Colossus

Colossus (pronounced kuh-los-us)

(1) A statue of gigantic size.

(2) Anything colossal, gigantic, or very powerful.

(3) The internal name for Google's file system, introduced in 2010 and optimized for use in big-machine databases stored in multiple server clusters.  

1350-1400: From the Middle English, from the Latin colossus (statue larger than life), from the Ancient Greek κολοσσός, (kolossós) (statue or image, origin uncertain but thought most likely from a pre-Hellenic Mediterranean language) and the word was used by Herodotus to describe large Egyptian statues.  The figurative sense "anything of awesome greatness or vastness" is from 1794, taken from the adjective colossal (of extraordinary size, huge, gigantic), in use since 1712 although, colossic in the same sense is noted from circa 1600 and there are instances of colossean in the seventeenth century, both from the French colossal, from colosse, all forms from the Latin colossus from the Greek kolossós. The noun Colosseum dates from the 1560s, replacing the earlier Coliseum, the name in Medieval Latin for the classical Amphitheatrum Flavium (begun circa 70), noun use of the neuter of the adjective colosseus (gigantic), thought perhaps a reference to the big statue of Nero that for so long stood nearby. Colossus is a noun' the noun plural is colossi or colossuses.

The plural of colossus doesn't often come up in conversation but when it does, the choice is between colossi and colossusus, the latter there to be used by anyone who finds unwelcome, for whatever reason, the adoption in English of classical plural forms.  Not all words from Greek with a Latinised ending -us take the same pluralisation and there's no objection either to colossuses or the Latinized colossi; those who object to either probably suffer the condition known as hyper-correctionism and it is a real phenomenon (the squabble about octopuses, octopodes and the charming octopi) and is ongoing.  All that can be recommended is consistency; in a document, either adopt the English plural forms or use the classical form but don't mix.

Vaguely plausible rendering of how The Colossus of Rhodes may have appeared.

The Colossus of Rhodes was one of the seven wonders of the ancient world.  It was a very big statue, erected somewhere near the port of the city of Rhodes, the biggest settlement on what is the one of the larger Greek islands of the same name which lies off what is now Turkey’s Aegean coast.  Taking a dozen years to complete, the statue, construction of which began in 292 BC, was erected to honor Elios, the God of the Sun, who brought the inhabitants victory over Demetrius Poliorcetes (Demetrius I of Macedon; “The Besieger" 337–283 BC) who laid siege to Rhodes in 305-304 BC.  It stood for only sixty-odd years, collapsing during a severe earthquake which struck in 226 BC, contemporary reports indicating the structure fractured at both knees before toppling.  Remarkably, the mostly bronze wreckage was left substantially undisturbed for some eight-hundred years, becoming something of a tourist attraction before, in 654, it was salvaged by Arab invaders under the Muslim caliph Mu'awiya I (معاوية بن أبي سفيان‎, Muʿāwiya ibn Abī Sufyān; circa 600–680) who sold it to someone described as “a Jewish merchant from Damascus” who is said to have carted it off on a camel train of almost “a thousand beasts”.

Demetrios the Besieger had a scandalous private life but had a flair for military matters, noted too for innovations in engineering such as the machines and devices built by his armies as siege engines.  However, even the forces he was able at deploy in 305-304 BC weren’t sufficient to defeat the fortifications of Rhodes and eventually, Demetrios was compelled to retreat, abandoning the siege machinery on the island.  To give thanks to the Sun God, the Rhodians granted the commission to build a triumphal statue to Helios to the sculptor Chares of Lindos (Χάρης ὁ Λίνδιος, circa 330 BC-circa 280 BC), a pupil of Lysippos (Λύσιππος; fourth century BC) and, in the dozen years between 304-292 BC, he supervised the construction.

Digitally generated image of statue of Zeus by Phidias,

Before the Colossus, Rhodes had long been famous for its statues, the contemporary accounts probably as unreliable as any Roman histories but even if Pliny’s count of some three-thousand was an exaggeration, the writing of others do suggest there were doubtlessly a lot, many in stone, some in bronze, but nothing on the scale of the Colossus had even been attempted.  There was a titanic statue, as they’re now known, in Olympus, a chryséléphantine (one made from Gold and ivory) study of Zeus some 13 m (42 feet) high, another of the seven wonders although the sculptor Phidias (Φειδίας, circa 480–430 BC) had avoided the fragility inherent in a standing figure by having Zeus sit in a chair.  He had also built a chryshephantine statue of the goddess Athena but that stood but 9m (30 feet) high; by any standards, the titanic Colossus was truly colossal.

Logo of Lindsay Lohan's Rhodes Beach House.

Beach Structurally, the build was executed along the well-understood engineering principles of the age, the base of white marble first installed to which were affixed the feet and ankles, an iron and stone framework gradually formed as scaffolding and structure proceeded in unison upwards.  To permit the workers to reach the highest levels, an earth ramp was built because the heights involved meant a free-standing system of scaffolding would lack the needed stability; when the work was complete, the earth ramp was demolished and the soil carted off.  While the superstructure was built, workers cast the outer skin in bronze using plates, the metal formed with copper melted in large ovens, to which iron, making 10-20% of the mix, was added.  Then the mouton metal mixture was moved in large ladles to be distributed in clay molds, flat structures used to form sheets varying in thickness according to need. Once cast, the rough edges were ground away and the plates polished before they were transported to the building site where they were hammered to the desired shape to be attached to the iron structure,  The thickest and heaviest plates were those rendered for the feet and ankles, complex in the shape of their curves and needing more mass to afford greater stability.  Thus for a dozen years, the thin bronze skin was added to the growing body of stone, each plate fixed to the iron frame and then to the neighboring plate.  Once finished, it was polished to reflect the rays of the Sun so it would shine as intensely as possible, better to honor Helios. 

