Fuselage pronounced fyoo-suh-lahzh, fyoo-suh-lij, fyoo-zuh-lahzh or fyoo-suh-lahzh)
(1) In
aeronautical design, the complete central structure of an airplane, to which are
attached the wings (or rotors), tail and other stabilizing fins or surfaces (engines
sometimes also directly attached or enclosed).
It is inside the fuselage where the crew, passengers, cargo and most
internals systems are located.
(2) In
design, a style which borrows from or alludes to the elements used in aircraft
fuselages.
(3) By extension, the main body of an aerospace vehicle
1909 (In English): From the French fuselage, the construct being fusel(é) (spindle-shaped), from fuseler (to shape like a spindle), from the Old French fus or fuseau (spindle), from the Latin fusus (spindle) + -age. The French suffix -age was from the Middle & Old French -age, from the Latin -āticum, (greatly) extended from words like rivage and voyage. It was used usually to form nouns with the sense of (1) "action or result of Xing" or (more rarely), "action related to X" or (2) "state of being (a or an) X". A less common use was the formation of collective nouns. Historically, there were many applications (family relationships, locations et al) but use has long tended to be restricted to the sense of "action of Xing". Many older terms now have little to no connection with their most common modern uses, something particularly notable of those descended from actual Latin words (fromage, voyage et al). In English, the suffix -age was from the Middle English -age, from the Old French -age, from the Latin -āticum. Cognates include the French -age, the Italian -aggio, the Portuguese -agem, the Spanish -aje & Romanian -aj. It was used to form nouns (1) with the sense of collection or appurtenance, (2) indicating a process, action, or a result, (3) of a state or relationship, (4) indicating a place, (5) indicating a charge, toll, or fee, (6) indicating a rate & (7) of a unit of measure. Fuselage is a noun & adjective; the noun plural is fuselages.
Many languages also borrowed fuselage but there were sometimes variations in spelling including in Catalan (fuselatge), Portuguese (fuselagem), Spanish (fuselaje), Russian (fjuzeljáž (фюзеля́ж)), Kazakh (füzeläj (фюзеляж)) and Ukrainian (fjuzeljáž (фюзеля́ж)). It’s not clear when “fuselage” was first used in English, the earliest known reference dating from 1909 but it’s not improbable the word had earlier been in oral use. The alternative was presumably “hull” (the body or frame of shop, boat or other such vessel). Hull was from the Middle English hul, hulle & holle (seed covering, hull of a ship), from the Old English hulu (seed covering), from the Proto-Germanic hul- (and related to the Dutch hul (hood) and the German Hülle & Hülse (cover, veil)), and may have been from either the primitive Indo-European forms ḱel- (to cover, hide) or kal- (hard). Hull came into wide use in aircraft design when “flying boats” were developed.
Flying boats: Short S.25 Sunderland (1938-1946) (left) and Dornier Do X (1929-1932) (right).
Most
aeroplanes have fuselages; flying boats have hulls, a tribute to the nautical
part of their hybrid origin. Commercially,
flying boats were widely used during the inter-war years because of their range
and, needing only a suitable body of water (sea, lake, river), their ability to
operate in regions without suitable aerodromes.
A vital military machine during World War II (1939-1945), the advances
in aircraft design during that conflict, coupled with the proliferation of airstrip
construction able to be re-purposed for civil use doomed them for all but some
specialist uses. Quickly they almost
vanished from European and (most) North American skies and waterways, enduring
in the Far East only until infrastructure there too was improved.
The fuselage can be optional: Dunne D.5 (1908) (left), Northrop YB-49 prototype (1947) (centre) and Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit (1989) (right).
In the early days of aviation, before even an airplane had flown the English Channel, designers had been intrigued when their slide-rule calculations suggested the optimal shape of a flying machine was a "flying wing" with no conventional fuselage and certainly no tail-plane apparatus. Tests of scale models in primitive wind tunnels proved the math was substantially correct and proof of concept tests using an unpowered glider proved inconclusive, it being clear only a powered flight would demonstrate if such a design could achieve stable flight. When tested, the designer admitted an early, under-powered, version was "more a hopper than a flyer" but when fitted with more powerful engines, the "flying wings" proved remarkably stable. However, more conventional designs proved more suitable for military use and that, increasingly was where the source of funding was to be found. Despite that, the idea continued to fascinate designers and a flying wing was one of the extraordinary range of experimental aircraft under development in Nazi Germany during World War II, most of which never made any contribution to the Luftwaffe's war effort. In the US, Northrop built both propeller and jet-powered prototypes in the 1940s and after early difficulties, a stable platform emerged although, like most designs, it both offered advantages and imposed restrictions but the whole project was cancelled; ever since some have argued this was due to political influence while others claim the flaws in the concept were so fundamental they couldn't be fixed. The Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit (in service with the US Air Force (USAF) until at least 2034) is a modified version of a flying wing in that its really a variation of a delta with an integrated fuselage.
