Schizophrenia (pronounced skit-suh-free-nee-uh or skit-suh-freen-yuh)
(1) In psychiatry (also called dementia praecox), a severe mental disorder characterized by some, but not necessarily all, of the following features: withdrawal from reality, illogical patterns of thinking, delusions, and hallucinations, and varying degrees of other emotional, behavioral, or in emotional blunting, intellectual deterioration, social isolation, disorganized speech and behavior, delusions, and hallucinations.
(2) A state characterized by the coexistence of contradictory or incompatible elements; informal behavior that appears to be motivated by contradictory or conflicting principles.
(3) In informal use, used to suggest a split personality, identity or other specific forms of dualism.In popular usage, the term is often confused with dissociative identity disorder (also known as multiple personality disorder).
1908: From German Schizophrenie, from the New Latin schizophrenia and Coined by Swiss psychiatrist Eugen Eugen Bleuler (1857-1939) as an umbrella term covering a range of more or less severe mental disorders involving a breakdown of the relation between thought, emotion, and action and literally "a splitting of the mind", the construct being the Ancient Greek σχίζω (skhizein or skhízō) (to split), from the primitive Indo-European root skei (to cut, split apart), + φρήν (phrḗn) (genitive phrenos) (mind, heart, diaphragm) + -ia (the suffix from the Latin -ia and Ancient Greek -ία (-ía) & -εια (-eia), which forms abstract nouns of feminine gender). It's from phrḗn that English gained phrenes (wits, sanity) and hence phreno-.
The adjective schizophrenic (characteristic of or suffering from schizophrenia) dates in the medical literature from 1912 (in English translations of Bleuler's publications) and was immediately adopted also as a noun (schizophrenic patient). That survived but another noun formation in English was schizophrene which emerged in 1925, the construct presumably a tribute to Dr Bleuler's original work having been written in German. As such things became more publicized during the post-war years (and picked up in popular culture including film and novels), the transferred adjectival sense of "contradictory, inconsistent" emerged in the mid 1950s, applied to anything from the behavior of race horses and motor-cycles to the nature of musical composition. The jargon of psychology also produced schizophrenogenic (tending to spark or inspire schizophrenia). The adjective schizoid (resembling schizophrenia; tending sometimes to less severe forms of schizophrenia) dates from 1925, from the 1921 German coining schizoid (1921), the construct being schiz(ophrenia) + -oid. The suffix -oid was from a Latinized form of the the Ancient Greek
-ειδής (-eidḗs) & -οειδής (-oeidḗs) (the “ο” being the last vowel of the stem
to which the suffix is attached); from εἶδος (eîdos)
(form, shape, likeness). It was used (1) to
demote resembling; having the likeness of (usually including the concept of not
being the same despite the likeness, but counter-examples exist), (2) to mean
of, pertaining to, or related to and (3) when added to nouns to create
derogatory terms, typically referring to a particular ideology or group of
people (by means of analogy to psychological classifications such as schizoid). Schizophrenia is a noun, schizophrenic & schizoids are nouns & adjectives and schizophrenically is an adverb; the noun plural is schizophrenics.
Madness
Within
the profession of psychiatry, schizophrenia has a long (and technical)
definitional history although, in essence, it’s always been thought a severe
and chronic mental disorder characterized by disturbances in thought, perception
and behavior.Lacking any physical or
laboratory test, it can be difficult to diagnose as schizophrenia involves a
range of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional symptoms. In the
fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA)Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5 (2013)), the lifetime
prevalence of schizophrenia is noted as 0.3%-0.7%, the psychotic manifestations
typically emerging between the mid-teens and mid-thirties, with the peak age of
onset of the first psychotic episode in the early to mid-twenties for males and
late twenties for females.The DSM-5 editors
also made changes to the criteria to make a diagnosis of schizophrenia, the
most significant amendments since DSM-III (1980).
Madness and Modernism: Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought (1992),
by US clinical psychologist Louis A Sass (b 1949), was an exploration of why mystery
continues to shroud schizophrenia, which, despite advances in biological
psychiatry and neuroscience, appears little changed in the quarter-century
since. Sass quoted approvingly a
description of schizophrenia as "a
condition of obscure origins and no established etiology, pathogenesis and
pathology…" without "…even
any clear disease marker or laboratory test by which it can readily be
identified."
However,
in a departure from most writings on mental illness, Sass explored the "striking similarities" between the
seemingly bizarre universe of schizophrenic experiences and the sensibilities
and structures of consciousness revealed in the works of modernist artists and
writers such as Kafka, Valery, Beckett, Robbe-Grillet, de Chirico and Dali.Applying the techniques of psychology to
modernism, he traced similar cognitive configurations reflected in
schizophrenia and modern art & literature, finding both artist and
schizophrenic characterized by a pronounced thrust to deconstruct the world and
subjectively to reconstruct human experience without reference to objective
reality.Layers of reality, real and
constructed, co-exist and interact, frequently fusing into each-other, producing
an acute self-awareness Sass called "hyperreflexivity",
as well as a profound sense of alienation from the empirical world. Sass allowed
his analysis to reach its logical conclusion, that there is a tenuous, though
clearly discernible, connection between modern culture and madness, speculating
that insanity might be “…a disease of
certain highly advanced forms of cultural organization, perhaps a part of the
price we pay for civilization?"His thesis wasn’t without critics although most acknowledged Madness and Modernism was at least a minor literary
classic.
