Signature (pronounced sig-nuh-cher or sig-nuh-choor)
(1) A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed
personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
(2) The act of signing a document.
(3) In music, a sign or set of signs at the beginning of
a staff to indicate the key or the time of a piece.
(4) In broadcasting, a song, musical arrangement, sound
effect, etc., used as a theme identifying a program.
(5) Any unique, distinguishing aspect, feature, or mark.
(6) In computing, as digital signature, any one of a
number of attempts to create a mechanism whereby a digital object can have the
same unique identifying characteristic as a physical signature in ink; in cryptography,
data attached to a message certifying the message originated from its claimed
source; in email and some other variations of communication, test, images or
other objects collectively appended usually at the end of a message, analogous
with a traditional signature on a letter.
(7) In digital forensic analysis, as digital signature, a
term used to refer to any collection of characteristics which can be used as an
identifier of origin, intent etc;
(8) The part of a prescription for pharmaceuticals instructing
the patient the frequency and quantity in which a drug should be administered
(US only).
(9) As an adjective, something intended to be emblematic
of an institution or individual (signature dish signature cocktail, signature
scent etc).
(10) In printing, a sheet of paper printed with several
pages that upon folding will become a section or sections of a book; such a
sheet so folded.
(11) In mathematics, a tuple specifying the sign of
coefficients in any diagonal form of a quadratic form.
(12) In medicine, a resemblance between the external
character of a disease and those of some physical agent (obsolete).
1525-1535: From the Old & Middle French signature, from the Medieval Latin signātura, future active periphrastic of the verb signāre (to sign), the construct being signum (sign), + -tura, feminine of -turus, the future active periphrastic suffix. The first use with a link to English appears to have been as a kind of document defined in Scottish law. The Medieval Latin signatura, was, in Classical Latin a rescript (the matrix of a seal). The meaning "one's own name written in one's own hand" is from 1570s, which replaced the early-fifteenth century “sign-manual” in this sense. The use in musical notation in which composers used "signs placed it the beginning of a staff to indicate the key and rhythm" was noted first in 1806. Signature began to be used in the generalized sense of "a distinguishing mark of any kind" as early as the 1620s.
Non est factum
Historically, in contract law a signature was binding on the party who signed and obliged the performance of the specific terms of the contract. Even if someone could prove they signed because of their own misunderstandings or in an act of carelessness even to the point of gross negligence, courts would still usually enforce the contract but a notable exception was the doctrine of non est factum. Translated literally from the Latin as "it is not my deed", it’s available as a defense where a person has been induced to sign something in circumstances where the contents of what was signed differ fundamentally from what the person was led to believe. Where a plea is upheld, the court can set aside the contract (void ab initio). Special circumstances must exist for the defense to succeed: it does not cover a claim where someone either misunderstood or failed to read the terms and conditions.
An octuple of Lindsay Lohan signatures on Lohanic merchandise.
It’s novel in that it differs from other aspects of contract law such as the provisions which permit judges to strike-out particular clauses or even entire contracts if their enforcement is held to be “unconscionable”. Non est factum is available even where terms and conditions can be reasonable such as the sale of a property for fair value; it hinges instead on the state of mind of the signee and the circumstances under which a signature was induced. Typically, courts are most sympathetic to “innocent victims”, those who through no fault of their own (those illiterate, deaf, blind or suffering some other relevant incapacity) could not understand the document they were signing and relied upon another for advice. Such is the reverence in contract law for the sanctity of the signature, a heavy evidential onus of proof is laid upon a claimant for non est factum to succeed; it’s a rare and exceptional defense.
The signature dish
Noted chefs and great restaurants often have signature
dishes, not necessarily unique to them but something with which they’re famously
associated. Countries and regions also
have signature dishes, sometimes advertised and promoted and sometimes just a link which develops over time.
There can even be disputes if the origin of something is thought a
source of pride; there are factions in both Australia and New Zealand which lay
claim to the pavlova.