Ascending the stairs: Lindsay Lohan entering a fuselage, Mykonos, Greece, August 2016.
Aileron: A hinged flight-control surface usually
attached to the trailing edge of each wing and used to change the roll (ie
cause fuselage to begin rotation).
Although the word “flaps” is commonly used of ailerons, the flaps are
usually positioned closer to the fuselage and are used to increase or reduce lift
& drag. The flap-like devices mounted
on the trailing edges of the vertical stabilizers (somewhere in the tail-section) are properly called “elevators”.
Aileron was a diminutive of aile
(wing) and before powered flight (flying machines) had been used in ornithology
to refer to the extremities of a bird's wings used to control their flight. There is an entry in a French-English dictionary
dating from 1877 (with the lead meaning: “small wing”) and in the context of
the language of aviation, the earliest known use in entry in French technical
literature is from 1908.
Empennage: The tail assembly of an
aircraft, including the horizontal and vertical stabilizers, elevators, and
rudder. Empennage was from the French empenner
(to feather an arrow).
Chassis: This was the original term used in English to describe
the framework of an aircraft but soon was replaced by "frame, structure etc"),
presumably because of the association with the heavy steel constructions used
in cars and trucks, things far removed from the lightweight designs needed in
the air. Chassis was from the French chassis
(frame, supporting structure), from châsse
(reliquary; coffin), from the Latin capsa
(case).
Concours
d'Elegance: Not strictly an aviation term and most associated with affairs like
those in Pebble Beach where rows of vintage Bentleys, Ferraris and such (the
latter always in a much better state of finish than when they left the factory)
are judged for their closeness to perfection.
Although not strictly a term from aviation, there are such events for
old aircraft. Concours d'Elegance was
from the French concours d'élégance (competition
of elegance).
Pilot: Pilot was from the Middle French pilot & pillot, from the Italian pilota
& piloto, (pedotta, pedot & pedotto the older forms), the pil- element probably influenced by pileggiare (to sail, navigate), ultimately
from the unattested Byzantine Greek *πηδώτης (pēdṓtēs) (helmsman), from the Ancient Greek πηδόν (pēdón) (blade of an oar, oar) (the the Ancient
and Modern Greek πηδάλιον (pēdálion)
(rudder). Familiar from nautical use,
pilot was a straight borrowing for the person fulfilling the same function in
the air. The construct of pilotage was
pilot + -age.
Canard: A type of aircraft configuration where the
tail-plane is ahead of the main lifting surfaces. In aviation, a canard is either (1) a type of
aircraft in which the primary horizontal control and stabilization surfaces are
in front of the main wing or (2) a horizontal control and stabilization surface
located in front of the main wing of an aircraft (a fore-plane). In just about any form of engineering involving
movement and fluid dynamics (air, plasma, water etc), a canard is a small,
wing-like structure used usually as a stabilizing device. Canard was from the French canard (duck, hoax) and in English as “a
canard”, is still used in that sense to mean “a false or misleading report or
story, especially if deliberately so”.
The Fuselage Chryslers, 1968-1973
1969 Imperial LeBaron, four-door hardtop.
The “fuselage”
Chryslers were released late in 1968 for the 1969 model year and, as a class,
remain the largest regular production cars ever made by the US industry. In the catalogue between 1968-1973, by the
end of their run the Imperial was built on a 127 inch (3226 mm) wheelbase, was
235 ½ (5981 mm) inches in length and almost 80 (2022 mm) inches in width. Big cars from Detroit were not uncommon in
the 1960s (Buick in 1959 even naming their top-of-the-range model the Electra 225,
a tribute to its 225 inch (5715 mm) length) but even by those standards the fuselage
cars not only were vast but the bulbous shape (source of the “fuselage” tag)
made them appear more excessive still; it wasn’t only for the big Chryslers the derisive “land yacht” was
coined but the line exemplified the idea.