How engineers would today build a 122 m (400 feet) high Colossus using modern techniques of structural engineering.  An interesting exercise although the Greek exchequer may have other fiscal priorities.

From the laying of the first stone to its toppling, building its destruction lies a time span of but sixty-seven years but the Colossus ranks as one of the seven wonders of the ancient world with Great Pyramid of Giza which still stands after almost five-thousand.  Such was the scale of the Colossus that the ruins still impressed, “…even lying on the ground, it is a marvel" wrote Pliny the Elder (24-79) who noted few men could wrap their arms around the fallen thumb and each finger alone would have stood taller than most other statues.  The earthquake which so damaged the city 226 BC broke the Colossus at its narrowest and thus weakest points, the knees, and given the mass which existed above, there was no chance it could survive.  Although it would be centuries before the list of the seven wonders would exist as the codified canon now familiar, the stature was already famous and the an offer to the pay the cost of restoration was extended by Ptolemy III Euergetes (Πτολεμαῖος Εὐεργέτης, Ptolemy the Benefactor; circa 280–222 BC) of Egypt.  However, an oracle was consulted and their judgement forbade any re-construction so the offer was declined.  Details of the oracle’s pronouncement are lost but it’s speculated the conclusion may have been the earthquake was the act of a wrathful Helios and the ruins should be left where they fell, lest anger again be aroused.  There is no otherwise compelling explanation to account for why so much valuable bronze wouldn’t for centuries be recycled.

A (fanciful) engraving of the Colossus of Rhodes (circa 1540) by Martin Heemskerck (1498-1574).

The exact location remains uncertain but the notion the Colossus straddled the entrance to Rhodes harbor with ships passing between its legs was a figment of medieval imagination, a thing famously vivid.  Given its method of construction, such a thing would have collapsed under its own weight even before it was complete and, had it stood over the water, not only would construction have been challenging but when it fell, it would have blocked the entrance to the Mandraki harbor.  Despite that, in the early 1980s when a large piece of rubble was discovered in the water, there were still romantics who hoped this might vindicate the medieval theory.  There’s little doubt the story of a 60m (200 feet) tall Colossus straddling the entrance to the harbor was the work of opportunist poets and artists, the engineers and architects of the time sufficiently acquainted with physics and metallurgy to have assured all of the impossibility of their vision yet it seems long to have captured the medieval imagination.  Despite all that, it still influenced many even at the dawn of modernity, being one of the inspirations for the Statue of Liberty but that was designed in a way to ensure greater strength and stability, the weight distribution and the dimensions of the base entirely different.  There’s no doubt the statue stood somewhere in the proximity of Rhodes harbor but archaeological excavations have thus far revealed nothing, not unsurprising given the footprint of a vertical structure is much less than a temple or other building, and the urbanization of Rhodes over two millennia mean the site may long ago have been built-over.  The Colossus though would have shared one noted characteristic with the Statue of Liberty: When copper rubs on iron, it creates electricity, especially in a costal environment with salty air.  Like Liberty, the Colossus of Rhodes made its own electricity.

Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen (1911–2005; Premier of Queensland 1968-1987) (left), Russ Hinze (1919–1991; Minister for this and that in Queensland state government, 1974-1988) (centre) & Bob Hawke (1929–2019; Prime Minister of Australia 1983-1991) (right).  Russ Hinze was a politician who served in the state parliament of Queensland, Australia between 1966-1988.  He held many portfolios, often simultaneously, one of which was minister for roads.  In honor of his impressive girth, he was dubbed The Colossus of Roads.

Wartime photograph of Colossus.

Colossus was the name of the world’s first electronic device which truly could be described a computer (being programmable, electronic and digital although the instructions were effected by switches, not stored programs).  It was built by the British in 1943 to break German military codes and was one of the mechanisms which provided the allies with the ultra decrypts, the importance of which to the war effort was of critical significance or merely helpful depending on the historian consulted.  During the war, twelve of the machines were assembled (which functioned independently; clusters and farms then an engineer's dream) but two didn't become functional until after the end of hostilities.  Colossus and the whole code-breaking operation remained a well-kept secret until the mid-1970s and the revelation induced some re-assessment of the strategic and tactical acuity of a number of political and military leaders, many of their decisions once through based on intuition or brilliance now understood as merely the use of good intelligence (ie "reading the enemy's mail").

Route

Route (pronounce rout or root)

(1) A course, way, or road for passage or travel; the choice of roads or a path taken to reach a destination,

(2) A customary or regular line of passage or travel, sometimes formally so-named.

(3) A specific itinerary, round, or number of stops regularly visited by a person in the performance of their work or duty (bus route, paper route, mountaineering route etc).

(4) To set the path of something or someone.

(5) To send or forward by a particular course or road.

(6) In clinical medicine, the means by which a drug or agent is administered or enters the body (the oral, surface or injectionoral route).

(7) Figuratively, one of multiple methods or approaches to doing something.

(8) In Sino-historiography, one of the major provinces of imperial China from the Later Jin to the Song, corresponding to the Tang and early Yuan circuits.

(9) In computing (networking), an entry in a router table instructing a router how to relay the data packets received (and as a transitive verb, to send information through a router).

(10) In computing, to connect two local area networks, thereby forming an internet (now a rare expression though the practice remains common).

(11) In horse racing, a race longer than one mile (1600m) (now rare).

1175–1225: From the Middle English route (a way, a road, space for passage), from the Middle French route, from the Anglo-Norman rute (troop, band) from the Old French rute (road, way, path), from the Vulgar Latin rupta (literally “via a broken established way” (a road opened by force or cut through a forest etc)), the feminine past participle of rumpere (to break; to burst).  Route is a noun, router is a noun & verb and routed & routing are verbs; the noun plural is routes.

The famous US Route 66.