Hubert Horatio Humphrey (1911–1978) served as a senator
for Minnesota (1949-1964 & 1971-1978) and as US vice president (1965-1969). He was the Democrat Party’s nominee for president in 1968, his candidature something of a rush-job after LBJ's abrupt decision not to seek re-election. As part of the 1968
campaign, his wife’s Minnesota hotdish
recipe was published, unusual today in that it didn’t include the potato gems which
usually now sit atop the concoction. Mrs Humphrey’s
culinary campaign contribution wasn’t decisive, her husband, although running Republican
Richard Nixon (1913-1994; US president 1969-1974) close in the popular vote (Nixon (31,783,783 votes; 43.4%), Humphrey
(31,271,839; 42.7%)), lost the electoral college (Nixon, 32 states & 301
votes, Humphrey 13 states & 191 votes).
Mrs Humphrey’s Ingredients
4 tablespoons shortening
2 green bell peppers, sliced
1 medium onion, chopped
1 lb (500 g) ground beef
1½ half teaspoons salt
¼ teaspoon pepper
2 eggs
2 cups whole kernel corn
4 medium tomatoes, sliced
½ cup dry bread crumbs
Butter
Mrs Humphrey’s Instructions
(1) Put shortening in skillet; lightly fry green peppers,
onion and ground beef for 3 minutes or until partially done. Salt and pepper.
Remove from heat; stir in eggs and mix well.
(2) Place 1 cup corn in casserole. Top with layer of meat
mixture and layer of sliced tomatoes.
(3) Repeat until corn, meat mixture and tomatoes are
used.
(4) Cover casserole with crumbs. Dot with bits of butter.
(5) Bake at 375º F (190º C) for 1 hour or until heated
thoroughly.
It can be finished in a grill to add something to the
cheese. Serve with a side salad and rolls.
Hitler's signature
Between 1943-1945, Adolf Hitler's (1889-1945; Führer (leader) and German head of government 1933-1945 & head of state 1934-1945) handwriting suffered and, towards the end, it took some effort even to etch his name, a process which happened in conjunction with a physical decline noted in many contemporary accounts. The reason for this deterioration has been discussed by doctors, historians and popular authors, most recently in 2015 by Norman Ohler (b 1970) in Der totale Rausch: Drogen im Dritten Reich (The Total Rush: Drugs in the Third Reich), published in English in 2017 as Blitzed: Drugs in Nazi Germany (Penguin, ISBN: 9780141983165). Blitzed is a study of the use of methamphetamine stimulants in German society, the military and Hitler himself during the Nazi years with a focus especially on the relationship between the Führer and his personal physician, Dr Theodor Morell (1886–1948) who prescribed and administered a variety of drugs and vitamins between 1936-1945. It’s the use of opioids and psychoactive drugs that is of most interest.
The fault in Blitzed is probably that habitual journalistic tendency to exaggeration. That stimulants were widely available and demonstratively popular in Germany doesn’t mean the entire workforce, every hausfrau and all servicemen in the Wehrmacht were habitual or even occasional users of amphetamines although, given the documentary evidence and the observational accounts of behavior, the case for Hitler’s addictions (or at least dependence) is stronger. Critics felt also compelled to run the usual objection to anything which could be constructed as some sort of exculpatory argument; the idea that being stupefied by psychoactive drugs could somehow absolve individual or collective guilt. Among those who lived the Nazi experience, long has been established the guilt to one degree or another of the many and the innocence of a few. That said, there seems little doubt the rapidity of the Wehrmacht's advances in 1939-1941 were at least partially attributable to the soldiers being supplied amphetamines which enabled a heightened level of alertness and performance for sometimes thirty hours without need for sleep. It was a most effective force multiplier. Other factors, notably (1) the revolutionary approach to deploying tanks as armored spearheads, (2) the used of dive-bombers, (3) the ineptness of the Allied response and (4) luck were more significance but the speed did make a contribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment