (crimes against humanity) for his part in deporting Viennese Jews to the death camps while Gauleiter and Reichsstatthalter of Vienna. Cunningly, and not without ostentation, he admitted some guilt for his role in “corrupting German youth” although by that he meant the political indoctrination to which he subjected them, rather than conduct many in the Nazi party liked to hint he enjoyed with the boys under his command; however defined, it’s certain he corrupted more youth than Socrates (circa 470–399 BC). Applying common law principles, the IMT found his actions as head of the Hitlerjugend didn’t reach the threshold of “conspiracy” and thus acquitted him on Count 1, his 20 year sentence handed down for his conduct in Vienna. The preparation for the trial had been rushed and had subsequently discovered evidence against him been presented at the trial, doubtlessly and deservedly he’d have been hanged. Had that sentence been imposed, whether like Göring he’d have followed Socrates and taken hemlock will never be known.