The verb dates from the 1880s and the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) lists the first citation as an 1881 guide for stationmasters on the London & North Western Railway which included the phrase “mark for use on a certain route”.  In the development of the noun, the sense of a “regular course for carrying passengers or freight (first used in the postal system) emerged in the late eighteenth century, and was an extension of the fifteenth century "customary path for the driving of animal stock and herds; something later applied to sales, collections, delivery of newspapers, bread etc and the pronunciation rout was apparently universal since the early nineteenth century.  The meaning “direct an electrical signal, phone call etc over a particular defined circuit or to a particular location" has existed since 1948 and is now most familiar in computer networking.  Computer networking engineers also picked-up “re-route” (direct packets of data to another route), a direct borrowing from the postal system where a “re-route” was an instruction physically to re-direct mail from one address to another.  The word “routine” was related to route (presumably from the notion of something like a postman’s route which was unchanged from year to year) as was “rut” which originally described the track in (an unpaved) road left by a wheel and etymologists speculate this may have begun as a variant of route.  The figurative sense of rut (a dull, unchanging and habitual course or life) emerged in the mid nineteenth century based on the idea that once the wheel of a cart become “stuck in a rut”, it’s difficult (and demands much energy) to change direction (ie to “get out of the rut”).

An unfortunate choice of route: In 2012, Lindsay Lohan, travelling on the Pacific Coast Highway in Santa Monica, California, was involved in a crash between her (rented) Porsche 911 (997) Carrera S and an eighteen wheeler truck.  As one would suspect in such an unequal contest, the Porsche was badly damaged.

In postal systems, railways, computing and other fields in which objects (real or weightless) must be moved, specialized forms have been created as needed including misroute, misrouting, misrouted, preroute, prerouted, prerouting, reroute, rerouted & rerouting (hyphenated forms also used) although deroute seems never to have been needed.  The alternative spellings misrouteing, rerooted etc also existed.  Route was one of many words used to describe some sort or road including avenue, course, direction, itinerary, journey, line, passage, road, track, trail, way, transmit, beat, beeline, byway, circuit, detour, digression, divergence & meandering although routes tend to be longer and made of many roads joined together.  In idiomatic use, “to go the route” is to see something difficult or challenging through to completion.

Funded by the Lockwood Charitable Foundation, London's Red Route Café (24 Lower Clapton Road E5) is located at the Community Service Volunteers (CSV) Springboard Hackney learning centre.  In 2012, while in London for a theatrical engagement, Lindsay Lohan added her support, tweeting "Volunteer and be of service.  Come help us at #RedRouteCafé".  Apparently, while in the city, Ms Lohan helped in promotional activities for the Red Route Café, contributing to a community radio show and planning events.

It’s a simple, five letter, one syllable word but around the world it supports two distinct pronunciations (rout & rout), both of which for centuries co-existed in British English but during the 1800s, rout faded and then vanished (Scotland the last hold-out and interestingly in the cities rather than the highlands) from the British Isles.  In North American it persisted and to this day, as both noun and verb, both can be heard.  One definite exception to the general pattern of use is the pronunciation of the noun router ((1) one who arranges or schedules routes or (2) in computer networking, a device (hardware or software) that forwards data packets between computer networks).  Many languages simply adopted the name and usual pronunciation from US use and in most of the world it’s thus root-ha or rou-ter.  However, in Australia & New Zealand, the word “root” evolved also a slang term for sexual intercourse which of course begat rooter in that sense so the pronunciations root-ha or rou-ter became exclusive to that use (and there’s some evidence the slang has somewhat spread in the south Pacific islands).  In those markets, the computer routers are pronounced rout-ah, something which sometimes initially baffles visiting engineers.

Rooted: The Evil Dead (1981).

The most illustrative example of the slang term root (Australia & New Zealand) in action is the famous tree root scene from the horror movie The Evil Dead (1981).  After that, the producers had nowhere to go and the sequels were increasingly comedic and such is the cult following of the original that interest remains and Evil Dead Rise is scheduled for release in April 2023.

Huawei AR3260-100E-AC Series Enterprise Router.

Said to have been prompted by fears the equipment might be configured in such a way that it enabled spying by the Chinese government (ie the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)), a number of nations have either banned or restricted use of Chinese-made Huawei routers and other telecommunications equipment.  The countries imposing a complete or partial ban of the Huawei equipment in big-machine infrastructure included the "five eyes" countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia & New Zealand) and Japan.  Thus far, a number of EU nations (including Spain, France & Germany) have not issued an outright ban but have imposed restrictions and tightened security measures in networks in which they're installed.  This is either because they believe still that a robust security model can be mapped onto the concept of a "core & edges" model of network infrastructure or they've accepted Huawei's (TikTok-like) assurance they would decline any request from the CCP to provide information.  In Beijing, the Spanish, French and German files may already have been moved to the "Useful Idiots" filing cabinet.

Pugilist

Pugilist (pronounced pyoo-juh-list)

A person who fights with their fists; a boxer, amateur or professional.

1789: From the Latin pugil (boxer, fist-fighter) related to pugnus (a fist), from a suffixed form of the primitive Indo-European roots peuk- (to prick) & pewǵ- (to prick, to punch) and from the Latin root, English picked up the slang term for the journeyman boxer (pug).  Pugil as a descriptor for a boxer was first noted in English in the 1640s but faded from use although in 1962 the pugil stick was introduced by US military as a substitute for rifles in bayonet drills.  Related forms include the noun pugnacity (the act or characteristic of being aggressive or combative), from the Latin pugnacitas, from pugnāx (combative, fond of fighting) and the adjective pugnacious (naturally aggressive or hostile; combative; belligerent; bellicose), from the Latin, a derivative of pugnāx, from pugnō (I fight), from pugnus (a fist).  Pugilist & pugilism are nouns, pugilistic is an adjective and pugilistically and adverb; the noun plural is pugilists.