In fairness, the trend generally was “longer, heavier
& fatter”, even once compact (by US standards) and agile machines like Ford’s
Mustang and Thunderbird bloating with each update although the manufacturers
were aware there was considerable public demand for something smaller and by
the late 1960s, those in the pipelines were well-advanced. However, demand for the full-sized cars
remained strong and Chrysler decided their lines should be more full-sized than
ever, thus the fuselage design. There
was at the time a bit of an aeronautical influence about and that was nothing
new, jet aircraft and space rockets during the previous two decades having
contributed many of the motifs which appeared on US cars. During the development cycle for the fuselage
cars, Chrysler were well-acquainted with the appearance of the Boeing 747, sketches
circulating for some three years before its first public appearance in
September 1968, coincidently just days after the Chrysler’s debuted. In its appearance, the bulging 747 was the
same sort of departure from the earlier, slender 707 as the 1969 Chryslers were from their rectilinear predecessors.
1969 Chrysler 300 advertising. In graphics & text, the "fuselage" motif was integral to the promotion; it was no mere nickname.
In some ways the styling has aged surprisingly well because the basic lines are uncluttered and, particularly on the higher priced editions, there was some nice detailing but at the time, critics found the look peculiar and a deviance from the direction other manufacturers were travelling. The sides were unusually deep and rounded (recalling, obviously, an airplane’s fuselage) with a beltline so high the glasshouse (the cabin area defined by the windows) was relatively shallow, something accentuated by the surrounding bulk. The corporation’s full-sized platform (internally the “C-Body”), it was shared by the Plymouth, Dodge, Chrysler and Imperial lines, the latter a surprise to some because since 1955 when it had been established as a separate division, the Imperial had been built on a unique platform. However, despite some encouraging results in the 1950s, Imperial never achieved the volume which would have justified another unique platform so the line was merged into mainstream development.
1969 Imperial LeBaron advertising. The "messaging" in this advertisement remains obscure.
The debut season saw good sales for the fuselage cars (though still more than 10% down on the previous C-Body (1965-1968)) but demand dropped precipitously in the next three years although sales were in buoyant in 1973 when many manufacturers set records; it was the last good year for the “old” American economy and the swansong of the long post-war boom built on cheap, limitless energy and the uniquely advantageous position the country enjoyed after the war; something squandered by the mistakes of more than one administration. It was certainly unfortunate timing for Chrysler that the first oil crisis should hit just weeks after they had replaced the fuselage cars with something mechanically similar but with clever styling tricks (even the engineers admitted it was “nips & tucks; smoke & mirrors”), something dimensionally similar appeared both smaller and more modern. Underneath, as the fuselage line had been, was essentially a good product, Chrysler’s basic engineering always good and while the big machines would never behave like a Lotus Elan, on the road they were competent and in most aspects as good as or better than the competition.
The last of Harry S Truman's (1884–1972; US president 1945-1953) many cars was a 1972 Chrysler Newport, the entry-level model in Chrysler's Fuselage range (some Plymouth & Dodge models were cheaper still). Purchased some six months before his death, the licence plate (5745) was a special request, a reference to 7 May, 1945 (VE Day (Victory in Europe). Truman was in office on that day and the plate has since permanently been retired.
1978 Chrysler New Yorker advertising. Still obviously bulky, the 1974-1978 re-style toned down the fuselage look although the interiors in tufted leather or velor became increasingly baroque. Publications like Road & Track (R&T) where the writers disapproved of anything so big (they thought everyone should drive a Lancia) sneered at the extravagant fit-out, dismissing it as "gingerbread" but it was a luxurious and isolating environment. There were still many who liked that sort of thing, none of whom maintained subscriptions to R&T.
So the writing was on the wall and even by 1977 when the oil crisis faded from memory and it seemed buyers were ready again to buy big, Chrysler was left with its now 1974 range while press and public fawned over General Motors’ (GM) newly slimmed-down, taut looking, full-size cars, the style and dimensions of which were so obviously the future. Tellingly, while radically reduced in weight and external measurements, on the inside, they were in most places as capacious as both their predecessors and the now antique Chryslers which were still just an update of the 1969 fuselage range. With the coming of 1976, the corporation had accepted the inevitable and axed the Imperial brand, Chrysler's top-of-the-range New Yorker tarted-up with left-over Imperial trim to become the new flagship. The end was close and in 1978 it came, that the last year of the big Chryslers released with such high expectations a decade before and when the line was retired, it took with it the once popular four-door hardtop body-style, other manufacturers having already retired their models. Shockingly inefficient though they are, the few surviving land yachts have a small but devoted following who appreciate what remains a unique driving experience (one as enjoyable as a passenger) and it's unlikely anything like them will ever be built again.
No comments:
Post a Comment