As the DSM makes clear, not all schizophrenics are the same. In 2011, Lindsay Lohan was granted a two-year
restraining order against alleged stalker David Cocordan. The order was issued some days after she
filed complaint with police who, after investigation by their Threat Management
Department, advised the court Mr Cocordan (who at the time had been using at
least five aliases) “suffered from schizophrenia”, was “off his medication” and
had a "significant psychiatric history of acting on his delusional beliefs.”That was worrying enough but Ms Lohan may
have revealed her real concerns in an earlier tweet on X (then known as Twitter) in which she
included a picture of David Cocordan, claiming he was "the freemason
stalker that has been threatening to kill me- while he is TRESPASSING!", adding "im actually scared now- the blood in the 'cults' book was too much. All my fans, my supporters, please stand by me. (sic)". Being stalked by a schizophrenic
is bad enough but the thought of being hunted by a schizophrenic Freemason truly is frightening. Apparently an unexplored matter in the annals of psychiatry, it seems the question of just how schizophrenia might particularly manifest in Freemasons awaits research so there may be a PhD there for someone, the obvious question to explore being (1) does Freemasonry tend to attract schizophrenics or (2) does Freemasonry tend to induce schizophrenia? As far as is known, there have been no further reports of Ms Lohan being a victim of Masonic stalking but few doubt the Freemason will have kept open their "Lindsay Lohan file".
(1) Any of numerous insects of the order Coleoptera, having
biting mouthparts and characterized by hard, horny forewings modified to form
shell-like protective elytra forewings that cover and protect the membranous
flight wings.
(2) Used loosely, any of various insects resembling true beetles.
(3) A game of chance in which players attempt to complete
a drawing of a beetle, different dice rolls allowing them to add the various
body parts.
(4) A heavy hammering or ramming instrument, usually of
wood, used to drive wedges, force down paving stones, compress loose earth etc.
(5) A machine in which fabrics are subjected to a
hammering process while passing over rollers, as in cotton mills; used to
finish cloth and other fabrics, they’re known also as a “beetling machine”
(6) To use a beetle on; to drive, ram, beat or crush with
a beetle; to finish cloth or other fabrics with a beetling machine.
(7) In slang, quickly to move; to scurry (mostly UK),
used also in the form “beetle off”.
(8) Something projecting, jutting out or overhanging
(used to describe geological formation and, in human physiology, often in the
form beetle browed).
(9) By extension, literally or figuratively, to hang or
tower over someone in a threatening or menacing manner.
(10) In slang, the original Volkswagen and the later
retro-model, based on the resemblance (in silhouette) of the car to the insect;
used with and without an initial capital; the alternative slang “bug” was also analogous
with descriptions of the insects.
Pre 900: From the late Middle English bittil, bitil, betylle & bityl, from the Old English bitula, bitela, bītel & bīetel (beetle (and apparently
originally meaning “little biter; biting insect”)), from bēatan (to beat) (and related to bitela, bitel & betl,
from bītan (to bite) & bitol (teeth)), from the Proto-West
Germanic bitilō & bītil, from the Proto-Germanic bitilô & bītilaz (that which tends to bite, biter, beetle), the construct
being bite + -le. Bite was from the Middle English biten, from the Old English bītan (bite), from the Proto-West
Germanic bītan, from the
Proto-Germanic bītaną (bite), from
the primitive Indo-European bheyd-
(split) and the -le suffix was from the Middle English -elen, -len & -lien, from the Old English -lian
(the frequentative verbal suffix), from the Proto-Germanic -lōną (the frequentative verbal suffix)
and was cognate with the West Frisian -elje,
the Dutch -elen, the German -eln, the Danish -le, the Swedish -la and
the Icelandic -la.It was used as a frequentative suffix of
verbs, indicating repetition or continuousness.The forms in Old English were cognate with the Old High German bicco
(beetle), the Danish bille (beetle), the
Icelandic bitil & bitul (a bite, bit) and the Faroese bitil (small piece, bittock).
In architecture, what was historically was the "beetle brow" window is now usually called "the eyebrow". A classic example of a beetle-brow was that of Rudolf Hess (1894–1987; Nazi deputy führer 1933-1941).
Beetle in the sense of the tool used to work wood,
stonework, fabric etc also dates from before 900 and was from the Middle
English betel & bitille (mallet,
hammer), from the Old English bītel,
bētel & bȳtel which was cognate with the Middle
Low German bētel (chisel), from bēatan & bētan (beat) and related to the Old Norse beytill (penis). The adjectival
sense applied originally to human physiology (as beetle-browed) and later extended
to geological formations (as a back-formation of beetle-browed) and
architecture where it survives as the “eyebrow” window constructions mounted in
sloping roofs. The mid-fourteenth
century Middle English bitelbrouwed (grim-browed,
sullen (literally “beetle-browed”)) is thought to have been an allusion to the
many beetles with bushy antennae, the construct being the early thirteenth
century bitel (in the sense of "sharp-edged,
sharp" which was probably a compound from the Old English bitol (biting, sharp) + brow, which in
Middle English meant "eyebrow" rather than "forehead." Although the history of use in distant oral
traditions is of course murky, it may be from there that the Shakespearean
back-formation (from Hamlet (1602)) in the sense of "project,
overhang" was coined, perhaps from bitelbrouwed. As applied to geological formations, the
meaning “dangerously to overhang cliffs etc” dates from circa 1600. The alternative
spellings bittle, betel & bittil are all long obsolete. Beetle is a noun & verb & adjective,
beetled is a verb, beetling is a verb & adjective and beetler is a noun;
the noun plural is beetles.
Gazing back.
Even before
he went mad (something of a calling among German philosophers) Friedrich
Nietzsche (1844–1900) would warn the impressionable: “And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the
abyss gazes also into you.”In some European towns, gaze for long at the houses and Rudolf Hess also
gazes at you.Attending the first Nuremberg
Trial (1945-1946) as a journalist, the author Rebecca West (1892–1983) perceived
an abyss in Hess, writing he was “…so plainly mad… He looked as if his mind had no surface,
as if every part of it had been blasted away except the depth where the
nightmares lived.”Imprisoned
for life (Count 1: Conspiracy & Count 2: Crimes against peace) by the IMT
(International Military Tribunal), Hess would spend some 46 years in captivity
and when in 1987 he took his own life, he was the last survivor of the 21 who
has stood in the dock to receive their sentences.Opinion remains divided over whether Hess was
“mad” in either the clinical or legal sense but his conduct during the trial
and what is known of his decades in Berlin’s Spandau prison (the last 20-odd
years as the vast facility’s sole inmate) does suggest he was at least highly
eccentric.
The Beetle (Volkswagen Type 1)
First built before World War II (1939-1945), the Volkswagen
(the construct being volks (people) +
wagen (car)) car didn’t pick up the
nickname “beetle” until 1946, the allied occupation forces translating it from
the German Käfer and it caught on,
lasting until the last one left a factory in Mexico in 2003 although in
different places it gained other monikers, the Americans during the 1950s
liking “bug” and the French coccinelle
(ladybug) and as sales gathered strength around the planet, there were
literally dozens of local variations, the more visually memorable including:
including: bintus (Tortoise) in
Nigeria, pulga (flea) in Colombia, ඉබ්බා (tortoise) in Sri Lanka, sapito (little toad) in Perú, peta
(turtle) in Bolivia, folcika (bug) in
Bosnia and Herzegovina, kostenurka (turtle)
in Bulgaria, baratinha (little
cockroach) in Cape Verde, poncho in
Chile and Venezuela. buba (bug) in
Croatia, boblen (the bubble), asfaltboblen (the asphalt bubble), gravid rulleskøjte (pregnant
rollerskate) & Hitlerslæden
(Hitler-sled) in Denmark. cepillo
(brush) in the Dominican Republic, fakrouna
(tortoise) in Libya, kupla (bubble)
& Aatun kosto (Adi's revenge) in
Finland, cucaracha (cockroach) in Guatemala,
El Salvador and Honduras, Kodok
(frog) in Indonesia, ghoorbaghei (قورباغهای) (frog) in Iran, agroga عكروكة (little frog) & rag-gah ركـّة (little turtle) in Iraq, maggiolino (maybug) in Italy, kodok (frog) in Malaysia, pulguita (little flea) in Mexico and much
of Latin America, boble (bubble) in
Norway, kotseng kuba (hunchback car)
& boks (tin can) in the Philippines,
garbus (hunchback) in Poland, mwendo wa kobe (tortoise speed) in
Swahili and banju maqlub (literally “upside down bathtub”) in Malta.
A ground beetle (left), a first generation der Käfer (the Beetle, 1939-2003) (centre) and an "New Beetle" (1997-2011). Despite the appearance, the "New Beetle" was of front engine & front-wheel-drive configuration, essentially a re-bodied Volkswagen Golf. The new car was sold purely as a retro, the price paid for the style, certain packaging inefficiencies.
A handy (and
potentially life-saving) accessory for wartime KdF-Wagens was a passenger-side mount for a MP 40/41 Maschinenpistole (submachine gun),
usually dubbed the Schmeisser by Allied
troops on the basis German weapons designer Hugo Schmeisser (1884–1953) was
responsible for the earlier and visually similar MP 18 (the world’s first mass-produced
submachine gun). Although he was not
involved in the development of the MP 40, that weapon did use a magazine
produced in accordance with one of his patents.