The heavyweights

Three heavyweights dominated the perception of the sport in the second-half of the twentieth century, Sonny Liston, Muhammad Ali & Mike Tyson.

Sonny Liston (circa 1932-1970).

Sonny Liston was a thug, something no disqualification for success in the  heavyweight ranks and he’d been undisputed world champion for half a decade when first he fought Muhammad Ali.  Ali was a rank outsider rated by the bookies between 7-8:1 yet beat Liston.  To this day it’s not known if there's any truth in the rumors of Liston’s heavy drinking the night before the bout or throwing the fight for money.  Some find the first-round knock-out of Liston in the return match proof of a conspiracy while claim it suggests Ali was the better fighter and Liston’s best years were over although when he died in 1970, even if no longer quite the formidable fighter of his younger years, he was still a world-rated boxer.

Muhammad Ali (1942-2016).

While understandable, it's unfortunate the popular focus on Muhammad Ali’s flair for publicity, prose and politics has drawn attention from just how good a boxer he was.  Ali was fast, technically almost perfect and possessed a physique close to at least equal in height and reach of most of his opponents although his most under-rated trait was the ability to absorb blows yet remain an attacking force late in matches.  In a career interrupted by bans and suspension, Ali fought in the heavyweight division’s golden age, the finest group of the mid-late century, of whom Ali was "the greatest", not because he was indisputably the best ever heavyweight (among the experts there are various top-ten list though he's in them all) but because he influenced his sport and wider culture like no other.

Mike Tyson (b 1966).

The younger Mike Tyson was ferocious and intimidating and he scared men.  Although not tall by the standards of his profession, he was famous for the power and speed of his punch and it’s really easy to believe there’s no one who could have beaten Tyson the younger.  Boxing analysts tend to disagree, being split on the likely result of Liston v Tyson, largely because of Tyson’s technical flaws but almost as one in finding Ali would have beaten Tyson.  Tyson had a difficult, troubled youth and has admitted that had it not been for boxing, things would likely have worked out worse but had his career been better managed, such was his potential, much more could have been achieved.

Amateur pugilist Lindsay Lohan in pugnacious mode.

Alienist

Alienist (pronounced eyl-yuh-nist or ey-lee-uh-nist)

(1) A medical practitioner specializing in the treatment of mental illness (archaic).

(2) In law, an expert witness who specializes in the legal aspects of mental illness and mental competence (now less common).

1864: From the French aliéniste, from aliéné (insane), the construct being alien(ation) + -ist.  Alien was from the Middle English alien, from the Old French alien & aliene, from the Latin aliēnus (belonging to someone else (the sense of that which was “exotic; foreign” came later), from alienare (deprive of reason, drive mad (literally “to make another's, estrange”)) from alius (other), from the primitive Indo-European hélyos (from which English ultimately gained “else”).  The -ist suffix was from the Middle English -ist & -iste, from the Old French -iste and the Latin -ista, from the Ancient Greek -ιστής (-istḗs), from -ίζω (-ízō) (the -ize & -ise verbal suffix) and -τής (-tḗs) (the agent-noun suffix).  It was added to nouns to denote various senses of association such as (1) a person who studies or practices a particular discipline, (2), one who uses a device of some kind, (3) one who engages in a particular type of activity, (4) one who suffers from a specific condition or syndrome, (5) one who subscribes to a particular theological doctrine or religious denomination, (6) one who has a certain ideology or set of beliefs, (7) one who owns or manages something and (8), a person who holds very particular views (often applied to those thought most offensive).  Alienist is a noun; the noun plural is alienists.

In English, the noun alienist was in 1864 adopted from the French to describe “one who scientifically treats or studies mental illness”.  The French aliéniste was a use of “alienation” in the sense of “insanity, loss of mental faculty”, a development in the use which from the fifteenth century had been used to mean “loss or derangement of mental faculties, insanity”, the notion drawn from the Latin alienare (deprive of reason, drive mad).  The use in English sounds strange to modern ears but was probably an improvement on the earlier “mad doctor” (ie a physician dealing with the mad although doubtless there were a few doctors who were madmen), noted since the early eighteenth century.  Although psychiatry really didn’t come to be accepted as part of mainstream medicine until the late nineteenth century, there had since antiquity been those (not always physicians) in many cultures who specialized in the care of those thought mad although institutionalized professionalism (as opposed to their employment in institutions known often as “lunatic asylums”) waited centuries to be formalized.

The word psychiatry dates from 1808 and was coined by Prussian physician Johann Christian Reil (1759–1813) as the German Psychiatrie (literally “medical treatment of the soul”, the construct being the Ancient Greek psykhē (soul) + -iatry (medical treatment) from the Greek iātrikos (medical) from iāsthai (to heal).  From this evolved the idea of physician specializing in psychiatry being a psychiatrist.  Dr Reil’s word caught on but wasn’t wholly without linguistic competition, psychiater (expert in mental diseases) in the literature since at least 1852.  Although Austrian neurologist Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) seems assumed by some almost to have “invented” psychiatry, his work in the late nineteen century was but one thread in a discipline both well established (if not wholly accepted by the medical establishment) and becoming increasingly used as the first generation of drug treatments became available.  What Freud did however in his systemised method of treatment (psychoanalysis) was define in the popular imagination just what a psychiatrist was.  The profession however had been around for a while and it was in 1841 the Association of Medical Officers of Asylums and Hospitals for the Insane was founded; receiving a royal charter in 1926, it became the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

Patient and alienist: Lindsay Lohan on Sigmund Freud’s couch.

