Baffle
(pronounced baf-uhl)
(1) To confuse, bewilder or perplex.
(2) To frustrate or confound; to thwart (a now archaic
and probably obsolete seventeenth century use which didn’t of necessity involve
the creation of confusion or bewilderment).
(3) To check or deflect the movement of (sound,
light, fluids, etc.).
(4) To equip with a baffle or baffles.
(5) To cheat or trick; to hoodwink or deceive someone
(used between the sixteenth & eighteenth centuries and now obsolete).
(6) To struggle ineffectually, as a ship in a
gale (a nineteenth form rare except in Admiralty use).
(7) Publicly to disgrace, especially of a
recreant knight (used between the sixteenth & seventeenth centuries and now
obsolete).
(8) Something that balks, checks, or deflects
(also called a baffle-board); an artificial obstruction for checking or
deflecting the flow of gases (as in a boiler), sounds (as in the loudspeaker
system of a radio or hi-fi set), light (as in a darkroom) or fluids (as in a
tank).
(9) In audio engineering, any boxlike enclosure
or flat panel for mounting a loudspeaker.
(10) In military camouflage, an architectural
feature designed to confuse enemies or make them vulnerable.
(11) In coal mining, a lever for operating the
throttle valve of a winding engine (US dialectal use).
1540-1550: Of uncertain origin but may have entered
English from the Scots dialectal bauchle
(to disgrace, treat with contempt, especially a perjured knight), from bauch or bachlen (publicly to condemn) and probably related to the
early-modern French bafouer (to
disgrace, to scorn, abuse or hoodwink) or the obsolete French befer (to mock) which was definitely picked
up from the Scots bauchle. The most likely root is the German natural
sound of disgust, like bah which
appears in the language as baff machen
(to flabbergast) and the familiar modern meaning “to bewilder or confuse” is
from 1640s while that of “to defeat someone's efforts” is from 1670s. The use meaning “shielding device” dates from
1881 and “artificial obstruction” is from 1910.
The alternative spellings bafful
& baffol are both obsolete. Baffle is a noun & verb, bafflement &
baffler are nouns and baffled & baffling are verbs & adjectives; the
noun plural is baffles (or the rare bafflers).
As a noun, baffle emerged in the early 1880s, initially
used mostly of the shielding device attached to stoves and ovens where it was
short for “baffle-plate”, derived from the noun. The earlier noun (from circa 1860) in the same
sense was baffler, a word which can still be used to describe (1) something
that causes one to be baffled, particularly a difficult puzzle or riddle &
(1) in gaming, one of the projections inside a dice tower that serve to deflect
the die unpredictably. The noun bafflement
(state of being baffled) dates from 1841 while the adjective baffling (bewildering,
confusing, perplexing) was from 1733; it was the present-participle adjective
from the verb baffle but also emerged in Admiralty slang (soon picked up in the
merchant service) in the eighteenth century as a sailor's adjective for winds
that blow variously and make headway difficult; although now rare, it survived into
the age of steam. The noun and verb bafflegab
was first noted in 1952 and describes pretentious, incomprehensible, or overly
technical language, especially legal or bureaucratic jargon; a synonym of gobbledygook
(but not “hocus-pocus” or “mumbo-jumbo” which reference something
nonsensical although use of those two is now probably proscribe because of
their origin when speaking dismissively of the speech of African “witch doctors”. The companion word is baffound (to perplex,
bewilder by the use of bafflegab).
Although it had probably before been on the tips
of not a few tongues, the words “baffle”, “baffling” & “baffled” in connection
with Lindsay Lohan really spiked in 2016 when footage circulated of her speaking
in distinctively different accent which used a conventional US English
vocabulary but was delivered, with an occasionally halting delivery, the accent
vaguely Russian or eastern European. She
later clarified thing by saying it was “…a
mixture of most of the languages I can understand or am trying to learn”,
adding that she’d been “…learning
different languages since I was a child. I'm fluent in English and French can
understand Russian and am learning Turkish, Italian and Arabic”. Taking advantage of the interest, she named the
latest addition to the planet’s linguistic diversity “LiLohan” and a limited
edition LiLohan clothing line was quickly made available as a philanthropic endeavour,
part of the proceeds from each item sold going to Caudwell Children and the
Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Turkey (AFAD). Turkey is now properly called Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti (Republic of Türkiye); the accepted short form Türkiye.
Baffled sump (left) and fuel tank (right).In
cars, baffles are used in sumps and fuel tanks to prevent fluids sloshing around
when subjected to the high lateral forces encountered in high-speed cornering. With fuel tanks this ensures weight transfers
are minimized while the purpose in a sump is to (1) avoid the oil surge or starvation
which can happen if movement means the oil becomes removed from the oil-pump’s
pickup & (2) assist in reducing the oil’s tendency to foam. In Australia Ford included a baffled sump on
the Falcon GTHO Phase III (1970-1971) and this was to be carried over to the
abortive Phase IV (1972), the novelty with the latter being the race cars
gaining tear-drop shaped “ears” welded to each side of the sump, adjacent to
the oil pump. The ears not only increased
oil capacity but also, sitting as they did in the air-flow passing under the
body, enhanced cooling.
Speak no evil: Alan Tudge.Given the number of times the Australian
Liberal Party has in recent years sought to celebrate the virtue of “personality responsibility” the evidence
given by Alan Tudge (b 1971) to the royal commission investigating the “robodebt”
scheme (a system which sought to “recover” what were alleged to be debts
incurred by citizens who had failed to inform the government about their
earnings) must to some have seemed baffling; not necessarily surprising, just
baffling. The scheme had been found to
be unlawful but Mr Tudge, who served as (Liberal) minister for human services in
2017-2018 and was (under the Westminster system) “responsible” for the
administration of “robodebt”, refused during questioning to accept ministerial
responsibility for the unlawfulness of the scheme. Despite being the minister in charge, Mr Tudge
said it was not his responsibility check whether or not the robodebt scheme was
lawful although he did seem to concede he was responsible for the scheme’s
“lawful implementation”, adding that he assumed it was lawful, and had never
been shown legal advice regarding its legality.
His position appeared to be based on what sounds a reasonable
assumption: that the departmental secretary (the public servant in charge of
the department) would not be implementing a program which he or she would know
to be unlawful, something he described as “unfathomable”,
adding that the scheme had gone through a rigorous cabinet process “which always has a legal overlay”.
Justice Jackson prosecuting, Albert Speer in the dock, Nuremberg, 1946.
There are many books by academics, historians and
former politicians which discuss the doctrine of ministerial responsibility but
it's not known if the transcript of 20 June 1946 of the International Military
Tribunal (the Nuremberg Trial) was in Mr Tudge's mind: Mr Justice Robert Jackson
(1892–1954; US Supreme Court Justice 1941-1954; Chief US Prosecutor at the
Nuremberg (IMT) trials of Nazi war criminals 1945-1946) cross-examining Albert
Speer (1905–1981; Nazi court architect 1934-1942; Nazi minister of armaments
and war production 1942-1945):
MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Your statement some time ago that you had a certain responsibility as a
Minister of the Government. I should
like to have you explain what responsibility you referred to when you say you
assume a responsibility as a member of the Government; your common
responsibility, what do you mean by your common responsibility along with
others?
DEFENDANT SPEER: In
my opinion, a state functionary has two types of responsibility. One is the responsibility for his own sector
and for that, of course, he is fully responsible. But above that I think that in decisive
matters there is, and must be, among the leaders a common responsibility, for
who is to bear responsibility for developments, if not the close associates of
the head of State?
This common responsibility, however, can only be applied to
fundamental matters, it cannot be applied to details connected with other
ministries or other responsible departments, for otherwise the entire
discipline in the life of the state would be quite confused, and no one would
ever know who is individually responsible
in a particular sphere. This individual responsibility in one's own sphere
must, at all events, be kept clear and distinct.
MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Well, your point is, I take it, that you as a member of the Government
and a leader in this period of time acknowledge a responsibility for its large
policies, but not for all the details that occurred in their execution. Is that
a fair statement of your position?
DEFENDANT SPEER: Yes,
indeed.
MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: I think that concludes the cross-examination.
Alan Tudge at the 2017 Midwinter Ball with Liberal
staffer Rachelle Miller.Ms Millar also provided
some interesting evidence to the “robodebt” royal commission and (pursuant to an
unrelated matter) received from the Commonwealth a taxpayer-funded Aus$650,000 settlement
for damages while working in two ministerial offices. Ms Millar had accused Mr Tudge of being
physically abusive towards her while in a consensual relationship and part of
the settlement related to these matters, including compensation for loss of
earning, hurt, distress, humiliation & medical and legal costs. The Commonwealth did not admit liability but
in paying Aus$650,000 seems to have assumed responsibility. In a Clintonesque touch, Mr Tudge admitted he
was at times sexually intimate with Ms Miller but insists he did not have “sexual
intercourse” with that woman.