Empire (pronounced em-pahyuhr (sometimes om-peer if affecting to speak of things historically French)).
(1) A group of nations or peoples ruled over by an emperor, empress, or other powerful sovereign or government: usually a territory of greater extent than a kingdom, as the former British Empire, French Empire, Russian Empire, Byzantine Empire, or Roman Empire.
(2) As First Empire, the period of imperial rule in France under Napoleon Bonaparte, 1804-1815; as Second Empire, the period of Imperial rule under Napoleon III, 1852-1870 (a decadent period).
(3) A government under an emperor or empress.
(4) The historical period during which a nation is under such a government (often initial capital letter).
(5) Supreme power in governing; imperial power; sovereignty.
(6) Supreme control; absolute sway.
(7) A powerful and important enterprise or holding of large scope, especially one controlled by a single person, family, or group of associates.
(8) In horticulture, a variety of apple somewhat resembling the McIntosh.
(9) In fashion, of the style that prevailed during the first French Empire, in clothing being characterized especially by décolletage and a high waistline, coming just below the bust, from which the skirt hangs straight and loose (usually initial capital letter).
(10) As Empire State, a term for New York since 1834.
(11) In architecture and design, noting or pertaining to the style of architecture, furnishings, and decoration prevailing in France, emulated variously in various other places circa 1800-1830; characterized by the use of delicate but elaborate ornamentation imitated from Greek and Roman examples or containing classical allusions, as animal forms for the legs of furniture, bas-reliefs of classical figures, motifs of wreaths, torches, caryatids, lyres, and urns and by the occasional use of military and Egyptian motifs and, under the Napoleonic Empire itself, of symbols alluding to Napoleon I, as bees or the letter N (often initial capital letter).
1250–1300: From the Middle English empire (territory subject to an emperor's rule (and, in general "realm, dominion"), from the Anglo-French & Old French empire & empere (rule, authority, kingdom, imperial rule; authority of an emperor, supreme power in governing; imperial power), from the Latin imperium & inperium (a rule, a command; authority, control, power; supreme power, sole dominion; military authority; a dominion, realm) from inperare & imperāre (to command) from parāre (to prepare; to make ready; order). The construct of the Latin imperare was in- (in) (from the primitive Indo-European root en (in)) + parare (to order, prepare) (from the primitive Indo-European root pere- (to produce, procure). A doublet of empery and imperium.
In English, the early understanding of the word was defined substantially by the knowledge (however imperfect) of the Persian and Roman (especially the latter) empires of Antiquity and though never etymologically restricted to "territory ruled by an emperor", for entirely logical reasons it did tend to be used that way. The phrase "the Empire" (which in the UK and the British empire almost exclusively implied "the British Empire" (dating from 1772)) previously would have been supposed to be a reference to the Holy Roman Empire. Officially, the British Empire devolved into "The Commonwealth" in 1931 because of the constitutional implications of the Statute of Westminster (and the changing world view) but opinion is divided on when it really ended, most dating it from Indian independence in 1947 (when George VI ceased to be George RI (Rex Imperator (king-emperor)) and became George R) while others claim (less plausibly) that in a sense it endured until Hong Kong was handed back to China in 1997. Nobody claims that still holding the Falkland Islands an empire makes.
Always a civilizing project, the Roman Empire stopped short of Ireland and Scotland. One has to draw the line somewhere.
Despite
the modern habit, etymologically, empire was never restricted to
"territory ruled by an emperor" but has been used that way for so
long a meaning-shift may have happened.
In political theory, an empire is an aggregate of conquered, colonized,
or confederated states, each with its own government subordinate or tributary
to that of the empire as a whole but history is replete with accidents and
anomalies. Japan’s head of state is an
emperor although no empire exists and the most often quoted remark about the Holy
Roman Empire has long been Voltaire’s bon mot that it was "...not holy, nor
Roman, nor an empire".
Long
pre-dating the era, the empire-line (sometimes called empire-silhouette) dress is
most associated with the French First Empire (which lasted from 1804 when
Napoleon Bonaparte crowned himself Emperor, to his final defeat at the Battle
of Waterloo in 1815) and although the look endured longer than the political
construct, beginning in the 1820s, skirts widened and waistlines lowered to an
extent most were no longer identifiable as the style. The look became linked to the First Empire
because it was Napoleon's first Empress, Joséphine de Beauharnais (1763–1814) who
popularized it in Europe and there are fashionistas who when speaking of the
style, will pronounce it as a quasi-French om-pire. In England, Emma, Lady Hamilton's ((1765–1815);
mistress of Lord Nelson (1758-1805) and muse of the artist George Romney (1734-1802)) adoption of the
style was much imitated, the cross-channel exchanges of fashion continuing
uninterrupted even when a state of war existed between London and Paris. The English or American fashions of this time
tend respectively to be termed "Regency" (referring to the Regency of
the Prince of Wales, 1811-1820) and "Federal" (referring to the
decades immediately following the American Revolution).
Gisele Bündchen in Dior empire-line dress, Academy Awards Ceremony, Los Angeles, February 2005.
Empire-line
dresses featured a waistline considerably raised above the natural level with
skirts which vary from the slim and columnar to the swishy and conical. In its pure form it was characterized by (1)
a columnar silhouette without gathers in front, (2) some fullness over the
hips, (3) a concentration of gathers aligned with a wide centre-back bodice
panel and (4), a raised waistline which reached usually to just below the bust
but (occasionally) as high as the armpits.
Mass-production of the design was possible only because the industrial
revolution made available new fabrics and other materials at volume and an
attainable cost. Empire- line proved
appealing to women without an ideal figure because, by adjusting the parameters
of the various components, a seamstress could flatter a wide variety of body
types, disguising and emphasizing as required, able to create also the illusion
of greater height.
The empire-line inherently needs a lot of fabric which offers designers the possibility of using bold patterns, especially florals, which can't be displayed to the same effect in styles with less surface area.
Traditionally, most clothing had relied on the shape of the human body but new forms of corsetry, including strong yet delicate shoulder straps to provide the necessary structural integrity, combined with materials such as mull, a soft, sheer Indian white muslin, allowed designers to create wearable outfits in which the neoclassical influence was obvious, the silhouette imitating the Classical statutes of Antiquity. Such constructions had before existed for the rich but they were heavy, hot, rigid, uncomfortable and very expensive. Sadly, the relative freedom women enjoyed proved short lived, evolving by the 1820s into something less simple and notably more restrictive, the hourglass Victorian styles much more prevalent in high-fashion by the mid-nineteenth century, a trend which lasted until the First World War. The ideas of empire-line were revived for the less-constricting clothing popular in the 1920s and, although coming and going, it’s never gone away and, being somewhat hippie in its look, gained a new following in the 1960s.
Empire-line wedding dresses (left to right) by Dana Harel, Savannah Miller, Two Birds & LoveShackFancy. Although the design and structural details differ between these, all four can be reduced to the same mathematics. The wedding dress business seems to be one part of the industry where blonde models seem not to enjoy their usual natural advantage, photographers preferring dark hair, better to contrast and define the edges of all that white fabric.
No comments:
Post a Comment