In English, the word alienation had a varied history.  It began in the late fourteenth century in the law of real property (ie real estate) with the sense of “transfer of ownership, action of estranging”, from the Old French alienacion and directly from the Latin alienationem (nominative alienatio) (a transfer, surrender, separation), the noun of action from the past-participle stem of alienare (to make another's, part with; estrange, set at variance), from alienus (of or belonging to another person or place), from alius (another, other, different), from the primitive Indo-European root al- (beyond).  Early in the fifteenth century, the word was borrowed from the notaries and land conveyancers to mean “deprivation of mental faculties, insanity”, this time from a secondary sense of the Latin alienare (deprive of reason, drive mad) and for decades the word seems to appear as frequently in court records as medical journals, decisions on matters of madness very often the province of the magistracy.  A nice blending of the original idea in land ownership with the divorce courts saw “alienation of affection” (falling in love with another) adopted in the US as legal jargon in 1861.  In politics, the theorist most famously associated with alienation was Karl Marx (1818-1883) who in Das Kapital’s (Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (1867-1894) three (very long) volumes explored, inter alia, the idea of the worker being alienated from the fruits of his labor by the employer extracting from the process the surplus value.  That has turned out to be an ongoing process.

In law, although terms like forensic psychiatrist are now preferred, an Alienist was a mental health professional who evaluated individuals in some way involved with a case before a court.  The most publicized of the alienists were those who appeared in notorious criminal trials where typically they were called upon to determine a defendant’s (and less commonly a victim’s or witness’s) state of mind at time of the alleged offense or since and thus their competency to stand trial, be cross-examined or give evidence.  Alienists almost always had a background in psychiatry or psychology and, in recent decades, also specialised training in the techniques of forensic evaluation.  Depending on the jurisdiction, alienists were sometimes asked to comment on recommendations for treatment and offer opinions on issues such as the potential for reform or likelihood of recidivism.

The idea of medical experts offering opinions on mental health matters is now so unexceptional as not usually to attract comment but in the nineteenth century when the first alienists began to be called as expert witnesses, it was novel.  Then, psychology (the clinical study of mental pathologies) was not only embryonic but subject to much criticism by doctors who insisted that diagnosis without empirical evidence was an absurdity and echos of the attitude persist in the views some have of the very existence of conditions such as chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)).  Then, the mentally ill tended to be confined rather than treated and the psychology of the nineteenth century alienists was very much a laboratory discipline, the clinical or behavioral work today familiar as an orthodoxy mostly still decades away.  Instead, alienists analysed aspects of learning, perception and memory and their craft would now be understood as a kind of study of cognition.  As a profession, the alienists really advanced their discipline in the first three quarters of the twentieth century as understanding improved of the influence of the unconscious mind on individual actions.  Additionally, the consequences of the two world wars provided vast numbers of the mentally damaged to study and in the 1950s and 1960s, it came to be appreciated just how significant could be contextually such as poverty and racism.  All this happened while there were enormous advances in neurology and the physical brain itself came better to be understood, the idea of neuropsychological research coming to be accepted as a valid scientific method to explain the behaviour of individuals.  So much has changed including the nomenclature, the term alienist now rarely used in courts and if asked, most folk would likely assume an alienist is "one who studies aliens".

Erase

Erase (pronounced ih-reys)

(1) To rub or scrape out, as letters or characters written, engraved etc; efface.

(2) Completely to eliminate.

(3) To remove material recorded on magnetic tape or magnetic disk; synonymous for most purposes in this context with delete although technically, in computing, an erasure is the substitution of data with characters representing a null value whereas a deletion is the removal of an pointer entry in an index.

1595–1605: From the Middle English arasen & aracen (to eradicate, remove), from the Latin ērāsus, past participle of ērādere (scrape out, scrape off, shave, abolish, remove, to abrade), the construct being ex (out of) + radere (to scratch, scrape).  The use in the context of data on magnetic storage media (tapes, disks) dates from 1945, the technical distinction between erase and delete defined in computer science theory as early as 1947 though, to this day, the distinction escapes most users.  The adjective erasable dates from 1829.  Eraser (thing that erases writing) is attested from 1790, an invention of American English, agent noun from erase.  Originally, the product was a knife with which to scraping off ink, the first rubber devices for removing pencil marks not available until from 1858.

Erasure, Comrade Stalin and Lindsay Lohan

Evil dictators (like those running beach clubs or Greek islands) have their problems too and they like them to go away.  Where problems exist, they like them to be erased or is some other way to disappear.  Sometimes, the technical term is “unpersoned”.

The Erased

Not best pleased at images of the pleasingly pneumatic Karolina Palazi appearing on the official Lohan Beach Club Mykonos Beach Club Instagram account, Lindsay Lohan quickly responded with a post demanding her staff “Erase this random person at my beach”.  In the digital age, it can be difficult entirely to erase anything which appears on the internet and probably impossible for anything distributed on the big-data social media platforms.  That said, there is unpredictability to the fate of anything ever on-line.  There is (1) material which genuinely vanishes forever, (2) stuff which proves impossible to eradicate despite best efforts, and (3) things which were thought lost, only to re-appear.  Noted for some time, the issue will be of increasing interest in the future, the internet being a distributed system with no centralised repository indicating what is held where, by whom and whether it is accessible (by someone) on or off-line or in storage.

The Disappeared

General Augusto Pinochet (1915–2006; military dictator of Chile 1973-1990).

This is the relatively new name for the centuries-old practice of secretly kidnapping or arresting people, then imprisoning or killing them, all without due process of law.  It’s most associated with the late twentieth-century military dictatorships in Chile, Argentina and Brazil but is used to describe the practice in many South and Central American republics and of late, others, sometimes at scale.  Although the practice probably pre-dates even modern humans, the word, in this context appears first to have been used by Joseph Heller (1923–1999) in the satirical Catch-22 (1961) when describing how the US military dealt with malcontents.  However it’s done, the person disappears without trace.

The Unpersoned

Unpersoning wasn’t invented in the Soviet Union but it was under comrade Stalin (1878-1953; Soviet leader 1924-1953) it was undertaken at scale, although, like later attempts on the internet, the process wasn’t always perfect because it was performed on extant physical material, some of which inevitably escaped attention.  The process interested critics in the West; in George Orwell's (1903–1950), dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), protagonist Winston Smith works at the Ministry of Truth where his job is to alter historical records to conform to the state's ever-changing version of history.  Done in the USSR mostly between 1928-1953, unpersoning was the physical modification of existing text and imagery, modified to erase from history those who had fallen from favor and it’s thought the most extensively unpersoned figure in the USSR was comrade Leon Trotsky (1879-1940).  Comrade Stalin had him murdered in Mexico, the assassin's choice of weapon an ice axe.

Erased from history: Before & after being unpersoned, Comrades Molotov (1890-1986) & Stalin with Comrade Nikolai Yezhov (1895-1940), head of the NKVD (one of the predecessors of the KGB); Comrade Stalin had him shot.

In the Soviet Union, the process was essentially as Orwell described and even in the age of digital editing it's probably often still done in a similar manner.  A photograph would be passed to the party's technicians with the comrade(s) to be unpersoned marked in some obvious way, the preferred technique apparently a black crayon.

Succeeding where others failed: Erasing crooked Hillary Clinton

The White House situation room, 2 May 2011 (official WH photo; left) and as depicted in Di Tzeitung (right).

Unpersoning can also be sex-specific (gender-based the currently preferred term).  In May 2011, the Orthodox Jewish news paper Di Tzeitung (a Brooklyn-based weekly) was forced to apologize after unpersoning the women in the photograph released by the White House showing President Barack Obama (b 1961; US president 2009-2017) and his staff monitoring the raid by US Navy Seals in which Osama bin Laden (1957-2011) was killed while in his Pakistani compound.  Unpersoned were then counterterrorism director, Audrey Tomason (b circa 1977) and then secretary of state, crooked Hillary Clinton (b 1947; US secretary of state 2009-2013).  Di Tzeitung's subsequent apologia was somewhat nuanced.  The publication reiterated it did not publish images of women and thus sent its “regrets and apologies” to the White House and the State Department, not because it had unpersoned women but because their photo editor had not read the “fine print” in the text issued by the White House (which accompanied the photograph) which forbid any changes.  Di Tzeitung further explained it has a “long standing editorial policy” of not publishing images of women because its readers “believe that women should be appreciated for who they are and what they do, not for what they look like and the Jewish laws of modesty are an expression of respect for women, not the opposite”.  They added that Di Tzeitung regarded crooked Hillary Clinton (a former US senator (Democrat) for New York who secured overwhelming majorities in the Orthodox Jewish communities) highly and “appreciated her unique capabilities, talents and compassion for all”.  It concluded by acknowledging it “should not have published the altered picture”.  Commentators noted the practice is not unusual in some ultra-Orthodox Jewish publications which regard depictions of the female form as “immodest”.  Neither the White House nor the State Department responded to the apology although there were cynics who wondered if the president wished it were that easy to get rid of crooked Hillary.

The Watergate tapes and the erased 18½ minutes

Looking over his shoulder: Richard Nixon and HR Halderman in the White House.

Tapes, audio and video, have played a part in many political downfalls but none is more famous than the “smoking gun” tape which compelled the resignation of Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974) after it revealed he was involved in the attempt to cover-up the involvement in the Watergate break-in of some connected to his administration.  Recording conversations in the White House had been going on for years and Nixon initially had the equipment removed, the apparatus re-installed two years later after it was found there was no other way to ensure an accurate record of discussions was maintained.  Few outside a handful of the president’s inner circle knew of the tapes and they became public knowledge only in mid-1973 when, under oath before a congressional hearing, a White House official confirmed their existence.  That was the point at which Nixon should have destroyed the tapes and for the rest of his life he must sometimes have reflected that but for that mistake, his presidency might have survived because, although by then the Watergate scandal had been a destabilizing distraction, there was at that point no “smoking gun”, nothing which linked Nixon himself to any wrongdoing.  As it was, he didn’t and within days subpoenas were served on the White House demanding the tapes and that made them evidence; the moment for destruction had passed.  Nixon resisted the subpoenas, claiming executive privilege and thus ensued the tussle between the White House and Watergate affair prosecutors which would see the “Saturday Night Massacre” during which two attorneys-general were fired, the matter ultimately brought before the US Supreme Court which ruled against the president.  Finally, the subpoenaed tapes were surrendered on 5 August 1973, the “smoking gun” tape revealing Nixon and his chief of staff (HR Haldeman, 1926–1993; White House chief of staff 1969-1973) discussing a cover-up plan and at that point, political support in the congress began to evaporate and the president was advised that impeachment was certain and even Republican senators would vote to convict.  On 8 August, Nixon announced his resignation, leaving office the next day.

Uher 5000 reel-to-reel tape recorder used by a White House secretary to create the tape (20 June 1972) with the 18½ minute gap.  (Government Exhibit #60: Records of District Courts of the United States, Record Group 21. National Archives Identifier: 595593).

To this day, mystery surrounds one tape in particular, a recording of a discussion between Nixon and Halderman on 20 June 1972, three days after the Watergate break-in.  Of obviously great interest, when reviewed, there was found to be a gap of 18½ minutes, the explanations offered of how, why or by whom the erasure was effected ranging from the humorously accidental to the darkly conspiratorial but half a century on, it remains a mystery.  Taking advantage of new data-recovery technology, the US government did in subsequent decades make several attempts to “un-delete” the gap but without success and it may be, given the nature of magnetic tape, that there is literally nothing left to find.  However, the tape is stored in a secure, climate-controlled facility in case technical means emerge and while it’s unlikely the contents would reveal anything not already known or assumed, it would be of great interest to historians.  What would be even more interesting is the identity of who it was that erased the famous 18½ minutes but that will likely never be known; after fifty years, it’s thought that were there to be any death-bed confessions, they should by now have been heard.  Some have their lists of names of those who might have "pressed the erase button" and while mostly sub-sets of Watergate's "usual suspects", one who tends not to appear is Nixon himself, the usual consensus being he was technically too inept to operate a tape machine though it's not impossible he ordered someone to do the deed.  However it happened, the suspects most often mentioned as having had their "finger on the button" (which may have been a foot-pedal) are Nixon's secretary and his chief of staff.

Rorschach

Rorschach (pronounced raw-shack)

(1) A canton and town in Switzerland.

(2) A personality test using ink-blots

1927: The ink-blot based personality analysis was first published in codified form in 1927, the genesis of which was a 1921 paper by Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach (1885-1922).  Rorschach (Wahlkreis) is a constituency of the canton of Saint Gallen, Switzerland and Rorschach is its largest town.  The town lies on the Swiss side of Lake Constance, the construct of the name an early form of the German Röhr (reeds) + Schachen (lakeside).

The Rorschach test was for some time a standard clinical diagnostic tool in psychology & psychiatry.  It was a collection of ten “ink blots”, five rendered in grey scale, two in grey & red and three in color, all printed on separate cards and presented to the subjects who were asked (1) What might this mean? & (2) What parts of the card made you say that?  The usual protocol was to provide a pencil and have the subject write their responses in the space underneath the image although, depending on the circumstances, a clinician might engage with the subject and obtain more of their thoughts or the tests could immediately be taken for analysis.  Fond of jargon, the profession even took the opportunity to coin a word to describe specific responses, a subject thought to be especially demonstrative in their response to a Rorschach ink blot said to be exhibiting "extratensive" tendencies.  As an adjective it was thus a synonym of "extroverted" and is occasionally seen outside of psychology where it probably adds little but confusion.  It served also as a noun, the relevant subjects being labelled "extratensives".

Lindsay Lohan in Rorschach Ink-Blot Test inspired gold beaded cocktail dress at the Source Code premiere, Crosby Street Hotel, New York City, March 2011.  The dress was paired with black patent ankle strap platform pumps shoes and matching opaque tights.

The idea of using indeterminate and ambiguous shapes as a way of assessing an individual's personality had been around for centuries before Dr Rorschach began his research and in the nineteenth century there were even popular parlor games which used the idea although they were designed to amuse rather than analyze.  What made Dr Rorschach’s work different was the sheer quantity of the data with with he worked, his research encompassing some 300 patients in mental institutions (with a control group of 100 “normal” subjects) to whom to he exposed over 400 ink-blots before selecting the ten which had proved to be of the greatest diagnostic utility.  Although the method was not greatly different from the games, the Rorschach test was genuinely scientific in its design and the systematic approach linking impressionistic responses to ambiguous shapes, this producing evidence of certain tendencies.  Within the still embryonic psychiatric profession, his approach was thought novel and initially received little support.  His book (a 174-page monograph Psychodiagnostik (Psychodiagnostics)), when eventually published in 1921 contained the structure of the ink-blot tests and the results of the 300 patient survey yet it attracted more interest from intrigued literary reviewers than the medical journals and he died little more than a year after its release.  Even the appearance of reviews in the odd literary magazine however did little to stimulate appeal because the book was very much a work by a scientist for other scientists and Dr Rorschach had made no attempt to make his findings accessible to a general audience.  It wasn’t until the work was republished and others began to refine the methodology that others saw potential, especially after professional mathematicians added rigor to the statistical models used to generate the scores from which conclusions were drawn.

The Rorschach cards.

However, those who inherited the work also shifted the goal posts.  While Dr Rorschach had always intended the ink-blots to be only a helpful tool in the diagnosis of schizophrenia, such was the expansion of the profession in the inter-war years that many became interested and, by 1938, the test had been adapted and was being promoted as a kind of “personality testing kit”.  It was quite a departure from Dr Rorschach’s original vision which had been designed deliberately to maintain some ambiguity in the images, his belief that the diagnosis of schizophrenia lay in the margins between the possible responses whereas when used as a personality testing tool, the answers took on the character of a parameter which, when collectively assessed with the provided statistical tool, placed patients in categories.  The test in that form proved highly successful, its proliferation assisted by the demands of wartime and the military’s need for psychological testing, the Rorschach kit easily produced, more popular with subjects than many other methods and, as a piece of mathematics, able easily to be collated into the big data sets electronic machines were beginning to make possible.  It had that those qualities the military so adore: Speed, standardization and simplicity.  It was therefore by the mid 1940s a standard part of psychological testing, used in everything from job applications to assessing an inmate’s eligibility for parole so it was perhaps inevitable it would be applied to the defendants in the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946).  Even before the International Military Tribunal (IMT; which would conduct the trial) assembled, the authorities in charge of the Nazis in custody insisted on psychiatrists and psychologists being available as soon as the prisoners had been assembled.  There were a number of reasons for this, notably that they wanted to ensure the prisoners had the support necessary to dissuade them from attempting suicide and there was the need also to ensure all were mentally competent to stand trial.  Additionally, there was genuine curiosity about the Nazis because never had there been such an opportunity to subject to tests two-dozen odd who were responsible for what was becoming clear were the greatest crimes in history.  The question then, as now was: Are “normal ordinary people” able to be drawn to commit evil acts or are some people evil.

The famous astrophotograph of The Pillars of Creation in the Eagle Nebula of the Serpens constellation (taken by the Hubble Space Telescope on 1 April 1995) imagined as four Rorschach ink-blot cards.  The original is at the top, below is a rendering in greyscale and the lower two have different filters applied.