The Beetle (technically, originally the KdF-Wagen and later the Volkswagen
Type 1) was one of the products nominally associated with the Nazi regime’s Gemeinschaft Kraft durch Freude (KdF,
“Strength Through Joy”), the state-controlled organization which was under the
auspices of the Deutsche Arbeitsfront
(German Labor Front) which replaced the independent labor unions. Operating medical services, cruise liners and
holiday resorts for the working class, the KdF envisaged the Volkswagen as a
European Model T Ford in that it would be available in sufficient
numbers and at a price affordable by the working man, something made easier
still by the Sparkarte (savings
booklet) plan under which a deposit would be paid with the balance to be met in
instalments. Once fully paid, a
Volkswagen would be delivered. All this
was announced in 1939 but the war meant that not one Volkswagen was ever
delivered to any of those who diligently continued to make their payments as
late as 1943. Whether, even without a
war, the scheme could have continued with the price set at a politically sensitive
990 Reichsmarks is uncertain. That was
certainly below the cost of production and although the Ford Model T had
demonstrated how radically production costs could be lowered once the
efficiencies of mass-production reached critical mass, there were features
unique to the US economy which may never have manifested in the Nazi system,
even under sustained peace although, had the Nazis won the war, from the Atlantic to the Urals they'd have had a vast pool of slave labor, a obvious way to reduce unit labor costs. As it was, it
wasn’t until 1964 that some of the participants
in the Sparkarte were granted
a settlement under which they received a discount (between 9-14%) which could
be credited against a new Beetle.
Inflation and the conversion in 1948 from Reichsmark to Deutschmark make
it difficult accurately to assess the justice of that but the consensus was
Volkswagen got a good deal. The settlement was also limited, nobody resident in the GDR (The German Democratic Republic, the old East Germany (1949-1990)) or elsewhere behind the iron curtain received even a Reichspfennig (cent).
Small, life-size & larger than life: A scale model (left), a 1955 Volkswagen Beetle (centre) and the “Huge Bug”, on the road
with the 1959 Cabriolet used as a template.
Produced or
assembled around the world between 1938-2003, over 21.5 million Beetles were
made and there were also untold millions of scale models, ranging from small,
colorful molded plastic toys distributed in cereal boxes (an early form of “indirect
marketing” to children) through the ubiquitous “Matchbox Toys” to some highly
detailed and expensive renditions, some powered by electric motors.However, as far as in known, there's been
only one “up-scaled” Beetle and so impressive was it in execution, until seen
with objects (ideally a standard Beetle) to give some sense of the size, it’s
not immediately obvious the thing is some 40% bigger.While it may be tempting to call this a “Super
Beetle” that would only confuse because the factory applied that label to a
version introduced in 1970 and customers nick-named those “Super Bug” so that’s
taken too; maybe “Big Bug” is best although the builders liked “Huge Bug”.
The Huge Bug
was created by a Californian father and son team who disassembled a 1959 Beetle
Cabriolet so the relevant components could be scanned and digitized, enabling versions
40% larger to be fabricated.Built on
the chassis of a Dodge Magnum, mechanical components were carried over so the
Huge Bug features a specification which would have astonished Germans (or
anyone else) in 1957, including a 345 cubic inch (5.7 litre) Hemi V8, automatic
transmission, power steering, heated seats, air conditioning & power
windows.Not unexpectedly, whenever
parked, the Huge Bug attracts those wanting a unique backdrop for selfies. If the Huge Bug seems too conventional (if large) an approach, others have allowed their imagination to wander in other directions.
Herbie, the love bug
Lindsay
Lohan (left) among the Beetles (centre) on the red carpet for the Los Angeles premiere
of Herbie Fully Loaded (2005), El
Capitan Theater, Hollywood, Los Angeles, 19 June 19, 2005.The Beetle (right) was one of the many
replica “Herbies” in attendance and, on the day, Ms Lohan (using the celebrity-endorsed
black Sharpie) autographed the glove-box lid, removed for the purpose.
In a Beetle
it’s a simple task quickly to remove and re-fit a lid but unfortunately it was
upside down when signed.Autographs on glove-box
lids (and other parts) are a thing and the most famous (and numerous) are those
of Carroll Shelby (1923–2012) on Shelby American AC Cobras and Mustangs.Many are authentic because for a donation to
the Shelby foundation (typically around US$250) an owner could send to Shelby American
headquarters in California a lid with a SSAE (stamped, self-addressed envelope)
and it would come back duly signed and with a letter of authenticity (though
one owner noted dryly the felt pen (silver ink) he’d enclosed wasn’t returned.There are many slight variations in the signatures
which hints they were done by hand and not an auto-pen although those that
differ most are the ones signed while the lid was fixed to the car; for most it’s
an unnatural action to sign on other than a flat, horizontal surface.There are also some of questionable provenance,
not all of which are one Cobra replicas built long after Carroll Shelby’s death
and “Carroll Shelby glove-box signature vinyl transfer tapes” are available on-line in black, white and silver for
as little as US$6.00.Beware of
imitations one might say but given there are over 50,000 “imitation” Cobras
against a thousand-odd originals, the fake signature industry is sort of in the
same spirit.
One of the cars
used in the track racing sequences, now on display in the Peterson Automotive
Museum on Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California (left), a Disney Pictures
promotional image (centre) and a Herbie “replica” (with glove-box lid signed by Lindsay Lohan) built on a modified 1964
Beetle (right).
Before the
release in 2005 of Herbie: Fully Loaded,
following the first "Herbie" film (The Love Bug (1968)), there had been three sequels and a television
series so the ecosystem of Herbie replicas (clones, tributes etc) was
well-populated and as a promotional gimmick Disney Pictures invited fans to
bring their replicas to line the red carpet at the Los Angeles premiere.Producing a “true” Herbie replica is
technically possible but not all will be the same because even within each film
there were variations in the appearance because a number of Beetles were
required for the filming with not all identical in every visual aspect.In post-production, there is a “continuity
editor” who is tasked with removing or disguising such inconsistencies but
minor details, especially if not in any way significant, often slip through
something which delights the film obsessives who curate sites documenting the “errors”.Among Beetle (especially the pre 1968 models)
collectors there’s a faction of originality police (as uncompromising as any
found in the communities patrolling vintage Ferraris, Corvettes, Jaguars,
Porsches and such) and when the Herbie “replica” (above right) was offered for
sale (as a “Herbie-Style 1964 Volkswagen
Beetle Sunroof Sedan”) they were there to pounce, noting:
(1) The last
year for the Golde folding sunroof was 1963, 1964 Sunroof Sedans fitted with a steel,
sliding-roof. The consensus was either the
roof from an earlier Sunroof Sedan was spliced on or a hole was cut for
salvaged Golde assembly to be installed.
Neither would be technically difficult for someone with the parts and
skill but an inspection would be required to know which and on the basis of the
photographs the work had been done well.
(2) The
hood (“bonnet” over the frunk) was from an earlier model (with a pre-1963 Wolfsburg
crest).
(3) The
licence plate light was from 1963 (the updated engine and conversion to 12-volt
electrics (both common in early Beetles) were disclosed in the sales blurb).
(4) The radio antenna was
on the driver’s side whereas in the film it appears on the passenger’s side and
there were many detail differences (decals and such) but there were inconsistencies
also in the film.
Professor Porsche
There were many Volkswagens produced during the war but
all were delivered either to the military or the Nazi Party organization where
they were part of the widespread corruption endemic to the Third Reich, the
extent of which wasn’t understood until well after the demise of the regime.The wartime models were starkly utilitarian and
this continued between 1945-1947 when production resumed to supply the needs of
the Allied occupying forces, the bulk of the output being taken up by the
British Army, the Wolfsburg factory being in the British zone.As was the practice immediately after the
war, the plan had been to ship the tooling to the UK and begin production there
but the UK manufacturers, after inspecting the vehicle, pronounced it wholly
unsuitable for civilian purposes and too primitive to appeal to customers.Accordingly, the factory remained in Germany
and civilian deliveries began in 1947, initially only in the home market but within
a few years, export sales were growing and by the mid-1950s, the Beetle was a success even in the US market, something which must have seem improbable in 1949 when two were sold.The
platform proved adaptable too, the original two-door saloon and cabriolet augmented
by a van on a modified chassis which was eventually built in a bewildering array
of body styles (and made famous as the Kombi and Microbus (Type 2) models which became
cult machines of the 1960s counter-culture) and the stylish, low-slung
Karmann-Ghia (the classic Type 14 and the later Type 34 & Type 145 (Brazil), sold as a 2+2 coupé and convertible. Later there would be attempts to use more modern body styling while preserving the mechanical layout (the Type 3, 1961-1973 and Type 4 (411/412), 1968-1974) but the approach was by the early 1970s understood to be a dead end although the concept was until 1982 pursued by Volkswagen's Brazilian operation.
Herr
Professor Ferdinand Porsche (1875–1951) explaining the Beetle to Adolf Hitler
(1889-1945; Führer (leader) and German head of government 1933-1945 & head
of state 1934-1945) during the ceremony marking the laying of the foundation
stone at the site of the Volkswagen factory, Fallersleben, Wolfsburg in
Germany's Lower Saxony region, 26 May 1938 (which Christians mark as the
Solemnity of the Ascension of Jesus Christ, commemorating the bodily Ascension
of Christ to Heaven) (left). The visit would have been a pleasant diversion for Hitler who was at the time immersed in the planning for the Nazi's takeover of Czechoslovakia and later the
same day, during a secret meeting, the professor would display a scale-model
of an upcoming high-performance version (right).
The Beetle also begat what are regarded as the classic Porsches (the 356 (1948-1965), the 911 (1964-1998) and 912 (1965-1969 & 1976)).Although documents filed in court over the
years would prove Ferdinand Porsche’s (1875-1951) involvement in the design of
the Beetle revealed not quite the originality of thought that long was the stuff of
legend (as a subsequent financial settlement acknowledged), he was attached to the concept and for reasons of economic necessity
alone, the salient features of the Beetle (the separate platform, the
air-cooled flat engine, rear wheel drive and the basic shape) were transferred
to the early post-war Porsches and while for many reasons features like liquid
cooling later had to be adopted, the basic concept of the 1938 KdF-Wagen is still identifiable in today’s 911s.
The Beetle had many virtues as might be surmised given
it was in more-or-less continuous production for sixty-five years during which
over 20 million were made.However,
one common complaint was the lack of power, something which became more
apparent as the years went by and average highway speeds rose.The factory gradually increased both
displacement & power and an after-market industry arose to supply those who
wanted more, the results ranging from mild to wild.One of the most dramatic
approaches was that taken in 1969 by Emerson Fittipaldi (b 1946) who would
later twice win both the Formula One World Championship and the Indianapolis
500.
The Fittipaldi 3200
Team Fittipaldi in late 1969 entered the Rio 1000 km race at
the Jacarepagua circuit, intending to run a prototype with an Alfa Romeo engine but after
suffering delays in the fabrication of some parts, it was clear there would be insufficient
time to prepare the car.No other
competitive machine was immediately available so the decision was taken to
improvise and build a twin-engined Volkswagen Beetle, both car and engines in
ample supply, local production having begun in 1953.On paper, the leading opposition (Alfa Romeo
T33s, a Ford GT40 and a Lola T70 was formidable but the Beetle, with two tuned
1600 cm3 (98 cubic inch) engines, would generate some 400 horsepower
in a car weighing a mere 407kg (897 lb) car.Expectations weren't high and other teams were dismissive of the threat yet
in qualifying, the Beetle set the second fastest time and in the
race proved competitive, running for some time second to the leading Alfa Romeo
T33 until a broken gearbox forced retirement.
Fittipaldi 3200, Interlagos, 1969. The car competed on Pirelli CN87 Cinturatos (which were for street rather than race-track use) tyres which was an interesting choice but gearbox failures meant it never raced long enough for their durability to be determined.
The idea of twin-engined cars was nothing new, Enzo Ferrari
(1898-1988) in 1935 having entered the Alfa Romeo Bimotor in the Grand Prix
held on the faster circuits.At the time
a quick solution to counter the revolutionary new Mercedes-Benz and Auto-Union race
cars, the Bimotor had one supercharged straight-eight mounted at each end, both
providing power to the rear wheels.It
was certainly fast, timed at 335 km/h (208 mph) in trials and on the circuits
it could match anything in straight-line speed but its Achilles heel was that
which has beset most twin-engined racing cars, high fuel consumption & tyre
wear and a tendency to break drive-train components. There were some successful adoptions when less powerful engines were used and the goal was traction rather than outright speed (such as the Citroën 2CV Sahara (694 of which were built between 1958-1971)) but usually there were easier ways to achieve the same thing. Accordingly, while the multi-engine idea
proved effective (indeed sometimes essential) when nothing but straight line speed was demanded (such as
land-speed record (LSR) attempts or drag-racing), in events when corners needed to be
negotiated, it proved a cul-de-sac. There was certainly potential as the handful of "Twinis" (twin-engined versions of the BMC (British Motor Corporation) Mini (1959-2000) built in the 1960s demonstrated. The original Twini had been built by constructor John Cooper (1923–2000 and associated with the Mini Cooper) after he'd observed a twin-engined Mini-Moke (a utilitarian vehicle based on the Mini's platform) being tested for the military. Cooper's Twini worked and was rapid but after being wrecked in an accident (not directly related to the novel configuration), the project was abandoned.
Still, in 1969, Team Fittipaldi had nothing faster
available and while on paper, the bastard Beetle seemed unsuited to the task as
the Jacarepagua circuit then was much twistier than it would become, it would
certainly have a more than competitive power to weight ratio, the low mass likely to
make tyre wear less of a problem.According
to Brazilian legend, in the spirit of the Q&D (quick & dirty) spirit of
the machines hurried assembly, after some quick calculations on a slide-rule,
the design process moved rapidly from the backs of envelopes to paper napkins
at the Churrascaria Interlagos Brazilian Barbecue House where steaks and red wine were ordered. Returning to the workshop, most of the chassis was fabricated against
chalk-marks on garage floor while the intricate linkages required to ensure the
fuel-flow to the four Weber DC045 carburetors were constructed using cigarette
packets as templates to maintain the correct distance between components.In the race, the linkages performed
faultlessly.
Fittipaldi 3200: The re-configuration of the chassis essentially transformed the rear-engined Beetle into a mid-engined car, the engines between the driver and the rear-axle line, behind which sat the transaxle.
The chassis used a standard VW platform, cut just behind
the driver’s seat where a tubular sub-frame was attached. The front suspension and steering was retained
although larger Porsche drum brakes were used in deference to the higher speeds
which would be attained.Remarkably, Beetle type swing axles were used at the rear which sounds frightening but
these had the advantage of providing much negative camber and on the smooth and
predictable surface of a race-track, especially in the hands of a race-driver,
their behavior would not be as disconcerting as their reputation might
suggest.Two standard 1600cm3
Beetle engines (thus the 3200 designation) were fitted for the shake down tests
and once the proof-of-concept had been verified, they were sent for tuning, high-performance
Porsche parts used and the displacement of each increased to 2200cm3
(134 cubic inch).The engines proved
powerful but too much for the bottom end, actually breaking a crankshaft (a
reasonable achievement) so the stroke was shortened, yielding a final
displacement only slightly greater than the original specification while maintaining the ability to sustain higher engine speeds.
Fittipaldi 3200 (1969) schematic (left) and Porsche 908/01 LH Coupé (1968–1969) (right): The 3200's concept of a mid-engined, air-cooled, flat-eight coupe was essentially the same as the Porsche 908 but the Fittipaldi 3200's added features included drum brakes, swing axles and a driver's seat which doubled as the fuel tank. There might have been some drivers of the early (and lethal) Porsche 917s who would have declined an offer to race the 3200, thinking it "too dangerous".
The rear engine was attached in a conventional
arrangement through a Porsche five-speed transaxle although first gear was
blanked-off (shades of the British trick of the 1950s which discarded the "stump-puller" first gear to create a "close ratio" three-speed box) because of a noted
proclivity for stripping the cogs while the front
engine was connected to the rear by a rubber joint with the crank phased at 90o
to the rear so the power sequenced correctly. Twin oil coolers were mounted in the front
bumper while the air-cooling was also enhanced, the windscreen angled more
acutely to create at the top an aperture through which air could be ducted via flexible channels in the roof.Most
interesting however was the fuel tank.To satisfy the thirst of the two engines, the 3200 carried 100 litres (26.4
(US) / 22 (Imperial) gallons) of a volatile ethanol cocktail in an aluminum
tank which was custom built to fit car: It formed the driver’s seat!
Incongruity: The Beetle and the prototypes, Interlagos, 1969
In the Rio de Janeiro 1000 kilometre race on the Guanabara
circuit, the 3200, qualified 2nd and ran strongly in the race, running
as high as second, the sight of a Beetle holding off illustrious machinery
such as a Porsche special, a Lola-Chevrolet R70, and a Ford GT40, one of
motorsport’s less expected sights.
Unfortunately, in the twin-engined tradition, it proved fast but
fragile, retiring with gearbox failure before half an hour had elapsed. It raced once more but proved no more
reliable.
How to have fun with a Beetle.
Caffeine
addiction is one of humanity’s most widespread vices and it extends to those
driving cars. In famous tort case, Stella Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants,
P.T.S., Inc. and McDonald's International, Inc (1994 Extra LEXIS 23
(Bernalillo County, N.M. Dist. Ct. 1994), 1995 WL 360309 (Bernalillo County,
N.M. Dist. Ct. 1994), a passenger in a car (a 1989 model with no cup holders)
received severe burns from spilled coffee, just purchased from a McDonald’s
drive-through. Although the matter
received much publicity on the basis it was absurd to be able to sue for being
burned by spilling what was known by all to be “hot” and the case came to be cited
as an example of “frivolous” litigation, there were technical reasons why some
liability should have been ascribed to McDonalds. The jury awarded some US$2.6 million in
damages although this was, on appeal, reduced to US640,000 and the matter was
settled out of court before a further appeal.
How to have coffee in a Beetle
Hertella Auto Kaffeemachine, 1959. What could go wrong?
In the twenty-first century,
some now judge cars on the basis of the count, capacity & convenience of its
cup-holders but in the less regulated environment of the FRG (Federal Republic
of Germany, the old West Germany, 1949-1990) of 1959, one company anticipated
the future trend by offering a dashboard-mounted coffee maker for the
Volkswagen Beetle. The Hertella
Auto Kaffeemachine was not a success, presumably because even those not
familiar with Sir Isaac Newton's (1642–1727) First Law of Motion (known also as
the Law of Inertia: “An object at rest will remain at rest, and an object in
motion will continue in motion with the same speed and in the same direction
unless acted upon by an unbalanced external force”) could visualise
the odd WCS (worst case scenario).
A happy caffeine
addict, pouring himself a cup of coffee in his VW Beetle.
That it was in 1959 available in 6v & 12v versions
is an indication Hertella may have envisaged a wider market because VW didn’t offer
a 12v system as an option until 1963 and the company seems to have given some thought
to Newtonian physics, the supplied porcelain cups fitted at the base with a
disc of magnetic metal which provided some resistance to movement although the
liquid obviously moved as the forces were applied. The apparatus was mounted with a detachable
bracket, permitting the pot to be removed for cleaning. The quality of the coffee was probably not
outstanding because there’s no percolation; the coffee added in a double-layer
screen and “brewed” on much the same basis as one would tea-leaves and for
those who value quality, a thermos-flask would have been a better choice but
there would have been caffeine addicts willing to try the device. The trouble was there clearly weren’t many of
them and even in the FRG of the Wirtschaftswunder (the post war “economic
miracle”) the fairly high price would have deterred many although now, one in
perfect condition (especially if accompanied by the precious documents or
packaging) would command a price well over US$1000.
How to advertise a Beetle
Although
the popular perception of motoring in the US during the 1960s is it was all about
gas-guzzling behemoths and tyre-smoking muscle cars no less thirsty, Detroit’s advertising
did not neglect to mention fuel economy and the engineers always had in the
range a combination of power-train and gearing options for those for whom that
was important; it was a significant if unsexy market. However, the advertising for domestic
vehicles, whatever the segment, almost always emphasised virtues like
attractiveness and, in the era of annual product updates, made much of things
being “new”.Volkswagen took a different
approach, centred around the “Think Small” campaign, created by the
advertising agency Doyle Dane Bernbach (DDB). Positioning VW Beetle ownership as a kind of
inverted snobbery, the campaign embraced simplicity and honesty, quite a contrast
with the exaggerations common at the time.The technique was ground-breaking and its influences have been seen in
the decades since.
The key
theme was one of self-deprecating humor which took the criticisms of the car
(quirky, small, ugly, lacking luxuries) and made a headline of them,
emphasising instead attributes such as reliability, fuel efficiency, and
affordability, all done with some wry observations. Whether making a virtue of the by then dubious qualities of swing axles (centre right) convinced many is uncertain but the "Why are the wheels crooked" one dates from 1962, some three years before the publication of Ralph Nadar's (b 1934) Unsafe at Any Speed (1965) in which a chapter was devoted to the troubling behavior swing axles induced in the Chevrolet Corvair (1960-1969). Still, the focus on authenticity had real appeal in
a consumerist age when agencies produced elaborate graphics and full-color
photographs taken in exotic locations: VW’s monochromatic look was emblematic
of the machine being advertised, one which in 1969 still looked almost identical
to one from 1959.A key to the success
of the campaign was the template: most of the upper part of the page usually a
single image of a Beetle, a caption beneath and then the explanatory text.
Spoof in National Lampoon's Encyclopedia of Humor (1973).
The US
magazine National Lampoon (1970-1998) ran a parody in the style of VW’s
campaign in their Encyclopedia of Humor
(1973).The "If Ted Kennedy drove a Volkswagen, he'd be
President today" piece not only borrowed the template but also
reprised VW’s claim of “watertight construction” which had appeared in one of
the manufacturer’s genuine advertisements.Although what the magazine did was protected under the constitution’s
first amendment (freedom of speech; freedom of the press) other legal remedies
beckoned and Volkswagen filed suit claiming (1) violations of copyright and
their trademark and (2) defamation. Apparently, a number of those who had seen the
spoof believed it to be real and the company was receiving feedback from the
outraged vowing never to buy another VW, a reaction familiar at scale in the
age of X (formerly known as Twitter) but which then required writing a letter,
putting it in an envelope, affixing a postage stamp and dropping it in the
mailbox.So pile-ons happened then but
they took longer to form.In a
settlement, National Lampoon undertook to (1) withdraw all unsold copies of the
450,000 print run (2) destroy the piece’s hot plate (in pre-digital printing, a
physical “plate” was created onto which ink was laid to create the printed
copy) and (3) publish in the next issue Volkswagen's explanatory disclaimer of
involvement. National Lampoon was also estopped from using the spoof for any subsequent purpose.
The 1967 Oldsmobile Delmont 88 which Ted Kennedy crashed into the water under Dike Bridge Chappaquiddick Island, Massachusetts.
The Oldsmobile belonged to Kennedy's mother, despite old Joe Kennedy (1888–1969) once having asserted "The Kennedys drive Buicks!". By the time Mary Jo Kopechne died, the company had already retired the Delmont nameplate after a two-year run.
The
notorious incident the parody referenced was the “Chappaquiddick Incident” in which
Ted Kennedy (1932–2009) drove off a bridge, shortly before midnight on 18 July
1969, after the then senator had left a cocktail party in the company of Miss Mary
Jo Kopechne (1940-1969) who had worked on Robert F Kennedy’s (RFK, 1925–1968;
US attorney general 1961-1964) presidential campaign in 1968.Miss Kopechne died in the crash, Senator
Kennedy not reporting the matter for more than ten hours after he left the
scene.Kennedy received a two month,
suspended sentence for leaving the scene of an accident but while his political
career continued for decades, he never succeeded in his attempts to become
president and his conduct in the Chappaquiddick Incident contributed to that although as one
notorious interview in 1979 revealed, apart from his sense of entitlement, he
could disclose no good reason why he should be POTUS.
Volkswagen's genuine "watertight construction" advertisment which inspired National Lampoon. It was one of the few in the series to be run in color and that was because water really didn't look like "water" in monochrome.
Years after
the Chappaquiddick Incident, when Ted was only of the brothers left alive, in an interview,
Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974) compared the three , pronouncing
Ted the best and most natural politician while Robert was driven and intense, “like a
seventeenth century Jesuit priest”, a phrase he attributed to Theodore
Roosevelt’s (TR, 1858–1919; US president 1901-1909) daughter Alice Lee
Roosevelt Longworth (1884–1980).John
Kennedy (JFK, 1917–1963; US president 1961-1963) he thought “quite a shy
person” for whom the public aspect of politics was “an effort”,
albeit one he performed very well.Nixon
was a flawed character but in his (enforced) retirement, he was a fair judge of
the politicians he knew.