Undecennial
(pronounced uhn-duh-seh-nee-uhl)
(1) Occurring
or observed every eleventh year.
(2) As “undecennial
magnetic period”, the Sun’s solar cycle.
1858: The
construct was undec-, (from the Latin
undecim, (eleven), the construct
being unus (one) + decem (ten)) + -ennial. The -ennial suffix was from the Latin -enniālis, the construct being annus (year (and figuratively “time,
season, epoch”)) + -ium (the suffix
used to form abstract nouns) + -ālis
(suffixed to nouns or numerals creating adjectives of relationship). It was a combining form denoting years. The Latin undecentesimus was from ūndēcentum
(ninety-nine; 99). In Roman numerals, 99
was written as XCIX, the construct of which was XC (90: 100 minus 10) + IX (9:
10 minus 1) thus XC (90) plus IX (9) equals XCIX (99). The fear of the number 11 is described as hendecaphobia. The alternative adjective (and non-standard
noun) is undecennary (once every eleven years) and the adjective in Portuguese is undecenal.
Undecennial & undecennary are adjectives and a (non-standard) noun;
the noun plural is undecennials.
Centennial
(every hundred years; commemoration of an event that happened a hundred years earlier)
is the best known of the words suffixed with “-ennial” but there are fun constructs
with meanings not immediately obvious including demisesquicentennial (75 years),
the construct being demi- (half-of) + sesqui- (one-and-a-half) + centennial (of 100 years) and quadranscentennial (twenty-fifth
anniversary (now often called “silver jubilee)), the construct being quad, from
the Latin quadrans (quarter) + -ennium (a variant of annus) + -ālis (the “quad” thus a reference to the four 25 year
quarter-centuries in a century). Unfortunately,
sexennial (pertaining to a period of six years; taking place once every six
years) (the construct being sexennium
(a period of six years) + -al) means just a “six year period or cycle” although
in August 2024, in Boston Massachusetts there was the Sexennial: A Sex-Positive Variety Show.
In modern
use, there’s also been some re-purposing.
The first use of “postmillennial” was to describe the world after the
year 1000 and it has been used of things Pos-2000 but it was also adopted in
the nineteenth century by certain Christian sects to describe the doctrine the
Second Coming of Christ will take place after the millennium; the antonym was premillennial
(pertaining to the belief the Second Coming will take place before the
millennium.). In the 21st century,
it’s used also of “Generation Z”, the one following the “Millennial Generation”. Premillennial seems not to be used in this
context (that would be the (Baby) Boomers).
The construct of the adjective perennial was the Latin perenn(is) (lasting through the whole year or for several years,
perennial; continual, everlasting, perpetual”) + the English -al (the
adjective-forming suffix imparting the meaning “of or pertaining to”. It’s familiar from its use in botany where it
describes plants active throughout the year, or having a life cycle of more
than two growing seasons (and thus used sometimes in the sense of “appearing
again each year; annual”) but is used also (sometime loosely) of waterways and
such. In figurative use, “perennial” is
used widely (and loosely) of just about anything (art, music, politics etc) with
the quality of or tending to “continuing without cessation or intermission for
several years, or for an undetermined or infinite period; never-ending or never
failing; perpetual, unceasing”.

Images from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory highlight the appearance of the Sun at solar minimum (December 2019, left) versus solar maximum (May 2024, right). These images are in the 171-angstrom wavelength of extreme ultraviolet light, which reveals the active regions on the Sun that are more common during solar maximum.
The Sun’s
11-year cycle was first detected in 1843 by German apothecary & amateur
astronomer Heinrich Schwabe (1789–1875). Schwabe noticed a pattern in the
number of sunspots that appeared on the Sun's surface over time. In 1825 Herr Schwabe obtained his first
telescope and between then and 1867 (on every day the skies were clear) he
recorded the size & shape of sunspots and it was in 1838 he first suspected
the phenomenon might be cyclical, his initial findings suggesting a ten-year
cycle. The discovery was wholly serendipitous
because he wasn’t interested in sunspots (then thought random events) but was
one of a number of astronomers searching for “Vulcan” a speculative planet in
an orbit between Mercury which theories suggested should exist because its
presence would account for the otherwise inexplicable peculiarities in
Mercury's orbital path. As a theory, the
science was sound because earlier the same math had been used correctly to
predict the existence of Neptune, based on calculation which determined the gravitational
influence required to explain disturbances in the orbit of Uranus. Over the decades, sightings of Vulcan had
been reported but all quickly were discounted and the search continued until Albert
Einstein’s (1879-1955) theory of general relativity (1915) was confirmed and Mercury's
variation from the orbit predicted by Newtonian physics was understood to be a
manifestation of the curvature of space-time induced by the mass of the Sun.
Because of Vulcan’s
predicted proximity to the Sun, it would have been very difficult to observe with
the telescopes of the nineteenth century, the only plausible method being to
view it during its transit in front of the Sun.
The reason Herr Schwabe kept notebooks with almost daily sketches of the
Sun and its spots was that he wanted to ensure he would never confuse a spot
with the passing Vulcan and mush have be surprised when he noticed the
suggesting of a cyclical pattern. In
1843 he published his initial findings which indicated sunspot activity appeared
to peak every ten-odd years and which his paper attracted little interest, it
did inspire a Swiss professional astronomer to begin his own regular
observations and these, combined with Herr Schwabe’s earlier drawings confirmed
the sun’s undecennial pattern. The use
in 1858 of “undecennial” to describe the solar cycle seems to have been the
first use of the word in English.

Visible light images from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory highlight the appearance of the Sun at solar minimum (Dec 2019, left) versus solar maximum (May 2024, right). During solar minimum, often the Sun is "spotless".
The Sun's eleven-year
cycle (the solar cycle) is driven almost wholly by changes in the body’s magnetic
field dynamics. The Sun’s magnetic field
isn’t as stable as that of Earth which, although subject to some ongoing movement,
retains its essential polarity for at least hundreds of thousands of
years. Deep within the Sun there exists
a layer called the convection zone (where hot plasma rises, cools, and sinks) and
these interactions, over time, cause the Sun’s magnetic field lines to twist
and tangle. Things are influenced also
by differential rotation, the Sun rotating faster at its equator than at its
poles (the equatorial regions taking some 25 days to complete a rotation, the
polar regions around 35. What this does
is “stretches and wind up” the magnetic field lines, resulting in what astronomers
describe as “a twisted, complex magnetic environment”. All this
combines to produce the “solar maximum & minimum”: Every eleven years the “twisted
& tangled” magnetic field lines stretch to the point where suddenly they “snap”,
creating a realigning process in which they are “straightened out”. During solar maximum, the Sun has many
sunspots (regions of intense magnetic activity), solar flares, and coronal mass
ejections. When the cycle resets to
solar minimum, these activities reduce as the Sun's magnetic field temporarily
stabilizes. The other obvious effect of
the undecennial magnetic period is the periodic polarity flip: Every 11 years, the Sun’s magnetic poles reverse,
north becoming south and vice-versa, something which happens on earth every few
hundred-thousand years.

Quantum Tech Club's chart of the solar cycle: This cycle of low-high-low sun activity operates on a cycle of about eleven years though there are always variations, the length of each cycle not exact and the volume of activity also varies. The previous Solar Cycle (24) was classified "not particularly active" and the current cycle (25) was predicted to be similar but it turned out to be more vibrant. So, while the numbers bounce around, the undecennial pattern remains constant.
For
cultural reasons, an eleven year cycle sounds somehow strange to us and we’re
unaccustomed to such things being associated with prime numbers although in
entomology there are insects with no aversion to primes. In entymology, there are insects with no fear
of the number 17. In the US, the
so-called “periodical cicadas” (like those of the genus Magicicada) exist in a
17 year life cycle, something thought to confer a number of evolutionary
advantages, all tied directly to the unique timing of their mass emergence: (1)
The predator satiation strategy: The creatures emerge in massive numbers (in
the billions), their sheer volume meaning it’s physically impossible for
predators (both small mammals & birds) to eat enough of them to threaten
the survival of the species. (2) Prime number cycles: Insects are presumed to
be unaware of the nature of prime numbers but 17 is a prime number and there
are also periodic cicadas with a 13 year cycle.
The 13 (Brood XIX) & 17-year (Brood X) periodic cicadas do sometimes
emerge in the same season but, being prime numbers, it’s a rare event, the
numbers' least common multiple (LCM) being 221 years; the last time the two
cicadas emerged together was in 1868 and the next such even is thus expected in
2089. The infrequency in overlap helps
maintain the effectiveness of the predator avoidance strategies, the predators
typically having shorter (2-year, 5-year etc) cycles which don’t synchronize
with the cicadas' emergence, reducing chances a predator will evolve to
specialize in feeding on periodical cicadas. (3) Avoidance of Climate
Variability: By remaining underground for 17 years, historically, periodical
cicadas avoided frequent climate changes or short-term ecological disasters
like droughts or forest fires. The long underground nymph stage also allows
them to feed consistently over many years and emerge when the environment is
more favorable for reproduction.
Etymologists and biological statisticians are modelling scenarios under
which various types of accelerated climate change are being studied to try to
understand how the periodic cicadas (which evolved under “natural” climate
change) may be affected. (4) Genetic Isolation: Historically, the unusually
extended period between emergences has isolated different broods of cicadas,
reducing interbreeding and promoting genetic diversity over time, helping to
maintain healthy populations over multiple life-cycles.

Lohanic undecenniality: Lindsay Lohan at eleven year intervals: 2002 (left), 2013 (centre) and 2024 (right).
A “year” as
defined (one orbit of our world around the sun) on Earth is a standard measure
and on this planet it makes complete sense but in other places (such as the
Sun) it’s just an abstraction although we map “years” onto many remote places,
vast distances best understood as expressed in “light years” although
cosmologists for many purposes prefer the parsec (a unit of astronomical
length, based on the distance from Earth at which a star would have a parallax
of one second of arc which is equivalent to 206,265 times the distance from the
earth to the sun or 3.26 light-years.
Its lineal equivalent is about 19.1 trillion miles (30.8 trillion km)). It takes Pluto 248 Earth years to make its
orbit of the Sun so that’s the length of one Plutoian year, meaning that
between being discovered in 1930 and the humorous cosmic clerks at the International
Astronomical Union (IAU) in 2006 voting re-classify Pluto as a dwarf planet (on
the basis that the icy orb failed to meet a set of criteria which the IAU
claimed had been accepted for decades), not even on year had there passed.
So it’s
only on Earth one of our “years” is of direct relevance and we tend to measure anniversaries
with the numbers we prefer (1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 25, 50. 100, 250, 500, 1000,
10,000 etc) (21 is a special case) but this meaning nothing to the physics of
the Sun and even here there have been cultures in which some things have tended
to the undecennial. In India, the Kumbh
Mela (or Kumbha Mela) is one of the great pilgrimage festivals in Hinduism (the
pre-Covid gathering in 2019 said to be the largest (peaceful) assembly of
people ever known) and although it is celebrated in what tends to be a twelve
year cycle, because of the complexity and regional distribution of some celebrations,
there have been times when things have happened at an eleven year interval. Among the indigenous peoples of North America
(notably the Hopi), there were also reports from anthropologists of ceremonial
cycles based on natural and astronomical cycles that can approximate an eleven year
pattern due to environmental changes or social cycles, although it doesn’t
appear the intervals ever assumed a precise, recurrent eleven-year pattern. Certain ceremonies were linked with observations
of the sun (and other celestial bodies), aligning closely with solar maximums
in some cases.