In 2022, the JWST (James Webb Space Telescope) was used to obtain a more detailed image of what was happening there some 7000 years ago and while the consensus among cosmologists was comething like “not much has appears to have changed in 27 years”, because the JWST captures in infrared, it was able to penetrate the dense dust, revealing embedded stars and internal structures Hubble (which captured only visible light) couldn’t see.  So much more detailed was the later image that the sharper edges of the clouds could be studied, providing insights into the interplay between the gas and stellar winds.

There is significance in some Rorschach inkblot plates including color while others are black-and-white and the use of color was a deliberate design choice by Hermann Rorschach as part of the “interpretative tool-set” used to assess a subject's responses.  Of the ten plate, cards 1, 4, 5, 6 & 7 are black & white, cards 2 & 3 include red & black while cards 8, 9 & 10 feature multiple colors, including pastels.  The notion was that color introduces emotional and affective complexity and it must be remembered that in this context, “black” & “white” also are “colors”.  According to Dr Rorschach, (1) black & white blots tend to elicit more structured, form-based, and cognitive responses, (2) red is often interpreted as a prompt for more emotional, aggressive, or stimulus-bound reactions and (3) the multi-colored blots test the subject's ability to integrate complex stimuli, including emotional nuance, conflict, or ambiguity.  The theory thus was color could be used to help assess (1) emotional responses, (2) impulsivity, (3) affective regulation and (4) cognitive integration.  What all that of course implied is that were the plates to be rendered in black (and thus rely on shape alone), outcomes and the validity of the test would be affected, most obviously because of the removal of stimuli which would make responses more form-focused, diminishing the utility of the test in differentiating certain traits, notably the interpretation of ambiguous affective signals.  This has been tested and researchers reported results became less rich and less diagnostic when color was removed.

PapaLeoArts take on the Rorschach in water colors.  This array should probably be thought a montage but there might be critics who would find definitional reasons why it's a collage.

In the ink-blots, Dr Rorschach used color selectively with some plates wholly black shapes on a white background, the allocation as critical to the integrity of the process as the shapes but once the test became well known, the ink-blots became pop-culture artefacts, reproduced on posters, T-Shirts, coffee mugs and anything else which might be packaged for sale.  Sometimes the color mix was retained in the original while others applied just about everything from the motifs of psychedelia to polka-dots.     

The Rorschach tests were of course only one of the tools the clinicians assigned to Nuremberg used and the conclusion drawn was that all defendants were sane in the sense they were "legally" sane and thus mentally competent to stand trial even if they were depressed psychopaths (that seemed to be the most common phrase).  Quite what part the tests played in this isn’t clear but the test results themselves assumed a life independent of the trial because of a dispute between the two clinicians most involved in the testing and it wasn’t until the 1990s they were (almost) all published.  This psychological time capsule proved irresistibly tempting for one of the US’s foremost Rorschach experts who over the years had assembled records which could be used as an extraordinarily diverse control group which included (in the hundreds) medical students, Unitarian ministers, psychology students, criminals, business executives and random patients from private practice.  From this were selected the clerics and psychiatric outpatients, the purpose of a comparison with the Nuremberg Nazis being a critique of a recently published analysis of the test results which had concluded the defendants (as individuals and a representatives of the whole Nazi hierarchy) were “cursed beyond redemption” and thus profoundly of “the other”.  Their work was not entirely conventional by accepted scientific standards and they tacitly acknowledged some of the long acknowledged limitations of the test but never wavered from their finding “…the Nazis were not psychologically normal or healthy individuals”.

Defendants in the dock, Palace of Justice, Nuremberg, 1945-1946.  The defendant in the front row at the far right of the photograph was Horace Greeley Hjalmar Schacht (1877–1970; president of the Reichsbank 1923-1930 & 1933-1939, general plenipotentiary for war economy 1935–1937 and Reichsminister without portfolio 1937-1943) and he secured an acquittal, which might seem surprising given the extent of his complicity in the Nazi re-armament programme but it did reflect the historic difficulties in securing the convictions of enablers of crime (accountants, lawyers, financiers etc) who are a step or more removed from the act(s) being prosecuted, a phenomenon which manifests still in many jurisdictions.  Of the accused, Dr Schacht was the only confessed Freemason but there's never been anything to suggest any of the IMT's eight judges had any connection with the cult.

The notion  “…the Nazis were not psychologically normal or healthy individuals” was as controversial a view in the 1990s as it had been fifty years earlier and if a blind test could not distinguish of the Nazi’s data from the two control groups, at least some doubt would be cast.  Accordingly, ten Rorschach experts were assembled and asked to assemble them into three groups.  All that did was identify the high, medium and low-functioning of each group but there was nothing in them which separated the Nazis.  That was interesting but what was probably definitive was that even when told the nature of the data, the experts were unable to discern any difference between the responses which would enable the Nazis to be identified.  Perhaps sadly, the Nazis may have been as ordinary as they appeared in the dock, the implication being we're all capable of evil, given the right temptation, a nod to an earlier memorable phrase spoken of them: "The banality of evil".  

As that might indicate, like many tests in psychology, the Rorschach is probably useful if its limitations are recognized and the interpretations thought valid decades ago are no longer treated as proven science.  For example there may be something which can be deduced from a subject assessing the whole image in their response which is different for one who picks just a section or who finds something different in different parts but whether there’s anything substantive in the difference between seeing moth and a butterfly may be dubious.  The test is still widely used although many have abandoned it though it’s famously a cult in Japan where it’s one of the profession’s standard tools.  Elsewhere use is mixed.  Interestingly, while the fourth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV (1994) did not endorse or recommend the use of any particular projective test, it did note many were used in clinical practice but cautioned that the validity and reliability of these tests had not been firmly established, urging caution.  Neither the DSM-5 (2013) nor DSM-5-TR (2022) make any reference to the Rorschach test.