Physiognomy (pronounced fiz-ee-og-nuh-mee or fiz-ee-on-uh-mee)
(1) The
face or countenance, especially when considered as an index to the character.
(2) The
art of determining character or personal characteristics from the form or
features of the body, especially of the face (also called anthroposcopy).
(3) The
outward appearance of anything, taken as offering some insight into its
character.
(4) Estimation
of one's character and mental qualities by a study of the face and general
bodily carriage.
1350-1400: From the Late Middle English phisognomie or phisiognomie (art of judging characters from facial features), from the Medieval Latin physionomi from the Late Latin physonomia, from the Late Greek physiognōmía, a syncopated variant of physiognōmonía (art of judging a person by his features). The construct in Greek was physio- (from physios (nature) + gnōmōn (genitive gnōmōnos) (a judge, interpreter, indicator) from the primitive Indo-European root gno- (to know). The word soon replaced the earlier Middle English forms fisenamie, fisnamie & fisnomie (from the Middle French fisonomie & the Old French phizonomie). There was also the strange medieval linguistic cul-de-sac phusiognōmia, an erroneous form of phusiognōmonia (from phusis (nature) + gnōmōn (judge)). The related form still occasionally used in technical literature is physiognomical.
There’s nothing in science which proves physiognomy can’t be anthropomorphic. The website Cats that look like Hitler accepts submissions from owners, victims and others who contribute photographs of führeresque felines. Everyone knows one can tell if a cat is evil by looking into its eyes.
In the same way astrology was once respectable science taught in universities, physiognomy was well accepted by ancient Greek philosophers though it fell into disrepute in medieval times when practiced by crooks and con-men. As a pseudo-science, it was later revived and briefly popularized by the Swiss theologian Johann Kaspar (1741–1801) who actually enjoyed a friendship with Goethe (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe; 1749–1832) until the author distanced himself, finding the priest just too weird and superstitious. There was a revival of interest in the late nineteenth century when people started to apply their own interpretations of Darwin’s theories and observations, physiognomy and physical anthropology among the techniques used as a basis for “scientific” racism. This period of its popularity, not uncoincidentally, happened during the height of European colonialism. Of late, there’s been a revival of interest because of the rapid improvements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for facial recognition. With big data-sets, it becomes, at least theoretically, possible to determine if correlations really do exist between facial appearance, personality and behavior.
Using just an image of Lindsay Lohan downloaded from Wikipedia, the analysis engine used by physiogomicia.com was able to determine she "practices self-denial" and "gets inspired and fantasizes". The promotional material for the website physiognomica.com begins by asking: "Do you want to learn more about the people surrounding you?" It promises to "open all the secrets of identity" so that:
"All human secrets will be accessible to you. Is someone capable of lying, is he/she kind, likely to get rich, intelligent or lazy? After analyzing just one photo, we will tell you about the personality and the motives that lead this person. Everything is spread before the eyes. And it is absolutely free of charge. Nothing stays buried forever! You will be literally reading people’s minds. Even before having a conversation with the person you will know exactly how to behave. From now on it will be easy to evaluate motives of the person. No more lie detectors and without long discussions with the psychologist."
No comments:
Post a Comment